| asac | gnomefreak: for this issue you don't need to test a full rebuild | 00:00 |
|---|---|---|
| ]reed[ | asac: hey, I just filed LP #162993 | 00:00 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 162993 in ia32-libs "ia32-libs missing 32-bit gnome libraries needed for gtk stock icons" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/162993 | 00:00 |
| asac | just build sources ...like what you upload and verify that it done right | 00:00 |
| gnomefreak | its still building the tar.gx | 00:00 |
| asac | bug 162993 | 00:00 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 162993 in ia32-libs "ia32-libs missing 32-bit gnome libraries needed for gtk stock icons" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/162993 | 00:00 |
| ]reed[ | what's the best way to get somebody to look at it? | 00:00 |
| gnomefreak | not building diff | 00:00 |
| gnomefreak | dpkg-source: building lightning-sunbird in lightning-sunbird_0.7+nobinonly-0ubuntu1.tar.gz | 00:01 |
| gnomefreak | dpkg-source: building lightning-sunbird in lightning-sunbird_0.7+nobinonly-0ubuntu1.dsc | 00:01 |
| gnomefreak | why the fuck is it building ubuntu1.tar.gz | 00:01 |
| Ubulette | rename the dir | 00:02 |
| gnomefreak | to what? | 00:02 |
| Ubulette | mv lightning-sunbird_0.7+nobinonly lightning-sunbird-0.7+nobinonly | 00:02 |
| gnomefreak | lightning-sunbird_0.7+nobinonly | 00:02 |
| asac | ]reed[: usually you should try to ping the last uploader and usually subscribe him to that bug | 00:02 |
| Ubulette | tar cvzf lightning-sunbird_0.7+nobinonly.orig.tar.gz lightning-sunbird-0.7+nobinonly/*.tar.bz2 | 00:02 |
| gnomefreak | it should be - not _ | 00:02 |
| gnomefreak | why would dir be - when tarball is _ | 00:03 |
| Ubulette | the name of the tarball is right, the dir in it is not | 00:03 |
| asac | ]reed[: but given the low bug count on that package it will probably get attention on its own. so maybe wait a few days | 00:03 |
| Ubulette | gnomefreak, look before the nobinonly: | 00:03 |
| Ubulette | ix:~/bzr/tarballs$ tar ztvf lightning-sunbird_0.7.orig.tar.gz | 00:03 |
| Ubulette | drwxr-xr-x fta/fta 0 2007-10-28 19:19 lightning-sunbird-0.7/ | 00:03 |
| Ubulette | -rw-r--r-- fta/fta 37292115 2007-10-28 19:18 lightning-sunbird-0.7/lightning-sunbird-0.7-source.tar.bz2 | 00:03 |
| Ubulette | so just reproduce with s/0.7/0.7+nobinonly/ | 00:04 |
| Ubulette | take extra care about "_" and "-" | 00:04 |
| Ubulette | you have to create APP_VERSION.orig.tar.gz containing APP-VERSION/something.tar.bz2 | 00:05 |
| gnomefreak | why would dir matter in that instance since tarball is _ figured dir should be aas well | 00:06 |
| Ubulette | where APP is lightning-sunbird and VERSION is 0.7+nobinonly | 00:06 |
| asac | ]reed[: i think a lot of kde users will complain if you pull in all those gnome libs | 00:06 |
| Ubulette | gnomefreak, try it | 00:06 |
| gnomefreak | i am but i dont get why it matters | 00:06 |
| gnomefreak | but you answere that | 00:06 |
| Ubulette | it's how dpkg-sources works | 00:06 |
| ]reed[ | asac: well, we're requiring them for Firefox 3 on Linux | 00:07 |
| ]reed[ | for now, at least | 00:07 |
| asac | ]reed[: i doubt that all those libs are needed for gtk stock icons | 00:07 |
| ]reed[ | we're open to help! | 00:08 |
| ]reed[ | help us! :) | 00:08 |
| ]reed[ | see mozilla bug 402742 | 00:08 |
| ubotu | Mozilla bug 402742 in ImageLib "nightlies on Ubuntu 7.10 x64 do not show stock icons" [Major,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402742 | 00:08 |
| asac | ]reed[: what kind of api do you use for stock icons? | 00:08 |
| ]reed[ | see comment #29 | 00:08 |
| ]reed[ | in that moz bug | 00:09 |
| gnomefreak | Ubulette: how can i run lintian and/or linda on this now? | 00:09 |
| gnomefreak | save me from uploading to find out errors | 00:09 |
| asac | Ubulette: do we see those stock icons? | 00:09 |
| === ]reed[ is now known as [reed] | ||
| Ubulette | in the file list ? yes | 00:10 |
| asac | without gnome-support? | 00:11 |
| Ubulette | I have gnome support | 00:11 |
| gnomefreak | the bule globe with or without | 00:11 |
| gnomefreak | asac: iirc it doesnt matter its blue globe either way | 00:11 |
| Ubulette | oh, mine are orange, not yellow | 00:11 |
| gnomefreak | yellow? | 00:12 |
| asac | Ubulette: yeah its probably from your theme :) | 00:12 |
| asac | Ubulette: can you try to uninstall xul-gnome-support and see if they go away as well? | 00:12 |
| asac | i only have a8 build here on this system | 00:12 |
| gnomefreak | i see the same icons as the mozilla bug has as attachments | 00:12 |
| Ubulette | i'm with b2pre | 00:12 |
| gnomefreak | this is on a9 | 00:12 |
| gnomefreak | a9pre | 00:12 |
| asac | Ubulette: right ... please try :-D | 00:13 |
| asac | Ubulette: bug was filed 06-11 ... so b2pre should be fine i guess | 00:13 |
| [reed] | the new Linux theme just landed last night | 00:13 |
| [reed] | that makes the main icons use stock icons | 00:13 |
| gnomefreak | mine looks like https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=287563 | 00:13 |
| gnomefreak | in help about | 00:14 |
| Ubulette | hold on, i'm gonna upgrade to 1.9~b2~cvs20071115t1439 | 00:17 |
| gnomefreak | asac: lintian == no errors linda == waiting on it to install | 00:19 |
| gnomefreak | grrrrrrr | 00:19 |
| gnomefreak | if i remove debhelper from control linda complains if i add it linda complains | 00:20 |
| gnomefreak | wonder if its linda | 00:20 |
| Ubulette | gasp, without gnome support, it's broken | 00:20 |
| gnomefreak | but native is gone | 00:20 |
| gnomefreak | not here | 00:21 |
| gnomefreak | Ubulette: i dont have gnome-support for firefox-3.0a9pre and i get the fuse on the globe | 00:21 |
| gnomefreak | assuming that is the correct icon | 00:21 |
| gnomefreak | using defaul gnome icons here | 00:22 |
| [reed] | no, you need to look at ftp listings | 00:22 |
