[00:10] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: ok now icons appear as they should
[00:10] <gnomefreak> what did you change?
[00:11] <Ubulette> the order of some dh_ calls
[00:13] <Ubulette> gnomefreak, could you check that icons are ok in nautilus and ff, and that you have only one candidate app for those files (both in n and ff too)?
[00:13] <gnomefreak> i did
[00:14] <gnomefreak> wait no
[00:14] <gnomefreak> ff still is borked
[00:14] <gnomefreak> hmmmmm
[00:14] <Ubulette> how ?
[00:14] <gnomefreak> and yes just restarted firefox
[00:14] <gnomefreak> they are paper looking icons
[00:14] <Ubulette> try ff3
[00:15] <gnomefreak> no icons at all
[00:15] <Ubulette> hmm
[00:15] <gnomefreak> address bar has a folder type icon but the page itself has noone
[00:15] <gnomefreak> none
[00:16] <gnomefreak> ff2 had icons just crappy ones
[00:16] <gnomefreak> maybe gnome-support packages?
[00:16] <gnomefreak> since i have none installed
[00:17] <Ubulette> you don't see anything like http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/firefox-prism.png (ff3) ?
[00:17] <Ubulette> oh, try with gnome-support
[00:17] <gnomefreak> nope nothing close
[00:18] <gnomefreak> ff2 had gnome-support installed but they looked like they did before (just peice of paper with folded corner)
[00:19] <gnomefreak> installing xulrunner firefox-3.0 -gnome-support packages
[00:19] <Ubulette> cool
[00:19] <gnomefreak> not cool it shouold work with ff2 shouldnt it?
[00:20] <gnomefreak> 2.0 still paper icones
[00:20] <gnomefreak> icons
[00:20] <gnomefreak> still no icons in ff3
[00:20] <Ubulette> i don't think so. ff2 is very primitive with file:// urls
[00:21] <gnomefreak> well it didnt change for anything so far
[00:21] <Ubulette> you restarted ff3 right ?
[00:21] <gnomefreak> yes
[00:21] <Ubulette> hmm
[00:21] <Ubulette> mime type is right ?
[00:21] <Ubulette> click on one webapp
[00:21] <gnomefreak> ff3?
[00:22] <gnomefreak> it opens gdebi screen
[00:22] <Ubulette> both
[00:22] <gnomefreak> choose screen
[00:22] <Ubulette> damn
[00:22] <gnomefreak> still no icons
[00:22] <Ubulette> should not open gdebi
[00:22] <gnomefreak> if you click on it it should
[00:22] <gnomefreak> no?
[00:22] <Ubulette> should only show Prism
[00:23] <gnomefreak> file:///usr/share/prism/apps/ click on one of the files there it will open dialog to ask save open with gdebi ect...
[00:24] <gnomefreak> sorry yes it is prism
[00:24] <gnomefreak> was reading something else
[00:25] <Ubulette> http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/prism+ff2.png
[00:25] <gnomefreak> yes same
[00:25] <gnomefreak> without icons
[00:25] <gnomefreak> those look like my ff2 icons
[00:25] <gnomefreak> they dont have the colors on the right of them like in nautilus
[00:26] <gnomefreak> but ff3 doesnt even have that much
[00:26] <Ubulette> yes, i don't have anything else for ff2 too. anywhere on my disk. just white papers and folders
[00:26] <gnomefreak> yes but you got icons in ff3
[00:27] <Ubulette> as long as you click and the right webapp is launched, it's a real progress
[00:27] <gnomefreak> yes clicking on it asks to open with prism
[00:27] <gnomefreak> and works
[00:28] <Ubulette> you see the right webapp right ? not just always the same thing
[00:28] <gnomefreak> right
[00:28] <Ubulette> goof
[00:28] <Ubulette> good
