/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2007/10/27/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

gnomefreak18:57 <        Ubulette > I fetched the tarball from moz00:00
gnomefreak?00:00
Ubulettejust dled the orig from moz ftp00:00
gnomefreak1.1.4 tarball?00:00
Ubulettemoz = mozilla.org, not mozclient, sorry00:00
gnomefreakhow about using the 1.1.5 that fixed a crash with chrome00:00
gnomefreak;)00:00
Ubuletteyou were not done with 1.1.500:01
gnomefreakim done00:01
gnomefreakit was done just gutsys needed a touch up00:01
gnomefreakits already been pushed to gutsy00:01
gnomefreaki had to change target00:01
Ubuletteit was not 3 days ago00:01
gnomefreakit was00:01
Ubuletteremember i told you ?00:01
gnomefreakhe uploaded it 3 days ago00:01
gnomefreaki might have been working on it but i was finished before i left that day00:02
gnomefreakBy  John Vivirito <gnomefreak@ubuntu.com>   on 2007-10-2300:02
gnomefreakthat was finshed push to branch just had gutsy instead of gutsy-security that i fixed a bit ago00:03
gnomefreakhardys is done as well00:03
gnomefreakbluekuja: are you going to UDS?00:03
* gnomefreak pushing hardys build to revu00:04
gnomefreakshit i think i fucked up00:05
gnomefreaknope i didnt ;)00:05
gnomefreakhttps://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/iceape/ubuntu-1.1.x.gutsy Ubulette this is gutsys or leave off the .gutsy and that would be hardys00:06
Ubulettetold you last monday I forked after your commit 9400:08
gnomefreakoh00:08
Ubulettedon't worry, i'll not push iceape 1.*00:08
gnomefreakthat was 5 days ago i cnat remmeber everythng00:08
Ubulettei mean, seamonkey 1.*00:08
UbuletteOct 22 21:05:21 <Ubulette>      1.1.5 is not ready so I propose to fork 2.0 at commit 9400:09
UbuletteOct 22 21:05:29 <Ubulette>      seems good ?00:09
UbuletteOct 22 21:06:18 <gnomefreak>    make it a separate branch00:09
UbuletteOct 22 21:06:25 <gnomefreak>    yes00:09
gnomefreakthought that was temp 1.1.x uyntil you got it transfered over to 2.000:10
Ubuletteyes00:10
Ubulettei initially planed to do iceape 2.* but asac proposed to rebrand, i liked it00:11
gnomefreakrebrand for 2.000:11
Ubuletteyes but changing everything at once is painful00:12
Ubuletteso i did it steps by steps00:12
* gnomefreak not planning on rebranding 1.1.x series00:12
Ubulettenext step being to move to 2.000:12
Ubulettelol00:12
Ubuletteit's easier to rebrand the same version that has been unbranded00:13
Ubuletterather than port the unbranding across versions00:13
* gnomefreak perfers to keep 1.1.x unchanged since 2.0 is a big major change with all of seamonkey00:13
Ubulettethat's what i've said00:13
Ubulettei'll *not* push seamonkey 1.*00:14
Ubulettei just want it to run00:14
gnomefreak1.1.x gets so little changes i am not changing it yet. if he wants it changed in 1.1.x tell him to see me ;)00:14
Ubulettebefore i move forward00:14
gnomefreakno reason for seamonkey brand 1.1.00:14
Ubulettei agree00:14
gnomefreakpush it as you work on it00:14
gnomefreakill talk to him when i see him about branding since i was agaisnt the iceape branding to begin with00:15
Ubuletteno one wanted to rebrand 1.* for good.00:15
Ubulettebut just as a migration step00:15
gnomefreak1.1.5-1.1.7 might make it in hardy i doubt 2.0 will be ready or close to ready00:15
gnomefreakah yeah (might have done the hardwork first than worry about branching ;)00:16
Ubulette2.0 is alpha1 :)00:16
gnomefreakyeah i know another 6 more stages until its close to release00:16
Ubuletteanyway, if you have a clue about my seamonkey1 bug, please tell me00:17
gnomefreaki might give me a few00:17
Ubulette(crash on startup because of missing chrome)00:17
UbuletteI don't see where these rdf files are installed even in iceape00:19
Ubulettefta@ix:~ $ sudo /usr/sbin/update-seamonkey-chrome00:19
UbuletteUpdating seamonkey chrome registry...ls: *.rdf: No such file or directory00:19
Ubulettedone.00:19
Ubulettefta@ix:~ $ sudo /usr/sbin/update-iceape-chrome00:20
UbuletteUpdating iceape chrome registry...done.00:20
Ubulettefta@ix:~ $00:20
Ubulettethat's my bug00:20
Ubulettei have jars, but no rdf00:20
Ubuletteppa will be unavailable for the week end :(00:22
Ubulettesomeone flooded it with 300+ packages00:23
Ubulettehttps://edge.launchpad.net/+builds/samarium/+history00:23
Ubulettehttps://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-langpack/+archive/+builds?build_text=&build_state=all00:24
gnomefreakassholes00:24
gnomefreakbrb let me see if i can find it00:24
Ubulettestill 220+ to go00:25
gnomefreakim pushing to revu atm so browser is slow as hell00:26
Ubulettenew lp is slow anyway00:26
Ubuletteppa too00:26
gnomefreakthere was a crash reported i think fits your bug00:27
Ubulette(ppa slower than usual) "We've currently got a backlog of 15,000 builds for Ubuntu that were triggered by a large number of syncs that come with the opening of Hardy. This needs to be processed before the average time will come down, though we are working on making small optimizations for this situation. It should be normalized by next week."00:27
gnomefreaki think i just blew it off since reporter didnt provide info00:27
Ubulettegnomefreak, http://bugs.debian.org/41061300:28
Ubulettebut not helpful00:28
gnomefreakmy bug not helpful either00:29
gnomefreaksince you know the source of the crash00:29
