[00:00] <gnomefreak> 18:57 <        Ubulette > I fetched the tarball from moz
[00:00] <gnomefreak> ?
[00:00] <Ubulette> just dled the orig from moz ftp
[00:00] <gnomefreak> 1.1.4 tarball?
[00:00] <Ubulette> moz = mozilla.org, not mozclient, sorry
[00:00] <gnomefreak> how about using the 1.1.5 that fixed a crash with chrome
[00:00] <gnomefreak> ;)
[00:01] <Ubulette> you were not done with 1.1.5
[00:01] <gnomefreak> im done
[00:01] <gnomefreak> it was done just gutsys needed a touch up
[00:01] <gnomefreak> its already been pushed to gutsy
[00:01] <gnomefreak> i had to change target
[00:01] <Ubulette> it was not 3 days ago
[00:01] <gnomefreak> it was
[00:01] <Ubulette> remember i told you ?
[00:01] <gnomefreak> he uploaded it 3 days ago
[00:02] <gnomefreak> i might have been working on it but i was finished before i left that day
[00:02] <gnomefreak> By  John Vivirito <gnomefreak@ubuntu.com>   on 2007-10-23
[00:03] <gnomefreak> that was finshed push to branch just had gutsy instead of gutsy-security that i fixed a bit ago
[00:03] <gnomefreak> hardys is done as well
[00:03] <gnomefreak> bluekuja: are you going to UDS?
[00:04]  * gnomefreak pushing hardys build to revu
[00:05] <gnomefreak> shit i think i fucked up
[00:05] <gnomefreak> nope i didnt ;)
[00:06] <gnomefreak> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/iceape/ubuntu-1.1.x.gutsy Ubulette this is gutsys or leave off the .gutsy and that would be hardys
[00:08] <Ubulette> told you last monday I forked after your commit 94
[00:08] <gnomefreak> oh
[00:08] <Ubulette> don't worry, i'll not push iceape 1.*
[00:08] <gnomefreak> that was 5 days ago i cnat remmeber everythng
[00:08] <Ubulette> i mean, seamonkey 1.*
[00:09] <Ubulette> Oct 22 21:05:21 <Ubulette>      1.1.5 is not ready so I propose to fork 2.0 at commit 94
[00:09] <Ubulette> Oct 22 21:05:29 <Ubulette>      seems good ?
[00:09] <Ubulette> Oct 22 21:06:18 <gnomefreak>    make it a separate branch
[00:09] <Ubulette> Oct 22 21:06:25 <gnomefreak>    yes
[00:10] <gnomefreak> thought that was temp 1.1.x uyntil you got it transfered over to 2.0
[00:10] <Ubulette> yes
[00:11] <Ubulette> i initially planed to do iceape 2.* but asac proposed to rebrand, i liked it
[00:11] <gnomefreak> rebrand for 2.0
[00:12] <Ubulette> yes but changing everything at once is painful
[00:12] <Ubulette> so i did it steps by steps
[00:12]  * gnomefreak not planning on rebranding 1.1.x series
[00:12] <Ubulette> next step being to move to 2.0
[00:12] <Ubulette> lol
[00:13] <Ubulette> it's easier to rebrand the same version that has been unbranded
[00:13] <Ubulette> rather than port the unbranding across versions
[00:13]  * gnomefreak perfers to keep 1.1.x unchanged since 2.0 is a big major change with all of seamonkey
[00:13] <Ubulette> that's what i've said
[00:14] <Ubulette> i'll *not* push seamonkey 1.*
[00:14] <Ubulette> i just want it to run
[00:14] <gnomefreak> 1.1.x gets so little changes i am not changing it yet. if he wants it changed in 1.1.x tell him to see me ;)
[00:14] <Ubulette> before i move forward
[00:14] <gnomefreak> no reason for seamonkey brand 1.1.
[00:14] <Ubulette> i agree
[00:14] <gnomefreak> push it as you work on it
[00:15] <gnomefreak> ill talk to him when i see him about branding since i was agaisnt the iceape branding to begin with
[00:15] <Ubulette> no one wanted to rebrand 1.* for good.
[00:15] <Ubulette> but just as a migration step
[00:15] <gnomefreak> 1.1.5-1.1.7 might make it in hardy i doubt 2.0 will be ready or close to ready
[00:16] <gnomefreak> ah yeah (might have done the hardwork first than worry about branching ;)
[00:16] <Ubulette> 2.0 is alpha1 :)
[00:16] <gnomefreak> yeah i know another 6 more stages until its close to release
[00:17] <Ubulette> anyway, if you have a clue about my seamonkey1 bug, please tell me
[00:17] <gnomefreak> i might give me a few
[00:17] <Ubulette> (crash on startup because of missing chrome)
[00:19] <Ubulette> I don't see where these rdf files are installed even in iceape
[00:19] <Ubulette> fta@ix:~ $ sudo /usr/sbin/update-seamonkey-chrome
[00:19] <Ubulette> Updating seamonkey chrome registry...ls: *.rdf: No such file or directory
[00:19] <Ubulette> done.
[00:20] <Ubulette> fta@ix:~ $ sudo /usr/sbin/update-iceape-chrome
[00:20] <Ubulette> Updating iceape chrome registry...done.
[00:20] <Ubulette> fta@ix:~ $
[00:20] <Ubulette> that's my bug
[00:20] <Ubulette> i have jars, but no rdf
[00:22] <Ubulette> ppa will be unavailable for the week end :(
[00:23] <Ubulette> someone flooded it with 300+ packages
[00:23] <Ubulette> https://edge.launchpad.net/+builds/samarium/+history
[00:24] <Ubulette> https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-langpack/+archive/+builds?build_text=&build_state=all
[00:24] <gnomefreak> assholes
[00:24] <gnomefreak> brb let me see if i can find it
[00:25] <Ubulette> still 220+ to go
[00:26] <gnomefreak> im pushing to revu atm so browser is slow as hell
[00:26] <Ubulette> new lp is slow anyway
[00:26] <Ubulette> ppa too
[00:27] <gnomefreak> there was a crash reported i think fits your bug
[00:27] <Ubulette> (ppa slower than usual) "We've currently got a backlog of 15,000 builds for Ubuntu that were triggered by a large number of syncs that come with the opening of Hardy. This needs to be processed before the average time will come down, though we are working on making small optimizations for this situation. It should be normalized by next week."
