/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2007/10/30/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

Ubulettelibnspr4-0d | 4.7.0~cvs20070828t1830-0ubuntu1~mt1 | http://ppa.launchpad.net gutsy/main Packages00:00
Ubulettethis one is old but good enough00:00
gnomefreaksure? i can always disable that :)00:02
Ubulettei'm sure00:02
Ubulettethat's what i've been using for more than 6 months (both nss and nspr)00:03
gnomefreakah ok00:03
Ubulettei even used that for seamonkey 1.1.*00:03
gnomefreakdont we use the same version?00:05
gnomefreaki mean without the date and time00:05
Ubulettefor ?00:05
gnomefreakgutsy/hardy00:06
gnomefreak4.7.00:06
Ubuletteno, it's still 4.600:06
Ubulettelibnspr4-0d | 4.7.0~cvs20071024t1332+bbot-1 | http://www.sofaraway.org firefox-minefield/ Packages00:06
Ubulettelibnspr4-0d | 4.7.0~cvs20070828t1830-0ubuntu1~mt1 | http://ppa.launchpad.net gutsy/main Packages00:06
Ubulettelibnspr4-0d |    4.6.7-1 | http://archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages00:06
gnomefreakoh i thought we pushed them with xulrunner00:06
Ubuletteno, asac got nervous and removed system-nspr/nss for gutsy00:07
gnomefreaklol00:07
Ubuletteso gutsy has cvs but bundled into xul00:07
gnomefreakah00:07
Ubuletteare you compiling or using my ppa ?00:10
gnomefreakbuilding00:11
gnomefreaki want to get familar with it00:11
Ubulettesure00:11
Ubulettethere's almost nothing left from iceape ;)00:11
gnomefreakmore practice the better00:11
gnomefreaki saw that00:11
gnomefreakstill want the go button default00:12
gnomefreakso when you type ww.bleh.com it doesnt search it goes right to it00:12
gnomefreakwww*00:12
gnomefreakthat was one thing that pissed me off. thats why the 82_ubuntu_prefs00:13
gnomefreakpatch was there00:13
Ubuletteoh, damn, i forgot to remove something in seamonkey-2.0-gnome-support00:14
gnomefreaktoo late00:14
Ubulettei thought i did :p00:14
gnomefreakhow the hell does that remind you00:14
gnomefreaklol00:15
* gnomefreak needs to learn merges00:15
gnomefreakmaybe later this week or next week00:15
Ubulettein fact i did remove that stuff so all is good :)00:25
Ubulettechatzilla is not working00:36
joejaxxgnomefreak: hey! :D03:30
gnomefreakhello ;)03:49
* gnomefreak is sleeping03:50
=== asac_ is now known as asac
gnomefreakthere is somethig im missing but ill look at it again later. im heading upstrais for coffee bbl11:42
bluekujahi13:15
bluekuja:)13:15
asachi14:13
bluekujaheya asac14:13
asacbbl14:49
bluekujaoki14:50
gnomefre1kUbulette: i only have a minute or 2 before pain meds kick in but yesterdays tarball seamonkey-2.0_2.0~a1~cvs20071029t1846.orig.tar.gz fails to build16:23
gnomefre1kUbulette: the error i was getting is http://pastebin.mozilla.org/230559 they seem to be all certificate (cert) errors16:25
=== gnomefre1k is now known as gnomefreak
gnomefreakgonna try your date/time see if it builds16:36
asacok lunch here17:03
Ubulettehi18:42
Ubulettegnomefreak, your nss is too old (too)18:42
gnomefreaknope18:43
gnomefreaki installed yours18:43
Ubulettewhich one ?18:43
gnomefreakii  libnss3-0d     3.12.0~cvs2007 Network Security Service libraries18:44
gnomefreakii  libnss3-dev    3.12.0~cvs2007 Development files for the Network Security S18:44
Ubuletteok good18:44
gnomefreaki shouldnt need the dev branch18:44
Ubulettewell, you should. dev is post a8 (ie a9pre) and tarball for sm2 is very fresh (so post a8 too)18:45
Ubulettethat matches upstream reqs18:46
gnomefreakso i should use nss nad nspr -dev branches?18:46
Ubulettejust look at the tags in mozilla/client.mk18:47
gnomefreakyour gonna have to forgive me i just woke up and i have a meeting im preparing for in under 15 minutes18:47