[00:29] <gnomefreak> assuming you mean when i open the file with prism it opens what i want it to
[00:29] <gnomefreak> like clicking on twiddle opens twiddle
[00:29] <gnomefreak> not gmail
[00:29] <Ubulette> maybe the ff3 icons are not in b1. I'm runner pre b2 with the new gtk theme thing
[00:29] <gnomefreak> twitter even
[00:29] <Ubulette> running
[00:29] <gnomefreak> 3.0~b1~rc3+nobinonly-0ubuntu1
[00:30] <gnomefreak> maybe
[00:30] <Ubulette> yes, that's what I mean (click gmail, get gmail, click foo, get foo)
[00:30] <gnomefreak> lets find out
[00:30] <Ubulette> firefox-3.0 | 3.0~beta2~cvs20071119t0915+bbot-1 | http://www.sofaraway.org firefox-minefield/ Packages
[00:30] <Ubulette> firefox-3.0 | 3.0~b1~rc3+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 | http://archive.ubuntu.com hardy/universe Packages
[00:30] <Ubulette> firefox-3.0 | 3.0~alpha9~cvs20071105t0828-0ubuntu1~mt1~fta1 | http://ppa.launchpad.net hardy/main Packages
[00:31] <Ubulette> i'm using my daily debs so b2~cvs
[00:31] <gnomefreak> your ppa isnt up to date
[00:31] <Ubulette> indeed
[00:32] <gnomefreak> neither is mozillateam
[00:32] <Ubulette> that's expected.
[00:32] <gnomefreak> is your branch up to date
[00:32] <Ubulette> branch yes. you want to build that ?
[00:32] <gnomefreak> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-3.0.dev
[00:32] <gnomefreak> is that the one
[00:32] <gnomefreak> i might as well than i can test tomorrow
[00:33] <Ubulette> you want to push a fresh one to ppa ?
[00:33] <gnomefreak> i will if it builds ok here
[00:34] <gnomefreak> 5 days ago was last update to branch?:
[00:34] <Ubulette> not really, you need the temporary .head branch (xul) as asac didn't want me to touch the .dev branch until final b1
[00:34] <gnomefreak> ok so ill build that than install it than build ff
[00:35] <Ubulette> and you'd better not push to mt-ppa either, same reason, users will never use real b1 if you do that
[00:35] <Ubulette> you can also try my daily build :)
[00:35] <gnomefreak> i will push to mine
[00:35] <gnomefreak> as normal :) mine is a dumping ground until i can remove packages
[00:36] <Ubulette> try mine, you can remove them anytime
[00:36] <gnomefreak> i cant push to your PPA and i cant remove them yet
[00:36] <Ubulette> http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/minirepos/
[00:38] <gnomefreak> is that xul the .head?
[00:38] <Ubulette> all head
[00:38] <Ubulette> everything
[00:39] <Ubulette> read the README :)
[00:39] <gnomefreak> there is no readme until i grab packages
[00:39] <Ubulette> there is, in the url above
[00:40] <gnomefreak> oh i didnt see it
[00:42] <gnomefreak> nss nspr dont need to be upgraded right?
[00:44] <Ubulette> yes, upstream keeps bumping nss
[00:44] <Ubulette> nspr is kind of staled
[00:45] <Ubulette> i'm running those and i've never had any issue with anything
[00:47] <gnomefreak> ok ill work on getting these done should be tomorrow sometime
[05:30] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: i get the right icons in ff3 after building and installing it, its b2
[05:30]  * gnomefreak off to bed
[12:34] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: when do you plan on getting sm1 into hardy? once that is ready i need to file a bug report
[12:50] <Lord_Illidan> Hi, anyone trying out Firefox Beta here?
