=== elkbuntu_ is now known as elkbuntu [04:37] Anyone around? [04:37] yup [04:37] :) [04:37] I have been watching some marketing videos. [04:37] oh dear [04:37] Yeah. [04:38] indeed [04:38] What do we need to do to attract creative people to Ubuntu and allow them to create unique works of video art? [04:38] ignore most marketing stuff, it applies to big marketing orgs [04:38] we need a place for people to easily put that video art up somewhere [04:38] Well, youtube is a start. [04:38] no, not youtube [04:39] like Mozilla id [04:39] Yes, youtube is terrible. [04:39] http://www.firefoxflicks.com/ [04:39] see if they will give up taht code [04:39] if they won't, tell me [04:39] Oooh.. [04:40] Well, I am thinking more of the creation of the .MOV files on Ubuntu... [04:40] Or .OGG for that matter. [04:41] you talking about getting the programs ready? [04:41] pitivi is the answer to that [04:41] Is there a learning path where creative people can be directed to create videos? [04:41] are you talking about programs to create such videos or a campaign such as firefoxflicks? [04:42] I am not a video person myself. It's all I can do to take pictures and save them away. But some people are big into video and video editing. [04:42] Is there a tutorial that can show people how to save video and edit it on Ubuntu? [04:43] Burgundavia: Let me look at these videos and I'll tell you.... [04:44] we need better editing software [04:44] Pitivi is the way forward [04:45] Yes, exactly like those videos! [04:46] Then, the second part of my idea... [04:46] Public Access Cable Television. [04:47] But for starters, getting some video content about Ubuntu would be tops. [04:47] I am surprised at the video quality of the Firefox videos, frankly. [04:47] again, we need the program. Pitivi is what we need [04:47] http://www.pitivi.org/ [04:47] Thanks for the link. [04:48] however, having a firefoxflicks style contest is really parallel to getting a good video editor [04:48] in fact, they compliment each other [04:49] You're right. Pitivi looks very nice. [04:49] How far is the project? [04:49] How mature? [04:50] needs a bunch of work [04:50] Ah. [04:52] We could put the screencasts on our local cable public access channels, for starters. [04:52] screencasts are boring documentation [04:52] popey: no offence, given I know you are going to read this :) [04:52] But I wanted to emphasize that video is an effective marketing channel. [04:53] yes, but screencasts are not the way to do that [04:53] Hmm -- agreed. [04:53] getting yourself on those channels would be a good thing [04:53] dress up spiffy and bring a laptop with a default install of Ubuntu on it [04:53] What about audio content? Any 30 second audio clips promoting Ubuntu? [04:54] not currently [04:54] that would be the point of having such a contest [04:54] Here's another idea: Get some audio marketing into podcasts by paying for advertisement. [04:55] or better yet, get the podcasts to promote a contest, which costs us nothing [04:56] But the 'cast community is moving to video format, so best to think of the future. [04:57] I don't see the podcast community as a target for playing ads [04:57] Contest? To create what? [04:57] I see them as an ally to getting people to help us make those ads for other targets [04:58] I think putting an ad in a popular PC Tech podcast could get some mileage. [04:58] (What do people in other countries say who use kilometers? I guess they don't have the phrase, 'get some mileage'.) [04:59] Anyway, I think it might have some traction to get the Ubuntu message to a typically Windows podcast. [04:59] mileage is pretty much a common term across all of English-dom [04:59] ads in podcast == bad [05:00] them talking about us == good [05:00] Hmm [05:00] Maybe I could get some interview spots with them, at least. [05:02] http://www.accesschannel.com/whatisaccess.asp [05:05] Interesting that the Firefox Flicks are copyrighted by Firefox. [05:32] Burgundavia: Your talk on copyright attribution the other night has me all worked up. I am watching derivative works and wondering why they do not attribute their sources, or whether an original, modified source needs to be attributed or otherwise completely not used. [05:33] I started to read American copyright law, but, oh my gosh, is that some long legal code. [05:34] Then, I come to find out that Australian copyright law is even more restrictive than the American code. Makes one want to generate everything by hand, which is, I guess, what everyone has been doing for the Ubuntu Marketing effort. [05:34] not really [05:34] ignore copyright law, pay attention to the licenses [05:34] Not really? [05:34] people have been creating such from scratch because they cannot find the existing stuff [05:36] Well, I am just venting frustration. I understand the copyright laws are a legal morass right now, when considering computer technology. [05:37] As long as we can create new content on Ubuntu, then it isn't all bad. === juliux_ is now known as juliux === MrM is now known as mrmonday