[00:41] gnomefreak, 98 lang pack to go in ppa [00:41] yeah i know im getting pissed off [00:41] 64 bit iceape built [00:41] but 32 is more important but i would think it should build fine [00:49] * gnomefreak kind of wants to set up a build environment on windows for building win packages but ofcourse no guides are around [00:50] this way i can enable options that are not enabled in .exe [00:50] I can't help you, I barely use windows [00:51] yeah i know i just wish i could find info on it but it looks like there isnt a way other than using system, example no chroot type apps [00:52] i dont use windows much either jsut this week ive been working on win pcs for others [01:06] signfile seamonkey-2.0_2.0~a1~cvs20071026t1846-0ubuntu1~mt1_i386.changes [01:07] waaoo, it builds :) [01:07] its built? [01:07] well, debs are probably bad, i didn't touch the install part. I just did the configure and build parts [01:09] ah [01:09] i had to drop system libxul :( [01:10] that was expected atleast by me [01:10] i didnt think it was ready yet [01:35] ff finally finished im installing to test [01:48] night 2.0.0.8 in hardy works fine asac ill let you know more tomorrow since i only had a short testing time [01:06] asac, gnomefreak : http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/SeaMonkey-2.0a1pre-startup.png [01:07] http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/SeaMonkey-2.0a1pre-about.png [01:13] browser is ready. i'll continue tomorrow === asac_ is now known as asac [09:40] good morning :) [09:44] gnomefre1k, ping me when back [14:50] bluekuja: im back [14:53] asac: firefox 2.0.0.8 has my blessing [14:55] is PPA done with the lang. packs? [15:06] why do i have this feeling firefox 3.0 a9 is borked in MT PPA [15:07] Setting up firefox-trunk (3.0~alpha9~cvs20071003t0648-0ubuntu1~mt1) .. [15:07] but a8 is all i see [15:07] Hmm... Firefox 3.0a9 was borked for me. But I think it's Firefox itself. It was crashing a lot. (But that's expected for dev version) [15:08] Jazzva: not crashing here. not even running with firefox-3.0 command its still a8 [15:08] Hmm :/. Have you tried Ubulette's repo? I installed from there. [15:09] he pushed the one to MT repo [15:09] should be same [15:09] Uh-huh... Well, I'm confused then, too... [15:10] hmmmmmm i might have the fix [15:13] that worked [15:13] now fix depends and i can get ready to leave [15:37] gnomefreak, heya [15:37] gnomefreak, package built? [15:38] 64bit built hasnt been pushed to 386 due to flood [15:38] https://edge.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/+archive [15:39] bbs me and g/f need to go out for a while [16:43] hi [16:45] gnomefreak, ppa is nearly done: https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-langpack/+archive/+builds?build_text=&build_state=all&start=0&batch=50 [16:45] 3 left [16:45] then, 2 days of queue :P [16:46] gnomefreak, btw: [16:46] asac, gnomefreak : http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/SeaMonkey-2.0a1pre-startup.png [16:46] http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/SeaMonkey-2.0a1pre-about.png [16:46] browser is ready. i'll continue tomorrow [16:52] hi [16:52] hi [16:53] gnomefreak: ok thanks [16:54] Kazehakase-0.5.0 Released [16:55] Ubulette: xul 1.9 support? [16:55] maybe we should send a heads up that we have a package ... like we did for epiphany? [16:55] no mention of that in the release notes [16:59] asac, did you read above for seamonkey 2 ? [17:03] asac, i'm mostly done but not a single patch is in common, all dh_helper are different and even rules is almost new [17:04] sorry connection crashed again [17:04] so i'm wondering it it's not better to start a new branch like i did for xul 1.9 [17:04] cool ... so it works?? [17:04] asac, gnomefreak : http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/SeaMonkey-2.0a1pre-startup.png [17:04] http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/SeaMonkey-2.0a1pre-about.png [17:04] browser is ready. i'll continue tomorrow [17:04] how? [17:04] (that was yesterday) [17:05] screens look great [17:05] do they use