[00:00] <Ubulette> libnspr4-0d | 4.7.0~cvs20070828t1830-0ubuntu1~mt1 | http://ppa.launchpad.net gutsy/main Packages
[00:00] <Ubulette> this one is old but good enough
[00:02] <gnomefreak> sure? i can always disable that :)
[00:02] <Ubulette> i'm sure
[00:03] <Ubulette> that's what i've been using for more than 6 months (both nss and nspr)
[00:03] <gnomefreak> ah ok
[00:03] <Ubulette> i even used that for seamonkey 1.1.*
[00:05] <gnomefreak> dont we use the same version?
[00:05] <gnomefreak> i mean without the date and time
[00:05] <Ubulette> for ?
[00:06] <gnomefreak> gutsy/hardy
[00:06] <gnomefreak> 4.7.
[00:06] <Ubulette> no, it's still 4.6
[00:06] <Ubulette> libnspr4-0d | 4.7.0~cvs20071024t1332+bbot-1 | http://www.sofaraway.org firefox-minefield/ Packages
[00:06] <Ubulette> libnspr4-0d | 4.7.0~cvs20070828t1830-0ubuntu1~mt1 | http://ppa.launchpad.net gutsy/main Packages
[00:06] <Ubulette> libnspr4-0d |    4.6.7-1 | http://archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages
[00:06] <gnomefreak> oh i thought we pushed them with xulrunner
[00:07] <Ubulette> no, asac got nervous and removed system-nspr/nss for gutsy
[00:07] <gnomefreak> lol
[00:07] <Ubulette> so gutsy has cvs but bundled into xul
[00:07] <gnomefreak> ah
[00:10] <Ubulette> are you compiling or using my ppa ?
[00:11] <gnomefreak> building
[00:11] <gnomefreak> i want to get familar with it
[00:11] <Ubulette> sure
[00:11] <Ubulette> there's almost nothing left from iceape ;)
[00:11] <gnomefreak> more practice the better
[00:11] <gnomefreak> i saw that
[00:12] <gnomefreak> still want the go button default
[00:12] <gnomefreak> so when you type ww.bleh.com it doesnt search it goes right to it
[00:12] <gnomefreak> www*
[00:13] <gnomefreak> that was one thing that pissed me off. thats why the 82_ubuntu_prefs
[00:13] <gnomefreak> patch was there
[00:14] <Ubulette> oh, damn, i forgot to remove something in seamonkey-2.0-gnome-support
[00:14] <gnomefreak> too late
[00:14] <Ubulette> i thought i did :p
[00:14] <gnomefreak> how the hell does that remind you
[00:15] <gnomefreak> lol
[00:15]  * gnomefreak needs to learn merges
[00:15] <gnomefreak> maybe later this week or next week
[00:25] <Ubulette> in fact i did remove that stuff so all is good :)
[00:36] <Ubulette> chatzilla is not working
[03:30] <joejaxx> gnomefreak: hey! :D
[03:49] <gnomefreak> hello ;)
[03:50]  * gnomefreak is sleeping
[11:42] <gnomefreak> there is somethig im missing but ill look at it again later. im heading upstrais for coffee bbl
[13:15] <bluekuja> hi
[13:15] <bluekuja> :)
[14:13] <asac> hi
[14:13] <bluekuja> heya asac
[14:49] <asac> bbl
[14:50] <bluekuja> oki
[16:23] <gnomefre1k> Ubulette: i only have a minute or 2 before pain meds kick in but yesterdays tarball seamonkey-2.0_2.0~a1~cvs20071029t1846.orig.tar.gz fails to build
[16:25] <gnomefre1k> Ubulette: the error i was getting is http://pastebin.mozilla.org/230559 they seem to be all certificate (cert) errors
[16:36] <gnomefreak> gonna try your date/time see if it builds
[17:03] <asac> ok lunch here
[18:42] <Ubulette> hi
[18:42] <Ubulette> gnomefreak, your nss is too old (too)
[18:43] <gnomefreak> nope
[18:43] <gnomefreak> i installed yours
[18:43] <Ubulette> which one ?
[18:44] <gnomefreak> ii  libnss3-0d     3.12.0~cvs2007 Network Security Service libraries
[18:44] <gnomefreak> ii  libnss3-dev    3.12.0~cvs2007 Development files for the Network Security S
[18:44] <Ubulette> ok good
[18:44] <gnomefreak> i shouldnt need the dev branch
[18:45] <Ubulette> well, you should. dev is post a8 (ie a9pre) and tarball for sm2 is very fresh (so post a8 too)
[18:46] <Ubulette> that matches upstream reqs
[18:46] <gnomefreak> so i should use nss nad nspr -dev branches?