[00:27] <gnomefreak> i think i just blew it off since reporter didnt provide info
[00:28] <Ubulette> gnomefreak, http://bugs.debian.org/410613
[00:28] <Ubulette> but not helpful
[00:29] <gnomefreak> my bug not helpful either
[00:29] <gnomefreak> since you know the source of the crash
[00:29] <gnomefreak> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iceape/+bug/123750
[00:29] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 123750 in iceape "iceape-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in raise()" [High,Invalid]
[00:30] <Ubulette> not helpful either
[00:30] <gnomefreak> this looks like the install
[00:30] <gnomefreak> from what mike said
[00:30] <Ubulette> probably but I can't what/where
[00:31] <gnomefreak> do you have mozilla-imagezoom
[00:31] <Ubulette> no
[00:32] <gnomefreak> > You may be hitting an old bug that is supposed to have been fixed a
[00:32] <gnomefreak> > while ago...
[00:32] <gnomefreak> that is what i thought as well
[00:32] <gnomefreak> that it was fixed
[00:32] <gnomefreak> why is chrome only setting .jars during install ON SOME people not everyone
[00:33] <Ubulette> good question
[00:34] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: does it give anything in postinst?
[00:34] <gnomefreak> that would help us?
[00:35] <gnomefreak> im looking to see if it was fixed upstream
[00:35] <gnomefreak> one of these changelogs have to give me something
[00:36] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: turn off javascript and try it
[00:36] <gnomefreak> no i dont htink it will help but just making sure its not the javascript bug that has been around since 1st release
[00:37] <Ubulette> it crashes on startup so i can't turn off javascript ;)
[00:38] <gnomefreak> run it in safe mode
[00:38] <gnomefreak> ;)
[00:39] <Ubulette> i know what the bug is, missing chrome files
[00:39] <Ubulette> i just don't know why they are not installed
[00:39] <gnomefreak> it seems that javascript and the chrome run together
[00:39] <gnomefreak> dont ask me why :(
[00:40] <Ubulette> http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/42292/
[00:40] <gnomefreak> why couldnt you find a mem leak like everyone else
[00:41] <gnomefreak> http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/known-vulnerabilities.html#seamonkey1.1.5  see if you can find it faster than me
[00:41] <gnomefreak> that shows 2 .rdf
[00:41] <gnomefreak> and its still crashing?
[00:42] <gnomefreak> i have chrome.rdf  installed-chrome.txt  overlays.rdf in mine and i dont crash
[00:43] <gnomefreak> im not sure .rdf files is the issue TBH
[00:44] <Ubulette> those rdf files are generated by something
[00:44] <gnomefreak> brb and yes mozconfig no?
[00:46] <Ubulette> mozconfig ? it's just for configure
[00:47] <Ubulette>         # files autogenerated by update-iceape-chrome - we can remove them
[00:47] <Ubulette>         for file in installed-chrome.txt chrome.rdf overlays.rdf stylesheets.rdf; do
[00:47] <Ubulette>             rm -f /usr/lib/iceape/chrome/$file;
[00:47] <Ubulette>         done
[00:47] <Ubulette> hmm
[00:48] <Ubulette> regchrome maybe
[00:49] <gnomefreak> wrong file
[00:50] <gnomefreak> im not looking at source atm. but you show you have 2 .rdf files and you say its crashing due to not having them? where did you get them from
[00:54] <gnomefreak> if it created them properly and iceape just isnt using them it would have to be a failing link in one of our files in debian dir no?
[00:55] <Ubulette> no, reread, iceape has 2, i have none
[00:56] <gnomefreak> that pastebin wasnt from your files?
[00:57] <gnomefreak> it was from /var/lib
[00:57] <gnomefreak> thats not in iceape source
[00:57] <gnomefreak> http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/42292/
[00:59] <gnomefreak> oh iceape has them seamonkey doesnt
[01:01] <gnomefreak> give me a sec
[01:03] <Ubulette> oh, installed-chrome.txt is very different too
[01:04] <gnomefreak> i was looking at update-seam/icea chrome in debian but both are same
[01:05] <Ubulette> i checked that already
[01:05] <gnomefreak> did you drop the update-chrome patch?
[01:05] <Ubulette> no
[01:06] <Ubulette> i've dropped only 80_config.dpatch which is useless with cdbs
[01:07] <gnomefreak> ummmm these patches are not patching the same file
[01:07] <gnomefreak> --- xulrunner/config/rules.mk == iceape
[01:07] <gnomefreak> +++ iceape-1.1.4/config/rules.mk == seamonkey (ignore the +++ and ---)
[01:08] <Ubulette> ?
[01:08] <gnomefreak> patch name == same but they are patching diff. files
[01:08] <gnomefreak> 10_no_chromelist.dpatch
[01:09] <gnomefreak> why is iceapes patching xulrunner and seamonkey patching iceape-1.1.4/config
[01:09] <gnomefreak> why is seamonkeys patch patching iceape
[01:09] <gnomefreak> anything
[01:10] <Ubulette> top level doesn't matter
[01:10] <gnomefreak> # 10_no_chromelist.patch converted from dpatch file initially by Mike Hommey <glandium@debian.org>
[01:10] <gnomefreak> #
[01:10] <gnomefreak> # Don't build chromelist.txt files. bz#331781
[01:10] <gnomefreak> # Also correctly call make-jars.pl. bz#333543
[01:10] <gnomefreak> Index: iceape-1.1.4/config/rules.mk
[01:10] <gnomefreak> [01:10] <gnomefreak> --- iceape-1.1.4.orig/config/rules.mk
[01:10] <gnomefreak> +++ iceape-1.1.4/config/rules.mk
[01:10] <Ubulette> yep
[01:10] <gnomefreak> @@ -1557,34 +1557,30 @@
[01:11] <Ubulette> that's expected
[01:11] <gnomefreak> it should since seamonkey shouldnt have a top level of iceape and the patches are no where near the same either
[01:11] <gnomefreak> the content is totally different
[01:11] <Ubulette> quilt works as -p 1 so it doesn't matter
[01:12] <Ubulette> no mike imported this patch from xul, i imported/converted mine from iceape
[01:12] <gnomefreak> gonna have to assume it has something to do with it since they are clearly no where near the same patch afaict but it might be expected since the file changed
[01:13] <Ubulette> it is the same patch. both are touching config/rules.mk
[01:14] <gnomefreak> hmmmmmmmm
[01:15] <gnomefreak> i dont have any "if test" in iceape patch but the rest of it is same the if test lines are same but im missing the words "if test"
[01:15] <Ubulette> that's just -p1, you're confused by the (ignored) top level ;)
[01:16] <gnomefreak> not really im more concered about parts of file missing in icepae and not missing in seamonkey
[01:16]  * gnomefreak gonne assume autoconf was run 
[01:18] <gnomefreak> im heading to bed but im willing to bet its right in front of our faces
[01:18] <Ubulette> oh, just did a diff, it's just that I used more context with quilt
[01:18] <gnomefreak> i saw that
[01:18] <Ubulette> i bet the bug is in debian/rules
[01:19] <Ubulette> somewhere in my cdbs migration
[01:20] <Ubulette> hmm, the DO_CHROME macro
[01:20] <gnomefreak> ok night ill check revu comments in morning maybe
[01:20] <Ubulette> 'night
[01:21] <gnomefreak> let me know when i get here tomorrow if you found it
[01:21] <Ubulette> sure
[15:27] <asac> greetz from boston
[15:28] <Ubulette> hi
[15:28] <gnomefreak> hi
[15:32] <Ubulette> asac, could you read the logs here or do you want me to paste a few lines that I'd like you to comment
[15:32] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: he might be on the plane to boston
[15:33] <asac> Ubulette: please paste a few lines
[15:34] <asac> the connection currently sucks here so typing is pretty cumbersome
[15:34] <asac> ... and no, I am sitting in a conference room ;)
[15:35] <gnomefreak> long flight i bet ;)
 mozilla bug 327181
 mozilla bug 399275
 asac, if you have time, read those two bugs.