toolkit now? [17:09] no. [17:09] :( [17:09] if you meant xul [17:12] so its not using xul? [17:13] not yet. [17:14] the only fix i've found for the ftbfs is to modify xul, meaning re-up to gutsy [17:15] k [17:40] gnomefreak, lang packs are done [17:41] Ubulette: that doesnt mean much [17:41] still have a week of backlog at the least [17:41] just 2 days [17:42] hopefully, just a few hours [17:43] i doubt it [17:44] since its a gnome resync from what i heard it may be longer [17:45] Ubulette: re-up gutsy? i think we should make seamonkey for hardy as our primary focus [17:47] ok i am in a session agin ...bbl [17:47] finally pushing ffox to hardy now [18:07] !info sunbird [18:07] damn forgot hes nto here [18:12] Ubulette: can you add sunbird to mozclient (to make life a bit easier) [18:14] gnomefreak, cvs ? [18:15] Ubulette: it doesnt matter TBH how ever easy way to make tarball is nice [18:15] * gnomefreak cant find source tarball atm [18:16] mozclient only does cvs tarballs [18:17] thats fine, im not sure where to look to see if its on cvs [18:17] im looking at ftp.mozilla.org atm [18:18] http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/sunbird/build.html [18:18] Ubulette: that might help? [18:19] for .7 for time being i guess [18:20] wonder why they left out the source dir for .7 [18:23] oh, it's just calendar, easy then [18:23] yes [18:23] well no its calenday and lightening [18:23] gnomefreak, tell me if you need embedded tarball (like ff) and the mozilla dir (like xul) [18:24] # calendar (aka Sunbird, use this to build the calendar extensions also) [18:24] afaik just moz dir [18:24] i dont think i had to unpack source last time [18:25] lightning-sunbird 0.5-0ubuntu4 is the latest ? [18:26] it's an embedded tarball [18:26] wilth a mozilla root dir in it [18:26] with [18:28] oh ok [18:28] .5-0ubuntu4 is our latest yes [18:29] cvs is 0.6a1 [18:29] should be at .7 [18:29] its been released already [18:29] if they follow the same rules, 0.6a1 will give 0.6 at the end [18:30] strange [18:30] calendar/sunbird/config/version.txt says 0.6a1 [18:30] http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/sunbird/download.html [18:31] why wouldnt cvs have latest release [18:31] good question [18:31] asac: wtf is wrong with moz [18:32] http://mxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/calendar/sunbird/config/version.txt [18:36] Ubulette: why listed under seamonkey? [18:37] ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/sunbird/releases/0.7/ should have a sources dir but doesnt [18:37] .8 is in devel atm [18:39] http://mxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/calendar/sunbird/app/module.ver [18:39] still 0.6a1 [18:39] thats odd as nightly has .6a1 posted on 10/28/2007 [18:40] that still doesnt explain why on the sunbird homepage .7 is there (isnt .7 later than .6a1 :( [18:46] again i find .7 release no source tarball [18:46] http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/calendar/ [18:49] hmm, seems it's sunbird from the mozilla 1.8 branch, not from trunk (1.9) [18:49] .5 was from 1.9 afaik [18:50] http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/sunbird/nightly/latest-mozilla1.8/ [18:50] those are the nightlies [18:50] moz1.8 [18:51] http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/sunbird/nightly/latest-trunk/ [18:51] this is 1.9 => 0.6a1 [18:52] so i don't know what to do [18:53] maybe set up for .6a1 and ill keep it up to date and when final we will add it in? [18:53] why the fuck does mozilla go backwards for builds [18:53] * gnomefreak cant find source package for .7 at all [18:55] yep, bin without sources, that stinks. [18:56] ill ping asac about it sometime this week (maybe if he comes back today) [18:56] thats really odd [18:57] maybe they are doing awway with 1.8 [18:57] so this is thier way to force upgrade? [18:59] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401363 [18:59] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=286402 [19:00] + '0.8*' => 'branch', [19:00] '0.6a1' => 'trunk' [19:00] that's bad [19:00] well, you just need