[18:47] <Ubulette> just look at the tags in mozilla/client.mk
[18:47] <gnomefreak> your gonna have to forgive me i just woke up and i have a meeting im preparing for in under 15 minutes
[18:47] <Ubulette> :)
[18:47] <Ubulette> NSPR_CO_TAG          = NSPR_HEAD_20071016
[18:47] <Ubulette> NSS_CO_TAG           = NSS_3_12_ALPHA_2
[18:47] <gnomefreak> damnit
[18:48] <gnomefreak> ok ill install them (are they on ppa by chance?
[18:48] <Ubulette> the one in mt ppa should be ok
[18:48] <Ubulette> ones
[18:48] <gnomefreak> those are what i have
[18:49] <Ubulette> in my chroot, i used:
[18:49] <Ubulette> libnspr4-0d | 4.7.0~cvs20070828t1830-0ubuntu1~mt1 | http://ppa.launchpad.net gutsy/main Packages
[18:49] <gnomefreak> thats what i have
[18:49] <Ubulette> libnss3-0d | 3.12.0~cvs20071012t0909-0ubuntu1~mt1~fta3 | http://ppa.launchpad.net gutsy/main Packages
[18:49] <gnomefreak> i think
[18:50] <gnomefreak> or not
[18:50] <Ubulette> oh, the later is in my own ppa
[18:50] <gnomefreak> yours is newer
[18:50] <gnomefreak> 3.12.0~cvs20070827t2
[18:50] <Ubulette> too old
[18:50] <Ubulette> sorry :)
[18:51] <gnomefreak> ok please leave me links to the right packages my lawyer is about to call
[18:51] <gnomefreak> ill get to it in ~ an hour
[18:51] <Ubulette> ever you take the one in my ppa, or you build from my nss.head branch
[18:52] <Ubulette> i've stopped to build nss in mt/ppa because asac asked me to keep this ppa as close to a8 as possible
[18:57] <asac> I did? ... i just would like the ones in ppa not to be ahead of xul-trunk tags
[18:58] <asac> maybe i should write a wiki page on what is good for where :)
[18:59] <Ubulette> well, you also dropped versions in build deps so it makes things difficult when you don't know the details
[19:01] <asac> you mean to find the right buld depend branch for some xul source?
[19:01] <Ubulette> asac, not ahead of xul a8 means ftbfs for xul a9pre & sm2
[19:02] <asac> Ubulette: i said:
[19:02] <asac>  i just would like the ones in ppa not to be ahead of xul-trunk tags
[19:02] <asac> so the ppa one should be as new as needed to build latest xul trunk ... but not newser
[19:02] <Ubulette> you also said you wanted the ppa not too far from gutsy
[19:02] <Ubulette> for nss/nsrp
[19:02] <asac> xul trunk tags are the ones that are in client.mk from the current trunk checkout
[19:03] <asac> hmmm
[19:04] <Ubulette> well, i don't care the limitation. we'll never agree here so I no longer touch this ppa for anything needing fresher nss
[19:04] <Ubulette> i use my ppa for all that
[19:05] <Ubulette> but it's full now so i'm stuck
[19:05] <asac> full?
[19:05] <Ubulette> mine is over 1G
[19:06] <Ubulette> i didn't get errors yet but I guess i will if i push something
[19:06] <asac> i will try to fix that as soon as i get a grib on someone in charge here
[19:07] <asac> for me lp is currently down from here
[19:07] <Ubulette> i've been told to ask a question on lp, i did
[19:07] <asac> ok ... if they don't help you ... let me know
[19:08] <Ubulette> no answer so far
[19:09] <asac> well ... let me know if you didn't get an answer today ... or of course if you got a negative archive.
[19:09] <asac> but i think it you tell cprov that you provide preview packages for the mozillateam it shouldn't be a problem
[19:09] <asac> unless of course if ppa currently cannot adjust quota
[19:10] <asac> LP is dead here
[19:17] <Ubulette> no problem here
[19:24] <Ubulette> asac, how is UDS ?
[19:24] <Ubulette> i've tried to listen to the icecast feeds, noway
[19:25] <Ubulette> quality is awful
[19:25] <Ubulette> i can barely hear a full sentence
[19:25] <asac> yesterady?