Ubulette:)18:47
UbuletteNSPR_CO_TAG          = NSPR_HEAD_2007101618:47
UbuletteNSS_CO_TAG           = NSS_3_12_ALPHA_218:47
gnomefreakdamnit18:47
gnomefreakok ill install them (are they on ppa by chance?18:48
Ubulettethe one in mt ppa should be ok18:48
Ubuletteones18:48
gnomefreakthose are what i have18:48
Ubulettein my chroot, i used:18:49
Ubulettelibnspr4-0d | 4.7.0~cvs20070828t1830-0ubuntu1~mt1 | http://ppa.launchpad.net gutsy/main Packages18:49
gnomefreakthats what i have18:49
Ubulettelibnss3-0d | 3.12.0~cvs20071012t0909-0ubuntu1~mt1~fta3 | http://ppa.launchpad.net gutsy/main Packages18:49
gnomefreaki think18:49
gnomefreakor not18:50
Ubuletteoh, the later is in my own ppa18:50
gnomefreakyours is newer18:50
gnomefreak3.12.0~cvs20070827t218:50
Ubulettetoo old18:50
Ubulettesorry :)18:50
gnomefreakok please leave me links to the right packages my lawyer is about to call18:51
gnomefreakill get to it in ~ an hour18:51
Ubuletteever you take the one in my ppa, or you build from my nss.head branch18:51
Ubulettei've stopped to build nss in mt/ppa because asac asked me to keep this ppa as close to a8 as possible18:52
asacI did? ... i just would like the ones in ppa not to be ahead of xul-trunk tags18:57
asacmaybe i should write a wiki page on what is good for where :)18:58
Ubulettewell, you also dropped versions in build deps so it makes things difficult when you don't know the details18:59
asacyou mean to find the right buld depend branch for some xul source?19:01
Ubuletteasac, not ahead of xul a8 means ftbfs for xul a9pre & sm219:01
asacUbulette: i said:19:02
asac i just would like the ones in ppa not to be ahead of xul-trunk tags19:02
asacso the ppa one should be as new as needed to build latest xul trunk ... but not newser19:02
Ubuletteyou also said you wanted the ppa not too far from gutsy19:02
Ubulettefor nss/nsrp19:02
asacxul trunk tags are the ones that are in client.mk from the current trunk checkout19:02
asachmmm19:03
Ubulettewell, i don't care the limitation. we'll never agree here so I no longer touch this ppa for anything needing fresher nss19:04
Ubulettei use my ppa for all that19:04
Ubulettebut it's full now so i'm stuck19:05
asacfull?19:05
Ubulettemine is over 1G19:05
Ubulettei didn't get errors yet but I guess i will if i push something19:06
asaci will try to fix that as soon as i get a grib on someone in charge here19:06
asacfor me lp is currently down from here19:07
Ubulettei've been told to ask a question on lp, i did19:07
asacok ... if they don't help you ... let me know19:07
Ubuletteno answer so far19:08
asacwell ... let me know if you didn't get an answer today ... or of course if you got a negative archive.19:09
asacbut i think it you tell cprov that you provide preview packages for the mozillateam it shouldn't be a problem19:09
asacunless of course if ppa currently cannot adjust quota19:09
asacLP is dead here19:10
Ubuletteno problem here19:17
Ubuletteasac, how is UDS ?19:24
Ubulettei've tried to listen to the icecast feeds, noway19:24
Ubulettequality is awful19:25
Ubulettei can barely hear a full sentence19:25
asacyesterady?19:25
Ubulettetoday19:25
asachmmm ... which session?19:25
Ubuletteall19:25
Ubuletteyours included19:26
asacthats bad ... we actually moved the power adapters down under the tables because yesterady there apparently was bad interference19:26
Ubulettetry from where you are. you'll see.. well, hear, well, not hear.. a thing ;)19:27
asachehe19:27
asacunfortunately my sound doesn't work since my laptop has ubuntu on it :)19:27
Ubuletteno sound on ubuntu ? file a bug :)19:28
Ubuletteask someone else19:28