[12:51] <gnomefreak> Lord_Illidan: yes
[12:52] <gnomefreak> Lord_Illidan: its in gutsy repos
[12:52] <Lord_Illidan> I have an issue with font handling. Namely it looks v. jagged
[12:52] <Lord_Illidan> And in the repos, there is the alpha, not the beta
[12:53] <gnomefreak> Lord_Illidan: the person you should talk to isnt here. if you built it yourself or running upstreams we are not responsible for that. get it from here https://edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive
[12:54] <Lord_Illidan> I got it from mozilla's build.. well the ppl at #ubuntu directed me here
[12:54] <Lord_Illidan> as for that link, I can only see alpha versions
[12:54] <gnomefreak> Lord_Illidan: for mozilla builds you would need to talk to mozilla we only build for ubuntu
[12:55] <Lord_Illidan> firefox-3.0 - 3.0~alpha9~cvs20071003t0648-0ubuntu1~mt1
[12:55] <Lord_Illidan> ok
[12:55] <gnomefreak> oh yeah we didnt update it yet waiting on more space
[12:55] <gnomefreak> we are at our limit on ppas
[12:56] <Lord_Illidan> I tried Gran Paradiso from Gutsy repos, same problem
[12:57] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: Lord_Illidan file a bug on it from our packages and please provide screenshot of problem
[12:58] <Lord_Illidan> sure, ok
[19:06] <powerfox> Hey, folks! Is anybody here? I'm building qt_firefox and can't do that
[19:53] <Ubulette> hi everyone
[19:54] <powerfox> Hi!
[19:56] <powerfox> Ubulette, did you build ff?
[19:56] <Ubulette> ff3, yes
[19:56] <powerfox> And ff2?
[19:56] <powerfox> A'm playing with 2 version. I'm interesting in qt_mozilla
[19:57] <powerfox> And also, what gtk does it use by default? 1 or 2?
[19:57] <Ubulette> gtk2
[19:58] <powerfox> Demn ((( I was looking through gtk1 sources
[19:58] <Ubulette> well, i don't build ff2 as someone else is already taking care of it but that's not a problem either
[19:58] <powerfox> Did you build qt_ff3?
[19:59] <powerfox> I need some non_gtk2 ff to test some bug.
[19:59] <powerfox> And non-windows of cource
[20:00] <Ubulette> no sorry, i've never even heard of qq_ff
[20:00] <Ubulette> gt
[20:00] <Ubulette> qt(
[20:00] <Ubulette> gasp
[20:01] <Ubulette> ff2 uses libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.8)
[20:01] <powerfox> Ubulette: thanks a lot
[20:06] <Ubulette> powerfox, if you tell me what's wrong, i may be able to help. depends
[20:06] <powerfox> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69230
[20:06] <ubotu> Mozilla bug 69230 in Keyboard: Navigation "Accelerators should not be affected by keyboard group/level" [Normal,New]
[20:07] <gnomefreak> asac: im gonna run dist-upgrade atm and i was informed that networkmanager broke but i think its just knetworkmanager
[20:07] <powerfox> I decide to try myself in it. And first of all to locolize it. If everything in windows is ok, so it's a gtk bug (on the page they wrote about gtk1, but know it's on the gtk2 with the same bug).
[20:08] <gnomefreak> wasnt that a no fix as it was a feature or was that something else that im thinking of
[20:08] <gnomefreak> if i leave suddenly get asac to fix it
[20:08] <powerfox> It was. But I want to play with the code
[20:09] <Ubulette> powerfox, the bug started in 2001 so it was gtk1 at that time.
[20:09] <powerfox> I'm building debug version rigth now. So, maybe is says somethnig.
[20:09] <Ubulette> and it's a damn long bug to read
[20:09] <powerfox> Ubulette: just skip it - nothing interesting
[20:10] <powerfox> Just chatting. Only few guys were talking a deel
[20:10] <Ubulette> how come is it related to QT ? i don't anything like that in there
[20:10] <powerfox> If there is no such bug in qt version, so it's 100% that it is in the gtk2 directory
[20:11] <powerfox> But if windows version have the only difference in GUI (I mean hotkeys), so it's in the gtk2
[20:13] <powerfox> I'm shocked nobody have fixed it. It shouldn't be so difficult
[20:13] <powerfox> I thing it's a little localization mistake
[20:13] <powerfox> * think
[20:14] <powerfox> But, devil knows what it is :)
[20:16] <Ubulette> gnomefreak, wtf with nspr/nss in your ppa ?
