[07:53] <ianloic_> hey, is there a repo containing previous ubuntu kernel releases
[07:53] <ianloic_> so I can try downgrading my kernel easily?
[07:54] <ianloic_> I want to isolate a bug I'm seeing
[08:24] <kraut> moin
[09:12] <gregorovius> I know this is a dev channel, but I can't seem to get any answers, maybe one of you can point me to the right direction. I'm running gutsy, I installed the RT kernel, but when booting from it my computer becomes unresponsive
[09:12] <gregorovius> I can type, move the mouse, change ttys, but I can't login and there's no disk activity
[09:13] <gregorovius> and I can't find any similar bug reports
[09:14] <pwnguin> why linux-rt?
[09:15] <gregorovius> trying to use jack without xruns...
[09:17] <gregorovius> any ideas? I can't even see anything weird on the logs
[09:19] <pwnguin> what's mount say?
[09:20] <gregorovius> pwnguin, sorry, what's mount got to do with it?
[09:21] <pwnguin> if you're having problems with disk, perhaps mount will reveal some bad state
[09:23] <gregorovius> pwnguin, http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/44703/ but I don't see nothing unusual
[09:24] <pwnguin> fuseblk?
[09:25] <gregorovius> sda1, I guess that'd be my ntfs partition
[09:25] <pwnguin> i thought you couldn't log in
[09:26] <gregorovius> now i'm with the generic kernel, with the RT kernel I can't do anything
[09:26] <pwnguin> not even with the recovery console?
[09:28] <gregorovius> didn't try that, I guess I should
[09:43] <gregorovius> it works up to init 1
[09:43] <gregorovius> it crashes when I start gdp
[09:44] <gregorovius> gdm*
[10:24] <abogani> Zinc go very slow with a simple git-clone: is it normal?
[12:39] <zul> morning
[12:50] <abogani> zul: to you
[13:00] <abogani> zul: Do you know why zinc runs so very slow?
[13:01] <zul> abogani: nope
[13:03] <abogani> Perhaps my internet connection have some trouble...
[13:11] <amitk> abogani: zinc is not loaded at all
[13:11] <amitk> abogani: load average: 0.00, 0.04, 0.02
[13:41] <tepsipakki> I sent an email to kernel-team, hopefully someone will let it through :)
[14:36] <ogra> BenC, awake already?
[15:01] <Kano> hi
[15:02] <Kano> could ivtv-fb included into the lum package?
[15:02] <Kano> a tiny mod is needed to the source, as the "wrong" headers are used by default, but basically it works then
[15:03] <Kano> hmm maybe not for the current release, i see there is very new one..
[15:04] <Kano> http://dl.ivtvdriver.org/ivtv/archive/1.0.x/ivtv-1.0.3.tar.gz
[15:05] <Kano> well 100% is to replace the ivtv-driver*.h file...
[15:07] <Kano> i would do that
[15:09] <rtg> Kano: send a patch to kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com, but note that it has to conform to the SRU policy.
[15:12] <Kano> sru?
[15:13] <zul> stable release update
[15:16] <Kano> when will be a package for kernel+lum with the current changes?
[15:17] <Kano> btw. i posted the raid 5 patch for dmraid on the kernel list and got no response
[15:17] <Kano> it is 100% verified that the patch works
[15:19] <Kano> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2007-October/001878.html
[15:20] <Kano> i verified it on 2 ubuntu boxes remotely
[15:20] <abogani> Kano: Sure, It importat that you have verified the patch on two your machines but it is more important check the patch for avoid regressions and this isn't a simple task.
[15:21] <Kano> as it only adds a new module what regression should happen?
[15:21] <Kano> i use it daily
[15:21] <Kano> same kernel, just without raid 5 hardware currently
[15:52] <Kano> btw. how are the packages are created out of the git without that additional git data
[18:27] <rtg> lamont: Are you and Kyle co-maintainers of hppa?
[18:28] <lamont> rtg: kyle is the upstream side of things, and I deal with ubuntu and such
[18:28] <lamont> sup>?
[18:28] <rtg> lamont: I'm about to upload configs for hardy. Would you go through the hppa configs and send me any changes you need?
[18:28]  * lamont needs to run a quick errand
[18:29] <lamont> rtg: can do
[18:29] <lamont> there's an outstanding 64-bit A500 bug that we need to track down eventually... that'll certainly result in some changes to the configs
[18:29] <rtg> lamont: upload is done.
[18:29] <lamont> it's not exactly top-of-my-list right now though
[18:29] <lamont> upload to where?
[18:29] <rtg> the usual place on kernel.ubuntu.org.
[18:30] <lamont> and will look when I get back online later
[18:30] <lamont> ah, ok
[18:30] <rtg> kernel.ubuntu.com
[18:30] <rtg> lamont: its in the git repo, not a source package upload.
[18:34] <lamont> right
[18:34] <lamont> I assume ubuntu/ubuntu-hardy.git, and will look at scrollback when I'm back online
[18:35] <rtg> lamont: yep.
[18:39] <ogra> amitk, do you happen to be here ? 
[20:38] <amitk> ogra__: hi
[20:38] <ogra__> hey
[20:38] <ogra__> i ran into this patch: http://lwn.net/Articles/198333/
[20:39] <ogra__> by reading teh thread it looks like grekKH isnt opposed to it 
[20:39] <amitk> awesome
[20:39] <ogra__> (its for 2.6.18 though)
[20:40] <amitk> ogra__: that shouldn't be a problem now that we have something that supposedly works
[20:40] <amitk> we just need to find time to port it :)
[20:40] <ogra__> :)
[20:41] <rtg> amitk: how do I build lpia? Its doesn't follow the normal custom-binary-FLAV formula.
[20:41] <amitk> rtg: it should
[20:42] <amitk> fakeroot debian/rules custom-binary-lpia{,compat}
[20:42] <amitk> ohh.. you need the lpia chroot :p
[20:42] <rtg> amitk: I think I saw an option in 2.6.24 that allows USB devices to persist during suspend.
[20:43] <rtg> amitk: ah, the lpia chroot. I should have guessed. I thought it was an i386 based flavour.
[20:43] <amitk> rtg: ogra__: great.. I will play with it during my alleged vacation
[20:44] <ogra__> doh !
[20:44] <ogra__> dont !
[20:44] <ogra__> you can surely get assigned some work time for that :)
[20:45] <ogra__> relax during your holiday :)
[21:56] <amitk> rtg: is everything in 2.6.23.x stable tree guaranteed to be in 2.6.24?
[21:57] <amitk> http://lwn.net/Articles/258938/rss
[22:10] <rtg> amitk: In some form or another, unless it was deemed a bad feature and got ripped out.