 basically, the ui for self signed / bad cert is gone for good as it's considered bad security practice
 there's an override ui deep in the option (7 steps or so)
 the argument makes sense but I think it will be badly received by lambda users
[15:36] <Ubulette> http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/bad-cert-before.png
[15:36] <Ubulette> http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/bad-cert-Minefield.png
[15:42] <Ubulette> asac, still there ?
[15:48] <gnomefreak> lol
[15:48] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: did you find the issue with chrome crash?
[15:49] <Ubulette> yes, i'm fixing it right now
[15:49] <gnomefreak> ah ok rules file?
[15:49] <Ubulette> it's cdbs
[15:50] <gnomefreak> oh
[15:50] <Ubulette> well, not cdbs's fault. the install stuff is just far too messy
[15:51] <Ubulette> i'm having a hard time to find where to hook those f*g rules in cdbs
[15:52] <gnomefreak> should be siumular to firefox
[15:52] <gnomefreak> simular
[15:52] <gnomefreak> rules from ff and rules from iceape are very very close to same so i would assume adding cdbs should be very close to same as ff
[15:53] <gnomefreak> atleast able to be used as template
[15:53] <asac> got distracted
[15:53] <asac> let me read
[15:53] <asac> is ubotu down?
[15:53] <gnomefreak> yes
[15:54] <gnomefreak> ubotwo is being used
 Mozilla bug 327181 in Security: PSM "Improve error reporting for invalid-certificate errors (error page for https, or combined dialog)" [Enhancement,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=327181
 Mozilla bug 399275 in Security: PSM "create preference which restores per-page SSL error override option for IT professionals" [Enhancement,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399275
[15:54] <Ubulette> <
[15:54] <gnomefreak> but not in here. if you want him here i can ask ljl when i see him
[15:55] <asac> Ubulette: hmmm .... the security error dialog ... is that really an upstream issue?
[15:56] <asac> or maybe because how we ship nss and build it in?
[15:56] <Ubulette> no, it's not a bug
[15:56] <Ubulette> they dropped the ui
[15:56] <Ubulette> bad security practice
[15:56] <asac> i know
[15:56] <asac> but you seee an error dialog
[15:57] <Ubulette> 399275 wanted to recreate it, but it's going nowhere
[15:57] <asac> it should be a notification on top of the gecko window
[15:57] <Ubulette> it's been like that for 2 weeks in trunk
[15:57] <asac> and before?
[15:57] <asac> what happens in our a8 build?
[15:58] <Ubulette> before, the ui was there like in ff2
[15:58] <Ubulette> a8 was before that change
[15:58] <Ubulette> it's an a9 stuff
[15:58] <asac> ok ... but i remember having seen something like that somewhere ... e.g. when you visit a not-signed ssl site you get a notification like for popup blocking
[15:59] <Ubulette> i'm not aware of that
[16:00] <bluekuja> good afternoon everyone
[16:00] <bluekuja> :)
[16:00] <asac> have you testeed nightly upstream builds?
[16:00] <bluekuja> gnomefreak, unfortunately no :/
[16:00] <asac> Ubulette: ^^ ?
[16:00] <bluekuja> asac: do you have a minute for pushing bittorrent to -proposed?
[16:00] <Ubulette> asac, no
[16:01] <Ubulette> but the bug is clear to me. what I see is what is in the bug
[16:01] <gnomefreak> bluekuja: you have a minute to push iceape?
[16:02] <gnomefreak> ;)
[16:02] <gnomefreak> bluekuja: i cant be there this time either (and it pisses me off something bad)
[16:02] <bluekuja> gnomefreak, yes, link?
[16:02] <bluekuja> gnomefreak, I hope next UDS will be done in italy
[16:02] <gnomefreak> ok
[16:02] <bluekuja> hehe
[16:03] <gnomefreak> im hoping for north carolina but good luck :(
[16:03] <gnomefreak> bluekuja: http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=438
[16:03]  * gnomefreak thinks most motus are scared of moz. packages
[16:04] <bluekuja> oh, it's a new upstream release
[16:04] <gnomefreak> bluekuja: security release already in gutsy
[16:04] <bluekuja> yep
[16:05] <asac>  Ubulette i don't see anything about this error dialog you see in mozilla bug 399275
[16:06] <asac> gnomefreak: did you receive any regression bug reports for iceape security update we rolled?
[16:06] <gnomefreak> asac: no
[16:06] <gnomefreak> should i have?
[16:07] <bluekuja> gnomefreak, how long for having it built?
[16:07] <gnomefreak> bluekuja: huh?
[16:07] <gnomefreak> asac: do you remember the cloaks that were used at UDS sevilla?
[16:08] <gnomefreak> bluekuja: how long did it take to build?