[20:17] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: i screwed something up but also seems like glibc is messed up
[20:17] <Ubulette> your diff is empty
[20:17] <gnomefreak> nss i can fix but everything is still gonna FTBFS
[20:17] <Ubulette> nspr diff
[20:17] <Ubulette> http://ppa.launchpad.net/gnomefreak/ubuntu/pool/main/n/nspr/
[20:17]  * gnomefreak can fix the diff issue but glibc needs to be fixed as well
[20:18] <gnomefreak> nspr didnt build
[20:18] <gnomefreak> nspr FTBFS on glibc
[20:18] <gnomefreak> nss is my fault
[20:19] <gnomefreak> it built locally but PPA and hobbsee it both failed on with glibc errors. nss is my messup
[20:21] <gnomefreak> it will be fixed tonight or tomorrow
[20:22] <Ubulette> asac, ping
[20:22] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: is he off this week?
[20:22] <gnomefreak> i havent seen him in like 3 days
[20:23] <Ubulette> yes, he said so
[20:23] <gnomefreak> he is off?
[20:23]  * gnomefreak hasnt heard this but good to know 
[20:25] <Ubulette> "Firefox 3 Beta 1 is available for download" :)
[20:25] <powerfox> Are you build-team? Or bugfixing too?
[20:25] <powerfox> Really?
[20:26] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: can we get them pushed to repos there is a bug i think agaisnt gutsy to upgrade firefox-gp
[20:26] <gnomefreak> i saw it in email a bit agao
[20:26] <Ubulette> i'm preparing the package, but i'll need a sponsor
[20:26] <gnomefreak> ago
[20:26] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: join the crowd
[20:27] <gnomefreak> i have 2 that need to be pushed and motus dont like to test moz apps. i havent seen bluekuja or asac to ask them to push them
[20:28] <Ubulette> yep, i realized that too. I have sm1 and xul1.8 waiting
[20:28] <gnomefreak> maybe ill ask jdong as a new motu to push them
[20:29] <gnomefreak> i might contact dh in the next day or 2, i wont be around much if at all on thursday
[20:31] <Ubulette> gnomefreak, Nov 14 12:19:39 <asac>  i start holiday tomorrow till nov 23
[20:34] <gnomefreak> ok ty i missed that
[20:34] <Ubulette> SEAMONKEY_1_1_7_RELEASE
[20:34] <Ubulette> damb
[20:35] <Ubulette> damn
[20:35] <gnomefreak> damnit
[20:35] <gnomefreak> see what i mean
[20:35] <gnomefreak> i build it it doesnt go anywhere
[20:35] <gnomefreak> next release comes out
[20:35] <Ubulette> same here
[20:35]  * gnomefreak gonna contact daniel tomorrow
[20:35] <Ubulette> FIREFOX_2_0_0_10_RELEASE
[20:36] <gnomefreak> we havent put out 9 yet
[20:36] <gnomefreak> afaik
[20:36] <gnomefreak> i guess ill do iceape for gutsy now
[20:37] <gnomefreak> are you sure its released?
[20:37] <gnomefreak> http://www.seamonkey-project.org/
[20:37] <Ubulette> ff 2.0.0.10 is still in QA, kind of RC1, iirc
[20:37] <gnomefreak> seamonkey hasnt been released anywhere
[20:38] <Ubulette> but cvs is taggued anyway
[20:38] <gnomefreak> i see source in nightly
[20:39]  * gnomefreak might wait till tomorrow incase there is something they missed
[20:39] <rhelmer> yeah we've been turning around a lot or security releases lately :(
[20:40] <Ubulette> rhelmer, i don't see any new cvs tag for ff3b1. is that expected ?
[20:41] <rhelmer> Ubulette: no there should be one
[20:42]  * rhelmer cheks
[20:42] <rhelmer> er, checks
[20:42] <gnomefreak> rhelmer: whats the chances of seamonkey staying the way it is for 1.1.7?