gnomefreakhttps://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iceape/+bug/12375000:29
ubotuLaunchpad bug 123750 in iceape "iceape-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in raise()" [High,Invalid]00:29
Ubulettenot helpful either00:30
gnomefreakthis looks like the install00:30
gnomefreakfrom what mike said00:30
Ubuletteprobably but I can't what/where00:30
gnomefreakdo you have mozilla-imagezoom00:31
Ubuletteno00:31
gnomefreak> You may be hitting an old bug that is supposed to have been fixed a00:32
gnomefreak> while ago...00:32
gnomefreakthat is what i thought as well00:32
gnomefreakthat it was fixed00:32
gnomefreakwhy is chrome only setting .jars during install ON SOME people not everyone00:32
Ubulettegood question00:33
gnomefreakUbulette: does it give anything in postinst?00:34
gnomefreakthat would help us?00:34
gnomefreakim looking to see if it was fixed upstream00:35
gnomefreakone of these changelogs have to give me something00:35
gnomefreakUbulette: turn off javascript and try it00:36
gnomefreakno i dont htink it will help but just making sure its not the javascript bug that has been around since 1st release00:36
Ubuletteit crashes on startup so i can't turn off javascript ;)00:37
gnomefreakrun it in safe mode00:38
gnomefreak;)00:38
Ubulettei know what the bug is, missing chrome files00:39
Ubulettei just don't know why they are not installed00:39
gnomefreakit seems that javascript and the chrome run together00:39
gnomefreakdont ask me why :(00:39
Ubulettehttp://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/42292/00:40
gnomefreakwhy couldnt you find a mem leak like everyone else00:40
gnomefreakhttp://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/known-vulnerabilities.html#seamonkey1.1.5  see if you can find it faster than me00:41
gnomefreakthat shows 2 .rdf00:41
gnomefreakand its still crashing?00:41
gnomefreaki have chrome.rdf  installed-chrome.txt  overlays.rdf in mine and i dont crash00:42
gnomefreakim not sure .rdf files is the issue TBH00:43
Ubulettethose rdf files are generated by something00:44
gnomefreakbrb and yes mozconfig no?00:44
Ubulettemozconfig ? it's just for configure00:46
Ubulette        # files autogenerated by update-iceape-chrome - we can remove them00:47
Ubulette        for file in installed-chrome.txt chrome.rdf overlays.rdf stylesheets.rdf; do00:47
Ubulette            rm -f /usr/lib/iceape/chrome/$file;00:47
Ubulette        done00:47
Ubulettehmm00:47
Ubuletteregchrome maybe00:48
gnomefreakwrong file00:49
gnomefreakim not looking at source atm. but you show you have 2 .rdf files and you say its crashing due to not having them? where did you get them from00:50
gnomefreakif it created them properly and iceape just isnt using them it would have to be a failing link in one of our files in debian dir no?00:54
Ubuletteno, reread, iceape has 2, i have none00:55
gnomefreakthat pastebin wasnt from your files?00:56
gnomefreakit was from /var/lib00:57
gnomefreakthats not in iceape source00:57
gnomefreakhttp://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/42292/00:57
gnomefreakoh iceape has them seamonkey doesnt00:59
gnomefreakgive me a sec01:01
Ubuletteoh, installed-chrome.txt is very different too01:03
gnomefreaki was looking at update-seam/icea chrome in debian but both are same01:04
Ubulettei checked that already01:05
gnomefreakdid you drop the update-chrome patch?01:05
Ubuletteno01:05
Ubulettei've dropped only 80_config.dpatch which is useless with cdbs01:06
gnomefreakummmm these patches are not patching the same file01:07
gnomefreak--- xulrunner/config/rules.mk == iceape01:07
gnomefreak+++ iceape-1.1.4/config/rules.mk == seamonkey (ignore the +++ and ---)01:07
Ubulette?01:08
gnomefreakpatch name == same but they are patching diff. files01:08
gnomefreak10_no_chromelist.dpatch01:08
gnomefreakwhy is iceapes patching xulrunner and seamonkey patching iceape-1.1.4/config01:09
gnomefreakwhy is seamonkeys patch patching iceape01:09
gnomefreakanything01:09
Ubulettetop level doesn't matter01:10
gnomefreak# 10_no_chromelist.patch converted from dpatch file initially by Mike Hommey <glandium@debian.org>01:10
gnomefreak#01:10
gnomefreak# Don't build chromelist.txt files. bz#33178101:10
gnomefreak# Also correctly call make-jars.pl. bz#33354301:10
gnomefreakIndex: iceape-1.1.4/config/rules.mk01:10
gnomefreak===================================================================01:10
gnomefreak--- iceape-1.1.4.orig/config/rules.mk01:10
gnomefreak+++ iceape-1.1.4/config/rules.mk01:10
Ubuletteyep01:10
gnomefreak@@ -1557,34 +1557,30 @@01:10
Ubulettethat's expected01:11
gnomefreakit should since seamonkey shouldnt have a top level of iceape and the patches are no where near the same either01:11
gnomefreakthe content is totally different01:11
Ubulettequilt works as -p 1 so it doesn't matter01:11
Ubuletteno mike imported this patch from xul, i imported/converted mine from iceape01:12
gnomefreakgonna have to assume it has something to do with it since they are clearly no where near the same patch afaict but it might be expected since the file changed01:12
Ubuletteit is the same patch. both are touching config/rules.mk01:13
gnomefreakhmmmmmmmm01:14
gnomefreaki dont have any "if test" in iceape patch but the rest of it is same the if test lines are same but im missing the words "if test"01:15