[16:08] <bluekuja> gnomefreak, yes
[16:08] <gnomefreak> you dont want to know
[16:08] <asac> gnomefreak: cloaks?
[16:08] <asac> gnomefreak: on freenode?
[16:08] <gnomefreak> bluekuja: for binaries it took > 3hours
[16:08] <gnomefreak> asac: yes
[16:08] <bluekuja> omg
[16:08] <asac> bluekuja: deid you add the info i asked for to the bug?
[16:08] <bluekuja> asac: yup
[16:08] <bluekuja> asac: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bittorrent/+bug/66795
[16:08] <gnomefreak> asac: at UDS they give cloaks now due to failing connections to freenode
[16:08] <Ubulette> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=327181#c147
[16:08] <asac> gnomefreak: no i  don't remember
[16:08] <gnomefreak> i didnt think so
[16:09] <Ubulette> asac, ^^
[16:09] <bluekuja> asac: everything is ready there
[16:10] <asac> bug #124336
[16:10] <gnomefreak> bluekuja: i have a p4 1.7ghz and 256 ram so it might build faster for you
[16:11] <asac> gnomefreak: you really should get mor ram
[16:11] <gnomefreak> and AFAIK ppa hasnt updated for hardy yet
[16:11] <bluekuja> asac: ubotu is now here :/
[16:11] <asac> afaik in gutsy its not even supported to have just 256
[16:11] <bluekuja> *not
[16:11] <gnomefreak> asac: its way too much for ram
[16:11] <gnomefreak> i can get a new pc for what it would cost for ram
[16:11] <bluekuja> gnomefreak, yes, I have a 3 ghz
[16:11] <asac> Ubulette: i currently download latest nightly upstream build
[16:11] <gnomefreak> theres some kind of fucked up ram in here
[16:11] <bluekuja> so maybe it will build a little faster
[16:12] <gnomefreak> bluekuja: nope ubotu has troubles seveas isnt around to fix it either
[16:12] <Ubulette> gnomefreak: ppa does hardy, i've already built ff3/xul1.9
[16:12] <bluekuja> gnomefreak, ah damn
[16:13] <gnomefreak> oh it has been updated already
[16:13] <Ubulette> yesn last week
[16:13] <gnomefreak> crap could have sent it there to build bins so you can see it built
[16:13] <gnomefreak> assuming that is what you are checking before pushing
[16:14] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: it must have opened the day hardy uploads were released than
[16:14] <bluekuja> asac: would be great to have it done :)
[16:16] <gnomefreak> asac: you wont need the UDS cloak sin ceyou have a cloak already is what i gather
[16:16] <asac> gnomefreak: yeah :)
[16:16] <asac> are there others online that don't have a cloak ... or what are you claimin?
[16:17] <gnomefreak> we are working on sorting out the UDS cloaks
[16:17] <gnomefreak> they will be k-lined without it
[16:17] <asac> bluekuja: so how to reproduce?
[16:17] <bluekuja> asac: apt-get install bittorrent-gui
[16:17] <asac> e.g. just installing bittorrent-gui?
[16:17] <bluekuja> then
[16:17] <bluekuja> open up your terminal
[16:18] <bluekuja> and do
[16:18] <bluekuja> btdownloadgui.bittorrent
[16:18] <bluekuja> you'll find the bug
[16:18] <bluekuja> then get the fixed package
[16:18] <bluekuja> and check again
[16:18] <bluekuja> :)
[16:22] <asac> ok ... connection is really slow here
[16:22] <gnomefreak> btw asac i got a bunch of confirms that reply to list doesnt work
[16:22] <asac> 22k :/
[16:22] <asac> gnomefreak: where? is there abug? i guess this is about tbird, isn't it?
[16:24] <gnomefreak> yes bug
[16:24] <gnomefreak> just commented on it
[16:24] <gnomefreak> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozilla-thunderbird/+bug/52667
[16:24] <gnomefreak> asac: this is the bug (it hasnt worked since tbird 2.0 final) iirc that was upstream complaint or a blog i read a while back
[16:25] <Ubulette> asac, are the conferences streamed ?
[16:25] <asac> gnomefreak: does it work for icedove?
[16:25] <gnomefreak> i dont kno wi dont have a sid chroot it keeps failing to build it
[16:26] <gnomefreak> i will try again since its been a week
[16:26] <asac> Ubulette: no idea ... i don't think that this weekend fosscamp is streamed, but UDS will have IP telephony where you can dial in to listen and contribute
[16:26] <bluekuja> asac: ok, let me know when done
[16:26] <Ubulette> I just want videos ;)
[16:27] <Ubulette> btw, i've updated https://edge.launchpad.net/prism
[16:29] <asac> bluekuja: done
[16:30] <bluekuja> asac: you rock alex, gonna message the motu-list later when I'll be back home
[16:31] <bluekuja> asac: for having it tested and moved to gutsy
[16:32] <bluekuja> ok, leaving
[16:32] <bluekuja> cu later
[16:32] <bluekuja> gnomefreak, gonna ping you for iceape again
[16:32] <bluekuja> today or tomorrow
[16:33] <gnomefreak> bluekuja: ok did you want me to upload to PPA?
[16:33] <gnomefreak> so it builds for you?
[16:34] <gnomefreak> asac: can you pastebin the repos for sid please
[16:41] <asac> bluekuja: thanks
[16:41] <asac> repos for sid?
[16:42] <asac> deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian sid main
[16:42] <asac> deb-src http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian sid main
[16:42] <asac> gnomefreak: ^^
[16:42] <gnomefreak> oh thats it?
[16:42]  * gnomefreak thought there was more
[16:42] <gnomefreak> official reops atleast
[16:43] <Ubulette> gnomefreak, forget about i386 ppa for at least 2 days
[16:43] <gnomefreak> ok will get it done and test on icedove
[16:43] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: figured as much
[16:44] <gnomefreak> but this should be handled sooner than that IMHO if it does break the TOS
[16:44] <asac> bluekuja: i think the package has to enter -proposed first
[16:44] <asac> i will ask someone
[16:45] <gnomefreak> problem is its a weekend and UDS weekend so finding people usefull like LP admins is gonna be hard for the next week or so
[16:46] <gnomefreak> bbl i have to run and get flu shot
[16:59] <asac> hmmm  anybody gets an idea what mozilla bug 396695 is about? ... do we see this as well in 2.0.0.8?
