| asac | Ubulette: i think xul is uploaded | 14:55 |
|---|---|---|
| asac | went pretty fast ... which is why i just think ;) | 14:56 |
| asac | Ubulette: let me know if you haven't received a confirmation mail in a few minutes | 14:57 |
| Ubulette | nothing so far | 14:57 |
| Ubulette | our gdk/glib is ugly | 14:58 |
| Ubulette | http://paste.ubuntu.com/1982/ | 14:58 |
| asac_ | 16:09 < asac> yeah | 15:12 |
| asac_ | 16:10 < asac> ok upload failed | 15:12 |
| asac_ | 16:10 < asac> lets try again | 15:12 |
| asac_ | damn ... now i got disconnected :) | 15:13 |
| Ubulette | hmm, I still have 21 upgrades pending in hardy, some 2+ weeks old | 15:14 |
| asac_ | Ubulette: xulrunner accepted | 15:23 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| bluekuja | asac: is normal that the package didnt enter NEW queue already? | 15:25 |
| Ubulette | asac, got no email | 15:29 |
| asac | Ubulette: its ok ... i received it | 15:30 |
| asac | apparently the signer gets the mail in ubuntu ... which isn't the case in debian | 15:30 |
| asac | which is why i always get it wrong | 15:30 |
| bluekuja | asac: usually it was something automatic | 15:31 |
| Ubulette | so it was not a sponsored upload ? | 15:31 |
| bluekuja | asac: but I still cannot see anything | 15:31 |
| asac | Ubulette: read what i said :) | 15:31 |
| bluekuja | Ubulette, it is | 15:31 |
| bluekuja | Ubulette, just the package signer gets the mail back | 15:31 |
| bluekuja | not the changelog author | 15:31 |
| asac | Ubulette: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xulrunner-1.9/1.9~b1~rc3+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 | 15:32 |
| bluekuja | asac: any idea? | 15:32 |
| asac | bluekuja: no idea ... maybe the sync host is down | 15:33 |
| asac | i know that debian has some issue with some hosts | 15:33 |
| asac | atm | 15:33 |
| asac | but no idea how it works | 15:33 |
| asac | you should receive a mail though | 15:33 |
| bluekuja | asac: yes, I received it | 15:33 |
| bluekuja | asac: but it doesnt appear on NEW | 15:33 |
| bluekuja | usually when you receive the mail, you see the package in NEW | 15:34 |
| asac | bluekuja: are you subscribed to debian-devel-announce? | 15:34 |
| asac | you should | 15:34 |
| asac | http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/11/msg00001.html | 15:34 |
| asac | http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/11/msg00002.html | 15:34 |
| bluekuja | asac: that's old | 15:35 |
| bluekuja | and has been fixed | 15:35 |
| asac | yes ... but it takes time to resume | 15:35 |
| asac | read second one | 15:36 |
| bluekuja | true | 15:36 |
| bluekuja | but we uploaded it after ries went up to normality | 15:37 |
| bluekuja | so should be faster | 15:37 |
| bluekuja | but as you said it might be a mirror sync problem | 15:37 |
| bluekuja | (I'm subscribed to that list it seems) | 15:38 |
| bluekuja | :) | 15:38 |
| bluekuja | and yes, I received that mail as well | 15:38 |
| bluekuja | thought it was a bit faster | 15:38 |
| bluekuja | asac: so we have to wait a bit more or it will need a re-upload? | 15:43 |
| bluekuja | having received the mail should be just a delay | 15:43 |
| bluekuja | on having it mirrored | 15:43 |
| asac | bluekuja: well ... i read from the mail the it needs to update db and al ... maybe that takes a few days | 15:47 |
| Ubulette | http://patches.ubuntu.com/by-release/extracted/ubuntu/f/firefox/ | 15:57 |
| Ubulette | useful site :) | 15:58 |
| bluekuja | asac: don't know. I'll have to ask about it | 15:58 |
| bluekuja | asac: gambas2 got uploaded to NEW 28 minutes ago | 16:02 |
| bluekuja | and it appeared now | 16:02 |
| bluekuja | so our delay seems to be a problem | 16:02 |
| bluekuja | 2 hours | 16:02 |