Ubulettethat's just -p1, you're confused by the (ignored) top level ;)01:15
gnomefreaknot really im more concered about parts of file missing in icepae and not missing in seamonkey01:16
* gnomefreak gonne assume autoconf was run 01:16
gnomefreakim heading to bed but im willing to bet its right in front of our faces01:18
Ubuletteoh, just did a diff, it's just that I used more context with quilt01:18
gnomefreaki saw that01:18
Ubulettei bet the bug is in debian/rules01:18
Ubulettesomewhere in my cdbs migration01:19
Ubulettehmm, the DO_CHROME macro01:20
gnomefreakok night ill check revu comments in morning maybe01:20
Ubulette'night01:20
gnomefreaklet me know when i get here tomorrow if you found it01:21
Ubulettesure01:21
=== asac_ is now known as asac
asacgreetz from boston15:27
Ubulettehi15:28
gnomefreakhi15:28
Ubuletteasac, could you read the logs here or do you want me to paste a few lines that I'd like you to comment15:32
gnomefreakUbulette: he might be on the plane to boston15:32
asacUbulette: please paste a few lines15:33
asacthe connection currently sucks here so typing is pretty cumbersome15:34
asac... and no, I am sitting in a conference room ;)15:34
gnomefreaklong flight i bet ;)15:35
Ubulette<Ubulette> mozilla bug 32718115:35
Ubulette<Ubulette> mozilla bug 39927515:35
Ubulette<Ubulette> asac, if you have time, read those two bugs.15:35
Ubulette<Ubulette> basically, the ui for self signed / bad cert is gone for good as it's considered bad security practice15:35
Ubulette<Ubulette> there's an override ui deep in the option (7 steps or so)15:35
Ubulette<Ubulette> the argument makes sense but I think it will be badly received by lambda users15:35
Ubulettehttp://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/bad-cert-before.png15:36
Ubulettehttp://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/bad-cert-Minefield.png15:36
Ubuletteasac, still there ?15:42
gnomefreaklol15:48
gnomefreakUbulette: did you find the issue with chrome crash?15:48
Ubuletteyes, i'm fixing it right now15:49
gnomefreakah ok rules file?15:49
Ubuletteit's cdbs15:49
gnomefreakoh15:50
Ubulettewell, not cdbs's fault. the install stuff is just far too messy15:50
Ubulettei'm having a hard time to find where to hook those f*g rules in cdbs15:51
gnomefreakshould be siumular to firefox15:52
gnomefreaksimular15:52
gnomefreakrules from ff and rules from iceape are very very close to same so i would assume adding cdbs should be very close to same as ff15:52
gnomefreakatleast able to be used as template15:53
asacgot distracted15:53
asaclet me read15:53
asacis ubotu down?15:53
gnomefreakyes15:53
gnomefreakubotwo is being used15:54
Ubulette<ubotu> Mozilla bug 327181 in Security: PSM "Improve error reporting for invalid-certificate errors (error page for https, or combined dialog)" [Enhancement,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32718115:54
Ubulette<ubotu> Mozilla bug 399275 in Security: PSM "create preference which restores per-page SSL error override option for IT professionals" [Enhancement,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39927515:54
Ubulette<15:54
gnomefreakbut not in here. if you want him here i can ask ljl when i see him15:54
asacUbulette: hmmm .... the security error dialog ... is that really an upstream issue?15:55
asacor maybe because how we ship nss and build it in?15:56
Ubuletteno, it's not a bug15:56
Ubulettethey dropped the ui15:56
Ubulettebad security practice15:56
asaci know15:56
asacbut you seee an error dialog15:56
Ubulette399275 wanted to recreate it, but it's going nowhere15:57
asacit should be a notification on top of the gecko window15:57
Ubuletteit's been like that for 2 weeks in trunk15:57
asacand before?15:57
asacwhat happens in our a8 build?15:57
Ubulettebefore, the ui was there like in ff215:58
Ubulettea8 was before that change15:58
Ubuletteit's an a9 stuff15:58
asacok ... but i remember having seen something like that somewhere ... e.g. when you visit a not-signed ssl site you get a notification like for popup blocking15:58
Ubulettei'm not aware of that15:59
bluekujagood afternoon everyone16:00
bluekuja:)16:00
asachave you testeed nightly upstream builds?16:00
bluekujagnomefreak, unfortunately no :/16:00
asacUbulette: ^^ ?16:00
bluekujaasac: do you have a minute for pushing bittorrent to -proposed?16:00
Ubuletteasac, no16:00
Ubulettebut the bug is clear to me. what I see is what is in the bug16:01
gnomefreakbluekuja: you have a minute to push iceape?16:01
gnomefreak;)16:02
gnomefreakbluekuja: i cant be there this time either (and it pisses me off something bad)16:02
bluekujagnomefreak, yes, link?16:02
bluekujagnomefreak, I hope next UDS will be done in italy16:02
gnomefreakok16:02
bluekujahehe16:02
gnomefreakim hoping for north carolina but good luck :(16:03
gnomefreakbluekuja: http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=43816:03
* gnomefreak thinks most motus are scared of moz. packages16:03
bluekujaoh, it's a new upstream release16:04
gnomefreakbluekuja: security release already in gutsy16:04
bluekujayep16:04
asac Ubulette i don't see anything about this error dialog you see in mozilla bug 39927516:05
asacgnomefreak: did you receive any regression bug reports for iceape security update we rolled?16:06
gnomefreakasac: no16:06