| [reed] | go to ftp://ftp.mozilla.org | 00:22 |
| [reed] | do you see icons? | 00:22 |
| gnomefreak | the folders and files yes | 00:22 |
| gnomefreak | ugly as hell but yes | 00:23 |
| [reed] | download ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/tinderbox-builds/fx-linux-tbox-trunk/firefox-3.0b2pre.en-US.linux-i686.tar.bz2 | 00:23 |
| [reed] | unpack it and run it | 00:23 |
| Ubulette | http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/Minefield-without-gnome.png | 00:23 |
| [reed] | Ubulette: yes, that's what people are reporting :0 | 00:23 |
| [reed] | we'd like to fix it | 00:24 |
| gnomefreak | ok it looks right here ill let you know when download is done what b2 looks like | 00:24 |
| Ubulette | readding gnome support does not change anything, it's still broken | 00:24 |
| [reed] | Ubulette: does that include libgnomeui ? | 00:25 |
| Ubulette | what ? | 00:26 |
| gnomefreak | ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/tinderbox-builds/fx-linux-tbox-trunk/firefox-3.0b2pre.en-US.linux-i686.tar.bz2 | 00:26 |
| gnomefreak | shit | 00:26 |
| gnomefreak | http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=81twl7d&s=1 | 00:26 |
| asac | [reed]: ok ... the idea is to just use gtk_icon_theme_lookup_icon and guess the name from mime-type | 00:26 |
| gnomefreak | that is a9pre | 00:26 |
| asac | is that good enough? | 00:26 |
| gnomefreak | waiting for b2 | 00:26 |
| [reed] | asac: hmm, can you comment in the bug? | 00:27 |
| asac | yes | 00:27 |
| Ubulette | http://paste.ubuntu.com/2016/ | 00:28 |
| Ubulette | well, that's with gnome-support but it looks like without | 00:28 |
| Ubulette | maybe a chrome reg | 00:29 |
| Ubulette | damn, it's borked | 00:29 |
| Ubulette | i can't stay like that | 00:29 |
| asac | Ubulette: he? | 00:30 |
| Ubulette | look at my screenshot | 00:30 |
| Ubulette | i'm like that now | 00:30 |
| Ubulette | i've downgraded to b1 rc3, it's back in shape.. aaaahh, i feel better | 00:34 |
| gnomefreak | testing upstream build waiting for it to open | 00:35 |
| gnomefreak | i see icons | 00:36 |
| gnomefreak | its using ubuntu themes | 00:36 |
| gnomefreak | theme | 00:36 |
| Ubulette | i've upgraded again but this time with gnome support, i see the icons but my bmtoolbar is missing | 00:36 |
| gnomefreak | post screenshot in a moment | 00:37 |
| gnomefreak | Ubulette: i dont have -gnome-support for 3.0 installed | 00:37 |
| gnomefreak | would it be using 2.0 gnome-support? | 00:37 |
| gnomefreak | i wouldnt think so | 00:37 |
| Ubulette | http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/Minefield-with-gnome.png | 00:37 |
| Ubulette | gnomefreak, no, firefox-3.0-gnome-support & xulrunner-1.9-gnome-support | 00:38 |
| [reed] | Ubulette: yeah, I think the bookmark toolbar issue is mozilla bug 403743 | 00:38 |
| ubotu | Mozilla bug 403743 in Toolbars "Bookmark toolbar items don't show up even though they are accessible in the Bookmark Toolbar Folder" [Normal,Resolved: duplicate] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403743 | 00:38 |
| gnomefreak | i dont have neither | 00:38 |
| Ubulette | Error: uncaught exception: [Exception... "'[JavaScript Error: "this._result is null" {file: "chrome://browser/content/places/toolbar.xml" line: 357}]' when calling method: [nsIController::isCommandEnabled]" nsresult: "0x80570021 (NS_ERROR_XPC_JAVASCRIPT_ERROR_WITH_DETAILS)" location: "JS frame :: chrome://browser/content/places/controller.js :: updatePlacesCommand :: line 1644" data: yes] | 00:39 |
| Ubulette | ok, it's mozilla bug 403854 | 00:40 |
| ubotu | Mozilla bug 403854 in Search "Removing searchbar or location bar breaks many things" [Normal,Assigned] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403854 | 00:41 |
| [reed] | yeah, so that should be reviewed and landed for tomorrow's nightliews | 00:41 |
| [reed] | -w | 00:41 |
| Ubulette | i don't like the new icons at all | 00:42 |
| Ubulette | the two arrows look weird when you hover them | 00:42 |
| Ubulette | is it really supposed to look native ??? | 00:43 |
| [reed] | the tab scrolling arrows? | 00:43 |
| [reed] | or what? | 00:43 |
| [reed] | what arrows? | 00:44 |
| [reed] | back/forward? | 00:44 |
| Ubulette | b/f | 00:44 |
| [reed] | what's the proper way of doing things? | 00:45 |
| [reed] | you should file bugs :) | 00:45 |
| Ubulette | i can't take a screenshot showing that hovering thing | 00:47 |
| Ubulette | the border of the arrow when hovered is complete, the one of the smaller arrow on the right (for history) has only 3 sides | 00:48 |
| Ubulette | that looks weird to me | 00:48 |
| [reed] | can you not use "Take Screenshot" and set a delay? | 00:49 |
| Ubulette | the close button of tabs disappear when hovered | 00:49 |
| Ubulette | even with delay, the hovering is not visible | 00:49 |
| Ubulette | i've tried twice | 00:50 |
| [reed] | lame | 00:50 |
| Ubulette | sorry | 00:50 |
| [reed] | so, you should file all these issues in bugzilla | 00:50 |
| [reed] | so we can fix them :) | 00:50 |
| Ubulette | close button doesn't seem vertically centered: http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/tabs.png | 00:52 |
| gnomefreak | firefox hates me | 00:53 |
| [reed] | Ubulette: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org :) | 00:53 |
| [reed] | please file | 00:53 |
| Ubulette | well, i have enough bugs opened everywhere. i usually don't care much about color/theme. Here, i was just used to the previous ones | 00:53 |
| [reed] | well, people really want it native | 00:54 |
| [reed] | so, that's what we're doing | 00:54 |
| [reed] | with new Tango icons making up stuff that gtk stock icons doesn't have | 00:54 |
| [reed] | http://tango.freedesktop.org/Firefox | 00:54 |
| Ubulette | no offense intended. i know it's important for end users. i'm just not representative of the mass ;) | 00:55 |
| gnomefreak | http://i9.tinypic.com/7xui9w5.png | 00:55 |