| asac | meeting atm ... 30 min i hope | 16:08 |
| bluekuja | ok :) | 16:08 |
| === \sh is now known as \sh_away | ||
| Ubulette | mozilla bug 381206 | 16:30 |
| ubotu | Mozilla bug 381206 in OS Integration "Tango Style theme for better Linux UI integration" [Enhancement,Assigned] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381206 | 16:30 |
| Ubulette | bug 157126 | 16:37 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 157126 in mozilla-firefox "FF2 without default mozilla-five-home" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/157126 | 16:37 |
| Ubulette | asac, please fix this one, it's creating troubles in other distro | 16:39 |
| asac | other distro? | 16:40 |
| Ubulette | bug 162430 | 16:40 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 162430 in exaile "Fix for #136202 causes problems on non-Debian distros" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/162430 | 16:40 |
| Ubulette | bug 136202 | 16:40 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 136202 in exaile "Segmentation fault when clicked on Artist tab on Information page (dup-of: 123409)" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/136202 | 16:40 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 123409 in exaile "[exaile/gutsy] crash in lib gtkembedmoz" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/123409 | 16:40 |
| bluekuja | asac: found duplicate status token ('KEYEXPIRED'). | 16:47 |
| Ubulette | asac, it's a trivial fix | 16:47 |
| Ubulette | LIBDIR is undefined | 16:48 |
| asac | bluekuja: where did you get that from? | 16:48 |
| bluekuja | asac: I was talking with anthony towns | 16:48 |
| asac | thats strange ... my key is still valid ... at least the sign subkey | 16:49 |
| bluekuja | <aj> yeah, the upload key has expired, and if it's been refreshed, the refreshed key hasn't made it into the keyring yet | 16:50 |
| asac | strange | 16:50 |
| asac | bluekuja: maybe ask him which key the upload key is :/ | 16:50 |
| asac | or if there is no valid encryption key anymore could cause this | 16:51 |
| bluekuja | asked, now he gives me | 16:51 |
| bluekuja | the ID | 16:51 |
| asac | ? | 16:52 |
| bluekuja | asac: http://pastebin.com/m15b5c1d | 16:53 |
| bluekuja | sub 2048g/BD94D82D 2003-08-15 [expired: 2006-07-05] | 16:54 |
| bluekuja | sub 4096R/8D7621E6 2006-01-25 [expired: 2007-01-25] | 16:54 |
| bluekuja | sub 4096R/9580ABA9 2006-11-15 [expired: 2007-07-13] | 16:54 |
| bluekuja | sub 4096R/140C6664 2006-11-23 [expires: 2008-05-16] | 16:54 |
| bluekuja | asac: it looks like a parsing bug | 16:55 |
| bluekuja | gpg: NOTE: signature key 8D7621E6 expired Thu 25 Jan 2007 07:57:47 AM UTC | 16:56 |
| Ubulette | asac, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xulrunner-1.9/1.9~b1~rc3+nobinonly-0ubuntu1/+build/444689 | 16:56 |
| Ubulette | not our fault | 16:57 |
| asac | well | 16:57 |
| asac | bluekuja: where did you talk to aj? | 16:58 |
| bluekuja | asac: irc | 16:58 |
| asac | which channel? | 16:58 |
| bluekuja | asac: I ask him to come here? | 16:58 |
| bluekuja | via pm | 16:58 |
| asac | ok | 16:58 |
| bluekuja | just a sec | 16:58 |
| bluekuja | heya aj :) | 16:59 |
| aj | gpg: NOTE: signature key 8D7621E6 expired Thu 25 Jan 2007 07:57:47 AM UTC | 17:00 |
| aj | that message is the problem, i don't see why though | 17:00 |
| aj | asac:^ | 17:00 |
| bluekuja | aj: is possible to have more than a key for uploads? | 17:02 |
| asac | aj: yes ... but i have another one .. and already did loads of uploads | 17:02 |
| aj | well, it's not giving that message for the other two expired keys | 17:03 |
| asac | why would gpg sign with an expired subkey when there is a valid one avail? | 17:03 |
| aj | it didn't -- gpgv says it used the current one | 17:03 |