gnomefreakshould i have?16:06
bluekujagnomefreak, how long for having it built?16:07
gnomefreakbluekuja: huh?16:07
gnomefreakasac: do you remember the cloaks that were used at UDS sevilla?16:07
gnomefreakbluekuja: how long did it take to build?16:08
bluekujagnomefreak, yes16:08
gnomefreakyou dont want to know16:08
asacgnomefreak: cloaks?16:08
asacgnomefreak: on freenode?16:08
gnomefreakbluekuja: for binaries it took > 3hours16:08
gnomefreakasac: yes16:08
bluekujaomg16:08
asacbluekuja: deid you add the info i asked for to the bug?16:08
bluekujaasac: yup16:08
bluekujaasac: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bittorrent/+bug/6679516:08
gnomefreakasac: at UDS they give cloaks now due to failing connections to freenode16:08
Ubulettehttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=327181#c14716:08
asacgnomefreak: no i  don't remember16:08
gnomefreaki didnt think so16:08
Ubuletteasac, ^^16:09
bluekujaasac: everything is ready there16:09
asacbug #12433616:10
gnomefreakbluekuja: i have a p4 1.7ghz and 256 ram so it might build faster for you16:10
asacgnomefreak: you really should get mor ram16:11
gnomefreakand AFAIK ppa hasnt updated for hardy yet16:11
bluekujaasac: ubotu is now here :/16:11
asacafaik in gutsy its not even supported to have just 25616:11
bluekuja*not16:11
gnomefreakasac: its way too much for ram16:11
gnomefreaki can get a new pc for what it would cost for ram16:11
bluekujagnomefreak, yes, I have a 3 ghz16:11
asacUbulette: i currently download latest nightly upstream build16:11
gnomefreaktheres some kind of fucked up ram in here16:11
bluekujaso maybe it will build a little faster16:11
gnomefreakbluekuja: nope ubotu has troubles seveas isnt around to fix it either16:12
Ubulettegnomefreak: ppa does hardy, i've already built ff3/xul1.916:12
bluekujagnomefreak, ah damn16:12
gnomefreakoh it has been updated already16:13
Ubuletteyesn last week16:13
gnomefreakcrap could have sent it there to build bins so you can see it built16:13
gnomefreakassuming that is what you are checking before pushing16:13
gnomefreakUbulette: it must have opened the day hardy uploads were released than16:14
bluekujaasac: would be great to have it done :)16:14
gnomefreakasac: you wont need the UDS cloak sin ceyou have a cloak already is what i gather16:16
asacgnomefreak: yeah :)16:16
asacare there others online that don't have a cloak ... or what are you claimin?16:16
gnomefreakwe are working on sorting out the UDS cloaks16:17
gnomefreakthey will be k-lined without it16:17
asacbluekuja: so how to reproduce?16:17
bluekujaasac: apt-get install bittorrent-gui16:17
asace.g. just installing bittorrent-gui?16:17
bluekujathen16:17
bluekujaopen up your terminal16:17
bluekujaand do16:18
bluekujabtdownloadgui.bittorrent16:18
bluekujayou'll find the bug16:18
bluekujathen get the fixed package16:18
bluekujaand check again16:18
bluekuja:)16:18
asacok ... connection is really slow here16:22
gnomefreakbtw asac i got a bunch of confirms that reply to list doesnt work16:22
asac22k :/16:22
asacgnomefreak: where? is there abug? i guess this is about tbird, isn't it?16:22
gnomefreakyes bug16:24
gnomefreakjust commented on it16:24
gnomefreakhttps://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozilla-thunderbird/+bug/5266716:24
gnomefreakasac: this is the bug (it hasnt worked since tbird 2.0 final) iirc that was upstream complaint or a blog i read a while back16:24
Ubuletteasac, are the conferences streamed ?16:25
asacgnomefreak: does it work for icedove?16:25
gnomefreaki dont kno wi dont have a sid chroot it keeps failing to build it16:25
gnomefreaki will try again since its been a week16:26
asacUbulette: no idea ... i don't think that this weekend fosscamp is streamed, but UDS will have IP telephony where you can dial in to listen and contribute16:26
bluekujaasac: ok, let me know when done16:26
UbuletteI just want videos ;)16:26
Ubulettebtw, i've updated https://edge.launchpad.net/prism16:27
asacbluekuja: done16:29
bluekujaasac: you rock alex, gonna message the motu-list later when I'll be back home16:30
bluekujaasac: for having it tested and moved to gutsy16:31
bluekujaok, leaving16:32
bluekujacu later16:32
bluekujagnomefreak, gonna ping you for iceape again16:32
bluekujatoday or tomorrow16:32
gnomefreakbluekuja: ok did you want me to upload to PPA?16:33
gnomefreakso it builds for you?16:33
gnomefreakasac: can you pastebin the repos for sid please16:34
asacbluekuja: thanks16:41
asacrepos for sid?16:41
asacdeb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian sid main16:42
asacdeb-src http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian sid main16:42
asacgnomefreak: ^^16:42
gnomefreakoh thats it?16:42
* gnomefreak thought there was more16:42
gnomefreakofficial reops atleast16:42
Ubulettegnomefreak, forget about i386 ppa for at least 2 days16:43
gnomefreakok will get it done and test on icedove16:43
gnomefreakUbulette: figured as much16:43
gnomefreakbut this should be handled sooner than that IMHO if it does break the TOS16:44
asacbluekuja: i think the package has to enter -proposed first16:44
asaci will ask someone16:44
gnomefreakproblem is its a weekend and UDS weekend so finding people usefull like LP admins is gonna be hard for the next week or so16:45
gnomefreakbbl i have to run and get flu shot16:46