| gnomefreak | that is with b2 upstream | 00:55 |
| gnomefreak | ubuntu doesnt use tango by default | 00:55 |
| gnomefreak | atleast not yet | 00:56 |
| Ubulette | gnomefreak, yep, i see the same now. i fixed my toolbar by adding a search bar | 00:56 |
| gnomefreak | toolbar wont fix your icons though | 00:56 |
| gnomefreak | default ubuntu themes firefox 3.0* shows icons fine | 00:57 |
| gnomefreak | flash is working on pissing me off something awfulol | 00:57 |
| Ubulette | http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/FF3-Unresponsive-script.png | 00:58 |
| Ubulette | this is weird too | 00:58 |
| gnomefreak | its not 3.0 thats stuck its 2.0 here | 00:58 |
| gnomefreak | cant do shit | 00:58 |
| gnomefreak | tinypic is freezing me up | 00:58 |
| gnomefreak | cant open term to kill ff | 00:58 |
| Ubulette | lol | 00:58 |
| [reed] | Ubulette: yeah, we've had some people complaining that the unresponsive script thing comes up at odd times | 00:59 |
| Ubulette | i'm talking about the icons | 01:00 |
| Ubulette | stop is green and continue red ? | 01:00 |
| Ubulette | counter intuitive | 01:00 |
| [reed] | Ubulette: oh, lol | 01:02 |
| [reed] | I didn't notice that | 01:02 |
| gnomefreak | ok asac sunbird is fixed firefox broken sb fixed :( | 01:03 |
| Ubulette | asac, I've patched xulrunner and seamonkey to ifdef that part | 01:45 |
| Ubulette | i've created mozilla bug 403994 | 01:54 |
| ubotu | Mozilla bug 403994 in Build Config "Don't install nss headers when sysytem-nss is used" [Normal,Unconfirmed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403994 | 01:54 |
| Ubulette | oops, sysytem | 01:55 |
| Ubulette | mozilla bug 403994 | 01:55 |
| ubotu | Mozilla bug 403994 in Build Config "Don't install nss headers when system-nss is used" [Normal,Unconfirmed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403994 | 01:55 |
| Ubulette | better | 01:56 |
| [reed] | oh | 02:28 |
| [reed] | that's you | 02:28 |
| [reed] | :p | 02:28 |
| Ubulette | ? | 02:29 |
| [reed] | Ubulette: so, you need to request review | 02:29 |
| Hobbsee | erm...how do i run firefox-3.0? i'm getting an error | 02:29 |
| Hobbsee | Could not find compatible GRE between version 1.9a8 and 1.9a8. | 02:29 |
| Hobbsee | (hardy) | 02:29 |
| Ubulette | you probably have a bad xul install | 02:30 |
| Hobbsee | how would i go about fixing that? | 02:30 |
| Ubulette | which version of xulrunner-1.9 do you have ? | 02:31 |
| Ubulette | (dpkg -l xulrunner-1.9) | 02:31 |
| Hobbsee | Setting up xulrunner-1.9 (1.9~b1~rc3+nobinonly-0ubuntu1) ... | 02:31 |
| Ubulette | oh | 02:31 |
| Hobbsee | not up to date? | 02:31 |
| Ubulette | it's just that firefox-3.0 b1 rc3 has not been built | 02:32 |
| Ubulette | it's still stuck in the merge flood | 02:32 |
| Hobbsee | Installed: 3.0~alpha8+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 | 02:32 |
| Ubulette | yep | 02:32 |
| Hobbsee | oh, crumbs you're right | 02:32 |
| Ubulette | that's why | 02:32 |
| Hobbsee | ok, will try to shove. i want buildd admin powers dammit. | 02:32 |
| Ubulette | https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+builds?build_text=firefox-3.0&build_state=all | 02:32 |
| Hobbsee | damn edge. stop timing out on me! | 02:33 |
| Ubulette | [reed], i never know which knob to select so i usually wait forever :p | 02:34 |
| Hobbsee | hehe | 02:34 |
| * Hobbsee is too familiar with edge :( | 02:34 | |
| Ubulette | but as i merge my patches directly here, it doesn't matter much | 02:34 |
| Ubulette | Hobbsee ?? | 02:34 |
| Hobbsee | it often times out on me. | 02:35 |
| [reed] | Ubulette: it matters to us | 02:35 |
| Hobbsee | Ubulette: right, problem solved. | 02:35 |
| Hobbsee | Ubulette: btw, you had a dpkg patch ages ago. iwj told me some stuff about it, but i've no idea what it was - about why some parts werent wise. | 02:36 |
| Hobbsee | you may want to ask him | 02:36 |
| Ubulette | Hobbsee, i have tons of patches everywhere, most of them are beeing ignored | 02:36 |
| Hobbsee | are the sponsorship teams subscribed to them? | 02:37 |
| Ubulette | i have no idea | 02:37 |
| Hobbsee | if not, that's why. | 02:37 |
| Ubulette | as i run my patches anyway | 02:37 |
| Ubulette | i have my own builder | 02:37 |
| Hobbsee | (ubuntu-universe-sponsors, ubuntu-main-sponsors, as the package requires) | 02:37 |
| Hobbsee | hardly helpful for anyone else, though. | 02:38 |
| Ubulette | well, i file bugs and post patches, that should be enough. if maintainers don't care to even have a look, why should i ? | 02:39 |
| Ubulette | all my patches are public | 02:39 |
| Hobbsee | ubuntu doesnt have maintainers. i thought you'd been around enough to know this. | 02:39 |
| Hobbsee | that's *why* we have a sponship queue | 02:39 |
| Ubulette | i'm running linux since 1991 so I know | 02:40 |
| Hobbsee | at last count, i think everyone in ~ubuntu-dev (and not all are active), have around 800 packages each. | 02:40 |
| Ubulette | and debian since 1996 | 02:40 |
| Hobbsee | oddly enough, they probably don't see all of them. | 02:40 |
| Hobbsee | i'm surprised you don't file to debian, as they do actually have maintainers. | 02:40 |
| Ubulette | i'm no longer interested by debian. | 02:41 |
| Ubulette | i'm still running it on a dozen servers but no more on desktops | 02:42 |
| * Hobbsee wonders just how many patches there are which arent on the sponsorship queue. | 02:42 | |
| Ubulette | no idea | 02:43 |
| Hobbsee | 1425, apparently. | 02:43 |
| Hobbsee | modulo dupes, and not-real-patches. | 02:43 |
| Ubulette | good, ff3 is building now. did you do something or is it just happening now ? | 02:44 |
| Hobbsee | yes, i poked the relevant people | 02:44 |
| Hobbsee | it wasn't going to happen for ages, otherwise. | 02:45 |
| Ubulette | excellent | 02:45 |
| Ubulette | thx | 02:45 |
| Hobbsee | no problem. things work well, when done in effective ways | 02:46 |