| asac | hmmm the subkey that should be used is 140C6664 ... and i just checked that its used according to what is said when signing. so gpgv has a bug and chokes if there is any expired S key? | 17:05 |
| aj | gpg --list-sigs 140C6664 # why does that think 8D7621E6 is special enough to warrant a NOTE? | 17:05 |
| aj | aren't the other expired keys S keys too? | 17:05 |
| asac | http://paste.ubuntu.com/1984/ | 17:07 |
| asac | just the one | 17:07 |
| asac | the other two are E | 17:07 |
| asac | what do you mean by gpg --list-sigs 140C6664 ... warrants a note? | 17:08 |
| asac | i don't see anything about 8D7621E6 in the output | 17:09 |
| asac | aj: ? | 17:09 |
| aj | $ gpg --keyring /srv/keyring.debian.org/keyrings/debian-keyring.gpg -v --list-sigs 140C6664 | head -n1 | 17:10 |
| aj | gpg: using PGP trust model | 17:10 |
| aj | gpg: NOTE: signature key 8D7621E6 expired Thu 25 Jan 2007 07:57:47 AM UTC | 17:10 |
| aj | pub 1024D/A824B93F 2003-08-15 | 17:10 |
| asac | strange | 17:10 |
| aj | you're not getting that? | 17:10 |
| aj | $ gpg --version | 17:11 |
| aj | gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.6 | 17:11 |
| aj | ii gnupg 1.4.6-2 GNU privacy guard - a free PGP replacement | 17:11 |
| asac | i get that ... forgot the -v before | 17:11 |
| aj | oh, it doesn't show up without -v? | 17:12 |
| asac | yes | 17:12 |
| asac | its not there without -v | 17:12 |
| bluekuja | asac: problem fixed or still investigating? | 17:23 |
| asac | i don't think its fixed | 17:23 |
| asac | aj: what do you think? | 17:23 |
| asac | there should be others affected as well ... e.g. if they use subkeys for signing | 17:24 |
| aj | well, someone else's upload was blocked because of an expired key, but i hacked an update to thekeyring which made it work fine for that upload | 17:25 |
| asac | aj: maybe i should delkey the expired subkey? | 17:26 |
| aj | Torsten Werner | 17:27 |
| asac | aj: ok i delkey the bad subkey ... no the --list-keys doesn't show up the signature | 17:28 |
| asac | aeh the NOTE | 17:28 |
| aj | okay, using the old keyring, -v --list-keys gives me: | 17:28 |
| aj | gpg: NOTE: signature key C4CF8EC3 expired Wed 31 Oct 2007 07:08:33 PM UTC | 17:28 |
| aj | gpg: NOTE: signature key C4CF8EC3 expired Wed 31 Oct 2007 07:08:33 PM UTC | 17:29 |
| aj | after doing a --recv-keys for that key, that goes away though | 17:29 |
| aj | hrm, and the expired key disappears | 17:29 |
| asac | aj: i send my key to subkeys ... and keyring.debian.org | 17:29 |
| asac | (just sent) ... maybe we should wait till tomorrow and then we can retry? | 17:29 |
| aj | worth a shot; it might need elmo to do something manual to update the keyring though | 17:30 |
| aj | -rw-r--r-- 1 archvsync archvsync 23932393 2007-08-04 11:35 debian-keyring.gpg | 17:30 |
| aj | is the date of the last update | 17:30 |
| asac | in the end i think its gpgv that is buggy ... why would it care if there is an expired subkey? | 17:30 |
| aj | i don't know, but i can't trace the codepath to see what exactly it's complaining about | 17:31 |
| aj | and changing dak doesn't seem an option, because it can't tell which key the KEYEXPIRED message is for | 17:31 |
| aj | (so has to assume it's the one being used) | 17:31 |
| asac | right | 17:32 |
| asac | lets see if it goes away with the subkey deleted (if that propagates to the keyservers at all) | 17:32 |
| asac | aj: i'll ping you tomorrow. thanks so far! | 17:32 |
| aj | righto, ttyl | 17:32 |
| asac | bluekuja: so maybe i am not a DD anymore :) | 17:33 |
| asac | lets hope | 17:33 |
| bluekuja | lol | 17:33 |
| bluekuja | if it doesnt work, what happens? | 17:33 |
| asac | ask elmo to fix it | 17:33 |