asachmmm  anybody gets an idea what mozilla bug 396695 is about? ... do we see this as well in 2.0.0.8?16:59
asacgnomefreak: jett wants to join the mozillateam17:11
asacok off for some socialising! will be back in a few hours i guess17:12
Ubuletteasac, I guess https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398728 needs an answer either from us or from debian17:37
Ubulettegnomefreak, hmm, 130 lang packs to go (out of 300+). maybe it will end faster than I expected17:46
=== Jazzva_ is now known as Jazzva
asacmozilla bug 39872818:35
Ubulettehttp://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/SeaMonkey.png18:35
Ubulettei'm done with sm 1.1.418:37
Ubulettewith nss/nspr head :)18:37
asacUbulette: cool18:41
asacmaybe twe want to contribute that page upstream?18:42
Ubulette?18:42
asaci think pristine upstream has something else18:42
asacwhich is far more ugly ... or even a remote page18:42
Ubulettei've updated the links to point to ubuntu18:43
gnomefreakW: Failure while configuring base packages.18:44
Ubulettewell, i don't think it matters as it's still 1.1.*.18:44
gnomefreakfuck chroots18:44
gnomefreakasac: cant build sid chroot18:44
asacUbulette: right .... lets see how it works out on trunk18:44
asacandif we still have a more beautiful start page try to get it upstream18:44
asacgnomefreak: why?18:45
gnomefreakI: Configuring klogd...18:45
gnomefreakW: Failure while configuring base packages.18:45
gnomefreakW: Failure while configuring base packages.18:45
gnomefreakW: Failure while configuring base packages.18:45
gnomefreakW: Failure while configuring base packages.18:45
gnomefreakW: Failure while configuring base packages.18:45
gnomefreakdoesnt give me more info than that18:46
gnomefreakso i dont have clue18:46
asacthose aappear to be just warnings18:46
asacotherwise there should be a dpkg-log or something in /var18:46
gnomefreakill look and see but when the warning is configuring base packages normally means it wont work properly if at all18:47
asacUbulette: ok the cert issue is really the same for upstream nightlies as well18:49
gnomefreakhmmmm theres a bootstrap.log but its strictly ubuntu chroots18:49
Ubuletteasac, it's not an "issue". more an unwanted feature18:49
Ubulettewell, i'm now used to it18:50
asacUbulette: he? .... from what i know it shouled be the same like the pop-up or missing plugin info18:50
Ubulettewhere ?18:50
Ubulettethey just have an override ui18:51
Ubuletteworks fine when you know where it is18:51
gnomefreakit seems /var/chroot/sid/var/log/dpkg.log contains no errors18:52
gnomefreakasac: who is jett? someone we know or just someone wanting to join?18:55
asaci don't know him18:55
gnomefreaki lost the email must have overlooked it18:56
gnomefreakthis is bad18:58
gnomefreakcant install any compilier without first removing aptitude18:58
Ubuletteasac, i want to keep the name seamonkey, instead of doing seamonkey-2.0 (like ff3/xul1.9) as 1.1 will rename as iceape, should not be a problem18:58
asacUbulette: no idea where ... i just remember that it worked at some point18:58
Ubulettes/rename/remain/18:58
asacright ... otoh maybe we should follow the ffox xul precedence18:59
asaci guess we will use versioned dirs for all mozilla apps starting from 1.9 branch, right?19:00
Ubulettehmm19:00
Ubulettelets see how they do that upstream now. I'll follow that19:01
Ubulettegnomefreak, 120+ to go: https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-langpack/+archive/+builds?build_text=&build_state=all&start=100&batch=5019:05
gnomefreakUbulette: did you ask kiko to kill them?19:06
gnomefreak101  â†’ 150  of 751 results19:06
gnomefreaktry again19:06
gnomefreakif counting up19:06
asacUbulette: upstream always installed versioned dirs from what i know19:06
Ubulettegnomefreak, i didn't. feel free to ask him ;)19:07
Ubuletteasac, yep.19:07
gnomefreaki just did19:07
Ubulettei don't see the point of lang packs in ppa but well, i'm not canonical so it seems i don't have the right to argue19:08
gnomefreaki want to know where the hell 751 lang packs came from :(19:09
Ubuletteask pitti19:10
Ubuletteit's for his ppa19:10
gnomefreakah yes 622 built19:10
gnomefreakpitti pushed these?19:10
Ubulettehttps://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-langpack19:11
Ubulette1 member19:11
Ubuletteso i guess19:11
gnomefreakyep he pushed them19:11
gnomefreakdamnit19:11
Ubulettethis is just not scalable :)19:12
* gnomefreak wonders why him of all people would do that 19:12
Ubuletteamd64 builder is idle as arch indep pkgs are always built on i38619:14
* gnomefreak wonders how many packages are waiting after these lang packs19:15
gnomefreakmaybe backed up for a few days playing catch up19:15
gnomefreakkiko isnt answering it either because it was pitti or hes just too busy19:15
Ubulettei think i have one just after that shit19:15
Ubuletteasac ?19:17
UbuletteI want to close my huge changelog but I don't push19:17
asacwait a sec19:18
gnomefreakok installing icedove its gonna be a while19:29
gnomefreakok uploading hardys iceape to PPA and hopfully it will build sooner or later19:31
gnomefreakok im gone for a while19:32
asacUbulette: what do you mean by "just one left"19:37
asacto finish 1.1.4 unbranding?19:37
Ubulettewhat ? where ?19:38
asac20:16 < Ubulette> i think i have one just after that shit19:39