[19:25] <Ubulette> today
[19:25] <asac> hmmm ... which session?
[19:25] <Ubulette> all
[19:26] <Ubulette> yours included
[19:26] <asac> thats bad ... we actually moved the power adapters down under the tables because yesterady there apparently was bad interference
[19:27] <Ubulette> try from where you are. you'll see.. well, hear, well, not hear.. a thing ;)
[19:27] <asac> hehe
[19:27] <asac> unfortunately my sound doesn't work since my laptop has ubuntu on it :)
[19:28] <Ubulette> no sound on ubuntu ? file a bug :)
[19:28] <Ubulette> ask someone else
[19:29] <asac> let me first verify my claim :)
[19:30] <asac> now my sound preferences dialog hangs :(
[19:30] <asac> i assume its compiz fault ;) ... the universal scapegoat
[19:31] <asac> anyway ... UDS is more or less good for me ... only thing is that i don'tget anything done that is unrelated to discussion
[19:31] <asac> i think tonight i will finally try to work from my hotel room
[19:34] <Ubulette> are you in now ?
[19:34] <asac> nope
[19:34] <asac> sitting in a conference room where i can at least try to process bugs
[19:34] <asac> but LP is down :(
[19:35] <Ubulette> it's not. maybe you're filtered
[19:37] <asac> i think this connection is just too sucky
[19:37] <asac> happy enough being able to use this irssi client at home
[19:37] <asac> but it has massive lag
[19:38] <asac> according to admins we have huge package loss ... so probably there is a physical problem on the landline from the conference location
[19:40] <Ubulette> you mean "huge *packet* loss" right ?
[19:40] <asac> ;)
[19:40] <asac> right
[19:41] <asac> though its the same ;)
[19:42] <Ubulette> i'l listening to something right now. far better than before but still worse than any conf call i've ever done
[19:42] <Ubulette> and i do a lot
[19:43] <asac> yeah ... its strange ... maybe don't use listen only?
[19:43] <Ubulette> i'm not using sip, but icecast
[19:43] <asac> Ubulette: you know how it works? ... you have to install gobby and then you can add comments and edit the spec that is getting developed
[19:44] <Ubulette> I just wanted to listen (and watch) a bit
[19:45] <asac> yeah ... but if you open gobby you can see how the type into the document what they discuss ... so might be helpful to get a clue on whats going on
[19:45] <asac> s/the type/they type/
[19:49] <Ubulette> http://icecast.ubuntu.com:8000/hunsaker-b.ogg.m3u    this one is awful
[19:50] <asac> no sound :(
[19:50] <asac> thats the platform room
[19:50] <asac> is it about initramfs or apt authentication?
[19:51] <asac> @time boston
[19:51] <asac> @time new_your
[19:51] <asac> @time new_york
[19:51] <ubotu> Current time in America/New_York: October 30 2007, 15:51:31 - Next meeting: Edubuntu Team in 16 hours 8 minutes
[19:52] <asac> Ubulette: you packaged intlclock?
[19:52] <asac> someone asked about a package here
[19:52] <Ubulette> I just fixed it
[19:52] <asac> but now i don't remember who it was
[19:52] <Ubulette> it's in my ppa
[19:53] <asac> yes i see this ... thats why i asked
[19:53] <asac> Ubulette: so why is it 1 gig already ... are the superseeded binaries still in ppa or what?
[19:54] <Ubulette> mostly the -dbg packages i guess
[19:54] <Ubulette> look at sm2 dbg for hardy and gutsy
[19:54] <Ubulette> size is very different
[19:55] <asac> oh
[19:55] <asac> ok
[19:55] <asac> http://hardware.slashdot.org/hardware/07/10/30/1742258.shtml
[19:56] <Ubulette> it's everywhere
[19:56] <Ubulette> tons of blogs at talking about that for days/weeks
[19:57] <asac> yeah
[19:57] <Ubulette> ff3 shows a blank page
[19:57] <asac> for the slashdot thing?
[19:58] <Ubulette> yes
[19:58] <Ubulette> sm2 is ok
[19:59] <asac> at least a8 works
[20:02] <Ubulette> a few things are not working in sm2
[20:02] <Ubulette> problem is i don't know what to expect
[20:02] <Ubulette> it's a1pre :P
[20:06] <asac> yeah ... i just join #seamonkey @ irc.mozilla.org and ping kairo now
[20:29] <Ubulette> asac, make install seems seriously broken
[20:29] <Ubulette> no idl/.h
[20:29] <Ubulette> wallet is not installed
[20:31] <asac> yeah ... currently talking about this
[20:31] <asac> ( well not exactly about this issue, but about the general mess)
[20:37] <Ubulette> and ?