[17:11] <asac> gnomefreak: jett wants to join the mozillateam
[17:12] <asac> ok off for some socialising! will be back in a few hours i guess
[17:37] <Ubulette> asac, I guess https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398728 needs an answer either from us or from debian
[17:46] <Ubulette> gnomefreak, hmm, 130 lang packs to go (out of 300+). maybe it will end faster than I expected
[18:35] <asac> mozilla bug 398728
[18:35] <Ubulette> http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/SeaMonkey.png
[18:37] <Ubulette> i'm done with sm 1.1.4
[18:37] <Ubulette> with nss/nspr head :)
[18:41] <asac> Ubulette: cool
[18:42] <asac> maybe twe want to contribute that page upstream?
[18:42] <Ubulette> ?
[18:42] <asac> i think pristine upstream has something else
[18:42] <asac> which is far more ugly ... or even a remote page
[18:43] <Ubulette> i've updated the links to point to ubuntu
[18:44] <gnomefreak> W: Failure while configuring base packages.
[18:44] <Ubulette> well, i don't think it matters as it's still 1.1.*.
[18:44] <gnomefreak> fuck chroots
[18:44] <gnomefreak> asac: cant build sid chroot
[18:44] <asac> Ubulette: right .... lets see how it works out on trunk
[18:44] <asac> andif we still have a more beautiful start page try to get it upstream
[18:45] <asac> gnomefreak: why?
[18:45] <gnomefreak> I: Configuring klogd...
[18:45] <gnomefreak> W: Failure while configuring base packages.
[18:45] <gnomefreak> W: Failure while configuring base packages.
[18:45] <gnomefreak> W: Failure while configuring base packages.
[18:45] <gnomefreak> W: Failure while configuring base packages.
[18:45] <gnomefreak> W: Failure while configuring base packages.
[18:46] <gnomefreak> doesnt give me more info than that
[18:46] <gnomefreak> so i dont have clue
[18:46] <asac> those aappear to be just warnings
[18:46] <asac> otherwise there should be a dpkg-log or something in /var
[18:47] <gnomefreak> ill look and see but when the warning is configuring base packages normally means it wont work properly if at all
[18:49] <asac> Ubulette: ok the cert issue is really the same for upstream nightlies as well
[18:49] <gnomefreak> hmmmm theres a bootstrap.log but its strictly ubuntu chroots
[18:49] <Ubulette> asac, it's not an "issue". more an unwanted feature
[18:50] <Ubulette> well, i'm now used to it
[18:50] <asac> Ubulette: he? .... from what i know it shouled be the same like the pop-up or missing plugin info
[18:50] <Ubulette> where ?
[18:51] <Ubulette> they just have an override ui
[18:51] <Ubulette> works fine when you know where it is
[18:52] <gnomefreak> it seems /var/chroot/sid/var/log/dpkg.log contains no errors
[18:55] <gnomefreak> asac: who is jett? someone we know or just someone wanting to join?
[18:55] <asac> i don't know him
[18:56] <gnomefreak> i lost the email must have overlooked it
[18:58] <gnomefreak> this is bad
[18:58] <gnomefreak> cant install any compilier without first removing aptitude
[18:58] <Ubulette> asac, i want to keep the name seamonkey, instead of doing seamonkey-2.0 (like ff3/xul1.9) as 1.1 will rename as iceape, should not be a problem
[18:58] <asac> Ubulette: no idea where ... i just remember that it worked at some point
[18:58] <Ubulette> s/rename/remain/
[18:59] <asac> right ... otoh maybe we should follow the ffox xul precedence
[19:00] <asac> i guess we will use versioned dirs for all mozilla apps starting from 1.9 branch, right?
[19:00] <Ubulette> hmm
[19:01] <Ubulette> lets see how they do that upstream now. I'll follow that
[19:05] <Ubulette> gnomefreak, 120+ to go: https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-langpack/+archive/+builds?build_text=&build_state=all&start=100&batch=50
[19:06] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: did you ask kiko to kill them?
[19:06] <gnomefreak> 101  → 150  of 751 results
[19:06] <gnomefreak> try again
[19:06] <gnomefreak> if counting up
[19:06] <asac> Ubulette: upstream always installed versioned dirs from what i know
[19:07] <Ubulette> gnomefreak, i didn't. feel free to ask him ;)
[19:07] <Ubulette> asac, yep.
[19:07] <gnomefreak> i just did
[19:08] <Ubulette> i don't see the point of lang packs in ppa but well, i'm not canonical so it seems i don't have the right to argue
[19:09] <gnomefreak> i want to know where the hell 751 lang packs came from :(
[19:10] <Ubulette> ask pitti
[19:10] <Ubulette> it's for his ppa
[19:10] <gnomefreak> ah yes 622 built
[19:10] <gnomefreak> pitti pushed these?
[19:11] <Ubulette> https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-langpack
[19:11] <Ubulette> 1 member
[19:11] <Ubulette> so i guess
[19:11] <gnomefreak> yep he pushed them
[19:11] <gnomefreak> damnit
[19:12] <Ubulette> this is just not scalable :)
[19:12]  * gnomefreak wonders why him of all people would do that 
[19:14] <Ubulette> amd64 builder is idle as arch indep pkgs are always built on i386
[19:15]  * gnomefreak wonders how many packages are waiting after these lang packs
[19:15] <gnomefreak> maybe backed up for a few days playing catch up
[19:15] <gnomefreak> kiko isnt answering it either because it was pitti or hes just too busy
[19:15] <Ubulette> i think i have one just after that shit
[19:17] <Ubulette> asac ?
[19:17] <Ubulette> I want to close my huge changelog but I don't push
[19:18] <asac> wait a sec
[19:29] <gnomefreak> ok installing icedove its gonna be a while
[19:31] <gnomefreak> ok uploading hardys iceape to PPA and hopfully it will build sooner or later
[19:32] <gnomefreak> ok im gone for a while
[19:37] <asac> Ubulette: what do you mean by "just one left"
[19:37] <asac> to finish 1.1.4 unbranding?
[19:38] <Ubulette> what ? where ?