* asac reboots19:39
Ubulettei've pushed something in my own ppa yesterday19:39
Ubulettejust when the flood started19:40
bluekujaback19:50
bluekujasorry had to go, I was pretty late19:50
bluekujagnomefreak, yes, nice idea :)19:50
bluekujaasac: it seems to be inside now19:51
bluekujaasac: did you ping someone?19:51
asacbluekuja: pitti did it automatically19:55
asaci asked him, but he already did it19:55
asacok .... going to smoke now19:55
bluekujathat's great19:55
bluekujaasac: do you smoke??19:56
bluekujaI thought you dont19:56
Ubulettelol, i thought that too.19:59
bluekujahehe20:00
Ubulettemy last cigarette was 15 years ago :)20:00
bluekujaoh^^20:00
bluekujaI usually dont smoke20:00
bluekujaor eventually one cigarette a month20:01
bluekujanothing^^20:01
Ubuletteasac, i'm still waiting for my changelog...20:03
asaci smoke :)20:16
asacUbulette: what info do you want=20:16
asac?20:16
Ubulette<Ubulette> I want to close my huge changelog but I don't push20:17
Ubulette<asac> wait a sec20:17
bluekujaasac: how does it take to have it available inside gutsy-proposed repo?20:17
Ubuletteso i'm waiting20:17
bluekujaI still cant see it20:17
asacUbulette: well ... i have no objections becaus i don't know the state20:18
asacmaybe you want to rephrase the Debian bugs ... to Ubuntu Bugs ?20:18
asacat least its still on the screenshot you showed me20:18
Ubuletteyep20:18
Ubulettei asked for changelog because i want a clear separation between 1.* and 2.* but i'm still UNRELEASED20:19
Ubuletteconfigure: error: --with-system-png won't work because the system's libpng doesn't have APNG support20:20
Ubulettewould be nice to solve that for hardy20:20
asacbut for 1.1.4 it should work?20:20
asacah ... yes20:20
asacmaybe we need to pack apng20:20
asaci will try to figure out here20:20
Ubuletteyep; socialize with the png guys while you're there ;)20:21
Ubulettewell, i'll figure out the changelog later.20:23
Ubulettei've started 2.0 with no patch at all20:24
asacso you dropped all? ... what about those patches we have in 3.0 ffox? are they browser/ only?20:24
Ubulettei just want to see what is needed20:25
asacgood20:25
Ubulettebefore I cherry pick either from ff3, or from xul or from 1.1.*20:25
Ubulettei want a sm 2.0 with xul1.9 and nss/nspr cvs20:26
asachmmm ... as long as ffox-3.0trunk works with that combo it should be fine20:27
asac(e.g. nss/nspr cvs)20:27
Ubuletteeven ff2 should work with nss/nspr cvs20:28
Ubuletteupstream nss said so20:28
Ubulettethere's just a small patch needed to fix a ftbfs20:28
asacyeah ... anyway ... for archive we probably want the  tags used in  client.mk20:28
UbuletteI thought you were ok to use the new nss/nspr in hardy ?20:29
Ubulettethey should be ready in time20:29
asacnew?20:29
asacUbulette: i would like to follow their tags20:29
asacwe never know when they will stop20:29
Ubulettethey bumped nss last week so it's close20:29
asacbeing ahead and reverting on release should be possible, but getting more exposure onwhat we finally reallease should be more valabeimo20:30
UbuletteNSPR_CO_TAG          = NSPR_HEAD_2007101620:30
UbuletteNSS_CO_TAG           = NSS_3_12_ALPHA_220:30
bluekujaasac: it seems it needs building20:33
asaci have no opinion on bzr branches being ahead as of changelog ... it just because cumbersome when packaging is adjusted ... whatever we upload to hardy should be from the tag20:33
bluekujaasac: bittorrent | 3.4.2-11ubuntu3~7.10 | http://archive.ubuntu.com gutsy-proposed/main Sources20:33
asacbluekuja: yes ... wait a bit before wecanverify then20:34
bluekujaasac: yeah, I need to wait it gets built20:34
bluekujathen I'll mail20:34
bluekujaasac: actually themuso just written the mail for one of his SRU20:36
bluekujaand the package got only Sources20:36
bluekujafor now20:36
bluekujausplash-theme-ubuntustudio |     0.15.1 | http://archive.ubuntu.com gutsy-proposed/universe Sources20:36
asacah ... ok ...given the normal delays of email send and testers actually jumping on it ... i think its ok20:37
bluekujayeah20:37
asacbut better wait till the bits are available usually20:37
bluekujaok, fine. We wait then20:37
bluekujaok, going to read my brand new python book20:44
bluekuja400+ pages20:44
bluekujawoohoo20:44
asachehe20:49
Ubuletteasac ?21:16
Ubulettein ff-3.0, a patch changes configure.in but we never re-run autoconf. how come ?21:17
asacfor trunk packages this is done automatically by cdbs21:18
UbuletteDEB_AUTO_UPDATE_AUTOCONF is not used anywhere21:18
Ubuletteand there's no 99_ patch21:19
asacno? hmm ... then it was lost at some point21:20
asacthe idea was to run it till it becomes stable21:20
asacmaybe its enabled by default?21:22
asacby setting the AUTOCON version?21:23
Ubuletteno it's not. i need to do it for sm221:25
UbuletteI'll go for 99_21:25
asacok21:31
asacthats fine21:31
asacwhat change to configure.in do we miss now in ffox?21:31
asacUbulette: just DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_AUTOCONF=2.13 should be enough21:43
Ubulettei think we can drop that patch from ff3, the code is built in xul21:43
asacanyway from what i see its enough to just use that setting ... and we do that for ff321:43
Ubuletteit's no-have-stdint-h-ftbfs.patch21:43
asacyes ... without that patch it won't build ... so it works21:44
Ubuletteit's needed in cairo-xlib-utils so i guess it could be dropped from ff3 ad it's xul job now21:50