asaclet me first verify my claim :)19:29
asacnow my sound preferences dialog hangs :(19:30
asaci assume its compiz fault ;) ... the universal scapegoat19:30
asacanyway ... UDS is more or less good for me ... only thing is that i don'tget anything done that is unrelated to discussion19:31
asaci think tonight i will finally try to work from my hotel room19:31
Ubuletteare you in now ?19:34
asacnope19:34
asacsitting in a conference room where i can at least try to process bugs19:34
asacbut LP is down :(19:34
Ubuletteit's not. maybe you're filtered19:35
asaci think this connection is just too sucky19:37
asachappy enough being able to use this irssi client at home19:37
asacbut it has massive lag19:37
asacaccording to admins we have huge package loss ... so probably there is a physical problem on the landline from the conference location19:38
Ubuletteyou mean "huge *packet* loss" right ?19:40
asac;)19:40
asacright19:40
asacthough its the same ;)19:41
Ubulettei'l listening to something right now. far better than before but still worse than any conf call i've ever done19:42
Ubuletteand i do a lot19:42
asacyeah ... its strange ... maybe don't use listen only?19:43
Ubulettei'm not using sip, but icecast19:43
asacUbulette: you know how it works? ... you have to install gobby and then you can add comments and edit the spec that is getting developed19:43
UbuletteI just wanted to listen (and watch) a bit19:44
asacyeah ... but if you open gobby you can see how the type into the document what they discuss ... so might be helpful to get a clue on whats going on19:45
asacs/the type/they type/19:45
Ubulettehttp://icecast.ubuntu.com:8000/hunsaker-b.ogg.m3u    this one is awful19:49
asacno sound :(19:50
asacthats the platform room19:50
asacis it about initramfs or apt authentication?19:50
asac@time boston19:51
asac@time new_your19:51
asac@time new_york19:51
ubotuCurrent time in America/New_York: October 30 2007, 15:51:31 - Next meeting: Edubuntu Team in 16 hours 8 minutes19:51
asacUbulette: you packaged intlclock?19:52
asacsomeone asked about a package here19:52
UbuletteI just fixed it19:52
asacbut now i don't remember who it was19:52
Ubuletteit's in my ppa19:52
asacyes i see this ... thats why i asked19:53
asacUbulette: so why is it 1 gig already ... are the superseeded binaries still in ppa or what?19:53
Ubulettemostly the -dbg packages i guess19:54
Ubulettelook at sm2 dbg for hardy and gutsy19:54
Ubulettesize is very different19:54
asacoh19:55
asacok19:55
asachttp://hardware.slashdot.org/hardware/07/10/30/1742258.shtml19:55
Ubuletteit's everywhere19:56
Ubulettetons of blogs at talking about that for days/weeks19:56
asacyeah19:57
Ubuletteff3 shows a blank page19:57
asacfor the slashdot thing?19:57
Ubuletteyes19:58
Ubulettesm2 is ok19:58
asacat least a8 works19:59
Ubulettea few things are not working in sm220:02
Ubuletteproblem is i don't know what to expect20:02
Ubuletteit's a1pre :P20:02
asacyeah ... i just join #seamonkey @ irc.mozilla.org and ping kairo now20:06
Ubuletteasac, make install seems seriously broken20:29
Ubuletteno idl/.h20:29
Ubulettewallet is not installed20:29
asacyeah ... currently talking about this20:31
asac( well not exactly about this issue, but about the general mess)20:31
Ubuletteand ?20:37
Ubuletteasac, https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mplayerplug-in/+bug/13799320:37
ubotuLaunchpad bug 137993 in mplayerplug-in "mozilla-mplayer unnecessarily depends on gecko browsers" [Low,Incomplete]20:37
asacyeah i somewhere read about that ... i guess it was in motu20:38
Ubuletteyou're mentioned in there20:39
asaci don't like the idea to make it a recommends20:40