| bluekuja | someone need to sign your key again? | 17:33 |
| asac | yeah :) | 17:33 |
| asac | i missed the chance to get loads of signatures | 17:33 |
| bluekuja | oh damn.. | 17:33 |
| asac | in UDS :) | 17:33 |
| asac | in january i can get a bunch again | 17:33 |
| bluekuja | what should I ask to elmo? | 17:34 |
| asac | bluekuja: no ... don't ask ... i will ask once its clear that i need his help | 17:34 |
| bluekuja | asac: can aj ack the upload anyway? | 17:34 |
| asac | no | 17:34 |
| asac | bluekuja: if it doesn't work out tomorrow we have to get another sponsor for you | 17:34 |
| asac | :) | 17:35 |
| bluekuja | asac: and why this problem went out now? | 17:35 |
| asac | ask siretart :) | 17:35 |
| asac | he is your AM after all | 17:35 |
| asac | because they updated gpgv recently | 17:35 |
| bluekuja | yep, true | 17:35 |
| bluekuja | ah | 17:35 |
| asac | which appears to choke on things the previous version didn't | 17:35 |
| asac | lets wait till tomorrow | 17:36 |
| bluekuja | I'm lucky we have find out this problem | 17:36 |
| asac | well ... i am pretty unhappy about it | 17:36 |
| asac | Ubulette: ffox 3 is up | 17:36 |
| bluekuja | yes, but at least you know it | 17:36 |
| bluekuja | and it won't be a surprise | 17:36 |
| bluekuja | for another upload | 17:36 |
| asac | since we have versioned build-depends the buildd should try once xul is build | 17:36 |
| asac | if it doesn't happen you need to ping archive admins to give it back | 17:37 |
| Ubulette | asac, could you force a retry of xul lpia ? elmo just told me it's fixed | 17:37 |
| asac | Ubulette: ask an archive admin | 17:37 |
| asac | buildd admin to be correct | 17:37 |
| asac | doko seb128 pitti mithrandir | 17:38 |
| bluekuja | asac: but why did you set an expiry date for your keys? | 17:38 |
| Ubulette | done | 17:38 |
| asac | well i read somewhere its good practice to use subkeys and let them expire | 17:38 |
| bluekuja | actually my keys won't expire | 17:38 |
| bluekuja | to prevent this kind of problems | 17:38 |
| asac | yeah | 17:38 |
| Ubulette | all keys expire | 17:38 |
| asac | when? | 17:38 |
| bluekuja | Ubulette, not true | 17:38 |
| asac | my mainkey is set to expire: never | 17:39 |
| bluekuja | same | 17:39 |
| bluekuja | here | 17:39 |
| Ubulette | you asked for that | 17:39 |
| asac | which is why i use subkeys to reduce the amount of exposure that key gets | 17:39 |
| Ubulette | it's 1 year by default or something like that | 17:39 |
| bluekuja | Ubulette, ? | 17:39 |
| asac | yes by default it expires | 17:39 |
| asac | Ubulette: who did you ask to give back? | 17:40 |
| asac | don't see any message on -devel | 17:40 |
| bluekuja | asac: well, at least you know there is a problem | 17:40 |
| Ubulette | elmo on #lp | 17:40 |
| bluekuja | about them | 17:40 |
| asac | ah ok | 17:40 |
| bluekuja | and you won't find that out | 17:40 |
| bluekuja | with a REJECTED mail | 17:40 |
| asac | right | 17:40 |
| bluekuja | on another upload | 17:40 |
| bluekuja | ;) | 17:40 |
| Ubulette | any reason not to push ff 2.0.0.8+2nobinonly-0ubuntu2 to gutsy ? it will help tons of users for bug 157126 | 17:41 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 157126 in mozilla-firefox "FF2 without default mozilla-five-home" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/157126 | 17:41 |
| asac | Ubulette: i will fix this in next security upload | 17:41 |
| asac | it will take that much time anyways to go through proposed | 17:41 |
| asac | i have to be sure that this doesn't cause any regressions though | 17:42 |
| bluekuja | asac: and your main-key is not registered? | 17:42 |
| asac | bluekuja: it is ... but i don't sign with that | 17:42 |
| Ubulette | not having it sure causes issues | 17:42 |