asacyes  ... anyway ... just the DEB_AUTO above should be fine ... if you think we should use 99 right from the beginning goforit21:52
Ubulettestrange, I get failures in places common to xul21:59
UbulettegfxPDFSurface.cpp: In member function 'virtual nsresult gfxPDFSurface::EndPage()':21:59
UbulettegfxPDFSurface.cpp:94: error: 'cairo_surface_show_page' was not declared in this scope21:59
Ubulettemake[6]: *** [gfxPDFSurface.o] Error 121:59
Ubulettemake[6]: Leaving directory `/src/bzr/build-area/seamonkey-2.0-2.0~a1~cvs20071026t1846/gfx/thebes/src'21:59
gnomefreakbluekuja: figured id save you some time ;)22:01
gnomefreaki guess iceape still uses cario22:02
gnomefreakafaik ff3 got rid of it22:02
asacUbulette: you try to use system-caiuro?22:03
asacthat won't work22:03
gnomefreakok iceape 64bit is building22:04
gnomefreakasac: is cario gone from iceape as well? (2.0 gonna use something else)22:04
Ubuletteit is with system cairo, i'm dropping it for now22:04
Ubuletteremember it's dropped from xul since a722:04
gnomefreakcant drop it without replacing it22:04
gnomefreakoh thats right22:04
Ubulettemoz ship it22:04
gnomefreakmoz has always shipped it afaik we just use ours instead22:05
asacgnomefreak: hopefully we will b in sync with moz cairo when hardy comes out22:05
asacbut i won't bet on it22:05
asac(sadly)22:05
Ubulettemoz cairo is cairo HEAD22:05
gnomefreaksomehow i have the feeling it wont happen22:05
asacUbulette: yes .... HEAD that aproaches 1.6 ... vlad wants 1.6 from what i know22:06
gnomefreakcant we just ship thiers and stop building ours?22:06
asacand we will ahve 1.6 in hardy hopefully22:06
gnomefreakasac: what is our version at?22:06
asac1.422:06
gnomefreakah ok22:06
gnomefreakdoes moz packages ship with it? example: firefox has it built in source tarball?22:07
asacyes22:08
asacthey always shipped it on their own22:08
asaccairo isn't mature enough to use system one accordingly to mofo22:08
gnomefreakbut we need to package it separately due to epiphany and such?22:09
Ubuletteit's bundled into libxul22:09
asacgnomefreak: don't mix thinkgs up ... we always have a ciaor shiped22:09
asacits just that moz uses its own version22:09
gnomefreakbut for that reason is what i mena22:09
gnomefreakother wise we wouldnt need to package it right? )for moz products)22:10
gnomefreakok i need a ML post22:15
Ubuletteasac, when you have time, could you sync your ff2 branches to mt ?22:15
Ubulettei've filled a bug against broken --with-default-mozilla-five-home but couldn't fix it myself because i couldnt find your last ff2 (~ 2008) branch22:16
gnomefreakUbulette: he didnt push changes from what i can see22:18
gnomefreakhttps://code.edge.launchpad.net/~asac/firefox/ubuntu-2.0.0.x.gutsy22:18
Ubulettei know, that what i meant by plz sync :)22:18
gnomefreakthats the latest one with 2.0.0.822:18
* gnomefreak snooped from his LP page22:18
gnomefreakasac: it works in icedove so i will take a look and maybe just take thier patch and see22:20
gnomefreakok ill work on reply to list tonight and tomorrow22:22
gnomefreakasac:  you havent pushed thunderbird 2.0.0.8 to hardy yet have you?22:23
gnomefreakto save from having another changelog entry ill add mine into your changelog if you havent pushed22:23
gnomefreakok looks as if i grab gutsy's and i build for hardy22:25
asacUbulette: hardy hasn't been pushed22:29
asacjust .gutsy22:29
Ubulettehttps://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozilla-firefox/+bug/15712622:30
asacnetwork is so sucky here that its almost impossible forme to work at all :/22:32
gnomefreakasac: ok im upgrading it for hardy while im fixing the patch did you want me to use your name and timestamp and im assuming i should remove gutsy's changelog entry as well and add changes to MT thunderbird branch22:32
gnomefreakversion it something like22:33
gnomefreak2.0.0.8~pre080422+nobinonly-1ubuntu1?22:33
gnomefreaknot sure what the 22 stands for22:34
gnomefreakasac: any idea what the patchs name is in icedove (maybe help me to not open all the patches22:35
asacgnomefreak: let me do it22:35
asacwait a second ... then please do a test build and let me know if it breaks or seomthing22:36
Ubulettestrange, xul1.9 doesn't ship nsIAutoCompleteSession.idl22:36
Ubuletteit should22:36
gnomefreakasac: i had planned on it but would like to add patch to it first well find it first22:36
asacgnomefreak: which patch?22:41
gnomefreakthe reply-to-list patch im not seeing one in icedove yet22:41
gnomefreakim reading all patches to see if they included it in a patch22:42
gnomefreakim wondering if removing the patch would fix it22:44
asacwell thats not firefox ... i will push firefox now22:44
gnomefreaki didnt plan on touching ff22:46
gnomefreakim just working on the patch atm22:46
asacok the main branch of ffox 2.0 is updated with hardy upload22:46
asacwould be great if you could do a test build and see if anything breaks22:46
asac(revision 103)22:46
gnomefreakasac: once i find the patch i will22:46
gnomefreakoh you mean ff22:46
asacyeah22:47
gnomefreakmake you a deal, find this frigging patch and ill start on ff test build22:47
gnomefreak;)22:47
gnomefreakim betting you dropped it from icedove22:47
asachttps://code.edge.launchpad.net/~asac/firefox/ubuntu-2.0.0.x22:47
