[00:15] thumper: ping? [00:15] jamesh: pong [00:17] thumper: I'm getting timeouts trying to access Launchpad at the moment. I was wondering if it is just my connection or something further upstream [00:17] jamesh: edge? [00:17] yeah [00:17] seems ok to me [00:18] what sort of things are you doing? [00:18] I just went to the bzr overview and code page [00:18] no problems [00:18] I'm also timing out on the Canonical IRC server [00:20] jamesh: I think it is just you [00:20] or your connection to the UK [00:20] thumper: thanks. I guess I'll check with my ISP [00:20] jamesh: ok === `23meg is now known as mgunes [02:18] What is the average lag time between requesting a translation .po file and receiving it via email on LP? === aleka is now known as aleka_ === aleka_ is now known as aleka [02:35] sabdfl: :D thanks! [03:35] New bug: #163968 in malone "Problems with drop down list on incorrect team name" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/163968 [03:38] sure Hobbsee [03:42] * Hobbsee throws more stuff at ppa [05:38] * Hobbsee pokes launchpad [05:39] error ID OOPS-689EA15 [05:39] mpt: do you want a bug for a broken URL, or do you want to just fix it? [05:40] +editemail != +contactaddress [05:41] bwah? [05:41] it appears these are 2 separate sections now. [05:41] Hobbsee, I can use grep :-) [05:41] what happened to the old manage email addresses page, where you could select the default? [05:41] and why do we have this duplication? [05:42] mpt: https://edge.launchpad.net/%7Ekubuntu-members/+editemail is a 404, but apparently shouldn't point to https://edge.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-members/+contactaddress [05:42] because the dialog is different [05:43] * Hobbsee wonders how one is supposed to set the default email address now. [05:43] or remove them. [05:45] * Fujitsu guesses it's due to the new mailinglist crack. [05:45] Fujitsu: would be odd... [05:46] Fujitsu: you used to be able to manage addresses for people and teams, and set the default [05:46] but i like this "notify the email, or notify everyone on the team" bit. [05:47] Hobbsee: It's like that on production too, so it's not a particularly new thing. [05:47] Fujitsu: how weird! [05:48] * Fujitsu wonders how the upgrade can manage to take 3.5 hours. [05:48] mpt: i think i'll file a bug on this - because they're not the same dialog [05:48] Some translation schema changes, I guess... [05:48] and hey, one of my bugs got fixed in a day, so maybe it's worth reporting them :P [05:49] Nice. [05:49] was a soyuz regression bug, but still :) [05:50] Hobbsee, yeah, it's a mistake that has its own typo [05:50] mpt: ah, goody :) [05:50] mpt: can i ask why we have 2 dialogs for essentially the same thing? [05:50] Because barry needs more coffee [05:51] a logical enough reason, i guess :) [05:51] do ppa's look in ${release}-backports ? [05:51] It should be one page that shows different stuff depending on whether it's yourself or a team you're dealing with [05:52] not two pages with one of them hidden by a typo [05:52] mpt: got it :) [05:52] or can they? [05:52] thanks Hobbsee [05:52] stdin: They do not. [05:52] mpt: you're welcome, thanks for fixing it. [05:59] * thumper checks for reviewer meeting [06:00] * thumper notices it isn't on just yet, and heads back to the BBQ [06:00] * Hobbsee heads off to work [06:02] * thumper wishes he had a little program to send an SMS when pinged... [06:02] I think it is time for the review meeting [06:02] who is here? [06:05] me [06:05] sort of [06:05] BBQ is cooking dinner [06:05] :) [06:05] spiv, lifeless: ping for review meeting? [06:05] I guess jml and jtv won't be available [06:06] nah, jml won't be making it today [06:06] * thumper smells good food, garlic mushrooms I think... [06:07] jamesh: it might just be you and me [06:07] I don't think there is much to discuss, so it'll be short [06:08] there seems to be quite a few branches that didn't make it all the way through the review process for 1.1.11 [06:08] any problem holding next weeks meeting at the same time? [06:08] but the current queue is short [06:08] same time is fine for me [06:09] I wonder how many of those branches were submitted for merge? [06:09] I'm going to propose that they decide in the US/EU meeting that we implement the slots [06:09] and suggest people no longer use the general queue [06:09] not sure about the number submitted [06:09] given that there aren't many people here it is probably best to do the review process discussion on list [06:09] it seems that quite a few got stuck in needs-reply [06:09] jamesh: fair enough [06:10] I think that almost everyone agrees anyway [06:10] * thumper smells burning [06:11] jamesh: I don't have anything else particular to bring up [06:11] jamesh: do you? [06:11] nope. [06:11] ok, it looks like we're done then [06:11] thanks jamesh [06:11] * thumper heads back to food and the BBQ [06:15] thanks jamesh; [06:16] I started at 5am; finished earlier and was awol at the meeting time. [06:51] New bug: #163991 in malone "Attachments for initial comment are not displayed" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/163991 [07:20] New bug: #163997 in soyuz "Subject of Soyuz binaryful acceptance emails, emails, emails, emails, emails, emails stutter" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/163997 [07:24] morning [07:24] Morning carlos. === LaserJock is now known as LaserRock_70s === LaserRock_70s is now known as LaserRock === doko_ is now known as doko [09:36] morning [09:39] Hmm... Am I missing something, or are security uploads no longer being announced to *-changes? [09:39] That seems to be a fairly nasty regression. [09:42] Hi. Has anyone else noticed this. Changing the ownership of a bzr branch doesn't change the url in branch/bound i.e. target branch [09:43] Right, there have been no security uploads announced to -changes since they day before 1.1.10. [09:43] * Fujitsu files a bug. [10:00] New bug: #164027 in soyuz "As of 1.1.10, security uploads no longer generate announcements to -changes" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/164027 [10:06] New bug: #164029 in launchpad-bazaar "Changing owner of a branch does not change target url in branch/bound" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/164029 [10:11] slytherin: Erm, how is Launchpad going to modify your local branch? [10:12] Fujitsu: no. this is not about modifying local branch. I synced/pulled from launchpad from scratch. [10:12] slytherin: Which URL did you pull from? [10:13] Fujitsu: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~apt-offline/apt-offline/dev [10:14] slytherin: Works fine for me. [10:14] It would be the local bzr setting that URL, anyway. [10:15] Fujitsu: works fine as in? what did you try? [10:15] slytherin: I bzr got it. [10:16] Then bzr upped and bzr infoed it. [10:17] let me try pull from scratch once again [10:18] I suspect you were using an old branch (accidentally or otherwise), as I don't see where it could get that URL otherwise. === meduxa is now known as toscalix [10:50] Fujitsu: hmm. looks like it is not a bug. my bad. I will try a few things first and then close it as invalid [11:40] * Hobbsee waves === \sh_away is now known as \sh [12:09] hmm, is there a limit (quota) for ppa's? [12:10] stdin: 1gb, but not yet [12:10] not until you can remove packages [12:10] Hobbsee: good, because apparently I'm using 4.4GB [12:14] The 1gb quote will almost certainly be negotiable [12:14] s/quote/quota [12:15] * Hobbsee waves to mrevell and carlos [12:15] yo Hobbsee [12:15] Hmm, I'm gonna take a lunch break. biab === mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch [12:29] * Hobbsee waves to Spads [12:29] * Spads waves in return [12:35] are the buildds for ppa hardy messed up by chance? [12:37] gnomefreak: which in particular? [12:38] not sure atm but it was 386 64 and the other arch all failed, said failed to apply or remove patch but builds fine locally [12:38] let me see if i can find it [12:39] its a bunch of them [12:39] gnomefreak: if you've got a build log, that would be handy [12:40] http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10478174/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-i386.nss_3.12.0%7Ecvs20071118t2115-0ubuntu1%7Eppa1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz failed during make not patches [12:42] all nss failed that way [12:42] nspr failed with http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10478117/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-i386.nspr_4.7.0%7Ecvs20071106t1834-0ubuntu1%7Eppa1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [12:43] gnomefreak: how's that a failed to apply or remove patch? [12:43] nspr is the failed patch Applying patch 30_config_64bits.patch [12:43] patching file mozilla/nsprpub/configure.in [12:43] Hunk #1 FAILED at 52. [12:43] Hunk #2 FAILED at 218. [12:43] 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file mozilla/nsprpub/configure.in [12:43] Patch 30_config_64bits.patch can be reverse-applied [12:43] nss is glibc errors [12:44] i'd only looked at the first one [12:44] that would be...rather odd for that to build locally [12:44] nss (the first one) is glibc errors and come to think of it i have a bug on that, but why would it build cleanly here [12:45] i built and have it installed [12:45] what are you building in? [12:46] http://pastebin.mozilla.org/246174 [12:46] that is build dir for nss [12:46] im building it in hardy system [12:46] no chroot no pbuilder just system [12:47] head-->desk. [12:47] try it in a proper builder (sbuild or pbuilder), and see if it still breaks. [12:47] nspr xulrunner and ff3 also built fine here [12:47] * gnomefreak doesnt know how to use pbuilder thats why i use chroots [12:47] asked for help? [12:48] followed !pbuilder? [12:48] i didnt think there was a need since it built fine here [12:48] you need a clean source, and a clean build place, how else do you expect it to work fine on others systems? [12:48] * Hobbsee wonders if the patch is already applied or something, so that's why it's bailing. [12:49] i didnt add patches i just renamed already built sources and re tared the dir up and changelog edit [12:49] pbuilders are easier to use than plain chroots, and actually do sane things. [12:50] * Hobbsee tries it here [12:50] Hobbsee: nspr needs to be first build [12:51] cant remember what version of nspr and nss are in hardy but since i was building it for ppa nsor than nss than xulrunner than ff3 [12:53] gnomefreak: OK, so it doesnt apply here [12:53] it does here :( [12:53] * gnomefreak wonders why [12:54] gnomefreak: debian/patches/30_config_64bits.patch is already applied to your source. [12:54] * Hobbsee thinks you screwed over your source, and didn't rebuild in a clean place [12:55] gnomefreak: in fact, both 30_'s have been applied, adn it's bad to have 2 patches starting with the same # [12:55] methinks you applied the patches to the source, *then* built the source. [12:55] Hobbsee: i didnt make the patches i only took already built sources from someones archive to build for ppa [12:56] might have i will try cleaning it up and trying again [12:56] yup, they're all already applied. [12:56] gnomefreak: who was the someone, and do you trust their packaging skills to be sane? :) [12:57] yes i trust them [12:57] they started on 3.0 right after alpha1 [12:57] then either their source was wrong...or yours is :) [12:58] i think i know what happened its my fault if im right [12:58] the patches got applied manually, it appears, and then the source got built. === mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell [13:40] hey is there a way to get new commits in a branch hosted on launchpad as rss, subscribing seems to be email only, right? [13:41] I just want rss with the commit message of new commits [13:43] AnMaster: At the moment that functionality isn't available. However, it is being worked on :) [13:43] ah I see [13:49] hi all! [13:50] mrevell, SteveA: what about launchapd-beta-testers membership approvation? [13:51] cavedon: Hi, have you have applied for membership? [13:51] I made a resquest a couple of days ago [13:51] on 17th [13:52] cavedon: I've approved your membership. welcome to the team [13:53] mrevell: thank you! [13:53] np :) [14:25] cprov: could I talk you into a mass-give-back on lpia/hardy? [14:25] I get tired of clicking [14:25] New bug: #164065 in launchpad-bazaar "more revision properties" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/164065 [14:25] lamont: another greasemonkey script required? [14:25] that's more than a script... [14:25] ooh, more interesting options here [14:25] oh i know :) [14:26] lamont: it's yours that does the build rescores in a click, isnt it? [14:26] mithrandir is more to blame for it - I just use it. [14:26] otoh, the version I have is currently broken (claims to