| bluekuja | asac: ah damn | 17:42 |
| bluekuja | asac: so in fact you don't have to get signatures again | 17:42 |
| bluekuja | if the main-key is registered | 17:43 |
| asac | bluekuja: i hope not | 17:43 |
| bluekuja | I hope not too | 17:43 |
| bluekuja | ;) | 17:43 |
| asac | ok i have to pack my things ... will be back eventually tomorrow ... in holiday mode | 17:43 |
| bluekuja | lol | 17:44 |
| bluekuja | ok | 17:44 |
| bluekuja | :) | 17:44 |
| asac | Ubulette: so you already have three packages on your list in LP :) | 17:48 |
| * Ubulette is sending subliminal remained to bluekuja to complete the review of sm1... | 17:48 | |
| asac | Ubulette: we should get prism in as well | 17:48 |
| Ubulette | gasp, remainder | 17:49 |
| bluekuja | Ubulette, I'll take a look at it tomorrow | 17:49 |
| bluekuja | I'm out this evening for a party | 17:49 |
| Ubulette | asac, i'll review the gasp with rhelmer debs later today | 17:49 |
| bluekuja | and will come back a bit drunk | 17:49 |
| asac | if you want to help .. we need to port yelp and devhelp to use XPCOM_GLUE | 17:49 |
| bluekuja | so won't touch the pc | 17:49 |
| bluekuja | :P | 17:49 |
| Ubulette | s/gasp/gaps/ | 17:49 |
| asac | that should be fairly simple though | 17:49 |
| bluekuja | tomorrow I should make it | 17:49 |
| bluekuja | Ubulette, send me a mail please | 17:50 |
| bluekuja | with right details | 17:50 |
| asac | except that gtkmozembed is broken due to url-classifier ... but one can just do a testbuild without safe-browsing | 17:50 |
| asac | oh i have an idea | 17:50 |
| Ubulette | maybe open a bug upstream to attract attention to that | 17:51 |
| asac | well ... i will try to use --enable-url-classifier instead of safe-browsing on xulrunner side | 17:51 |
| asac | as xulrunner doesn't implement safe-browsing anyways | 17:52 |
| asac | maybe that makes a difference :) | 17:52 |
| Ubulette | I don't know if prism and other xulapps could use safe-browsing through xul | 17:53 |
| asac | no ... xulrunner doesn't ship any safe-browsing code | 17:54 |
| asac | its all in browser/ ... the toolkit only contains url-classifier | 17:54 |
| asac | i will see soon | 17:54 |
| asac | build is running | 17:54 |
| asac | i doubt it makes any difference except maybe breaking firefox safebrowsing code :) ... but well worth a try as it builds without me paying attention | 17:55 |
| asac | now of to packing | 17:55 |
| Ubulette | E: Package cdbs has no installation candidate | 18:04 |
| Ubulette | Package cdbs is not available, but is referred to by another package. | 18:04 |
| Ubulette | still lpia | 18:04 |
| asac | ok out ... i wouldn't bother too much about lpia now ... let the others do the frontier diggin ;) | 18:31 |
| asac | cu tomorrow | 18:31 |
| Ubulette | ++ | 18:33 |
| rhelmer | Ubulette: cool let me know if you'd like to discuss the changes i made; the only thing i didn't get quite working was i'd like to be able to click on .webapps from firefox and have them launch with prism | 19:09 |
| rhelmer | Ubulette: it does work from nautilus however | 19:10 |
| rhelmer | the only problem is that firefox tries to do "prism whatever.webapp" not "prism -webapp whatever.webapp" | 21:59 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| Ubulette | rhelmer, sorry, i've been busy with something else today | 23:20 |
| Ubulette | i've had a look at the licences | 23:20 |
| Ubulette | it seems it's only MPL 1.1 | 23:20 |
| Ubulette | except dom inspector with is tri licenced MPL/GPL/LGPL | 23:21 |
| Ubulette | which is | 23:21 |
| Ubulette | would be nice to have the whole thing tri-licenced | 23:21 |
| Ubulette | i'm no expert in licences but I remember the debate with debian a while ago | 23:22 |