branch then [19:02] i saw that but still dont explain how to grab cvs of 1.8 branch at all [19:03] i can create the 0.7 tarball for you if you want [19:03] Ubulette: please do [19:03] how? [19:03] using cvs tags [19:09] * gnomefreak needs a good guide to cvvs [19:09] cvs even [19:10] there's no such thing [19:10] i noticed [19:10] problem i see is that when you chekout you are only checking out the make.mk file(or something like that) [19:11] client.mk even [19:12] vs -d :pserver:anonymous@cvs-mirror.mozilla.org:/cvsroot co calendar does that look right? [19:12] s/vs/cvs [19:13] you need to fetch the right client, then use it to fetch calendar with the right tags [19:13] cvs -d :pserver:anonymous@cvs-mirror.mozilla.org:/cvsroot co -r BRANCH mozilla/client.mk [19:14] than make -f client.mk checkout MOZ_CO_PROJECT=option,option?? [19:14] i'm mostly done [19:14] damn your fast [19:15] grrrr even looking at the tags there isnt a .7 tag, now im confused as hell [19:16] it looks like all mozilla cvs pages are out of date [19:21] done [19:21] thank you [19:25] 'im pushing it to my site [19:30] ty [19:31] done [19:32] ty ill grab in a minute [19:32] http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/42490/ [19:33] http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tarballs/lightning-sunbird_0.7.orig.tar.gz [19:35] ty reading [19:45] damn thats a big tarballl [19:45] ty im downloading it, ill be back soon [19:45] damn, another flood in the ppa [19:45] https://edge.launchpad.net/~schooltool-owners/+archive/+builds?build_text=&build_state=all [19:53] its 3 days behind atm [19:53] the builds now are from the 25th [19:55] i see 26 [19:56] https://edge.launchpad.net/~schooltool-owners/+archive/ [19:56] that list shows 25th [19:57] 26 binaries but uploaded on 25th [19:57] order is wrong [19:57] click on https://edge.launchpad.net/~schooltool-owners/+archive/+builds [19:58] select the one building [19:58] you'll see 26 [19:58] Queued: 2007-10-25 [19:59] lol [19:59] i see Queued: 2007-10-26 [19:59] Component: main [19:59] Status: Currently building [19:59] Queued: 2007-10-25 [19:59] Started: 25 minutes ago [19:59] Builder: samarium (xen-i386 [20:00] Status: Currently building [20:00] Queued: 2007-10-26 [20:00] Started: 26 minutes ago [20:00] Builder: samarium (xen-i386) [20:00] :) [20:00] maybe it uses the timezone [20:03] maybe [20:07] ok i started build lets hope no changes are needed (its the weekend) [20:09] holy shit [20:10] what ? [20:10] i forgot to run autoconf [20:10] hihi [20:10] since it not using dpatch how would i run it [20:11] 309 out of 327 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file configure [20:11] Patch configure-autoconf2-13-reconfigure.patch does not apply [20:12] that's quilt [20:12] i guess its quilt [20:12] do you know how to use it ? [20:12] * gnomefreak doesnt know quilt too well [20:12] i havent had to use it in a loing time [20:12] look if you're at the last patch : quilt applied [20:13] you should be on configure-autoconf2-13-reconfigure.patch [20:13] quilt applied listed a bunch [20:13] look at the last one [20:14] are you ? [20:14] force-no-pragma-visibility-for-gcc-4.2_4.3 [20:14] im in build tree also assuming i should be [20:14] oh, ok [20:14] then do: quilt push -f [20:14] it should show some rejects [20:15] and i get all 308 failures [20:15] fine [20:15] 309 [20:15] run autoconf2.13 [20:15] just in the build tree? [20:15] then do : quilt refresh [20:15] ah ok [20:16] Warning: trailing whitespace in lines 12098,14453,14468,14474,14524,14527,14530,14531,14539,14541,14543,14545 of configure [20:16] Refreshed patch configure-autoconf2-13-reconfigure.patch [20:16] is that ok? [20:16] once your done, check with : quilt pop -a ; quilt push -a [20:16] looks good :) [20:17] dont forget to copy the new patch to your bzr dir and commit [20:17] now move config patch over to debian and continue [20:17] :) [20:17] yep [20:20] i should run clean right? [20:21] or no need? [20:21] build runs it iirc [20:21] brb and ty for help [20:27] np [20:32] ok dinner while it builds [20:54] ffox 