[19:39] <asac> 20:16 < Ubulette> i think i have one just after that shit
[19:39]  * asac reboots
[19:39] <Ubulette> i've pushed something in my own ppa yesterday
[19:40] <Ubulette> just when the flood started
[19:50] <bluekuja> back
[19:50] <bluekuja> sorry had to go, I was pretty late
[19:50] <bluekuja> gnomefreak, yes, nice idea :)
[19:51] <bluekuja> asac: it seems to be inside now
[19:51] <bluekuja> asac: did you ping someone?
[19:55] <asac> bluekuja: pitti did it automatically
[19:55] <asac> i asked him, but he already did it
[19:55] <asac> ok .... going to smoke now
[19:55] <bluekuja> that's great
[19:56] <bluekuja> asac: do you smoke??
[19:56] <bluekuja> I thought you dont
[19:59] <Ubulette> lol, i thought that too.
[20:00] <bluekuja> hehe
[20:00] <Ubulette> my last cigarette was 15 years ago :)
[20:00] <bluekuja> oh^^
[20:00] <bluekuja> I usually dont smoke
[20:01] <bluekuja> or eventually one cigarette a month
[20:01] <bluekuja> nothing^^
[20:03] <Ubulette> asac, i'm still waiting for my changelog...
[20:16] <asac> i smoke :)
[20:16] <asac> Ubulette: what info do you want=
[20:16] <asac> ?
 I want to close my huge changelog but I don't push
 wait a sec
[20:17] <bluekuja> asac: how does it take to have it available inside gutsy-proposed repo?
[20:17] <Ubulette> so i'm waiting
[20:17] <bluekuja> I still cant see it
[20:18] <asac> Ubulette: well ... i have no objections becaus i don't know the state
[20:18] <asac> maybe you want to rephrase the Debian bugs ... to Ubuntu Bugs ?
[20:18] <asac> at least its still on the screenshot you showed me
[20:18] <Ubulette> yep
[20:19] <Ubulette> i asked for changelog because i want a clear separation between 1.* and 2.* but i'm still UNRELEASED
[20:20] <Ubulette> configure: error: --with-system-png won't work because the system's libpng doesn't have APNG support
[20:20] <Ubulette> would be nice to solve that for hardy
[20:20] <asac> but for 1.1.4 it should work?
[20:20] <asac> ah ... yes
[20:20] <asac> maybe we need to pack apng
[20:20] <asac> i will try to figure out here
[20:21] <Ubulette> yep; socialize with the png guys while you're there ;)
[20:23] <Ubulette> well, i'll figure out the changelog later.
[20:24] <Ubulette> i've started 2.0 with no patch at all
[20:24] <asac> so you dropped all? ... what about those patches we have in 3.0 ffox? are they browser/ only?
[20:25] <Ubulette> i just want to see what is needed
[20:25] <asac> good
[20:25] <Ubulette> before I cherry pick either from ff3, or from xul or from 1.1.*
[20:26] <Ubulette> i want a sm 2.0 with xul1.9 and nss/nspr cvs
[20:27] <asac> hmmm ... as long as ffox-3.0trunk works with that combo it should be fine
[20:27] <asac> (e.g. nss/nspr cvs)
[20:28] <Ubulette> even ff2 should work with nss/nspr cvs
[20:28] <Ubulette> upstream nss said so
[20:28] <Ubulette> there's just a small patch needed to fix a ftbfs
[20:28] <asac> yeah ... anyway ... for archive we probably want the  tags used in  client.mk
[20:29] <Ubulette> I thought you were ok to use the new nss/nspr in hardy ?
[20:29] <Ubulette> they should be ready in time
[20:29] <asac> new?
[20:29] <asac> Ubulette: i would like to follow their tags
[20:29] <asac> we never know when they will stop
[20:29] <Ubulette> they bumped nss last week so it's close
[20:30] <asac> being ahead and reverting on release should be possible, but getting more exposure onwhat we finally reallease should be more valabeimo
[20:30] <Ubulette> NSPR_CO_TAG          = NSPR_HEAD_20071016
[20:30] <Ubulette> NSS_CO_TAG           = NSS_3_12_ALPHA_2
[20:33] <bluekuja> asac: it seems it needs building
[20:33] <asac> i have no opinion on bzr branches being ahead as of changelog ... it just because cumbersome when packaging is adjusted ... whatever we upload to hardy should be from the tag
[20:33] <bluekuja> asac: bittorrent | 3.4.2-11ubuntu3~7.10 | http://archive.ubuntu.com gutsy-proposed/main Sources
[20:34] <asac> bluekuja: yes ... wait a bit before wecanverify then
[20:34] <bluekuja> asac: yeah, I need to wait it gets built
[20:34] <bluekuja> then I'll mail
[20:36] <bluekuja> asac: actually themuso just written the mail for one of his SRU
[20:36] <bluekuja> and the package got only Sources
[20:36] <bluekuja> for now
[20:36] <bluekuja> usplash-theme-ubuntustudio |     0.15.1 | http://archive.ubuntu.com gutsy-proposed/universe Sources
[20:37] <asac> ah ... ok ...given the normal delays of email send and testers actually jumping on it ... i think its ok
[20:37] <bluekuja> yeah
[20:37] <asac> but better wait till the bits are available usually
[20:37] <bluekuja> ok, fine. We wait then
[20:44] <bluekuja> ok, going to read my brand new python book
[20:44] <bluekuja> 400+ pages
[20:44] <bluekuja> woohoo
[20:49] <asac> hehe
[21:16] <Ubulette> asac ?
[21:17] <Ubulette> in ff-3.0, a patch changes configure.in but we never re-run autoconf. how come ?
[21:18] <asac> for trunk packages this is done automatically by cdbs
[21:18] <Ubulette> DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_AUTOCONF is not used anywhere
[21:19] <Ubulette> and there's no 99_ patch
[21:20] <asac> no? hmm ... then it was lost at some point
[21:20] <asac> the idea was to run it till it becomes stable
[21:22] <asac> maybe its enabled by default?
[21:23] <asac> by setting the AUTOCON version?
[21:25] <Ubulette> no it's not. i need to do it for sm2
[21:25] <Ubulette> I'll go for 99_
[21:31] <asac> ok
[21:31] <asac> thats fine
[21:31] <asac> what change to configure.in do we miss now in ffox?