| rhelmer | Ubulette: yeah mark finkle says tri-license should be fine | 23:25 |
| rhelmer | i made a new patch to mozilla bug 403593 | 23:25 |
| ubotu | Mozilla bug 403593 in Prism "prism on ubuntu should be in menu, have icons, file associations, etc." [Enhancement,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403593 | 23:25 |
| Ubulette | rhelmer, i see you're copying xulrunner-stub as prism-bin. Is there an advantage compared to just making a symlink like I did ? | 23:25 |
| rhelmer | Ubulette: hmm i must've misread, i thought yours just had a shell script which called xulrunner ? | 23:26 |
| Ubulette | (ie, to the script, not to -bin or -stub) | 23:26 |
| Ubulette | yes | 23:26 |
| rhelmer | if symlink instead of copy works that sounds fine | 23:27 |
| rhelmer | i am not sure if the LICENSE file i added is all done correctly but i'll find out :) | 23:27 |
| rhelmer | we may need to edit all the source files too, but i think the LICENSE overrides according to EXHIBIT A | 23:27 |
| Ubulette | i can do it, in fact, i've already made one | 23:27 |
| Ubulette | I'd prefer the sources to be changed upstream | 23:28 |
| Ubulette | i've derived my copyright file from the one i've made earlier for xulrunner 1.9 | 23:29 |
| rhelmer | Ubulette: cool check out https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=288750 | 23:29 |
| rhelmer | Ubulette: there is also a Makefile in there that you can do e.g. "make install PREFIX=whatever" | 23:30 |
| rhelmer | let me know if these things help | 23:30 |
| rhelmer | i haven't started working on the icon issues quite yet | 23:30 |
| Ubulette | usual debian way is a build system that honors DESTDIR | 23:30 |
| rhelmer | Ubulette: s/PREFIX/DESTDIR/ ? that's ok with me i thought PREFIX was the norm.. i have been trying to avoid autoconf for this as it seems overkill :) | 23:31 |
| Ubulette | PREFIX could be /usr then debhelper or cdbs could prepend DESTDIR = debian/tmp to make debian/tmp/usr/{bin,lib}/.... | 23:31 |
| Ubulette | hold on, let me find a pointer explaining that | 23:36 |
| Ubulette | here is the proposed copyright file: http://paste.ubuntu.com/1989/ | 23:36 |
| rhelmer | Ubulette: ok that sounds reasonable | 23:38 |
| Ubulette | rhelmer, what is your prism.keys file for ? | 23:38 |
| rhelmer | Ubulette: hmm is that needed anymore? i thought that's what update-mime-database used, or something | 23:39 |
| rhelmer | do we only need .desktop and .xml now? | 23:39 |
| rhelmer | (brb) | 23:39 |
| Ubulette | shared-mime-info wants the .xml | 23:40 |
| Ubulette | the desktop obviously is needed too | 23:40 |
| Ubulette | I need a better default icon, ie a prism with nice alpha colors. mine comes from xulrunner (the blue planet) | 23:42 |
| rhelmer | maybe keys is just cargo-cult; i followed some gnome howto to try to figure it out | 23:42 |
| rhelmer | Ubulette: i've got some, derived from the .ico; one is in my patch | 23:42 |
| rhelmer | that should really be the default xpm | 23:42 |
| rhelmer | hmm webrunner.xpm in svn is a transparent prism icon | 23:44 |
| rhelmer | app.xpm is the blue planet | 23:44 |
| Ubulette | cool. i'll use the one from sources and drop mine. we always prefer stuff from upstream | 23:45 |
| Ubulette | (don't tell debian guys, they should be mad about me for the rebranding ;) | 23:46 |
| Ubulette | hmm, now the .desktop file. %u %U %f %F is the question | 23:48 |
| rhelmer | heh | 23:52 |
| rhelmer | Ubulette: %F seemed to be the only one for work for me | 23:52 |
| Ubulette | for urls, shouldn't it be %U ? | 23:53 |
| Ubulette | well, i never remember | 23:53 |
| rhelmer | Ubulette: hmm doesn't prism only support files right now with -webapp? | 23:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!