=== sabotage is now known as sabotage_afk [01:08] will UME bill available for the nokia products? (770, n800, etc? [01:20] corevette: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MobileAndEmbedded/FAQ [04:19] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubuntu_Mobile_and_Embedded_Edition ? [04:23] ? === asac_ is now known as asac [06:45] good morning === asac_ is now known as asac === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach [13:01] lool: Does PPA show a "published" status before it starts building? [13:02] Because I didn't see those log files yesterday [13:11] amitk: It should, yes; I think everybody in the team received the failed build logs [13:12] amitk: At least StevenK and I did [13:12] lool: I haven't received the logs [13:13] amitk: I don't see why I have received them then [13:13] or rather the failed build notification. [13:14] with an URL to the logs [13:14] Yes [13:14] amitk: I see the linux upload published at https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mobile/+archive [13:14] It even built for lpia, which is what we're targetting :) [13:14] It only failed for amd64 and i386 [13:15] you want https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mobile/+archive/+builds [13:15] (view build records) [13:19] Mithrandir: So I have to keep polling that page? I don't get email? [13:20] lool: Yes, I noticed the lpia .deb this morning. But last night, the status was "published" and the only files available were orig.tar.gz, diff.gz and the .dsc file. [13:21] amitk: unsure. I got a "this build failed" email. [13:21] amitk: hm, are you in ubuntu-dev or ubuntu-core-dev? [13:21] amitk: Yes, the source was published [13:22] Mithrandir: I am not core dev...... yet :) [13:22] Me neither, but I got the mail [13:22] amitk: are you in -dev? [13:23] Mithrandir: nevermind... I am blind. It is sitting in my spam folder. [13:23] heh [13:40] * Mithrandir builds the first hardy UME build [14:02] Mithrandir: FYI I'm also building against hardy, but I'm running into tons of unrelated issues with MIC [14:02] It has a lot of duplication and useless hardcoding of gutsy all around the place [14:03] somehow, I'm not surprised. [14:03] I don't even know why they had to override the gutsy debootstrap script [14:03] uh, they don't? They use it if the distro doesn't provide its own, iirc? [14:03] Mithrandir: No, the path is incorrect in MIC [14:04] They check for /usr/lib/debootstrap instead of /usr/share, so their script is always used... [14:04] It was probably true for an older debootstrap [14:04] at least up and until gutsy, the scripts lived in /usr/lib [14:05] Ok, then it's not the case for hardy [14:05] * Change /usr/lib/debootstrap to /usr/share/debootstrap. Closes: #430615. [14:05] In the last upload of deboostrap to Debian synced to Ubuntu [14:06] just make sure to fix it in the hardy m-i-c, then [14:06] I am; it's part of the unrelated issues I'm mentionning [14:06] But if you grep for /usr/lib/debootstrap, you'll see it in no less than 3 places [14:07] somehow, I'm not surprised. [14:09] Mithrandir: If you're running tip, there was a known breakage at image creation time which was fixed overnight; make sure to pull if you want to generate actual images [14:09] I refuse to run anything but what's in the archive, except for pure testing purposes. [14:09] k, you should be fine then === doko_ is now known as doko [14:32] I'm pretty sure there are some target / buildroot mistakes in MIC grah === cprov is now known as cprov-lunch [14:49] Arglg, MIC wasn't calling dh_pysupport with its private module dir, so you could end up with old .pyc files around [15:02] Ah Err http://ppa.launchpad.net hardy/main Packages 404 Not Found [15:02] lool: Probably because nothing has been uploaded to it that targets Hardy [15:02] Anybody mind if I upload a dummy hildon-desktop with the same source as in hardy but a lower version number? [15:03] StevenK: Yes, quite certainly; and I have nothing to upload in particular! [15:03] I could upload hildon-input-method-framework, but the package is a pile of crap [15:03] (but I should probably sleep) [15:04] We also have an interesting problem that I started using hardy version + ~um1 for ppa uploads to gutsy, but the sources are shared across all dists in the pool, so I need to distinguish [15:04] StevenK: Do sleep, I prefer uploading something which will not actually be used [15:04] StevenK: 'night to you [15:05] Night! === sabotage_afk is now known as sabotage [16:32] amitk: The Samsung FSET will pull linux-lpiacompat by default; this seems broken; should it pull linux-image or linux-image-lpia? [16:32] Or linux-image-lpiacompat? [16:34] (I'm using mccaslin BTW) [17:36] Does someone know how the hosts file is generated? [17:36] With newer MIC, it's copied from the host [17:37] Hmm it seems it always was copied over [19:52] Mithrandir: I don't have a place to push my MIC yet; I'd like to sort the issue preventing the UI to come up on the device before uploading, but it might not be in MIC itself; if you really need one, let me know and I'll put it as a tar somewhere over the WE === cprov-lunch is now known as cprov-away [20:26] lool: ok, over the weekend is fine [20:40] is Ubuntu Mobile and Embedded just for UMPC-like devices? or also for QVGA smartphones? [20:41] LuitvD: For now it's just for UMPC-like devices [20:41] it requires an x86 CPU [20:41] Currently we're only targetting x86 compatible devices with a resolution of 800x480 or higher [20:41] smartphones (ARM core) are x86 too right? [20:41] No [20:41] They're ARM [20:41] damn :( [20:41] * LuitvD stoopid [20:42] if you give us money to work on an ARM port, we'll do the work ;) [20:42] lol, would it be worth more then OpenMoko? [20:42] (if it would be ARM-compatible?) [20:42] The current UI is not suited to low-resolution devices [20:43] right... [20:43] so I should just go with something else? [20:47] lool: You want linux-image-lpiacompat on the samsungs [20:48] and linux-image-lpia on the crownbeach