| Ubulette | fortunately, ff3 is fast to build now | 02:50 |
| Ubulette | 3 or 4 minutes instead of 1 hour | 02:50 |
| Hobbsee | wow, 8 mins. | 02:51 |
| Ubulette | that's mostly the chroot upgrade + builddeps install | 02:51 |
| Ubulette | I build locally in 1 minute | 02:51 |
| Hobbsee | yup | 02:51 |
| * Hobbsee ponders. wait for the binaries to become available, or nuke the debs. | 02:52 | |
| [reed] | you build a clobber build in 1 minute? | 02:53 |
| [reed] | oh, huh | 02:55 |
| Ubulette | ff with libxul | 02:55 |
| Ubulette | xul still takes 1h though ;) | 02:55 |
| [reed] | k, thought so :p | 02:56 |
| Ubulette | ok, pushing seamonkey2 to my ppa, and going to bed, it's 4am here | 02:58 |
| [reed] | [ Alexander Sack ] | 03:00 |
| [reed] | * Use granparadiso branding for alpha and beta builds and official branding | 03:00 |
| [reed] | for final builds: | 03:00 |
| [reed] | - update debian/rules | 03:00 |
| [reed] | asac: er? | 03:00 |
| [reed] | why Gran Paradiso branding on beta? | 03:00 |
| [reed] | official builds will be official branding | 03:01 |
| [reed] | for betas | 03:01 |
| Ubulette | that's what I've said too | 03:01 |
| Ubulette | but it's b1 rc3, so asac prefered to revert my change | 03:01 |
| [reed] | well, it's just going to make you all look odd! | 03:02 |
| [reed] | :p | 03:02 |
| Ubulette | b1 final will automatically have the official branding | 03:02 |
| [reed] | ah | 03:02 |
| [reed] | and how will rc3 be different from final? | 03:02 |
| Ubulette | we don't know. we'll see when the tarball will be available | 03:03 |
| Ubulette | here, I just fetched the rc3 tag from cvs | 03:03 |
| Ubulette | problem is, there's no official tarballs for xulrunner | 03:04 |
| Hobbsee | ooh, shiny :) | 03:06 |
| Ubulette | does it work ? | 03:06 |
| Hobbsee | yeah | 03:08 |
| Hobbsee | themes and such arent updated, though | 03:08 |
| Ubulette | most are just not compatible so they are there but disabled | 03:08 |
| Hobbsee | i wonder if it can be fooled with the nightly tester tools, as 2.x was | 03:09 |
| Ubulette | you can fool that with a key | 03:09 |
| Hobbsee | haha, nice. | 03:10 |
| Hobbsee | new about:config window warning. | 03:10 |
| Hobbsee | Ubulette: presumably extensions.lastAppVersion? | 03:11 |
| Hobbsee | nope, that didn't work | 03:12 |
| Hobbsee | which key do i want? | 03:12 |
| Ubulette | i don't remember and the about:config is broken in minefield. cpu over the roof | 03:19 |
| Hobbsee | hm. | 03:19 |
| * Hobbsee assumes that the current minefield is quite far aawy from the beta, then. | 03:19 | |
| [reed] | ? | 03:19 |
| [reed] | not reall | 03:19 |
| [reed] | really | 03:19 |
| [reed] | Ubulette: about:config wfm | 03:19 |
| [reed] | Minefield doesn't have many problems | 03:20 |
| Ubulette | it's the 1st time is doesn't work | 03:20 |
| Hobbsee | woot! extensions! | 03:20 |
| Hobbsee | switftabs, how i love thee! :D | 03:20 |
| Ubulette | [reed], cpu rockets for a while, then the popup asks me if I want to continue or kill the script | 03:21 |
| [reed] | strange | 03:21 |
| [reed] | any extensions? | 03:21 |
| Ubulette | not much, mostly tabmix+ and adblock+ | 03:22 |
| Hobbsee | erk, tabmix+ | 03:22 |
| [reed] | adblockplus is compatible with Minefield | 03:23 |
| * Hobbsee had that crashing even on 2.0 | 03:23 | |
| [reed] | is tabmix+ ? | 03:23 |
| Ubulette | the dev one is in sync with trunk usually | 03:23 |
| Hobbsee | uh oh, apparently using history tab complete is a bad idea. | 03:32 |
| Ubulette | tabs look weird in trunk... or at least, different. maybe it's tabmix+ fault. i'm daily building firefox so i'll see if it improves :) | 03:32 |
| Ubulette | bed time for me. 'night guys | 03:33 |
| PoofDaddy | Is this a chan to ask questions on Thunderbird? | 04:52 |
| tonyyarusso | PoofDaddy: it's mostly development-related, actually, but given that nobody's having real discussions right now, I guess you could try. (#ubuntu-offtopic, oddly enough, is often successful for TB stuff too) | 05:02 |
| PoofDaddy | I'll give it try. | 05:03 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| === \sh_away is now known as \sh | ||
| bluekuja | Ubulette, are you around? | 11:31 |
| Ubulette | HI | 11:50 |
| Ubulette | bluekuja, ping | 11:50 |
| bluekuja | Ubulette, heya | 11:51 |
| bluekuja | can you please test something for me? | 11:51 |
| bluekuja | it's a 5 min work | 11:51 |
| bluekuja | so I can finally move to sm | 11:51 |
| Ubulette | tell me | 11:53 |
| bluekuja | download http://incoming.ibluepaper.com/diff-ext_0.2.3-2_i386.deb | 11:53 |
| bluekuja | then | 11:53 |
| bluekuja | install it | 11:53 |
| bluekuja | then do | 11:53 |
| bluekuja | killall nautilus | 11:53 |
| bluekuja | and then right click on a folder/file | 11:53 |
| bluekuja | does it crash or works fine? | 11:53 |
| bluekuja | :) | 11:53 |
| Ubulette | does is matter if i run nautilus HEAD ? | 11:54 |
| bluekuja | I guess no | 11:54 |
| Ubulette | i'm far ahead of hardy for most of gnome | 11:54 |
| Ubulette | ok, give me 5 min, i was on something. | 11:54 |
| bluekuja | ok | 11:55 |
| Ubulette | done | 12:03 |
| Ubulette | no crash | 12:03 |
| Ubulette | but it does nothing. | 12:03 |
| Ubulette | i right click on a file, select "Compare later" | 12:04 |
| Ubulette | right click another file, select "Compare to my1stfile..." | 12:04 |
| Ubulette | nothing happens | 12:05 |
| Ubulette | bluekuja, ^^ | 12:05 |
| bluekuja | yes, it's ok | 12:05 |
| bluekuja | :) | 12:05 |
| bluekuja | but no crashes? | 12:05 |
| bluekuja | right? | 12:05 |
| bluekuja | you need to setup everything | 12:07 |
| bluekuja | to have it working | 12:07 |
| Ubulette | ? it's not automatic ? | 12:08 |
| bluekuja | nope | 12:10 |
| bluekuja | you have to select a file comparison tool | 12:10 |
| bluekuja | from the configuration program | 12:11 |
| Ubulette | how am i supposed to know ? | 12:11 |
