[01:14] <lamont> BenC: awake?
[01:14]  * lamont has issues with sata on his new computer...
[04:46] <Keybuk> how do I build an i386 kernel on an amd64?
[04:46] <mjg59> make ARCH=i386 ?
[04:46] <Keybuk> that simple, eh?
[04:46] <Keybuk> to debian/rules ?
[04:46] <mjg59> Not sure if it automatically passes -m32 - you might need to set CFLAGS as well
[04:47] <Keybuk> AUTOBUILD=1 NOEXTRAS=1 ARCH=i386 fakeroot debian/rules binary-generic
[04:47] <Keybuk> ?
[04:47] <mjg59> Worth a go. I've never tried it with the build system.
[04:47] <Keybuk> make bzImage gave me something with a different ABI string
[04:48] <mjg59> What does file say about it?
[04:48] <Keybuk> dunno, deleted it days ago
[04:48] <mjg59> Ah
[04:48] <Keybuk> Tim told me to use debian/rules
[04:49] <mjg59> make EXTRAVERSION=-14-generic, or whatever
[04:49] <Keybuk> arch=i386 seems to work
[04:49] <mjg59> Sweet
[04:50] <Keybuk> it's building arch/i386 anyway
[04:50]  * Keybuk waits for 40 minutes
[04:50] <mjg59> Ah, yes, arch/i386/Makefile:CC              := $(CC) -m32
[07:31] <\sh> moins
[07:33] <\sh> Keybuk, ping mom...why is mom only running against the unomdified archive, but not against -security or -updates? 
[07:46] <kraut> moin
[07:49] <cathyal> thats your mom?
[07:50] <cathyal> i mean your mom runs linux?
[07:50] <pwnguin> ...
[07:50] <pwnguin> mom is merge-o-matic
[07:50] <\sh> hmmm? my mom? 
[07:51] <\sh> I don't know what my mom is doing, I didn't see her for 20 years...but I know what Keybuks MoM does ;)
[08:43] <cathyal> lol
[11:22] <bullgard4> After upgrading from Feisty to Gutsy I have no LAN access any more. How can I resolve the IRQ 11 resource conflict thus formed? (https://bugs.launchpad.net/update-manager/+bug/158397/)
[11:22] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 158397 in update-manager "[Ubuntu 7.10] dmesg: "serial8250: too much work for irq11"" [Undecided,New] 
[13:29] <Keybuk> \sh: because it does
[13:29] <Keybuk> we don't normally fill -security or -updates for a development release ;)
[13:30] <Keybuk> likewise, there's no unstable security in Debian
[16:15] <zul> okies have the xen infrastructure kind of inplace for 2.6.24
[16:28] <amitk> zul: cool zul :)
[16:31] <zul> amitk: upstream kernel devs are evil or basatrds :)
[16:32] <amitk> hehe... you are referring to the x86 merge?
[16:32] <zul> yep
[16:33] <amitk> but it was all handled quite nicely for everything that is already in the kernel. I am running 2.6.24-rc2 right now
[16:33] <zul> cool..hopefully ill get there soon
[16:43] <abogani> zul: Great work chuck! 
[18:00] <alex_joni> 'lo all.. is the kernel version for 8.04 already decided?
[18:00] <zul> 2.6.24
[18:01] <alex_joni> zul: thanks.. any pointers on when there will be a first cd?
[18:01] <zul> check the release schedule on the wiki
[18:01] <alex_joni> ok, thanks
[18:02] <alex_joni> hmm.. 2.6.24 isn't released yet afaik, isn't it a bit too 'new' ?
[18:02] <alex_joni> or do you guys think it's best to take the last possible version beeing a LTS?
[18:05] <rtg> alex_joni: the first of the Hardy kernels is coming 'real soon now'
[18:05] <alex_joni> rtg: ok, thanks.. I plan of doing a RTAI patched version of it (did the same with dapper.. still works great)
[18:06] <rtg> alex_joni: I'm grinding through the test builds right now for the x86 variants. I hope to push them all later today.
[18:07] <alex_joni> rtg: is this based on rc2 form kernel.org?
[18:08] <alex_joni> RTAI's latest patch is for 2.6.22, I wanna see how far off it is
[18:08] <rtg> alex_joni: rc2 and them some. I pull from linux-2.6 just about every morning.
[18:08] <alex_joni> rtg: ok cool, I'll try against rc2
[18:17] <amitk> alex_joni: Going by past experience, we expect 2.6.24 to be released by February. That should give us a good 1-2 months to iron out the issues.
[18:18] <alex_joni> ok guys, you've been really helpfull as always.. I'll be back around that time :)