2 builds already arrived in hardy? [20:55] not sure give me 5 minutes or so to check [20:55] asac: sunbird 0.7 is building [20:56] should be ready for hardy soon [20:56] asac, i still see 2.0.0.6+2nobinonly-0ubuntu1 [20:56] * gnomefreak will push to ppa but it wont build i386 for a while [20:57] 2.0.0.6 is latest [20:57] asac, strange thing with sunbird is that sb 0.7 is moz1.8 while moz-trunk has sb 0.6a1 [20:58] * gnomefreak didnt like that much at all but the bug states 1.0 will be 1.9 branch and <1.0 will be 1.8 [20:58] atleast that is what they want (not sure why they built .6 on 1.9 [20:59] Ubulette: most likely they do their maindevelopment on the branches [20:59] so trunk is behind [21:00] weird [21:02] firefox | 2.0.0.6+2nobinonly-0ubuntu1 | http://archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages [21:02] firefox | 2.0.0.8+2nobinonly-0ubuntu3 | http://archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Sources [21:03] asac, gnomefreak, could I use sunbird between 2 PC ? [21:03] Ubulette: what so you mean? [21:04] weird is right [21:05] i want to have a sync calendar that I can see and edit on 2 different PCs [21:05] not sure never tried [21:05] seeing as there were over 250 changes in .7 maybe its in them [21:07] is there a sync feature somewhere ? [21:08] something like tomboy (sshfs) [21:08] Ubulette: you can use webdav [21:08] toshare your calendar [21:14] brb [21:52] do we really need seamonkey-dev ?? [21:53] i don't see anything depending on iceape-dev [21:54] well ... that doesn't mean that it makes no sense [21:55] so for firefox it should be just headers for firefox specific idl components whereas the rest is in xul-dev [21:55] tbird should be the same once migrated ... and seamonkey as well [22:27] asac: you want me to push sunbird to PPA even though it wont build or do you just want to grab from branch and grab tarball from Ubulette site? [22:37] * gnomefreak updating branch atm [22:37] well after looking at bugs to see if any need fixing [22:43] this is not good [22:45] asac: is the script for removing binary from tarballs interchangible or needs to be wrote from each package? [22:46] it should work for everything [22:47] looking at it it had firefox paths in there so im assuming i would have to chage it [22:47] change [22:49] ? [22:50] the script has firefox in path hence should need to be changed but that is the easy part [22:51] grep -i firefox remove.binonly.sh [22:51] rm -fv ./other-licenses/7zstub/firefox/7zSD.sfx [22:51] ? [22:51] that ? [22:51] doesn't matter [22:52] not sure atm [22:56] mozilla bug 351715 [22:56] Mozilla bug 351715 in ChatZilla "Build Chatzilla as extension for suiterunner (toolkit/ style seamonkey)" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351715 [22:58] * gnomefreak updating branch [23:02] asac: im gonna test build tbird without the patch but you had said you wanted to upgrade it to 2.0.0.8binonly so just let me know before you do it maybe we can fix this [23:07] * gnomefreak gone for a while [23:15] can i comment out in series? or is there a way of going about that? [23:15] you can [23:15] ok ty ill try it [23:15] just start each line with a # [23:16] but do that with that patch unapplied [23:16] (pop it 1st) [23:21] pop? [23:21] quilt pop -a ; quilt push -a [23:21] quilt pop [23:21] ah [23:22] you'd better pop -a before you remove a patch [23:22] otherwise, you're looking for troubles [23:24] waiting for it to build a bit so i can cancle it [23:26] this isnt going as planned but we will see in a bit [23:30] * gnomefreak was kind of hoping it would unpack source in build-area/thunderbird... [23:30] ? [23:31] this patch doesnt mean much anyway [23:31] Ubulette: it never gives me source dir [23:31] so i cant run quilt * in it [23:31] eh [23:31] building with -S -sa i was hoping it would but i guess i have to build bins and kill it [23:32] will fin dout shortly [23:41] * gnomefreak knows what went wrong and why ;) [23:45] asac: !!!!!!! you forgot to remove ~ppa* from iceape before pushing to archives [23:46] nevermind my fault read it wrong :(