asacit should depend on xulrunner-1.9 as well20:40
asacok so everything might fall apart20:41
asacsomeone claimed taht ffox 3.0 has been pushed back to Q220:42
asacwhich would be soooo scary20:43
asachttp://www.hirsch.sth.ac.at/~robert/thebot-logs/20:43
asacthere the logs about seamonkey will appear eventually20:43
asacto summarize: there is a _lot_ to do and they are definitly still pre alpha20:44
asacbut from what i understood its just a lack of resources20:44
asacmostly its about downloadmanager and fixing the use of some internal api elements20:44
asacas well as migrating mailnews to use the toolkit ... which appears to be the most tedious task to me20:45
asacbut mailnews migration to toolkit is needed for tbird as well ... so there might be non-seamonkey folks working on this as well20:45
asactch is practically identical to the last one, just synced with the20:45
Ubulettewhat about sm/tb with libxul ?20:46
asacyes ...thats what i talked about above20:46
asacand apparently they have to away fro moving nsISupportsArray ... ffoxdid that by unsafe casts, but apparently seamonkey devs want a cleaner solution20:47
asacbut they admitted if everything else is sorted out they would accept that dirty solution to finish stuff20:47
asacthere have been a bunch of bugs mentioned in discussion ... but lets wait till it pops up in bot-log so we can take a look20:48
Ubuletteok20:49
asacanyway ... maybe good to know that http://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey:suiterunner buglist is officially outdated and unmaintained ;)20:50
Ubuletteit's mentioned iirc20:51
asacyeah ... might be ... i always just scrolled down so i might have missed it20:52
* asac out for a smoke ... getting some coffee and while trunk suite checks-out20:52
* asac back21:02
asacUbulette: how do i checkout suite?21:06
asacwith MOZ_CO_PROJECT=suite my suite/ directory is completely empty21:06
Ubuletteuse mozclient21:07
asaclol21:08
asaci mean it should work21:08
Ubulettefor me, it does21:09
Ubulettemake -f $(MOZ_CLIENT) checkout MOZ_CO_PROJECT=suite $(DEBIAN_MOZ_CO_TAG)21:09
asacyeah ... for me it doesn't ... maybe its currently borken?21:15
Ubulettemozclient is fine21:17
Ubuletteasac, what's this touch .autoreg ? is it really useful ?21:28
asacit trigger the reregistration of xpcom componentes ... but i think its not needed in recent versiones anymore21:29
Ubulettei figured that too as in iceape, it's in all postinst/postrm21:30
asacUbulette: iceape still has no real extensionmanager ... so its indeeed needed there22:06
Ubulette_asac, http://home.kairo.at/blog/2007-10/goals_for_seamonkey_2_my_view22:07
asacUbulette_: you have an url to a current orig.tar.gz for suiterunner?22:09
asaci simple cannot get it out of CVS ... maybe client.mk broke today ... or maybe i am just too dump22:09
Ubulette_current as of today or the one i've used for my branch ?22:09
asaccurrent would be good22:10
asacdoes it still have CVS/ directory=22:10
asac?22:10
asac(i want to work on upstream branch ... so no packaging needed for now)22:10
Ubulette_i exclude it in mozclient, do you want it ?22:10
Ubulette_i guess so22:10
Ubulette_ok, redoing with cvs22:11
Ubulette_hold on.22:11
asacyeah would be great22:11
asacif not ... any tarball is better than none :)22:12
asacso i can at least take alook22:12
=== Ubulette_ is now known as Ubulette
Ubulettei'm trying to use places in sm222:13
Ubulettei have some nasty errors in the console in my latest build22:14
Ubulettewallet seems borked22:15
Ubuletteor missing22:15
Ubulette-rw-r--r-- 1 fta fta 47275288 Oct 30 23:16 seamonkey-2.0_2.0~a1~cvs20071030t1326.orig.tar.gz22:19