[21:43] <asac> Ubulette: just DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_AUTOCONF=2.13 should be enough
[21:43] <Ubulette> i think we can drop that patch from ff3, the code is built in xul
[21:43] <asac> anyway from what i see its enough to just use that setting ... and we do that for ff3
[21:43] <Ubulette> it's no-have-stdint-h-ftbfs.patch
[21:44] <asac> yes ... without that patch it won't build ... so it works
[21:50] <Ubulette> it's needed in cairo-xlib-utils so i guess it could be dropped from ff3 ad it's xul job now
[21:52] <asac> yes  ... anyway ... just the DEB_AUTO above should be fine ... if you think we should use 99 right from the beginning goforit
[21:59] <Ubulette> strange, I get failures in places common to xul
[21:59] <Ubulette> gfxPDFSurface.cpp: In member function 'virtual nsresult gfxPDFSurface::EndPage()':
[21:59] <Ubulette> gfxPDFSurface.cpp:94: error: 'cairo_surface_show_page' was not declared in this scope
[21:59] <Ubulette> make[6]: *** [gfxPDFSurface.o] Error 1
[21:59] <Ubulette> make[6]: Leaving directory `/src/bzr/build-area/seamonkey-2.0-2.0~a1~cvs20071026t1846/gfx/thebes/src'
[22:01] <gnomefreak> bluekuja: figured id save you some time ;)
[22:02] <gnomefreak> i guess iceape still uses cario
[22:02] <gnomefreak> afaik ff3 got rid of it
[22:03] <asac> Ubulette: you try to use system-caiuro?
[22:03] <asac> that won't work
[22:04] <gnomefreak> ok iceape 64bit is building
[22:04] <gnomefreak> asac: is cario gone from iceape as well? (2.0 gonna use something else)
[22:04] <Ubulette> it is with system cairo, i'm dropping it for now
[22:04] <Ubulette> remember it's dropped from xul since a7
[22:04] <gnomefreak> cant drop it without replacing it
[22:04] <gnomefreak> oh thats right
[22:04] <Ubulette> moz ship it
[22:05] <gnomefreak> moz has always shipped it afaik we just use ours instead
[22:05] <asac> gnomefreak: hopefully we will b in sync with moz cairo when hardy comes out
[22:05] <asac> but i won't bet on it
[22:05] <asac> (sadly)
[22:05] <Ubulette> moz cairo is cairo HEAD
[22:05] <gnomefreak> somehow i have the feeling it wont happen
[22:06] <asac> Ubulette: yes .... HEAD that aproaches 1.6 ... vlad wants 1.6 from what i know
[22:06] <gnomefreak> cant we just ship thiers and stop building ours?
[22:06] <asac> and we will ahve 1.6 in hardy hopefully
[22:06] <gnomefreak> asac: what is our version at?
[22:06] <asac> 1.4
[22:06] <gnomefreak> ah ok
[22:07] <gnomefreak> does moz packages ship with it? example: firefox has it built in source tarball?
[22:08] <asac> yes
[22:08] <asac> they always shipped it on their own
[22:08] <asac> cairo isn't mature enough to use system one accordingly to mofo
[22:09] <gnomefreak> but we need to package it separately due to epiphany and such?
[22:09] <Ubulette> it's bundled into libxul
[22:09] <asac> gnomefreak: don't mix thinkgs up ... we always have a ciaor shiped
[22:09] <asac> its just that moz uses its own version
[22:09] <gnomefreak> but for that reason is what i mena
[22:10] <gnomefreak> other wise we wouldnt need to package it right? )for moz products)
[22:15] <gnomefreak> ok i need a ML post
[22:15] <Ubulette> asac, when you have time, could you sync your ff2 branches to mt ?
[22:16] <Ubulette> i've filled a bug against broken --with-default-mozilla-five-home but couldn't fix it myself because i couldnt find your last ff2 (~ 2008) branch
[22:18] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: he didnt push changes from what i can see
[22:18] <gnomefreak> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~asac/firefox/ubuntu-2.0.0.x.gutsy
[22:18] <Ubulette> i know, that what i meant by plz sync :)
[22:18] <gnomefreak> thats the latest one with 2.0.0.8
[22:18]  * gnomefreak snooped from his LP page
[22:20] <gnomefreak> asac: it works in icedove so i will take a look and maybe just take thier patch and see
[22:22] <gnomefreak> ok ill work on reply to list tonight and tomorrow
[22:23] <gnomefreak> asac:  you havent pushed thunderbird 2.0.0.8 to hardy yet have you?
[22:23] <gnomefreak> to save from having another changelog entry ill add mine into your changelog if you havent pushed
[22:25] <gnomefreak> ok looks as if i grab gutsy's and i build for hardy
[22:29] <asac> Ubulette: hardy hasn't been pushed
[22:29] <asac> just .gutsy
[22:30] <Ubulette> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozilla-firefox/+bug/157126
[22:32] <asac> network is so sucky here that its almost impossible forme to work at all :/
[22:32] <gnomefreak> asac: ok im upgrading it for hardy while im fixing the patch did you want me to use your name and timestamp and im assuming i should remove gutsy's changelog entry as well and add changes to MT thunderbird branch
[22:33] <gnomefreak> version it something like
[22:33] <gnomefreak> 2.0.0.8~pre080422+nobinonly-1ubuntu1?
[22:34] <gnomefreak> not sure what the 22 stands for
[22:35] <gnomefreak> asac: any idea what the patchs name is in icedove (maybe help me to not open all the patches
[22:35] <asac> gnomefreak: let me do it
[22:36] <asac> wait a second ... then please do a test build and let me know if it breaks or seomthing
[22:36] <Ubulette> strange, xul1.9 doesn't ship nsIAutoCompleteSession.idl
[22:36] <Ubulette> it should
[22:36] <gnomefreak> asac: i had planned on it but would like to add patch to it first well find it first
[22:41] <asac> gnomefreak: which patch?
[22:41] <gnomefreak> the reply-to-list patch im not seeing one in icedove yet
[22:42] <gnomefreak> im reading all patches to see if they included it in a patch
[22:44] <gnomefreak> im wondering if removing the patch would fix it
[22:44] <asac> well thats not firefox ... i will push firefox now
[22:46] <gnomefreak> i didnt plan on touching ff
[22:46] <gnomefreak> im just working on the patch atm
[22:46] <asac> ok the main branch of ffox 2.0 is updated with hardy upload
[22:46] <asac> would be great if you could do a test build and see if anything breaks
[22:46] <asac> (revision 103)
[22:46] <gnomefreak> asac: once i find the patch i will
[22:46] <gnomefreak> oh you mean ff
[22:47] <asac> yeah
[22:47] <gnomefreak> make you a deal, find this frigging patch and ill start on ff test build
[22:47] <gnomefreak> ;)
[22:47] <gnomefreak> im betting you dropped it from icedove
[22:47] <asac> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~asac/firefox/ubuntu-2.0.0.x
[22:47] <gnomefreak> if it was ever added
[22:48] <asac> icedove or tunderbird?