[20:37] <Ubulette> asac, https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mplayerplug-in/+bug/137993
[20:37] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 137993 in mplayerplug-in "mozilla-mplayer unnecessarily depends on gecko browsers" [Low,Incomplete]
[20:38] <asac> yeah i somewhere read about that ... i guess it was in motu
[20:39] <Ubulette> you're mentioned in there
[20:40] <asac> i don't like the idea to make it a recommends
[20:40] <asac> it should depend on xulrunner-1.9 as well
[20:41] <asac> ok so everything might fall apart
[20:42] <asac> someone claimed taht ffox 3.0 has been pushed back to Q2
[20:43] <asac> which would be soooo scary
[20:43] <asac> http://www.hirsch.sth.ac.at/~robert/thebot-logs/
[20:43] <asac> there the logs about seamonkey will appear eventually
[20:44] <asac> to summarize: there is a _lot_ to do and they are definitly still pre alpha
[20:44] <asac> but from what i understood its just a lack of resources
[20:44] <asac> mostly its about downloadmanager and fixing the use of some internal api elements
[20:45] <asac> as well as migrating mailnews to use the toolkit ... which appears to be the most tedious task to me
[20:45] <asac> but mailnews migration to toolkit is needed for tbird as well ... so there might be non-seamonkey folks working on this as well
[20:45] <asac> tch is practically identical to the last one, just synced with the
[20:46] <Ubulette> what about sm/tb with libxul ?
[20:46] <asac> yes ...thats what i talked about above
[20:47] <asac> and apparently they have to away fro moving nsISupportsArray ... ffoxdid that by unsafe casts, but apparently seamonkey devs want a cleaner solution
[20:47] <asac> but they admitted if everything else is sorted out they would accept that dirty solution to finish stuff
[20:48] <asac> there have been a bunch of bugs mentioned in discussion ... but lets wait till it pops up in bot-log so we can take a look
[20:49] <Ubulette> ok
[20:50] <asac> anyway ... maybe good to know that http://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey:suiterunner buglist is officially outdated and unmaintained ;)
[20:51] <Ubulette> it's mentioned iirc
[20:52] <asac> yeah ... might be ... i always just scrolled down so i might have missed it
[20:52]  * asac out for a smoke ... getting some coffee and while trunk suite checks-out
[21:02]  * asac  back
[21:06] <asac> Ubulette: how do i checkout suite?
[21:06] <asac> with MOZ_CO_PROJECT=suite my suite/ directory is completely empty
[21:07] <Ubulette> use mozclient
[21:08] <asac> lol
[21:08] <asac> i mean it should work
[21:09] <Ubulette> for me, it does
[21:09] <Ubulette> make -f $(MOZ_CLIENT) checkout MOZ_CO_PROJECT=suite $(DEBIAN_MOZ_CO_TAG)
[21:15] <asac> yeah ... for me it doesn't ... maybe its currently borken?
[21:17] <Ubulette> mozclient is fine
[21:28] <Ubulette> asac, what's this touch .autoreg ? is it really useful ?
[21:29] <asac> it trigger the reregistration of xpcom componentes ... but i think its not needed in recent versiones anymore
[21:30] <Ubulette> i figured that too as in iceape, it's in all postinst/postrm
[22:06] <asac> Ubulette: iceape still has no real extensionmanager ... so its indeeed needed there
[22:07] <Ubulette_> asac, http://home.kairo.at/blog/2007-10/goals_for_seamonkey_2_my_view
[22:09] <asac> Ubulette_: you have an url to a current orig.tar.gz for suiterunner?
[22:09] <asac> i simple cannot get it out of CVS ... maybe client.mk broke today ... or maybe i am just too dump
[22:09] <Ubulette_> current as of today or the one i've used for my branch ?
[22:10] <asac> current would be good
[22:10] <asac> does it still have CVS/ directory=
[22:10] <asac> ?
[22:10] <asac> (i want to work on upstream branch ... so no packaging needed for now)
[22:10] <Ubulette_> i exclude it in mozclient, do you want it ?
[22:10] <Ubulette_> i guess so
[22:11] <Ubulette_> ok, redoing with cvs
[22:11] <Ubulette_> hold on.
