| jpan_ | robr, ping | 02:34 |
|---|---|---|
| robr | jpan_: pong | 02:36 |
| jpan_ | robr, do you know how do we generate modules.dep file for each kernel? | 02:36 |
| robr | jpan_: this a #moblin topic, but image-creator runs depmods at target image creation time for each kernel installed into /boot | 02:37 |
| jpan_ | robr, it seems modules.dep file is different than what i run depmod -a on the target fs | 02:39 |
| robr | jpan_: how so? | 02:41 |
| jpan_ | robr, let me double check. but i put the new psb.ko in with dependecy on firmware class then i recreate a new image, the modules.dep does not show that new dependency. | 02:43 |
| jpan_ | robr, so it should rerun depmod each time i create a new image, right? | 02:44 |
| robr | jpan_: that is correct ... this sounds like the same problem that rustyl ran into | 02:45 |
| rustyl | what are we talking about? | 02:45 |
| robr | rustyl: did you ever figure out the issue with depmod that you were seeing where the module dependencies were not getting updated? | 02:46 |
| robr | rustyl: read jpan_ 's comments above | 02:46 |
| jpan_ | robr, rustyl , the problem is that modules.dep is not updated when i create a new image with a newly loaded kernel driver. | 02:47 |
| rustyl | robr, i fixed a bug where we were updating the project root instead of the target root | 02:49 |
| rustyl | this is handled at image creation time | 02:49 |
| robr | jpan_: are you using the latest and greatest image-creator? | 02:50 |
| jpan_ | robr, mine is sometime last week of days old | 02:51 |
| jpan_ | robr, i will update to the latest and try again | 02:52 |
| robr | jpan_: rusty's fix has been there for a couple of weeks...but update to the latest and see if this fixes the issue | 02:52 |
| === Inuka_ is now known as Inuka | ||
| dholbach | good morning | 06:47 |
| === doko_ is now known as doko | ||
| === Blackgoth is now known as blackgoth | ||
| === blackgoth is now known as Blackgoth | ||
| === bspencer_ is now known as bspencer | ||
| simoncpu | hello | 08:09 |
| simoncpu | Have you guys had any luck running with WPA on iPAQ H5550? | 08:09 |
| Mithrandir | I don't think anybody has tried to do anything on the iPAQs at all. | 08:10 |
| Mithrandir | they're ARM-based, aren't they? | 08:10 |
| simoncpu | yepp yepp | 08:13 |
| simoncpu | i'm actually using familiar linux on my ipaq, but familiar's support channel seems to be very quiet | 08:14 |
| simoncpu | hehehe | 08:14 |
| Mithrandir | people keep asking about ARM stuff, but nobody has so far picked up the challenge to begin porting to ARM. | 08:14 |
| Mithrandir | we're targetting lpia initially. | 08:14 |
| simoncpu | do you guys use openembedded build env too? | 08:15 |
| Mithrandir | no | 08:15 |
| Mithrandir | we use Ubuntu packages | 08:15 |
| simoncpu | ubuntu mobile looks very promising | 08:17 |
| simoncpu | i hope i can play with it on my ipaq later | 08:17 |
| simoncpu | hehe | 08:17 |
| === Blackgoth is now known as blackgoth | ||
| === blackgoth is now known as Blackgoth | ||
| === agoliveira is now known as agoliveira_brb | ||
| === agoliveira_brb is now known as agoliveira | ||
| === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach | ||
| === agoliveira is now known as agoliveira_lunch | ||
| === cprov is now known as cprov-lunch | ||
| === agoliveira_lunch is now known as agoliveira | ||
| === cprov-lunch is now known as cprov | ||
| === viviji1 is now known as vivijim | ||
| === agoliveir1 is now known as agoliveira | ||
| === javamaniac_ is now known as javamaniac | ||
| === cprov is now known as cprov-out | ||
| smagoun | debian n00b question: can I rename a package simply by changing the package name in the control + changelog files? I don't care if it installs cleanly over an old version. | 20:59 |
| smagoun | Mithrandir: ping | 21:14 |
| ian_brasil | smagoun: you will need the orig.tar.gz and then run dh_make ..make your changes then run debuild -S -sa ..i might be mistaken on this however | 21:30 |
| smagoun | ian_brasil: I don't have an orig.tar.gz (it's a 'native' package I think?). | 21:31 |
| ian_brasil | can't you apt-get source? | 21:31 |
| smagoun | I'm the upstream for the package (it's only a handful of files), so I just have a bzr project with the files and a debian subdirectory. I build directly from there | 21:32 |
| ian_brasil | move the debian folder somewhere else and then run dh_make ? | 21:34 |
| ian_brasil | this will create the 5 files you need copyright, control, rules, and changelog | 21:35 |
| jonnylamb | smagoun: Are you sure you want to rename the source package, and not the binary package? | 21:35 |
| smagoun | ian_brasil: So I can't just use sed to update my existing debian dir? | 21:36 |
| smagoun | jonnylamb: Eventually I want to rename everything, bzr repo included. binary is most interesting to me at this point though | 21:36 |
| jonnylamb | If you just want to change the binary package name then change the appropriate entry in control. | 21:37 |
| smagoun | jonnylamb: ok, that's what I hoped. I assume I need to update the package name in the changelog too | 21:39 |
| jonnylamb | Nope. Make sure you change "Package: foo" and not "Source: foo". | 21:39 |
| jonnylamb | A source package can be "bananadotcom", and still contain binary packages called "libc6".. | 21:40 |
| smagoun | so the changelog keys off source package. gotcha. | 21:40 |
| jonnylamb | Jep. | 21:41 |
| smagoun | supposing I did want to rename the source package as well, I would change the changelog and Source: in control? | 21:41 |
| jonnylamb | ..of course my example would be just wrong though. | 21:41 |
| smagoun | :) | 21:41 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| jonnylamb | Well, you should only have to change "Source: foo" and the changelog entry, but there might be some other stuff in the debian/ directory that needs changing. grep is your friend though. | 21:42 |
| smagoun | yup | 21:44 |
| smagoun | thanks for the help | 21:44 |
| === sabotage is now known as sabotage_afk | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!