Ubulettemuch bigger with cvs in22:19
asacyeah ... where can i grab the CVS thing?22:23
Ubulettestill pushing to my site22:24
Ubulettemozilla bug 39871822:24
ubotuMozilla bug 398718 in Security: PSM "Better explanatory text for SSL error pages" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39871822:24
Ubuletteasac, http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tarballs/seamonkey-2.0_2.0~a1~cvs20071030t1326.orig.tar.gz22:28
asacde rien?22:29
asac \o/ 200k ;)22:30
asacthats a record for here22:30
asacbut actually i am one of the last ones sitting here i guess22:30
asacoh no ... now its just 23k22:31
Ubulette"de rien" :) you wanted to try some french ?22:34
Ubuletteasac, (btw, that was my line)22:40
asacyea22:43
asacis that the correct spelling/meaing=22:43
Ubuletteyou said "you're welcome"22:44
Ubuletteyou should have said "merci"22:44
Ubulette= thanks22:45
asacah right :)22:45
asachehe22:45
asachow obvoius22:45
Ubulettebut spelling was right22:45
asacgood ... at least i didn't mess that one up22:45
asacBug 13511022:46
ubotuLaunchpad bug 135110 in firefox "[gutsy] firefox freezes with google toolbar enabled when you attemp to open more than two windows" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/13511022:46
asaci wonder if this might be related to mozilla-five-home?22:47
asachttp://groups.google.com/group/FFToolbar-Group-Bugs/browse_thread/thread/d32b039cb2f92ff5?hl=en22:47
asacdamn .. i get bumped out here ... somehow this conference room is needed for a party tonight22:48
asaclets hope the inet works on hotel room22:48
Ubulettelol22:49
asacdamn22:49
Ubuletteg++-4.2  -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -Wall -Wconversion -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Woverloaded-virtual -Wsynth -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -g -Wall -O2 -fshort-wchar -pthread -pipe  -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -O -fPIC -shared -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,-h,libsuite.so -o libsuite.so  nsSuiteModule.o     -lpthread -Wl,--as-needed  -Wl,-rpath-link,../../dist/bin  -Wl,--whole-archive ../profile/libsu22:50
Ubuletteiteprofile_s.a ../profile/migration/src/libsuitemigration_s.a ../browser/src/libsuitebrowser_s.a  -Wl,--no-whole-archive -L../../dist/bin -L../../dist/lib -lgkgfx -L../../dist/lib -lunicharutil_external_s ../../dist/../modules/libreg/src/libmozreg_s.a -L../../dist/bin -lmozjs ../../dist/lib/libxpcomglue_s.a -L../../dist/bin -lxpcom -lxpcom_core  -L../../dist/bin -L/usr/lib -lplds4 -lplc4 -lnspr4 -lpthread -ldl22:50
Ubulette  -Wl,--version-script -Wl,../../build/unix/gnu-ld-scripts/components-version-script -Wl,-Bsymbolic -ldl -lm22:51
Ubulette/usr/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.18 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf-strtab.c:19722:51
Ubulette/usr/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.18 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf-strtab.c:19722:51
Ubulette/usr/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.18 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf-strtab.c:19722:51
Ubulette/usr/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.18 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf-strtab.c:19722:51
Ubulette/usr/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.18 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf-strtab.c:19722:51
Ubulette/usr/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.18 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf-strtab.c:19722:51
Ubulette/usr/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.18 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf-strtab.c:19722:51