[20:42] <Ubulette> I need xulrunner sources matching ff3b1
[20:42] <rhelmer> should be a FIREFOX_3_0b1_RELEASE tag
[20:43]  * gnomefreak makes a list of contacts for when i get home if i can still see
[20:44] <rhelmer> gnomefreak: well we always hope there's one RC but that's not always the case :)
[20:44] <gnomefreak> oh Ubulette btw i have eye dr. appy. tomorrow so i might not beable to see for some time
[20:44] <gnomefreak> File: seamonkey-1.1.7.source.tar.gz
[20:44] <rhelmer> gnomefreak: seamonkey releases are done by robert kaiser (kairo) but he usually only respins for core changes
[20:44] <gnomefreak> -File:
[20:45] <Ubulette> rhelmer, so it's the same  tarball as RC3 ? FIREFOX_3_0b1_RELEASE was already there when I did RC3 here.
[20:45] <Ubulette> I'm puzzled
[20:45]  * gnomefreak needs to figure out how to do multiple servers
[20:45] <Ubulette>         FIREFOX_3_0b1_RC3               (revision: 1.352.2.2)
[20:45] <Ubulette>         FIREFOX_3_0b1_RC2               (revision: 1.352.2.2)
[20:45] <Ubulette>         FIREFOX_3_0b1_RC1               (revision: 1.352.2.2)
[20:45] <Ubulette>         FIREFOX_3_0b1_RELEASE           (revision: 1.352.2.2)
[20:46] <gnomefreak> same change for all releases?
[20:46] <rhelmer> Ubulette: yeah it's kind of weird, what we do is re-apply _RELEASE every time there is a new RC
[20:46] <gnomefreak> that would mean nothing has changed i find that hard to believe
[20:47] <rhelmer> Ubulette: the reason why has to do with tool limitations mostly (client.mk, tinderbox, etc)
[20:47] <Ubulette> 8 days ago, it was already revision: 1.352.2.2
[20:48] <Ubulette> so you says it's okay to just use FIREFOX_3_0b1_RELEASE.. hmm. I can try and compare with my rc3 tarball
[20:48] <rhelmer> Ubulette: which file are you looking at?
[20:48] <rhelmer> Ubulette: yeah the rc3 tarball should be a CVS checkout of FIREFOX_3_0b1_RELEASE
[20:48] <Ubulette> status from client.mk
[20:48] <rhelmer> which at the time of the tarball's creation would be equiv to RC3
[20:49] <gnomefreak> what is the chatnet for irc.mozilla.org
[20:49] <Ubulette> ok, i'm trying that.
[20:50] <Ubulette> too bad I can't copy urls from prism
[20:50] <rhelmer> gnomefreak: er not sure what a chatnet is :(
[20:51] <rhelmer> Ubulette: really? i was able to, although i'm booted on livecd right now (hdd died) so i don't have it installed :)
[20:51] <gnomefreak> rhelmer: me neither
[20:51] <gnomefreak> ok im gonna try this out in a sec
[20:51] <rhelmer> Ubulette: there was "copy link location" on the context menu iirc
[20:54] <Ubulette> yes, i see it but using the greader webapp, if one feed is a google group one, if i click on one article, instead of going to the browser, i get a new prism window (i'd like not to) and in that new window, I have no control
[20:55] <Ubulette> oh wait, i can copy the link now (i had a selection active)
[20:56] <Ubulette> gnomefreak, http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey/browse_thread/thread/985bc94f0f5aef2a/6dd333d0afc8e2c6?#6dd333d0afc8e2c6
[21:07] <gnomefreak> ok think i got this set up im going for smoke
[21:22] <gnomefreak> now i need to figure out what channels are good to be in on mozilla.org im in seamonkey and mozilla atm
[21:24] <Ubulette> rhelmer, a diff between b1rc3 (got using FIREFOX_3_0b1_RC3 ~9 days ago) and b1 (using FIREFOX_3_0b1_RELEASE just now) shows absolutely nothing.
[21:24] <Ubulette> both browser and xulrunner
[21:34] <rhelmer> hm
[21:35] <rhelmer> Ubulette: yeah that sounds right
[21:36] <Ubulette> rhelmer, so what was rc3 about ? just packaging ?
