=== asac__ is now known as asac === bluekuja_ is now known as bluekuja === asac_ is now known as asac === nuu is now known as nu === nu is now known as nuu [21:47] bluekuja: hey I noticed transmission 0.93 has a bugfix for a serious issue I've heard reported several times, regarding knocking out router connectivity [21:47] bluekuja: debian is still like 2 versions behind and no activty for 2 weeks; I'm thinking about stepping ahead of them and directly packaging tranny 0.93 [21:47] jdong, yes, you can start working on it [21:48] and maybe ping debian [21:48] open a bug [21:48] whatever [21:48] now you have a good reason to do it [21:48] bluekuja: bug open already regarding 0.92 for 14 days ;-) [21:48] e.g serious issue [21:48] :) [21:48] figure it's redundant to poke them again [21:48] yeo [21:48] *yep [21:48] prepare an NMU then [21:49] and get it sponsored inside delayed [21:49] for 7 days [21:49] (should be enough) [21:52] bluekuja: hmm nmu's are an unfamiliarity to me.... [21:52] bluekuja: shall I just give you a prepared source pkg after I'm done and you deal with the Debian side? ;-) [21:53] jdong, yes. Also I think an NMU can be done by an already DD [21:53] I read that somewhere in the docs [21:53] yesterday [21:53] but I'm not *really* sure about that [21:54] bluekuja: are you familiar with what the debian package's dfsg repacking consists of? [21:54] jdong, yes [21:54] I'm doing the P&P test [21:54] atm [21:55] so I'm answering to the DFSG and some other policy docs [21:55] about that [21:55] ^^ [21:55] ok, was just wondering what I need to mangle from upstream's orig.tar.gz to make Debian happy [21:56] did upstream add some new files? [21:56] please do the package [21:56] make a dedbdiff [21:56] *debdiff [21:56] and then decide [21:56] what has been added/removed [21:56] and then ping me if some new files (non-free, bad licenses) are there [21:56] so we can analyze the problem [21:57] bluekuja: oh duh I'm an idiot, there's a watchfile , and rules already details what they removed [21:57] the beos/macos parts are license-ambiguous [21:58] fine then [21:58] you know what needs to be removed [21:58] :) [21:58] :) [21:59] ;) [21:59] bluekuja: and ther'es even a README.debian-source file that states in plain english what is removed. sheesh I feel foolish now ;-) [21:59] lol [22:00] fortunately you found that [22:00] better late than never [22:00] :) [22:08] bluekuja: dget http://jdong.mit.edu/~jdong/motu/transmission_0.93.dfsg-1.dsc [22:08] lol [22:08] you did a package in two seconds? [22:09] a magician? [22:09] bluekuja: please ignore that last message for 5 minutes ;-) [22:09] bluekuja: one of the dpatches isn't clean :) [22:09] lol I gave you the link and started buildtesting at the same time [22:10] lol [22:14] bluekuja: ok, and this time, I'm gonna sit through the build before I embarrass myself :P [22:14] :D === asac_ is now known as asac [22:16] bluekuja: ok *now* dget that URL [22:17] build tested in a gutsy pbuilder [22:17] don't have a sid one handy, so exercise to the sponsor ;-) [22:17] ^^ [22:18] do you want to pull this on Debian or Ubuntu? [22:18] bluekuja: currently it's versioned for Debian, I'm fine with either way [22:18] bluekuja: if we do debian, what do you think the turnaround time would be? [22:18] bluekuja: i.e. I released out a backport of 0.91 to gutsy, remember, that suffers from this router-knockout bug [22:18] :( [22:19] jdong, if we want it inside debian you have to build it using unstable (first) [22:19] second [22:19] waiting 14 days it's not too much [22:19] bluekuja: do you have an unstable pbuilder handy? [22:19] for asking an NMU [22:19] of course [22:19] :) [22:19] yeah 14 days is fine [22:19] if you wanna prepare it as an NMU or however is appropriate, please :) [22:21] I'm starving, so I'm gonna go make dinner :) [22:21] ok, I finish my answers [22:21] in the meantime === asac_ is now known as asac