[22:11] <asac> yeah would be great
[22:12] <asac> if not ... any tarball is better than none :)
[22:12] <asac> so i can at least take alook
[22:13] <Ubulette> i'm trying to use places in sm2
[22:14] <Ubulette> i have some nasty errors in the console in my latest build
[22:15] <Ubulette> wallet seems borked
[22:15] <Ubulette> or missing
[22:19] <Ubulette> -rw-r--r-- 1 fta fta 47275288 Oct 30 23:16 seamonkey-2.0_2.0~a1~cvs20071030t1326.orig.tar.gz
[22:19] <Ubulette> much bigger with cvs in
[22:23] <asac> yeah ... where can i grab the CVS thing?
[22:24] <Ubulette> still pushing to my site
[22:24] <Ubulette> mozilla bug 398718
[22:24] <ubotu> Mozilla bug 398718 in Security: PSM "Better explanatory text for SSL error pages" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398718
[22:28] <Ubulette> asac, http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tarballs/seamonkey-2.0_2.0~a1~cvs20071030t1326.orig.tar.gz
[22:29] <asac> de rien?
[22:30] <asac>  \o/ 200k ;)
[22:30] <asac> thats a record for here
[22:30] <asac> but actually i am one of the last ones sitting here i guess
[22:31] <asac> oh no ... now its just 23k
[22:34] <Ubulette> "de rien" :) you wanted to try some french ?
[22:40] <Ubulette> asac, (btw, that was my line)
[22:43] <asac> yea
[22:43] <asac> is that the correct spelling/meaing=
[22:44] <Ubulette> you said "you're welcome"
[22:44] <Ubulette> you should have said "merci"
[22:45] <Ubulette> = thanks
[22:45] <asac> ah right :)
[22:45] <asac> hehe
[22:45] <asac> how obvoius
[22:45] <Ubulette> but spelling was right
[22:45] <asac> good ... at least i didn't mess that one up
[22:46] <asac> Bug 135110
[22:46] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 135110 in firefox "[gutsy] firefox freezes with google toolbar enabled when you attemp to open more than two windows" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/135110
[22:47] <asac> i wonder if this might be related to mozilla-five-home?
[22:47] <asac> http://groups.google.com/group/FFToolbar-Group-Bugs/browse_thread/thread/d32b039cb2f92ff5?hl=en
[22:48] <asac> damn .. i get bumped out here ... somehow this conference room is needed for a party tonight
[22:48] <asac> lets hope the inet works on hotel room
[22:49] <Ubulette> lol
[22:49] <asac> damn
[22:50] <Ubulette> g++-4.2  -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -Wall -Wconversion -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Woverloaded-virtual -Wsynth -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -g -Wall -O2 -fshort-wchar -pthread -pipe  -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -O -fPIC -shared -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,-h,libsuite.so -o libsuite.so  nsSuiteModule.o     -lpthread -Wl,--as-needed  -Wl,-rpath-link,../../dist/bin  -Wl,--whole-archive ../profile/libsu
[22:50] <Ubulette> iteprofile_s.a ../profile/migration/src/libsuitemigration_s.a ../browser/src/libsuitebrowser_s.a  -Wl,--no-whole-archive -L../../dist/bin -L../../dist/lib -lgkgfx -L../../dist/lib -lunicharutil_external_s ../../dist/../modules/libreg/src/libmozreg_s.a -L../../dist/bin -lmozjs ../../dist/lib/libxpcomglue_s.a -L../../dist/bin -lxpcom -lxpcom_core  -L../../dist/bin -L/usr/lib -lplds4 -lplc4 -lnspr4 -lpthread -ldl
[22:51] <Ubulette>   -Wl,--version-script -Wl,../../build/unix/gnu-ld-scripts/components-version-script -Wl,-Bsymbolic -ldl -lm
[22:51] <Ubulette> /usr/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.18 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf-strtab.c:197
[22:51] <Ubulette> /usr/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.18 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf-strtab.c:197
[22:51] <Ubulette> /usr/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.18 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf-strtab.c:197
[22:51] <Ubulette> /usr/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.18 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf-strtab.c:197
[22:51] <Ubulette> /usr/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.18 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf-strtab.c:197
[22:51] <Ubulette> /usr/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.18 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf-strtab.c:197
[22:51] <Ubulette> /usr/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.18 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf-strtab.c:197
[22:51] <Ubulette> ...