[21:36] <rhelmer> Ubulette: no it's an RC so it should be identical
[21:36] <rhelmer> to release
[21:36] <rhelmer> Ubulette: maybe i am misunderstanding the question?
[21:36] <rhelmer> RC is literally a release candidate, if QA passes and noone finds anything then we post them
[21:37] <rhelmer> the files do get renamed and signed afterwards in some cases which is a bug imho
[21:37] <rhelmer> but the sources of the latest RC should match the RELEASE
[21:37] <Ubulette> i'm just trying to understand what happened in the last two weeks
[21:37] <rhelmer> Ubulette: you could diff RC1 and RC2 versus RC3
[21:37] <Ubulette> so ok, i'll take for granted that no blocker was found and sources remained untouched
[21:38] <Ubulette> I can't, tags are pointing to the same thing now
[21:38] <rhelmer> Ubulette: well RC1 and RC2 should be different, not sure i understand?
[21:38] <rhelmer> Ubulette: RELEASE and RC3 should be the same
[21:38] <rhelmer> RC1, RC2 and RC3 should not be the same
         FIREFOX_3_0b1_RC3               (revision: 1.352.2.2)
         FIREFOX_3_0b1_RC2               (revision: 1.352.2.2)
         FIREFOX_3_0b1_RC1               (revision: 1.352.2.2)
         FIREFOX_3_0b1_RELEASE           (revision: 1.352.2.2)
[21:39] <rhelmer> Ubulette: which file is that?
[21:39] <Ubulette> same revision ?
[21:39] <rhelmer> client.mk?
[21:39] <rhelmer> Ubulette: yeah but it's CVS so every file has a revision
[21:39] <rhelmer> Ubulette: and since we retag _RELEASE client.mk does not need to be bumped
[21:39] <rhelmer> Ubulette: you need to diff the whole tree to see the changes
[21:40] <rhelmer> Ubulette: does that make sense or am I missing something? certainly possible :)
[21:41] <gnomefreak> grrrrrrrrrrrrr
[21:41] <Ubulette> rhelmer, i'm just troubled to release rc3 and release with the exact same sources but a new name. well, if it's expected, i don't minf
[21:41] <Ubulette> mind
[21:46]  * gnomefreak wonders if i can use 2 different ~/.irssi/config
[21:46] <gnomefreak> this way i get 2 windows
[21:47] <\sh> gnomefreak, for what? ;)
[21:47] <gnomefreak> this single window is hard
[21:47] <gnomefreak> \sh: for 2 servers
[21:47] <\sh> gnomefreak, use a proxy
[21:47] <\sh> gnomefreak, and setup window creates in config
[21:48] <rhelmer> Ubulette: yeah it's literally a "release candidate", once we have one we like we ship it :)
[21:48] <gnomefreak> that sounds harder than opening up irssi killing it and joining other server
[21:49] <Ubulette> rhelmer, good enough. I take it :)
[21:49] <\sh> gnomefreak, no..actually...you setup your dircproxy e.g. and have all channels online...you connect via irssi to your proxy on a special port and setup irssi to create the necessary windows
[21:49] <\sh> gnomefreak, or use a graphical client ;)
[21:52] <gnomefreak> eh i use xchat when i have to and only when i have to ;) irssi is easier to use for general things
[22:14] <gnomefreak> its so damn hard to get an answer on this damn server :(
[22:14] <Greenery> answer on what?
[22:14] <gnomefreak> Greenery: anything on mozilla.org server
[22:15] <Greenery> oh heh
[22:15] <tonyyarusso> gnomefreak: so true....
[22:17] <gnomefreak> they dont give cloaks
[22:17] <gnomefreak> :(
[22:18] <gnomefreak> they cloak part of it by default
[22:18] <gnomefreak> kind of strange but works
[22:21] <gnomefreak> now i just need to learn to set up a pause for mozilla.org
[22:23] <Ubulette> "a pause" ? what's that ?