| bluekuja | by reading docs | 12:11 |
| bluekuja | ^^ | 12:11 |
| Ubulette | you should provide a default conf that does something | 12:12 |
| Ubulette | here, it's just confusing | 12:12 |
| bluekuja | I gonna add a README then | 12:12 |
| Ubulette | do you know many users who read docs ? I don't | 12:12 |
| bluekuja | they should | 12:12 |
| Ubulette | lol | 12:12 |
| bluekuja | lol | 12:12 |
| Ubulette | i started the setup tool (difficult to find), clicked on about, I can't close the about dialog | 12:13 |
| bluekuja | it's a known bug | 12:13 |
| bluekuja | will be fixed | 12:13 |
| bluekuja | :) | 12:13 |
| Ubulette | setting /usr/bin/diff didn't work. should it be a gui ? | 12:16 |
| bluekuja | yes | 12:16 |
| Ubulette | so i'm doomed | 12:16 |
| bluekuja | lol | 12:16 |
| bluekuja | it have to be a gui | 12:17 |
| bluekuja | you can use meld | 12:17 |
| bluekuja | it works fine | 12:17 |
| bluekuja | brb -- lunch | 12:17 |
| bluekuja | bak | 12:27 |
| bluekuja | *back | 12:27 |
| bluekuja | Ubulette, anyway the docs are inside | 12:27 |
| bluekuja | and usually an user is supposed to read them | 12:27 |
| bluekuja | before using an application | 12:27 |
| bluekuja | if not why ppl include them? | 12:27 |
| bluekuja | ;) | 12:28 |
| Ubulette | as you want, i just think that it should work by default | 12:29 |
| bluekuja | actually I cannot say an user what's the best diff comparison tool to use | 12:29 |
| bluekuja | and plus it should depends on tons of packages | 12:30 |
| bluekuja | so avoid ppl to search them | 12:30 |
| bluekuja | but it's just a 2 steps work | 12:31 |
| bluekuja | 1) configure | 12:31 |
| bluekuja | 2) compare | 12:31 |
| bluekuja | not really hard | 12:31 |
| Ubulette | not much, it's a an for nautilus which is already heavy on deps. so just dep on meld | diff-gui, let meld have a diversion to diff-gui and just pre configure diff-gui as default diff for your extension. any other differ could implement the same diversion | 12:32 |
| Ubulette | s/a an/an ext/ | 12:33 |
| bluekuja | that's true as well | 12:33 |
| bluekuja | I should ack upstream files | 12:33 |
| bluekuja | to get a default configuration | 12:33 |
| bluekuja | I'll talk with the main developer | 12:33 |
| bluekuja | to see what he thinks about that | 12:33 |
| Ubulette | it's a packaging decision. upstream should not be concerned/impacted much | 12:34 |
| bluekuja | yes, but having a default configuration | 12:34 |
| bluekuja | should concern modifing upstream files | 12:34 |
| Ubulette | we do that for everything | 12:34 |
| bluekuja | yep | 12:34 |
| bluekuja | Ubulette, do you have a debian unstable machine as well? | 12:35 |
| Ubulette | not anymore | 12:35 |
| Ubulette | just servers | 12:35 |
| bluekuja | ah damn | 12:36 |
| Ubulette | my own desktops were debian unstable for 10 years | 12:36 |
| bluekuja | really? | 12:36 |
| Ubulette | yes | 12:36 |
| Ubulette | I never had to reinstall the system. just regular upgrades | 12:38 |
| bluekuja | amazing | 12:38 |
| bluekuja | :) | 12:38 |
| Ubulette | sometimes dirty ones but i always managed | 12:38 |
| Ubulette | same for ubuntu. I've jumped on the dev ones the day they opened | 12:40 |
| Ubulette | anyway, no crash with your stuff | 12:41 |
| bluekuja | perfect | 12:41 |
| bluekuja | now I need an unstable test | 12:41 |
| bluekuja | and It can be uploaded | 12:41 |
| Ubulette | damn, another lang pack flood in the ppa | 12:45 |
| bluekuja | aww | 12:45 |
| Ubulette | ~500 debs | 12:48 |
| bluekuja | 0_0 | 12:48 |
| Ubulette | not debs but packages | 12:48 |
| Ubulette | [reed], i've tried to ask for review for my nss patch from yesterday. not sure i did it right | 12:59 |
| Ubulette | damn, seamonkey2 i386 is stuck in the flood in ppa. | 13:00 |
| Ubulette | rhelmer, do you have any idea if there's an ETA for prism 0.9 ? | 13:02 |
| Ubulette | rhelmer, I want to have a release for ubuntu hardy as cvs is not welcome | 13:03 |
| Ubulette | asac, http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=614647 | 14:31 |
| Ubulette | bluekuja, any progress with sm1 ? | 14:38 |
| bluekuja | Ubulette, for this evening | 14:39 |
| bluekuja | yes | 14:39 |
| Ubulette | ok | 14:39 |
| asac | Ubulette: ffox 3 is built | 14:43 |
| asac | you probably already noticed ;) | 14:43 |
| Ubulette | i know | 14:43 |
| Ubulette | Hobbsee wanted it yesterday so he pulled the right string | 14:44 |
| asac | Hobbsee == she | 14:44 |
| asac | she is buildd admin as well from what i know | 14:45 |
| Ubulette | she ? really ? excellent | 14:45 |
| asac | yeah | 14:45 |
| asac | sarah hobbs | 14:45 |
| asac | Ubulette: i think we should make libxul*pc Require: mozilla-nss and then create a link mozilla-nss.pc => nss.pc in case we use system-nss/nspr | 14:56 |
| asac | otherwise the headers are missing in epiphy | 14:57 |
| Ubulette | so you want to hack the pc files using debian/rules ? | 14:58 |
| asac | not sure ... i think in that way we can contribute it upstream | 14:58 |
| asac | or patch the .pc.in files | 14:58 |
| asac | including xul headers without nspr usually means build failure ... so having it without that Requires is just good luck that in some cases the nspr/nss headers are shipped in the same directory | 14:59 |
| Ubulette | that kind of things is distro specific, i don't see how upstream could accept that | 15:00 |
| asac | Ubulette: its not really upstream specific... its just out of luck that they ship the headers in the same directory | 15:06 |
| Ubulette | maybe that could be changed | 15:07 |
| asac | its not the default for them, but it semantically makes sense ... they ship mozilla-nss.pc ... and -nspr.pc so why not express the dependency properly | 15:07 |
| Ubulette | they ship mozilla-nss.pc ? you sure ? | 15:08 |
| asac | well .. its not invented by us ... we just run make install and have it, right? | 15:08 |
| Ubulette | hmm, no anymore | 15:21 |