[22:51] <Ubulette> just warnings but..hm, weird ones
[23:19] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: the dev packages for nss-dev -0d and nspr-dev -0d worked
[23:20] <gnomefreak> but it should work on versions we have in repos are we pushing the -dev branches to hardy?
[23:21] <Ubulette> in mt repo, they are too old for xul a9pre and sm2
[23:22] <Ubulette> nss cvs in hardy is fine for me but not for asac
[23:22] <gnomefreak> ah
[23:22] <asac> here i am :)
[23:22] <Ubulette> problem is we're not sure moz guys will release it before hardy is out
[23:23] <asac>  \o/
[23:23] <Ubulette> asac, back in your hotel ?
[23:23] <gnomefreak> asac: what was the fear in pushing nss nspr to gutsy and hardy
[23:23] <asac> in the room ... yes
[23:23] <Ubulette> no fiesta ?
[23:23] <asac> hehe ... well ... i guess i will go and have something to eat soon
[23:23] <gnomefreak> UDS is one big party
[23:23] <asac> but not nowyet
[23:23] <asac> well ... not in the U.S. :)
[23:24] <asac> they ID you even though you look like 40 just to get cigarettes
[23:24] <gnomefreak> asac: they stopped iding me
[23:24] <asac> its soooo ridiculous :)
[23:24] <gnomefreak> its the accent most likely
[23:24] <gnomefreak> asac: or you look that young
[23:24] <asac> well ... i got them once without ... then i should show it ... but i asked him ... "hey ... don't be a bot ... look at me" ... then he laughed and said ... ok
[23:24] <gnomefreak> rule is anyone looks <30 show id
[23:25] <asac> yeah ... i am 30 ... so maybe thats it ... but they even ided ogra ... who really looks more like 50
[23:25] <gnomefreak> oh
[23:25] <asac> getting abearin bars wasn't a problem for me ... though getting cigarettes in supermarket
[23:26] <asac> they are just botty
[23:26] <asac> probably had bad experience with old looking "agent underage"
[23:26] <gnomefreak> possibly
[23:27] <asac> Ubulette: which arch is this build issue above from?
[23:27] <Ubulette> i386
[23:27] <gnomefreak> brb something is wrong with my irssi config
[23:27] <asac> really ... ok ... i now read that its just w arning ... i saw similar things that failed in the past thats why i asked
[23:28] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: you didnt get dh_install: seamonkey-2.0-chatzilla missing files (debian/tmp/usr/lib/seamonkey-2.0*/chrome/icons/default/chatzilla-window.xpm), aborting
[23:28] <gnomefreak> make: *** [binary-install/seamonkey-2.0-chatzilla] Error 1
[23:29] <gnomefreak> bzr: ERROR: The build failed.
[23:29] <gnomefreak> that tells me what you said before that chatzilla doesnt work
[23:29] <Ubulette> no
[23:29] <gnomefreak> IMHO lets build chatzilla as a stand alone and remove binaries from seamonkey
[23:30] <gnomefreak> im sure fixing this error in chatzilla.install should be easy but do we really want to build it with seamoneky, firefox
[23:30] <Ubulette> yep, i wanted to do that when it's built with libxul
[23:30] <asac> Ubulette: http://paste.ubuntu.com/1534/ ... those are candidates that need to be fixed in mailnews befor libxul
[23:30] <gnomefreak> asac: you agree?
[23:31] <Ubulette> gnomefreak, what is the last commit in bzr ?
[23:31] <asac> gnomefreak: not sure ... imo we should provide whatever seamonkey devs want to provide
[23:31] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: 119 afaik
[23:31] <asac> gnomefreak: otherwise we end up removing everything because for mail we have tbird, for browser we have firefox ... and so on :)
[23:31] <gnomefreak> lol
[23:31] <asac> so if they still support it for suite ... we should package it
[23:32] <asac> anyway we should not add _more_ components like calendar
[23:32] <gnomefreak> no sunbird is fine
[23:32] <gnomefreak> btw i have to figure out how to run the script and version sunbird since everything else is done and tested
[23:32] <asac> 0.7?
[23:32] <Ubulette> gnomefreak, strange, how did you build ?
[23:33] <gnomefreak> i think thursday ill look at it (what dir to run it in ect
[23:33] <gnomefreak> bzr bd --merge --dont-purge --builder='dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -k3C1C3C2A' .
[23:33] <asac> gnomefreak: which script?