[22:23] <gnomefreak> wait -freenode 100000";
[22:23] <Ubulette> eh?
[22:24] <gnomefreak> server pauses before joining channels
[22:25] <gnomefreak> ok lets seee if this works
[22:28] <Ubulette> rhelmer, did you have the time to check prism ? I think all that mime/icons stuff is fixed.
[22:30] <rhelmer> Ubulette: well my hard drive is dead so i am on a livecd right now :) i can try installing it though but not much space :)
[22:30] <Ubulette> prism alone is tuny but you need xulrunner-1.9
[22:30] <Ubulette> tiny
[22:30] <gnomefreak> xulrunner is huge
[22:32] <rhelmer> yeah
[22:32] <rhelmer> Ubulette: i'll try to pick up a drive today and i can look once i get reinstalled
[22:33] <rhelmer> or maybe if my wife lets me use hers, it has gutsy also
[22:33] <rhelmer> but she does not like me screwing around on her computer :)
[22:34] <Ubulette> :)
[22:36] <gnomefreak> rhelmer: who was it that maintains seamonkey again?
[22:36] <gnomefreak> all the quits i lost it
[22:36] <rhelmer> gnomefreak: robert kaiser (kairo) does releases
[22:36] <gnomefreak> ty
[22:36] <rhelmer> sure
[22:37] <Ubulette> gnomefreak, him: http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey/browse_thread/thread/985bc94f0f5aef2a/6dd333d0afc8e2c6?#6dd333d0afc8e2c6
[22:37] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: i have him in channel
[22:37] <gnomefreak> well hes there but he might be afk
[22:38] <Ubulette> gnomefreak, what do you need from him ?
[22:38] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: if todays nightlies would be final
[22:38] <gnomefreak> .win 25
[22:40] <gnomefreak> lol it was canadates i was looking at anyway :(
[22:42] <rhelmer> gnomefreak: yeah he is in austria or something iirc
[22:43] <rhelmer> gnomefreak: you can join #build to hang out with mozilla build and release if you like as well :)
[22:43] <gnomefreak> everyone always trys to cofuse the hell out of me :(
[22:43] <gnomefreak> there is a #build/
[22:43] <gnomefreak> ?
[22:44] <rhelmer> gnomefreak: yeah on irc.mozilla.org
[22:44] <gnomefreak> k
[22:46] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: where did you read about 1.1.7 released
[23:24] <Ubulette> bug 164123
[23:24] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 164123 in firefox-3.0 "Firefox 3 Gran Paradiso need upgrade" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/164123
[23:34] <Ubulette> http://flickr.com/photos/nobihaya/1386721368/
[23:35] <Greenery> lol what a fanatic
[23:42] <Jazzva> wow... what a car. a bit scary, though :)...
[23:43] <Greenery> i'm very much concern abt the windshield
[23:44] <Jazzva> Naaah... I suppose it's safe enough :P... just kidding :)
[23:44] <Greenery> lol
[23:46] <Ubulette> not a very green car
[23:48] <Greenery> as in environmentally friendly?
[23:49] <Ubulette> yes
[23:50] <Greenery> most sports car aren't green, kinda sad
[23:52] <Ubulette> this is greener: http://www.velectris.com/catalog/electric-bike-electra-townie-pi-96.html
[23:52] <Ubulette> :)
[23:53] <Jazzva> So is this: http://www.teslamotors.com/
[23:53] <Jazzva> And it's named "Tesla" :)...
[23:54] <Jazzva> s/named/made by/g
[23:56] <Greenery> wow nice cars they got there
[23:56] <Greenery> US company?
[23:56] <Jazzva> I think it is...
[23:56] <[reed]> Ubulette: see, that was easy!
[23:57] <Ubulette> [reed], what ?
[23:57] <[reed]> Ubulette: getting your patch reviewed and committed :)
[23:57] <Ubulette> well, sort of
[23:59] <Ubulette> I think i would have waited a long time without asac 1st check and 2 or 3 calls for review in the motu channel. Good thing it's finally done *before* the next upstream release