[08:01] somerville32: what is meant is that there is no commitment for security updates for xubuntu as there is for the other officially supported flavours. Is that wrong? [08:02] mdke, Yes. [08:02] Security updates are provided for main and all of Xubuntu is in main. [08:03] somerville32: so why aren't isos supplied for xubuntu on releases.u.c? [08:03] mdke, lack of space atm [08:04] is that all? [08:04] Depends who you ask [08:04] There is lack of clarity on Xubuntu's status even within Canonical its self. [08:05] tell me more [08:05] mdke, Well, I asked for xubuntu to be placed on r.u.c [08:06] I think it was cjwatson who said there was no space after (I forget his irc atm) Matt said it should be. [08:06] Matt Zimmerman, that is [08:06] This was back in late-winter/early spring [08:07] I find it strange that space should be an issue. [08:07] mdke: It is an issue. [08:07] you mean they don't have any hard disks left? [08:07] They said they were moving to a different sever. [08:07] I dunno if they have or not [08:08] But hosting a distribution is not cheap when it comes to hd space [08:08] so that is the only difference between xubuntu and the other flavours? [08:09] There are three differences. [08:09] 1. No technical support sold for it (not enough demand at this time) [08:09] 2. No canonical sponsored developer (Kubuntu was lucky to get and only because there is a market at this time for Kubuntu) [08:10] 3. It is not hosted on releases.ubuntu.com [08:10] Canonical supports it like the other flavours but simply isn't looking to make money off of it at this point in time. [08:11] And besides, Ubuntu and Canonical are _not_ the same entity. [08:11] I'm aware of that [08:11] Ubuntu is an official flavour regardless if Canonical says so or not. It is up to the Ubuntu community. [08:12] actually, I don't agree. Anyway, what I had in mind was Canonical-guaranteed security updates [08:12] and if you're telling me that xubuntu gets those, I'll remove it [08:12] but you should address 3, I can't see any logical reason for it, if what you've said is right [08:12] mdke: I will move forward with that. [08:12] But I'd like to hear why you feel Canonical has move control over Ubuntu than the Community (ie. Community Council). [08:13] did I say that? [08:14] You said that you disagreed with the statement that Ubuntu is an official flavour regardless if Canonical says so or not. [08:14] yep [08:14] sommer, you're saying that Canonical decides which are official flavours. [08:14] sommer, sorry, stupid auto-nick [08:14] yes [08:14] mdke: So you're saying that Canonical has move control than Ubuntu over its self. [08:15] no [08:15] I'm saying it does so in relation to whether flavours are official or not [08:15] not in relation to everything [08:15] if there were no guaranteed security updates for Xubuntu, I think that would bring it outside the family of "official supported distributions" [08:15] because Canonical makes that commitment for some flavours [08:16] Canonical commits to main + restricted [08:16] yes, I know [08:16] ubuntulog, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, and Edubuntu are all derived from the same repository. [08:16] One moment while I reconfigure xchat. [08:17] I'm aware of all these things [08:17] and Gobuntu too [08:17] So where is the lack of clarity? [08:19] what? [08:19] Do you understand why Xubuntu is an officially supported flavour of Ubuntu? [08:20] yes [08:20] Wonderful :) [08:21] hey all, i just changed the xubuntu hardy docs assignments page to include the topics i hope to work on. i wasn't sure how to do the actual status bar though. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Xubuntu/Documentation/HardyAssignments [08:21] the topic background color i should say [08:22] Did you try using the existing table cells as an example? [08:24] somerville32: yea... i duno how to do that really? [08:25] erm,that'snot a question sorry [08:26] posingaspopular, I'll take a look. [08:26] thanks cody [08:26] np [08:27] actually, you probably know my brother: Admiral_Chicago [08:27] he helped with the docs last release i think [08:27] I do :) [08:29] oh cool. im going to visit him on friday. he's giving a talk about OS's and virtualization [08:30] my CS teacher agrees that his talk will be more interesting than the lecture on friday... kinda sad to be honest [08:31] hehe [08:32] they put me in the 'non CS major, omg you can't code' class that everyone has to take. [08:33] but i might minor in CS, so im going to be taking more classes anyway. assembley programming is going to be the suck though [08:37] i see the changes. thanks somerville32 [08:42] posingaspopular, Could you update https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Xubuntu/Documentation ? [08:42] The desktop guide is obsolete [08:42] and a more prominent link to the hardy assignment page would be awesome :) [08:43] is there a 7.10 link? [08:44] One sec. [08:44] Actually, mdke would be the guy to ask about that [08:44] he's idle atmtoo [08:46] posingaspopular, Also, help.ubuntu.com/community is void of a Xubuntu page/centre [08:46] ie. Our community wiki docs don't actually exist yet [08:47] yes i see [08:47] can we put a 'goals for hardy' section [08:47] and put that into the to do list? [08:48] or will that be done before the next release? [08:48] I'm not sure what you mean. [08:48] Goals for the documentation team? [08:48] yea, in terms of what docs should be finished [08:48] Isn't that what the Hardy assignment page is for? [08:49] or some other form of 'get help.com/community [08:49] i guess [08:49] i duno, it's 3am over ehre [08:49] Hopefully the xubuntu-doc team will start making use of help.com/community [08:50] There is a ton of stuff to write about [08:53] hmm i dont even see where the desktop guide even is [08:53] i thought we were doing away with the desktop guide completly...since edgy [08:54] how old/relevant is this page https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Xubuntu/Documentation/Wiki [08:55] looks like we're coming up on a year without edits on that one [08:56] posingaspopular, Desktop guide is obsolete. [08:56] wiki.ubuntu.com is no longer the place for help [08:56] help.ubuntu.com/community is the new help wiki [08:56] ah i see [09:00] somerville32: thoughts on that Xubuntu/Documentation/wiki page? [09:02] posingaspopular, That is the team wiki page. [09:02] Subcomponent of the doc team [09:02] okay. im just wondering why it's been so long without editing [09:02] It should contain information relevant to member of the doc team working on the community wiki (an official part of our documentation effort) [09:02] posingaspopular, No one has taken the initiative [09:03] please excuse me if im asking redundant questions, i swear my brain is fried tonight [09:04] No no [09:05] np :) [09:10] time to collapse for 5 hours... if you want me to look at/edit any more edit, just ping them to my nick and i'll take a bat to them asap [09:15] posingaspopular, awesome. thanks for your contributions! :) [09:16] i'll help anyway i can [18:24] anybody seen nixternal today? [18:36] nope, been on since 8am Central US time, and you are the first post === sladen_ is now known as sladen