gnomefreakif it was ever added22:47
asacicedove or tunderbird?22:48
gnomefreakicedove22:49
gnomefreaki dont see it in changelog anywhere22:49
gnomefreakif that means it doesnt have it than i think trying to drop it from tbird and see if it works on own now that 2.0 is final22:50
asachttp://people.debian.org/~asac/91_replytolist.dpatch22:50
asacthats the one from 1.5 branch22:50
gnomefreakits not listed in 2.022:50
asacgnomefreak: does tbird have that patch?22:50
gnomefreakyes22:50
gnomefreakthats why im thinking drop it22:50
asacthen icedove should have it as well22:50
gnomefreakand see what happens22:51
gnomefreakicedove works22:51
asacno ... please keep it ... icedove shouldhave it too22:51
asache?22:51
gnomefreaktbird doesnt22:51
asacstrange22:51
gnomefreakicedove doesnt have the patrch and works, tbird has it and fails to work22:51
gnomefreaki think i will do a fast build of tbird this weekend not changing anything except the patcha nd see what happens22:52
asacgnomefreak: sure that icedove works?22:53
asachave you seen this on your own?22:53
gnomefreakyes very sure see bug i even used it to comment on bug22:53
asacfor icedove 2.0?22:53
gnomefreakhttps://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozilla-thunderbird/+bug/5266722:53
gnomefreaki havent used it22:53
gnomefreaki just installed it22:53
asacso you built it on your own?22:53
asacor just the sid package?22:54
gnomefreaksid packages22:54
gnomefreakis this the right tarball for ff 2.0.0.8 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10064175/firefox_2.0.0.8%2B2nobinonly.orig.tar.gz22:54
asacyes22:55
* gnomefreak still not real sure why you have %###nobinonly22:55
gnomefreakthey dont need to know about binary packages afaik22:55
asacbecause its upstream tarball minus BINOLNY files22:55
gnomefreakOk, sorry, I just figured out I made a mistake:22:56
gnomefreakReply-To-List works, but only when you have configured thunderbird to show _all_ headers.22:56
gnomefreakthat comment bothers me a bit22:56
gnomefreaki might try it, if that is true than the patch needs to be fixed22:56
gnomefreaki should have ff tested tomorrow as it takes a while to build22:57
gnomefreakhes right22:58
gnomefreakthats odd22:58
gnomefreakwait a minute22:58
gnomefreakit works in tbird22:58
gnomefreakthat cant be right22:58
gnomefreaksomeone please post to ML about something22:59
gnomefreakim fetching things here23:00
asacgnomefreak: do you know bug id of tis package description bug (aka development version in ffox 2.0 package description?)23:03
Ubulette_asac, for some reason, xul1.9 doesn't ship nsIAutoCompleteSession.idl needed by sm2 /w libxul23:05
Ubulette_(needed for mailnews/addrbook)23:06
gnomefreakasac: give me afew minutes to locate it23:08
asacUbulette_: i remember something like that23:08
asaci think its an old feature from xpfe .... seamonkey 2.0 should migrate to use the new one23:09
asacmaybe you can disable that feature for now forcefully?23:09
asac(the new one from toolkit)23:09
Ubulette_http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/42407/23:10
gnomefreakasac: this isnt it but can we do something with this please as well https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/8823223:10
=== Ubulette_ is now known as Ubulette
gnomefreaki see alot of bugs i thought we fixed23:12
gnomefreakhttps://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/150791 asac this is bug you wanted23:14
asacthanks23:17
asacUbulette: yes .... sounds familiar23:18
asaci doubt that we can make this exported from xul23:18
gnomefreaki took 6 bugs and they are all fixed but still open, i think we need to work on this list :(23:19
Ubulettei can't find anything relevant in bugzilla :(23:19
asacgnomefreak: feel free to cleanup the bug mess :)23:19
asacUbulette: seamonkey devs probably don't try to use system xul ... and thus they don't recognize23:19
asacUbulette: is that idl file in xpfe hierarchy?23:20
gnomefreakasac: yeah yeah yeah23:21
Ubulette./mozilla/xpfe/components/autocomplete/public/nsIAutoCompleteSession.idl23:21
gnomefreakbug mes isnt helping me clean it23:21
* gnomefreak should check on flash version on site and maybe get that updated as a weekend quick fix23:22
gnomefreaki have 313 ff bugs in my bugs profile (give or take) and most are inprogress confirmed or just outright fixed, you need to be around while im working on them incase you fixed it and im not aware of it ;)23:23
gnomefreakbut maybe tomorrow ill see what i can do we need to fix these crashes or do something with them they are old as crap23:24
gnomefreakreply-to-list seems to work23:25
asacyes ... lets do that tomorrow ... pain is getting up already here23:26
asacwith this laggy inet connection23:26
asaci guess tomorrowi will be on as asac_the_2nd again23:26
asacok cu ... i hope i can come back in later ... depending on the connection speed my room gives me23:27
gnomefreaklater23:27
Ubulettegot it https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21494023:27
Ubuletteblocker since 2003 :(23:28
gnomefreakok commented on the bug about r-t-l please update tbird to 2.0.0.8 so i can test this on up to date package23:29
gnomefreakok gonna start ff build than dinner23:30
gnomefreakok bbl to check in23:31
gnomefreakoops forgot build-deps23:32

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!