| Ubulette | http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsview2.cgi?diff_mode=context&whitespace_mode=show&file=Makefile.in&branch=&root=/cvsroot&subdir=/mozilla/build/unix&command=DIFF_FRAMESET&rev1=1.29&rev2=1.30 | 15:21 |
| Ubulette | asac, this is mozilla bug 389673 | 15:21 |
| ubotu | Mozilla bug 389673 in Build Config "Fix "make install" to copy from dist/ rather than recursive makefile traversal" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389673 | 15:21 |
| Ubulette | s/no/not/ | 15:22 |
| Ubulette | (i really need a new keyboard and a new mouse) | 15:22 |
| Ubulette | and new hands too to come with those ;) | 15:22 |
| asac | hehe | 15:23 |
| asac | Ubulette: when was that checkin? | 15:24 |
| asac | Ubulette: i mean i still have that .pc files installed from what i know | 15:24 |
| Ubulette | 2007-08-03 07:46 | 15:24 |
| asac | i think that patch is just to remove the manual make install thing | 15:24 |
| Ubulette | i still see xulrunner-1.9-1.9~b2~cvs20071115t1159+nobinonly/mozilla/xulrunner/installer/mozilla-nss.pc.in but it's no longer installed/used | 15:25 |
| Ubulette | well, maybe it is, but not with system nss | 15:25 |
| asac | yes ... but for that case its like i proposed :) | 15:26 |
| asac | create link to real system one ... and always Requires: mozilla-nss | 15:26 |
| asac | $ dpkg -L xulrunner-1.9-dev | grep mozilla-nss | 15:28 |
| asac | /usr/lib/pkgconfig/mozilla-nss-1.9.pc | 15:28 |
| asac | thats for the a8 in gutsy | 15:28 |
| asac | maybe it would be better to produce the proper path in system-nss/nspr case though | 15:29 |
| asac | e.g. ship a good mozilla-nss in all cases | 15:30 |
| Ubulette | do we ever want to be able to install two sdk at once ? | 15:32 |
| asac | i doubt that | 15:33 |
| asac | why? | 15:33 |
| asac | the .pc files would conflict anyway | 15:33 |
| Ubulette | that's why i ask | 15:33 |
| Ubulette | upstream allows to install as many sdk as you want | 15:34 |
| asac | yeah ... i see the .pc files the single point of stableness developers need to figure out build paths et al | 15:34 |
| asac | how does upstream do that? i mean its not us that install those .pc files in /usr/lib/pkgconfig/ .. its the upstream behaviour | 15:34 |
| Ubulette | we're close to allow one xulrunner per branch, but only one sdk | 15:35 |
| asac | yes .. but i am sure thats the same for upstream ... one sdk per major bracnh | 15:35 |
| asac | e.g. 1.8 sdk + 1.9 sdk is good | 15:35 |
| asac | and since they don't even have the version in pc files its just one sdk at once for them | 15:35 |
| === \sh is now known as \sh_away | ||
| Ubulette | good. seamonkey2 has finally been built in my ppa. | 17:18 |
| asac | great :) | 17:19 |
| === \sh_away is now known as \sh | ||
| Ubulette | asac, what's your status with python/xul1.9 ? jamino bloged about it | 17:35 |
| === \sh is now known as \sh_away | ||
| gnomefreak | i was just thinking why do we keep xpcom, afaik its cross-platform components and we dont build cross platform unless it is used for 32 64 ppc since we dont build for windows | 17:37 |
| gnomefreak | asac: also you can grab sunbird from http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=663 and push its all good and been tested here | 17:39 |
| gnomefreak | oh and for some damn reason firefox isnt remembering the settings for the pop up warnings about encryped pages ect. | 17:40 |
| gnomefreak | yay 60 updates | 17:41 |
| gnomefreak | make that 73 | 17:43 |
| Ubulette_sm2 | hmm.. chatzilla in seamonkey2 has an empty user list | 17:43 |
| gnomefreak | suprise you? | 17:44 |
| Ubulette_sm2 | and the issue with localization of wallet is still there | 17:44 |
| gnomefreak | wallet is still giving issues? | 17:44 |
| Ubulette_sm2 | it's obsolete, supposed to be removed | 17:45 |
| Ubulette_sm2 | firefox did it a while ago | 17:45 |
| gnomefreak | already? | 17:45 |
| gnomefreak | firefox had wallet? | 17:45 |
| Ubulette_sm2 | up to ff2, yes | 17:45 |
| * gnomefreak is now confused | 17:45 | |
| gnomefreak | what does it use now? | 17:46 |
| * gnomefreak thinking wallet is what saved info/passwords ect.. | 17:46 | |
| Ubulette_sm2 | indeed | 17:47 |
| gnomefreak | what took its place? | 17:47 |
| gnomefreak | i know 3.0 offers to save passwords in a dialog at top of page but not sure what its called | 17:47 |
| Ubulette_sm2 | satchel | 17:48 |
| gnomefreak | hmmm | 17:48 |
| Ubulette_sm2 | mozilla bug 390025 | 17:49 |
| ubotu | Mozilla bug 390025 in XP Apps "Move to LoginManager and remove wallet from SeaMonkey" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390025 | 17:49 |
| Ubulette_sm2 | here it is | 17:49 |
| Ubulette_sm2 | not very active :( | 17:50 |
| gnomefreak | can we remove it atleast until upstream does? or we would have to remove it and provide something in place | 17:50 |
| Ubulette_sm2 | there's an issue with localization of wallet so it's too bad it's not moving | 17:50 |
| gnomefreak | this isnt good | 17:53 |
| gnomefreak | Ubulette: did you see bug 162723 (i ask since i know you worked ass off on xulrunner-1.9) | 18:00 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 162723 in xulrunner-1.9 "xulrunner-1.9 build leaves orphaned find processes, hangs buildds" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/162723 | 18:00 |
| === Ubulette changed the topic of #ubuntu-mozillateam to: Home of Ubuntu Mozilla Team - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam | Bug Triagers please read: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/ + https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/Procedures | Mailing List: ubuntu-mozillateam@lists.ubuntu.com | Mohmm nozilla QA tracker https://mozilla.qa.stgraber.org/ => please subscribe to help out | ||
| Ubulette | oops | 18:00 |