Ubulette...22:51
Ubulettejust warnings but..hm, weird ones22:51
gnomefreakUbulette: the dev packages for nss-dev -0d and nspr-dev -0d worked23:19
gnomefreakbut it should work on versions we have in repos are we pushing the -dev branches to hardy?23:20
Ubulettein mt repo, they are too old for xul a9pre and sm223:21
Ubulettenss cvs in hardy is fine for me but not for asac23:22
gnomefreakah23:22
asachere i am :)23:22
Ubuletteproblem is we're not sure moz guys will release it before hardy is out23:22
asac \o/23:23
Ubuletteasac, back in your hotel ?23:23
gnomefreakasac: what was the fear in pushing nss nspr to gutsy and hardy23:23
asacin the room ... yes23:23
Ubuletteno fiesta ?23:23
asachehe ... well ... i guess i will go and have something to eat soon23:23
gnomefreakUDS is one big party23:23
asacbut not nowyet23:23
asacwell ... not in the U.S. :)23:23
asacthey ID you even though you look like 40 just to get cigarettes23:24
gnomefreakasac: they stopped iding me23:24
asacits soooo ridiculous :)23:24
gnomefreakits the accent most likely23:24
gnomefreakasac: or you look that young23:24
asacwell ... i got them once without ... then i should show it ... but i asked him ... "hey ... don't be a bot ... look at me" ... then he laughed and said ... ok23:24
gnomefreakrule is anyone looks <30 show id23:24
asacyeah ... i am 30 ... so maybe thats it ... but they even ided ogra ... who really looks more like 5023:25
gnomefreakoh23:25
asacgetting abearin bars wasn't a problem for me ... though getting cigarettes in supermarket23:25
asacthey are just botty23:26
asacprobably had bad experience with old looking "agent underage"23:26
gnomefreakpossibly23:26
asacUbulette: which arch is this build issue above from?23:27
Ubulettei38623:27
gnomefreakbrb something is wrong with my irssi config23:27
asacreally ... ok ... i now read that its just w arning ... i saw similar things that failed in the past thats why i asked23:27
gnomefreakUbulette: you didnt get dh_install: seamonkey-2.0-chatzilla missing files (debian/tmp/usr/lib/seamonkey-2.0*/chrome/icons/default/chatzilla-window.xpm), aborting23:28
gnomefreakmake: *** [binary-install/seamonkey-2.0-chatzilla] Error 123:28
gnomefreakbzr: ERROR: The build failed.23:29
gnomefreakthat tells me what you said before that chatzilla doesnt work23:29
Ubuletteno23:29
gnomefreakIMHO lets build chatzilla as a stand alone and remove binaries from seamonkey23:29
gnomefreakim sure fixing this error in chatzilla.install should be easy but do we really want to build it with seamoneky, firefox23:30
Ubuletteyep, i wanted to do that when it's built with libxul23:30
asacUbulette: http://paste.ubuntu.com/1534/ ... those are candidates that need to be fixed in mailnews befor libxul23:30
gnomefreakasac: you agree?23:30
Ubulettegnomefreak, what is the last commit in bzr ?23:31
asacgnomefreak: not sure ... imo we should provide whatever seamonkey devs want to provide23:31
gnomefreakUbulette: 119 afaik23:31
asacgnomefreak: otherwise we end up removing everything because for mail we have tbird, for browser we have firefox ... and so on :)23:31
gnomefreaklol23:31
asacso if they still support it for suite ... we should package it23:31
asacanyway we should not add _more_ components like calendar23:32
gnomefreakno sunbird is fine23:32
gnomefreakbtw i have to figure out how to run the script and version sunbird since everything else is done and tested23:32
asac0.7?23:32
Ubulettegnomefreak, strange, how did you build ?23:32
gnomefreaki think thursday ill look at it (what dir to run it in ect23:33