[23:33] <gnomefreak> Ubulette:
[23:33] <gnomefreak> binonly
[23:33] <gnomefreak> nobinonly maybe the name
[23:33] <Ubulette> hmm
[23:34] <asac> gnomefreak: ah ... yeah ... just run it in top-level dir (aka inside the mozilla/ dir)
[23:34] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: maybe bzr doesnt gen that file (would be weird)
[23:34] <asac> just like the remove.nonfree.sh from iceape
[23:34]  * gnomefreak never had to run remove.nonfree.sh before afaik
[23:34] <gnomefreak> but i will look at it in a day or 2
[23:35] <asac> really? ... well ... its simple ... cd to/top/level/mozilla
[23:35] <gnomefreak> i have court tomorrow if i get done early ill work on it tomorrow
[23:35] <asac> sh /path/to/remove.binonly.sh
[23:35] <gnomefreak> and than repack tarball or doe sscript do that?
[23:35] <gnomefreak> does
[23:36] <asac> gnomefreak: no ... you have to tar it up afterwards ... so
[23:36] <gnomefreak> thats easy enough
[23:36] <asac> tar xjf /path/to/sunbird.tar.bz2
[23:36] <asac> cd mozilla
[23:36] <asac> sh /path/to/remove.binonly.sh
[23:36] <asac> cd ..
[23:36] <asac> and so on
[23:36] <gnomefreak> ok run script that tar it up
[23:37] <asac> yeah
[23:37] <gnomefreak> than build again
[23:37] <gnomefreak> should have it ready before friday than
[23:37] <asac> good ... did you pushb the bzr branch somewhere?
[23:37] <gnomefreak> asac: yes mine iirc
[23:37] <asac> i think or ppa you could even push withbinonly tarball ... nobody would really care about that
[23:38] <asac> gnomefreak: so its 0.7, right?
[23:38] <gnomefreak> yep
[23:38] <asac> does lignthing still work light a charme in tbird?
[23:38] <gnomefreak> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/sunbird/ubuntu-0.x
[23:38] <gnomefreak> asac: so far no issues
[23:38]  * gnomefreak hasnt had more than a couple of hours testing for it so far
[23:39] <asac> gnomefreak: so it was as simple as just bumping the changelog versionb?
[23:39] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: im not sure why that error other than bzr doesnt make a tmp dir afaik
[23:39] <asac> (and updating th configure patch)
[23:39] <gnomefreak> asac: and running autoconf
[23:39] <gnomefreak> yes really simple merge
[23:40] <asac> rock
[23:40] <gnomefreak> but its got added fetures so we cant push to gutsy without a backport
[23:40] <asac> gnomefreak: did your old calendar work well after upgrading?
[23:40] <gnomefreak> and if needed it can be done
[23:40] <asac> gnomefreak: we usually don't want to push to gutsy
[23:40] <gnomefreak> asac: yes i didnt see the bug about it removing icals
[23:40] <Ubulette> gnomefreak, you don't have debian/tmp ?
[23:40] <asac> just to ppa or backports ... to provide backports ... but since we usually don't use backports we should stick with ppa for now
[23:40]  * gnomefreak planned on gutsy ppa version of sunbird once its done
[23:41] <asac> yeah go ahead
[23:41] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: give me a sec but i dont rmemeber bzr making one
[23:42] <asac> oh fuck
[23:42] <Ubulette> bzr has nothing to do with that
[23:42] <asac> my /home is really full here
[23:42] <gnomefreak> there is no /tmp in top level
[23:42] <asac> i guess seamonkey wsill not finish that way
[23:42]  * asac hates his laptop
[23:42] <gnomefreak> http://pastebin.mozilla.org/230839
[23:42] <Ubulette> gnomefreak, no in top level. in debia/tmp
[23:43] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: there isnt one in debian eitehr
[23:43] <Ubulette> eh
[23:43] <gnomefreak> http://pastebin.mozilla.org/230841
[23:43] <gnomefreak> thats ls -a in debian
[23:44] <Ubulette> it's not installed at all
[23:44] <gnomefreak> whats not?
[23:44] <Ubulette> lol
[23:45] <asac> the remove.nonfree script should be replaced with remove.binonly ... unless mozclient does that now
[23:45] <Ubulette> that's the bzr dir, show me build-area
[23:45] <gnomefreak> i did
[23:45] <asac> but even in that case it would be beneficial to keep the file in itso its more or less self maintained
[23:45] <Ubulette> gnomefreak@Gutsy:~/seamonkey-2.0/work/seamonkey-2.0.dev/debian$ ls -a
[23:45] <gnomefreak> i found it
[23:46] <gnomefreak> its there
[23:46] <gnomefreak> inside is usr
[23:46] <gnomefreak> dh_install: seamonkey-2.0-chatzilla missing files (debian/tmp/usr/lib/seamonkey-2.0*/chrome/icons/default/chatzilla-window.xpm)
[23:46] <gnomefreak> thats for me
[23:47] <Ubulette> how come it builds for me and ppa but not for you ?