| === Ubulette changed the topic of #ubuntu-mozillateam to: Home of Ubuntu Mozilla Team - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam | Bug Triagers please read: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/ + https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/Procedures | Mailing List: ubuntu-mozillateam@lists.ubuntu.com | Mozilla QA tracker https://mozilla.qa.stgraber.org/ => please subscribe to help out | ||
| Ubulette | i meant to say; hmm no | 18:01 |
| Ubulette | ok, i'll handle that | 18:05 |
| Ubulette | i'm trying to do some ajax in xul, that's giving me headaches | 18:09 |
| * gnomefreak will be back later | 18:19 | |
| Ubulette_ | http://www.cnet.com/surveillance-state/8301-13739_1-9813407-46.html | 18:27 |
| Ubulette_ | http://shaver.off.net/diary/2007/11/16/correction-mozilla-stopbadware-and-google/ | 18:28 |
| Ubulette_ | http://ascher.ca/blog/2007/11/16/open-source-peer-to-peer-transportation-systems/ | 18:38 |
| Ubulette_ | that's what I'm using to commute everyday | 18:38 |
| asac | Ubulette_: bug 162723 | 18:47 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 162723 in xulrunner-1.9 "xulrunner-1.9 build leaves orphaned find processes, hangs buildds" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/162723 | 18:47 |
| asac | ?? | 18:47 |
| Ubulette_ | maybe the redirection you've added | 18:49 |
| Ubulette_ | never been an issue for my bot | 18:49 |
| Ubulette_ | it monitors orphaned processes too | 18:49 |
| asac | Ubulette_: well ... i did nothing like that before upload | 18:49 |
| Ubulette_ | i don't know it's new | 18:50 |
| Ubulette_ | i don't think it's new | 18:50 |
| Ubulette_ | (my hands are typing things that my brain never ordered) | 18:50 |
| asac | hehe | 18:51 |
| Ubulette_ | btw, i've trying to ping elmo to discuss that bug, no answer so far | 18:52 |
| asac | Ubulette_: he has stated that its clear to him :) | 18:53 |
| Ubulette_ | tried | 18:53 |
| asac | good luck in pinging elmo | 18:53 |
| Ubulette_ | god, what's happening to me ? | 18:53 |
| Ubulette_ | why ? | 18:53 |
| asac | Ubulette_: nevermind ... he often had high latency in the past:) | 18:54 |
| asac | why the hell would they orphan? ... i had something like that yesterday on my system before I had to reboot ... e.g. lots of those finds dangling around | 18:55 |
| asac | i thought i had killed the make with -KILL | 18:55 |
| asac | Ubulette_: i get | 18:57 |
| asac | test -d mozilla/_tests && rm -rf mozilla/_tests ; \ test -d mozilla/staticlib && rm -rf mozilla/staticlib ; \ find mozilla -type f -name \*.pyc -exec rm {} \; &> /dev/null; \ find mozilla -type l -exec rm {} \; &> /dev/null | 18:57 |
| asac | rm -f debian/xulrunner-1.9.postinst debian/xulrunner-1.9.prerm | 18:57 |
| asac | when running just debian/rules clean | 18:57 |
| asac | asac@ubun:/tmp/xulrunner-1.9-1.9~a8$ semop(1): encountered an error: Invalid argument | 18:57 |
| asac | semop(2): encountered an error: Invalid argument | 18:57 |
| Ubulette_ | my bot: | 18:58 |
| Ubulette_ | rm -f debian/stamp-autotools-files | 18:58 |
| Ubulette_ | test -d mozilla/_tests && rm -rf mozilla/_tests ; \ | 18:58 |
| Ubulette_ | test -d mozilla/staticlib && rm -rf mozilla/staticlib ; \ | 18:58 |
| Ubulette_ | find mozilla -type f -name \*.pyc -exec rm {} \; &> /dev/null; \ | 18:58 |
| Ubulette_ | find mozilla -type l -exec rm {} \; &> /dev/null | 18:58 |
| Ubulette_ | dpkg-source -b xulrunner-1.9-1.9~b2~cvs20071116t0151+bbot | 18:58 |
| Ubulette_ | semop(1): encountered an error: Invalid argument | 18:58 |
| Ubulette_ | semop(1): encountered an error: Invalid argument | 18:58 |
| Ubulette_ | dpkg-source: building xulrunner-1.9 using existing xulrunner-1.9_1.9~b2~cvs20071116t0151+bbot.orig.tar.gz | 18:58 |
| asac | yeah ... what are those semop things? | 18:58 |
| asac | maybe > is used for seomthing in make? | 18:58 |
| Ubulette_ | let me check when it started | 19:00 |
| asac | ok apparently its really &> | 19:01 |
| Ubulette_ | cvs20070925t0251 | 19:02 |
| asac | we need to use > /dev/null 2>&1 | 19:02 |
| asac | that works here without semop | 19:02 |
| Ubulette_ | cvs20070924t0733 was ok | 19:02 |
| Ubulette_ | yep, i told you that. in pure sh, &> is not supported | 19:02 |
| asac | find $(DEB_SRCDIR) -type f -name \*.pyc -exec rm {} \; > /dev/null 2>&1 ;\ | 19:02 |
| asac | find $(DEB_SRCDIR) -type l -exec rm {} \; > /dev/null 2>&1 | 19:03 |
| asac | k | 19:03 |
| asac | but is this the problem? | 19:03 |
| asac | most likely i guess | 19:03 |
| Ubulette_ | that's at best a bashism, for me it's in fact csh syntax | 19:03 |
| Ubulette_ | well, no csh/tcsh use >& and |& | 19:04 |
| asac | well in dash it works | 19:04 |
| asac | echo hallo &> /dev/null | 19:04 |
| asac | doesn't give me semop | 19:04 |
| Ubulette_ | try that when invoked as /bin/sh | 19:04 |
| Ubulette_ | and nohup | 19:05 |
| asac | ok its really backgrounded | 19:05 |
| asac | ok ... wanna add that fix? | 19:05 |
| Ubulette_ | i can do it | 19:05 |
| asac | like above? | 19:05 |
| asac | thanks | 19:05 |
| Ubulette_ | ok | 19:05 |
| asac | set it to fix committed and add the .dev branch to the bug then. | 19:06 |
| Ubulette_ | btw, i've created a xul.head branch yesterday | 19:06 |
| Ubulette_ | i need that to fix, hmm, xul head :) | 19:06 |
| Ubulette_ | needed | 19:06 |
| Ubulette_ | i'm merge in dev later | 19:06 |
| Ubulette_ | i'll | 19:07 |
| Ubulette_ | gasp | 19:07 |
| asac | after b1 i guess | 19:07 |
| Ubulette_ | yes | 19:07 |
| asac | we could have greated a b1 branch and keep main dev on .dev | 19:07 |
| asac | s/gr/cr/ | 19:07 |
| Ubulette_ | that's what I wanted to do with the non dev branch but you complained | 19:09 |
| Ubulette_ | asac, pushed to xul.dev : http://paste.ubuntu.com/2034/ | 19:14 |
| Ubulette_ | if you want to push, feel free | 19:15 |
| Ubulette_ | well, i've committed assuming you'll sponsor it immediately | 19:16 |
| Ubulette_ | asac, ok, elmo seems happy | 19:24 |