gnomefreakbzr bd --merge --dont-purge --builder='dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -k3C1C3C2A' .23:33
asacgnomefreak: which script?23:33
gnomefreakUbulette:23:33
gnomefreakbinonly23:33
gnomefreaknobinonly maybe the name23:33
Ubulettehmm23:33
asacgnomefreak: ah ... yeah ... just run it in top-level dir (aka inside the mozilla/ dir)23:34
gnomefreakUbulette: maybe bzr doesnt gen that file (would be weird)23:34
asacjust like the remove.nonfree.sh from iceape23:34
* gnomefreak never had to run remove.nonfree.sh before afaik23:34
gnomefreakbut i will look at it in a day or 223:34
asacreally? ... well ... its simple ... cd to/top/level/mozilla23:35
gnomefreaki have court tomorrow if i get done early ill work on it tomorrow23:35
asacsh /path/to/remove.binonly.sh23:35
gnomefreakand than repack tarball or doe sscript do that?23:35
gnomefreakdoes23:35
asacgnomefreak: no ... you have to tar it up afterwards ... so23:36
gnomefreakthats easy enough23:36
asactar xjf /path/to/sunbird.tar.bz223:36
asaccd mozilla23:36
asacsh /path/to/remove.binonly.sh23:36
asaccd ..23:36
asacand so on23:36
gnomefreakok run script that tar it up23:36
asacyeah23:37
gnomefreakthan build again23:37
gnomefreakshould have it ready before friday than23:37
asacgood ... did you pushb the bzr branch somewhere?23:37
gnomefreakasac: yes mine iirc23:37
asaci think or ppa you could even push withbinonly tarball ... nobody would really care about that23:37
asacgnomefreak: so its 0.7, right?23:38
gnomefreakyep23:38
asacdoes lignthing still work light a charme in tbird?23:38
gnomefreakhttps://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/sunbird/ubuntu-0.x23:38
gnomefreakasac: so far no issues23:38
* gnomefreak hasnt had more than a couple of hours testing for it so far23:38
asacgnomefreak: so it was as simple as just bumping the changelog versionb?23:39
gnomefreakUbulette: im not sure why that error other than bzr doesnt make a tmp dir afaik23:39
asac(and updating th configure patch)23:39
gnomefreakasac: and running autoconf23:39
gnomefreakyes really simple merge23:39
asacrock23:40
gnomefreakbut its got added fetures so we cant push to gutsy without a backport23:40
asacgnomefreak: did your old calendar work well after upgrading?23:40
gnomefreakand if needed it can be done23:40
asacgnomefreak: we usually don't want to push to gutsy23:40
gnomefreakasac: yes i didnt see the bug about it removing icals23:40
Ubulettegnomefreak, you don't have debian/tmp ?23:40
asacjust to ppa or backports ... to provide backports ... but since we usually don't use backports we should stick with ppa for now23:40
* gnomefreak planned on gutsy ppa version of sunbird once its done23:40
asacyeah go ahead23:41
gnomefreakUbulette: give me a sec but i dont rmemeber bzr making one23:41
asacoh fuck23:42
Ubulettebzr has nothing to do with that23:42
asacmy /home is really full here23:42
gnomefreakthere is no /tmp in top level23:42
asaci guess seamonkey wsill not finish that way23:42
* asac hates his laptop23:42
gnomefreakhttp://pastebin.mozilla.org/23083923:42
Ubulettegnomefreak, no in top level. in debia/tmp23:42
gnomefreakUbulette: there isnt one in debian eitehr23:43
Ubuletteeh23:43
gnomefreakhttp://pastebin.mozilla.org/23084123:43
gnomefreakthats ls -a in debian23:43
Ubuletteit's not installed at all23:44
gnomefreakwhats not?23:44
Ubulettelol23:44
asacthe remove.nonfree script should be replaced with remove.binonly ... unless mozclient does that now23:45
Ubulettethat's the bzr dir, show me build-area23:45
gnomefreaki did23:45
asacbut even in that case it would be beneficial to keep the file in itso its more or less self maintained23:45