[23:47] <asac> looks a bit like upstream removed that (old) icon recently?
[23:47] <gnomefreak> nothing in default for chatzilla
[23:48] <asac> hmmm not if you use the same orig as Ubulette though
[23:48] <gnomefreak> this is the 29ths tarball
[23:48] <gnomefreak> no i used mozclient to build
[23:48] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: if you post your tarball somewhere i will try it
[23:49] <gnomefreak> maybe bad tarball but damn you would think it would fail earlier than it did
[23:49] <gnomefreak> brb smoke
[23:50] <Ubulette> http://paste.ubuntu.com/1535/
[23:50] <Ubulette> http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tarballs/seamonkey-2.0_2.0~a1~cvs20071026t1846.orig.tar.gz
[23:51] <Ubulette> if you rebuild, just pull my branch. i'm at #121
[23:51] <asac> gnomefreak: well ... the icon above is an old hopefully unused icon .. so maybe they dropped in the last few daays
[23:52] <asac> Ubulette: is it 3 or 6 GB that a debug build needs ... i can't remember because i usually don't need to care :)
[23:52] <Ubulette> gnomefreak, it builds with both "bzr bd --merge --dont-purge" and "dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -nc"
[23:53] <Ubulette> asac, you mean the size of the build-area post build ?
[23:53] <asac> hmmm ... no i mean the mozilla/ treee ... e.g without make install
[23:54] <asac> nevermind ... i guess the 5gb i have spare now should be sufficient
[23:54] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: thats why
[23:54] <Ubulette> 2.5G for sm2, 290M in dist
[23:54] <gnomefreak> your tarball isnt same version
[23:55] <asac> oh cool
[23:55] <gnomefreak> i guess i can pull that out of .install
[23:55] <Ubulette> gnomefreak, should not make a difference
[23:55] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: if they changed it it would
[23:55] <gnomefreak> i built using 29th
[23:55] <asac> ok lets see according to some people latest bzr head of bzr has improved performance of 100 fold now :)
[23:55] <asac> they say its easy to use bzr for whole openoffice
[23:55] <asac> :)
[23:55] <gnomefreak> asac: safe to remove that link?
[23:55] <asac> so it shouold work for mozill afinally
[23:56] <gnomefreak> wth does oo.o and bzr have to do with eachother
[23:56] <Ubulette> tar ztvf ../tarballs/seamonkey-2.0_2.0~a1~cvs20071030t1326.orig.tar.gz | grep chatzilla-window.xpm
[23:56] <Ubulette> -rw-r--r-- fta/fta        6950 2006-06-29 13:00 seamonkey-2.0-2.0~a1~cvs20071030t1326/suite/branding/icons/gtk/chatzilla-window.xpm
[23:56] <Ubulette> -rw-r--r-- fta/fta        2160 2004-10-25 01:04 seamonkey-2.0-2.0~a1~cvs20071030t1326/extensions/irc/xpi/resources/chatzilla-window.xpm
[23:56] <Ubulette> it's still there today
[23:56] <gnomefreak> hmmm
[23:56] <asac> Ubulette: maybe its not installed anymore?
[23:56] <asac> during make install?
[23:57] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: do you have it in debian/tmp.....
[23:57] <Ubulette> maybe
[23:57] <Ubulette> i'll update my tarball then
[23:57] <asac> 29 October 2007 - 0.92rc1 released
[23:57] <asac> The first release candidate of bzr 0.92 has been released. Many changes, including bug fixes, performance improvements, and a new experimental repository format. download now
[23:58] <Ubulette> gnomefreak, sure. using seamonkey-2.0_2.0~a1~cvs20071026t1846.orig.tar.gz
[23:58] <gnomefreak> asac: its in repos assuming you mean bzr package
[23:58] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: what about 29/30?
[23:58] <asac> no ... i mean latest bzr development head
[23:58] <gnomefreak> ah
[23:58] <asac> (its probably not yet in repo  ... maybe hardy)
[23:58] <Ubulette> gnomefreak, haven't tried yet