[19:41] <arthur-> doko: do you have a 4.1 or 4.2 upload planed soon ?
[19:45] <arthur-> doko: I've fixed gdc-4.2 ICEs, I'm preparing next upload, it'll perhaps make sens to have a gdc in gcc-defaults now
[19:46] <arthur-> doko: but locales/dak must be fixed first to allow source uploads...
[20:47] <doko> arthur-: not yet planned
[20:50] <arthur-> doko: ok, thanks
[22:12] <jbailey> What is 'gdc'?
[22:13] <arthur-> jbailey: D front end for gcc
[22:13] <jbailey> Which 'D'?  There've been a dozen or so in the last decade calling themselves that.
[22:14] <arthur-> jbailey: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D_programming_language
[22:14] <jbailey> Thanks.
[22:14] <arthur-> ;-)
[22:18] <jbailey> I'll have to ask Danny about this.  I was chatting with him about the annoyances of optimising C code versus the annoyances of optimising Java code.
[22:18] <jbailey> He described a few chance to C that would make escape analysis quite nice, and a few other things.
[22:19] <jbailey> I'm curious if D does those things.