[22:49] <gnomefreak> icedove
[22:49] <gnomefreak> i dont see it in changelog anywhere
[22:50] <gnomefreak> if that means it doesnt have it than i think trying to drop it from tbird and see if it works on own now that 2.0 is final
[22:50] <asac> http://people.debian.org/~asac/91_replytolist.dpatch
[22:50] <asac> thats the one from 1.5 branch
[22:50] <gnomefreak> its not listed in 2.0
[22:50] <asac> gnomefreak: does tbird have that patch?
[22:50] <gnomefreak> yes
[22:50] <gnomefreak> thats why im thinking drop it
[22:50] <asac> then icedove should have it as well
[22:51] <gnomefreak> and see what happens
[22:51] <gnomefreak> icedove works
[22:51] <asac> no ... please keep it ... icedove shouldhave it too
[22:51] <asac> he?
[22:51] <gnomefreak> tbird doesnt
[22:51] <asac> strange
[22:51] <gnomefreak> icedove doesnt have the patrch and works, tbird has it and fails to work
[22:52] <gnomefreak> i think i will do a fast build of tbird this weekend not changing anything except the patcha nd see what happens
[22:53] <asac> gnomefreak: sure that icedove works?
[22:53] <asac> have you seen this on your own?
[22:53] <gnomefreak> yes very sure see bug i even used it to comment on bug
[22:53] <asac> for icedove 2.0?
[22:53] <gnomefreak> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozilla-thunderbird/+bug/52667
[22:53] <gnomefreak> i havent used it
[22:53] <gnomefreak> i just installed it
[22:53] <asac> so you built it on your own?
[22:54] <asac> or just the sid package?
[22:54] <gnomefreak> sid packages
[22:54] <gnomefreak> is this the right tarball for ff 2.0.0.8 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10064175/firefox_2.0.0.8%2B2nobinonly.orig.tar.gz
[22:55] <asac> yes
[22:55]  * gnomefreak still not real sure why you have %###nobinonly
[22:55] <gnomefreak> they dont need to know about binary packages afaik
[22:55] <asac> because its upstream tarball minus BINOLNY files
[22:56] <gnomefreak> Ok, sorry, I just figured out I made a mistake:
[22:56] <gnomefreak> Reply-To-List works, but only when you have configured thunderbird to show _all_ headers.
[22:56] <gnomefreak> that comment bothers me a bit
[22:56] <gnomefreak> i might try it, if that is true than the patch needs to be fixed
[22:57] <gnomefreak> i should have ff tested tomorrow as it takes a while to build
[22:58] <gnomefreak> hes right
[22:58] <gnomefreak> thats odd
[22:58] <gnomefreak> wait a minute
[22:58] <gnomefreak> it works in tbird
[22:58] <gnomefreak> that cant be right
[22:59] <gnomefreak> someone please post to ML about something
[23:00] <gnomefreak> im fetching things here
[23:03] <asac> gnomefreak: do you know bug id of tis package description bug (aka development version in ffox 2.0 package description?)
[23:05] <Ubulette_> asac, for some reason, xul1.9 doesn't ship nsIAutoCompleteSession.idl needed by sm2 /w libxul
[23:06] <Ubulette_> (needed for mailnews/addrbook)
[23:08] <gnomefreak> asac: give me afew minutes to locate it
[23:08] <asac> Ubulette_: i remember something like that
[23:09] <asac> i think its an old feature from xpfe .... seamonkey 2.0 should migrate to use the new one
[23:09] <asac> maybe you can disable that feature for now forcefully?
[23:09] <asac> (the new one from toolkit)
[23:10] <Ubulette_> http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/42407/
[23:10] <gnomefreak> asac: this isnt it but can we do something with this please as well https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/88232
[23:12] <gnomefreak> i see alot of bugs i thought we fixed
[23:14] <gnomefreak> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/150791 asac this is bug you wanted
[23:17] <asac> thanks
[23:18] <asac> Ubulette: yes .... sounds familiar
[23:18] <asac> i doubt that we can make this exported from xul
[23:19] <gnomefreak> i took 6 bugs and they are all fixed but still open, i think we need to work on this list :(
[23:19] <Ubulette> i can't find anything relevant in bugzilla :(
[23:19] <asac> gnomefreak: feel free to cleanup the bug mess :)
[23:19] <asac> Ubulette: seamonkey devs probably don't try to use system xul ... and thus they don't recognize
[23:20] <asac> Ubulette: is that idl file in xpfe hierarchy?
[23:21] <gnomefreak> asac: yeah yeah yeah
[23:21] <Ubulette> ./mozilla/xpfe/components/autocomplete/public/nsIAutoCompleteSession.idl
[23:21] <gnomefreak> bug mes isnt helping me clean it
[23:22]  * gnomefreak should check on flash version on site and maybe get that updated as a weekend quick fix
[23:23] <gnomefreak> i have 313 ff bugs in my bugs profile (give or take) and most are inprogress confirmed or just outright fixed, you need to be around while im working on them incase you fixed it and im not aware of it ;)
[23:24] <gnomefreak> but maybe tomorrow ill see what i can do we need to fix these crashes or do something with them they are old as crap
[23:25] <gnomefreak> reply-to-list seems to work
[23:26] <asac> yes ... lets do that tomorrow ... pain is getting up already here
[23:26] <asac> with this laggy inet connection
[23:26] <asac> i guess tomorrowi will be on as asac_the_2nd again
[23:27] <asac> ok cu ... i hope i can come back in later ... depending on the connection speed my room gives me
[23:27] <gnomefreak> later
[23:27] <Ubulette> got it https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214940
[23:28] <Ubulette> blocker since 2003 :(
[23:29] <gnomefreak> ok commented on the bug about r-t-l please update tbird to 2.0.0.8 so i can test this on up to date package
[23:30] <gnomefreak> ok gonna start ff build than dinner
[23:31] <gnomefreak> ok bbl to check in
[23:32] <gnomefreak> oops forgot build-deps