=== asac_ is now known as asac [01:14] BenC: awake? [01:14] * lamont has issues with sata on his new computer... === asac_ is now known as asac [04:46] how do I build an i386 kernel on an amd64? [04:46] make ARCH=i386 ? [04:46] that simple, eh? [04:46] to debian/rules ? [04:46] Not sure if it automatically passes -m32 - you might need to set CFLAGS as well [04:47] AUTOBUILD=1 NOEXTRAS=1 ARCH=i386 fakeroot debian/rules binary-generic [04:47] ? [04:47] Worth a go. I've never tried it with the build system. [04:47] make bzImage gave me something with a different ABI string [04:48] What does file say about it? [04:48] dunno, deleted it days ago [04:48] Ah [04:48] Tim told me to use debian/rules [04:49] make EXTRAVERSION=-14-generic, or whatever [04:49] arch=i386 seems to work [04:49] Sweet [04:50] it's building arch/i386 anyway [04:50] * Keybuk waits for 40 minutes [04:50] Ah, yes, arch/i386/Makefile:CC := $(CC) -m32 === \sh_away is now known as \sh [07:31] <\sh> moins [07:33] <\sh> Keybuk, ping mom...why is mom only running against the unomdified archive, but not against -security or -updates? [07:46] moin [07:49] thats your mom? [07:50] i mean your mom runs linux? [07:50] ... [07:50] mom is merge-o-matic [07:50] <\sh> hmmm? my mom? [07:51] <\sh> I don't know what my mom is doing, I didn't see her for 20 years...but I know what Keybuks MoM does ;) === soren_ is now known as soren [08:43] lol [11:22] After upgrading from Feisty to Gutsy I have no LAN access any more. How can I resolve the IRQ 11 resource conflict thus formed? (https://bugs.launchpad.net/update-manager/+bug/158397/) [11:22] Launchpad bug 158397 in update-manager "[Ubuntu 7.10] dmesg: "serial8250: too much work for irq11"" [Undecided,New] === zul_ is now known as zul [13:29] \sh: because it does [13:29] we don't normally fill -security or -updates for a development release ;) [13:30] likewise, there's no unstable security in Debian === \sh is now known as \sh_away [16:15] okies have the xen infrastructure kind of inplace for 2.6.24 [16:28] zul: cool zul :) [16:31] amitk: upstream kernel devs are evil or basatrds :) [16:32] hehe... you are referring to the x86 merge? [16:32] yep [16:33] but it was all handled quite nicely for everything that is already in the kernel. I am running 2.6.24-rc2 right now [16:33] cool..hopefully ill get there soon [16:43] zul: Great work chuck! [18:00] 'lo all.. is the kernel version for 8.04 already decided? [18:00] 2.6.24 [18:01] zul: thanks.. any pointers on when there will be a first cd? [18:01] check the release schedule on the wiki [18:01] ok, thanks [18:02] hmm.. 2.6.24 isn't released yet afaik, isn't it a bit too 'new' ? [18:02] or do you guys think it's best to take the last possible version beeing a LTS? [18:05] alex_joni: the first of the Hardy kernels is coming 'real soon now' [18:05] rtg: ok, thanks.. I plan of doing a RTAI patched version of it (did the same with dapper.. still works great) [18:06] alex_joni: I'm grinding through the test builds right now for the x86 variants. I hope to push them all later today. [18:07] rtg: is this based on rc2 form kernel.org? [18:08] RTAI's latest patch is for 2.6.22, I wanna see how far off it is [18:08] alex_joni: rc2 and them some. I pull from linux-2.6 just about every morning. [18:08] rtg: ok cool, I'll try against rc2 [18:17] alex_joni: Going by past experience, we expect 2.6.24 to be released by February. That should give us a good 1-2 months to iron out the issues. [18:18] ok guys, you've been really helpfull as always.. I'll be back around that time :) === doko_ is now known as doko === \sh_away is now known as \sh === hotsho1 is now known as hotti === bdmurray_ is now known as bdmurray === \sh is now known as \sh_away === Mithrand1r is now known as Mithrandir