work, doesn't change anything) [14:26] lamont: I'm about to leave for lunch, can we talk when I come back or is it urgent ? [14:26] lamont: the one i'm using works fine [14:26] * lamont wishes those LP guys would quit breaking greasemonkey scripts with their changes... [14:26] cprov: no hurry [14:27] there are a bunch of failures and I'm too lazy to figure out which ones [14:27] :-) [14:27] lamont: ok, talk to you in bit. === cprov is now known as cprov-lunch === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch [14:27] Hobbsee: hrm... could be that retry works, and rescore is b0rked. dunno [14:28] lamont: although, it appears to just say it's worked, show the correct increment, but not go back to the previous page [14:28] which should be simple to fix, but i dont speak greasemonkeyesque. [14:29] I don't mind it not going back a page... what I was seeing was that when I went back to the build queue and hit shift-reload, I didn't see the new scores. [14:29] which is, um, strange [14:29] weird. i'd say yours is borken [14:30] cprov-lunch: actually, the bigger question is why lpia isn't doing anything with the 300+ builds it has in needs-build... [14:30] lamont: i was wondering that earlier. [14:31] hppa is back below 2600 needs-builds... :-( [14:32] mrevell: u-d mail unmoderated btw. [14:32] Hobbsee: Thanks. I thought I was a member. I'll have to rejoin. [14:33] mrevell: for non-developers, it's moderated. [14:33] and as you're not a part of ~ubuntu-dev... [14:33] Hobbsee: Ah right... [14:33] :) [14:47] cprov-lunch: and ~lamont/chroot-fresh has freshened hardy chroots to help speed the build process along a little [14:49] * lamont heads officewards [14:56] New bug: #164071 in malone "The comments in +text are difficult to read" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/164071 === salgado is now known as salgado-lunch === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara === synic is now known as kkubasik_______ === kkubasik_______ is now known as synic === \sh is now known as \sh_away === cprov-lunch is now known as cprov === salgado-lunch is now known as salgado === LaserRock is now known as LaserJock === EdwinGrubb is now known as EdwinGrubbs === EdwinGrubbs is now known as Edwin-lunch === Edwin-lunch is now known as EdwinGrubbs [18:05] New bug: #164136 in rosetta "+translate page triggering a ShortListTimeOutError" [Critical,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/164136 [18:35] New bug: #164144 in launchpad "oops tools should categorize ProtocolErrorException in a different section" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/164144 [18:46] hello [18:47] is there people here which can help me with liblaunchpad-integration APIs ? [18:48] Hello, I would need to remove some file from a PPA, since I made a versioning error [18:55] how can I integrate liblaunchpad-integration with glade ? [18:56] gcalctool migrates to glade [18:56] migrated even [19:01] crevette: you mean to get the extra entries in the Help menu? [19:11] crevette: take a look at synaptic [19:11] crevette: basically a three line patch: [19:12] +#include + widget = glade_xml_get_widget (_gladeXML, "help1_menu"); [19:12] + launchpad_integration_add_items (widget, -1, TRUE, TRUE); [19:24] thanks glatzor === \sh_away is now known as \sh [19:35] is there some XML/RPC that can be used to obtain the list of branches registered on launchpad? [19:45] New bug: #164162 in launchpad "OOPS when requesting a non-existent host" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/164162 === mdz__ is now known as mdz_ [20:31] morning lunch padders [21:00] Gooooooooooooooood morning Launchpadders! [21:08] morning mpt === cprov is now known as cprov-away [21:23] is there a plan to make code.launchpad.net support private branches? [21:24] cr3: yes, why? [21:38] thumper: I would very much like that for my own projects :) is there any scheduled date for this feature? [21:39] cr3: yes, see priv msg === tonyy is now known as tonyyarusso === \sh is now known as \sh_away [22:15] New bug: #164196 in malone "Quickly-undone actions shouldn't send mail notifications" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/164196 [22:52] are the any PPA admins about, I need some packages removed from my PPA === soren_ is now known as soren