Ubulettegnomefreak@Gutsy:~/seamonkey-2.0/work/seamonkey-2.0.dev/debian$ ls -a23:45
gnomefreaki found it23:45
gnomefreakits there23:46
gnomefreakinside is usr23:46
gnomefreakdh_install: seamonkey-2.0-chatzilla missing files (debian/tmp/usr/lib/seamonkey-2.0*/chrome/icons/default/chatzilla-window.xpm)23:46
gnomefreakthats for me23:46
Ubulettehow come it builds for me and ppa but not for you ?23:47
asaclooks a bit like upstream removed that (old) icon recently?23:47
gnomefreaknothing in default for chatzilla23:47
asachmmm not if you use the same orig as Ubulette though23:48
gnomefreakthis is the 29ths tarball23:48
gnomefreakno i used mozclient to build23:48
gnomefreakUbulette: if you post your tarball somewhere i will try it23:48
gnomefreakmaybe bad tarball but damn you would think it would fail earlier than it did23:49
gnomefreakbrb smoke23:49
Ubulettehttp://paste.ubuntu.com/1535/23:50
Ubulettehttp://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tarballs/seamonkey-2.0_2.0~a1~cvs20071026t1846.orig.tar.gz23:50
Ubuletteif you rebuild, just pull my branch. i'm at #12123:51
asacgnomefreak: well ... the icon above is an old hopefully unused icon .. so maybe they dropped in the last few daays23:51
asacUbulette: is it 3 or 6 GB that a debug build needs ... i can't remember because i usually don't need to care :)23:52
Ubulettegnomefreak, it builds with both "bzr bd --merge --dont-purge" and "dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -nc"23:52
Ubuletteasac, you mean the size of the build-area post build ?23:53
asachmmm ... no i mean the mozilla/ treee ... e.g without make install23:53
asacnevermind ... i guess the 5gb i have spare now should be sufficient23:54
gnomefreakUbulette: thats why23:54
Ubulette2.5G for sm2, 290M in dist23:54
gnomefreakyour tarball isnt same version23:54
asacoh cool23:55
gnomefreaki guess i can pull that out of .install23:55
Ubulettegnomefreak, should not make a difference23:55
gnomefreakUbulette: if they changed it it would23:55
gnomefreaki built using 29th23:55
asacok lets see according to some people latest bzr head of bzr has improved performance of 100 fold now :)23:55
asacthey say its easy to use bzr for whole openoffice23:55
asac:)23:55
gnomefreakasac: safe to remove that link?23:55
asacso it shouold work for mozill afinally23:55
gnomefreakwth does oo.o and bzr have to do with eachother23:56
Ubulettetar ztvf ../tarballs/seamonkey-2.0_2.0~a1~cvs20071030t1326.orig.tar.gz | grep chatzilla-window.xpm23:56
Ubulette-rw-r--r-- fta/fta        6950 2006-06-29 13:00 seamonkey-2.0-2.0~a1~cvs20071030t1326/suite/branding/icons/gtk/chatzilla-window.xpm23:56
Ubulette-rw-r--r-- fta/fta        2160 2004-10-25 01:04 seamonkey-2.0-2.0~a1~cvs20071030t1326/extensions/irc/xpi/resources/chatzilla-window.xpm23:56
Ubuletteit's still there today23:56
gnomefreakhmmm23:56
asacUbulette: maybe its not installed anymore?23:56
asacduring make install?23:56
gnomefreakUbulette: do you have it in debian/tmp.....23:57
Ubulettemaybe23:57
Ubulettei'll update my tarball then23:57
asac29 October 2007 - 0.92rc1 released23:57
asacThe first release candidate of bzr 0.92 has been released. Many changes, including bug fixes, performance improvements, and a new experimental repository format. download now23:57
Ubulettegnomefreak, sure. using seamonkey-2.0_2.0~a1~cvs20071026t1846.orig.tar.gz23:58
gnomefreakasac: its in repos assuming you mean bzr package23:58
gnomefreakUbulette: what about 29/30?23:58
asacno ... i mean latest bzr development head23:58
gnomefreakah23:58
asac(its probably not yet in repo  ... maybe hardy)23:58
Ubulettegnomefreak, haven't tried yet23:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!