| Ubulette_ | asac, about prism, any objection to push a cvs release ? we'll get a real release before hardy is out for sure. problems with this one (0.7) are 1/ real source tarball is not available and 2/ it has been released for win only, then weeks later for linux/mac.. so it's not the same sources. | 19:32 |
| === Ubulette_ is now known as Ubulette | ||
| asac | i have to hand this computer over to my gf for a few | 19:47 |
| rhelmer | Ubulette: i'll find out about 0.9 | 19:57 |
| Ubulette | rhelmer, cool, thx | 19:57 |
| rhelmer | Ubulette: there's a #prism channel on irc, i'll see if anyone has plans yet | 19:57 |
| rhelmer | on irc.mozilla.org that is | 19:58 |
| Ubulette | asac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/2035/ | 20:03 |
| Ubulette | xul failed | 20:03 |
| Ubulette | seems fixed | 20:07 |
| Ubulette | hmm, nope | 20:08 |
| asac | Ubulette: unless something else pops up i would rather wait till beta is out | 21:25 |
| asac | Ubulette: about prism: yeah ... we can get this up | 21:25 |
| asac | Ubulette: maybe try to get the package sponsored the ubuntu way though ... of course, only if you are interested to become a motu at some point | 21:26 |
| asac | so you have me + bluekuja + whoever that can vouch for you before the council | 21:27 |
| Ubulette | if it means doing more politics than packaging, i'm not sure. | 21:27 |
| asac | Ubulette: he? | 21:27 |
| asac | Ubulette: no its just the easiest way to get people to vouch for you ... its not about policits, just multiple persons that can confirm your technical supremacy | 21:28 |
| asac | so did xul fail now? | 21:29 |
| asac | or did this resolve on its own? | 21:29 |
| Ubulette | i'm discussing with the owner of the patch | 21:31 |
| gnomefreak | gzip: stdin: not in gzip format | 21:39 |
| gnomefreak | dpkg-source: failure: gzip gave error exit status 1 | 21:39 |
| gnomefreak | bzr: ERROR: The build failed. | 21:39 |
| gnomefreak | that has got to suck | 21:39 |
| gnomefreak | ah i found it | 21:41 |
| Ubulette | motu seems to just be about doing merges or/and learning about how to do debs | 21:49 |
| Ubulette | i think i already know how to do both | 21:49 |
| gnomefreak | asac: sunbird is done iceape is in the works for gutsy | 21:53 |
| Ubulette | i don't see anything related to what i'm doing in the motu/todo list | 21:55 |
| gnomefreak | Ubulette: sort of yes that is about it but becoming motu give you access to upload to universe/multiverse | 21:55 |
| asac | Ubulette: you do new packages :) | 22:00 |
| asac | Ubulette: thats revu | 22:00 |
| asac | then you maintain them | 22:00 |
| asac | but indeed ... maybe you should rather become a debian NM :) | 22:01 |
| Ubulette | no, thanks. i have enough already. | 22:03 |
| gnomefreak | dpkg-source sucks big time :( | 22:08 |
| gnomefreak | it cant overwrite folders nor can it name it something else | 22:09 |
| gnomefreak | seems i fixed it | 22:10 |
| gnomefreak | yep i fixed it, ill be back later to check on it, building bins before pushing | 22:12 |
| Ubulette | xulrunner 1.8.1.4-2ubuntu5 1.8.1.9-1 1.8.1.4-2 | 22:24 |
| Ubulette | that one i can merge :) | 22:24 |
| asac | Ubulette: yeah ... go ahead | 22:24 |
| asac | read merge-o-matic instructions ... and just do it :) | 22:25 |
| Ubulette | maybe not, i'll not be able to resist cleaning it | 22:25 |
| asac | then ask on motu for someone to sponsor :) | 22:25 |
| asac | Ubulette: one virtue is to stick to things that suck :) | 22:25 |
| asac | Ubulette: but we should really do it .. i already see motus that have no idea wiping the alternative change we made | 22:25 |
| asac | or even worse things like resurrecting the old python patch ... or whatever :) | 22:26 |
| asac | Ubulette: who is listed as mergeee? | 22:26 |
| asac | is it me? | 22:26 |
| Ubulette | you | 22:26 |
| asac | ok if you want go ahead :) | 22:26 |
| asac | usually one should ping the last uploader because otherwise they will complain ... like \sh did for seamonkey ;) | 22:27 |
| asac | aeh kaze | 22:27 |
| asac | Ubulette: if there are things you want to clean up ... post a bug to mike :) | 22:28 |
| Ubulette | - * debian/patches/99configure.dpatch: Updated and added nsprpub/configure.in | 22:38 |
| Ubulette | + * debian/patches/99_configure.dpatch: Updated and added nsprpub/configure.in | 22:38 |
| Ubulette | everywhere | 22:38 |
| Ubulette | that's considered cosmetic | 22:38 |
| Ubulette | I guess we have to accept that | 22:39 |
| asac | out getting cigarrettes | 22:40 |
| Ubulette | we build-depend on ecj, not debian | 23:04 |
| asac | Ubulette: hmm ... maybewe build java xpcom? | 23:25 |
| Ubulette | am i only supposed to look at the conflicts ? | 23:26 |
| Ubulette | basically, control and 99_configure | 23:26 |
| Ubulette | i solved that | 23:26 |
| Ubulette | and i've dropped a patch | 23:26 |
| Ubulette | - drop debian/patches/68_python25_api_breakage.dpatch adopted by Debian as | 23:27 |
| Ubulette | debian/patches/35_python_2.5.dpatch | 23:27 |
| Ubulette | - update 00list | 23:27 |
| Ubulette | - update debian/patches/99_configure.dpatch | 23:27 |
| Ubulette | everything else has been done by the script | 23:27 |
| Ubulette | well, that's no good. that f*g script reverted our stuff | 23:29 |
| Ubulette | hmm maybe not | 23:31 |
| Ubulette | asac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/2041/ | 23:48 |
| Ubulette | oh, and maintainer | 23:48 |
| Ubulette | Maintainer: Ubuntu MOTU Developers <ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com>, why not mt ? | 23:49 |
| asac | well its not really something we want to be responsible for ... do we? | 23:51 |
| Ubulette | no | 23:52 |
| asac | keeing MOTU means that motus will take a look at bugs and all :) | 23:52 |
| asac | otherwise it will end up on our plate ;) | 23:52 |
| Ubulette | i'm done, i'll build it completely | 23:54 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
