[00:10] Ubulette: ok now icons appear as they should [00:10] what did you change? [00:11] the order of some dh_ calls [00:13] gnomefreak, could you check that icons are ok in nautilus and ff, and that you have only one candidate app for those files (both in n and ff too)? [00:13] i did [00:14] wait no [00:14] ff still is borked [00:14] hmmmmm [00:14] how ? [00:14] and yes just restarted firefox [00:14] they are paper looking icons [00:14] try ff3 [00:15] no icons at all [00:15] hmm [00:15] address bar has a folder type icon but the page itself has noone [00:15] none [00:16] ff2 had icons just crappy ones [00:16] maybe gnome-support packages? [00:16] since i have none installed [00:17] you don't see anything like http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/firefox-prism.png (ff3) ? [00:17] oh, try with gnome-support [00:17] nope nothing close [00:18] ff2 had gnome-support installed but they looked like they did before (just peice of paper with folded corner) [00:19] installing xulrunner firefox-3.0 -gnome-support packages [00:19] cool [00:19] not cool it shouold work with ff2 shouldnt it? [00:20] 2.0 still paper icones [00:20] icons [00:20] still no icons in ff3 [00:20] i don't think so. ff2 is very primitive with file:// urls [00:21] well it didnt change for anything so far [00:21] you restarted ff3 right ? [00:21] yes [00:21] hmm [00:21] mime type is right ? [00:21] click on one webapp [00:21] ff3? [00:22] it opens gdebi screen [00:22] both [00:22] choose screen [00:22] damn [00:22] still no icons [00:22] should not open gdebi [00:22] if you click on it it should [00:22] no? [00:22] should only show Prism [00:23] file:///usr/share/prism/apps/ click on one of the files there it will open dialog to ask save open with gdebi ect... [00:24] sorry yes it is prism [00:24] was reading something else [00:25] http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/prism+ff2.png [00:25] yes same [00:25] without icons [00:25] those look like my ff2 icons [00:25] they dont have the colors on the right of them like in nautilus [00:26] but ff3 doesnt even have that much [00:26] yes, i don't have anything else for ff2 too. anywhere on my disk. just white papers and folders [00:26] yes but you got icons in ff3 [00:27] as long as you click and the right webapp is launched, it's a real progress [00:27] yes clicking on it asks to open with prism [00:27] and works [00:28] you see the right webapp right ? not just always the same thing [00:28] right [00:28] goof [00:28] good [00:29] assuming you mean when i open the file with prism it opens what i want it to [00:29] like clicking on twiddle opens twiddle [00:29] not gmail [00:29] maybe the ff3 icons are not in b1. I'm runner pre b2 with the new gtk theme thing [00:29] twitter even [00:29] running [00:29] 3.0~b1~rc3+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 [00:30] maybe [00:30] yes, that's what I mean (click gmail, get gmail, click foo, get foo) [00:30] lets find out [00:30] firefox-3.0 | 3.0~beta2~cvs20071119t0915+bbot-1 | http://www.sofaraway.org firefox-minefield/ Packages [00:30] firefox-3.0 | 3.0~b1~rc3+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 | http://archive.ubuntu.com hardy/universe Packages [00:30] firefox-3.0 | 3.0~alpha9~cvs20071105t0828-0ubuntu1~mt1~fta1 | http://ppa.launchpad.net hardy/main Packages [00:31] i'm using my daily debs so b2~cvs [00:31] your ppa isnt up to date [00:31] indeed [00:32] neither is mozillateam [00:32] that's expected. [00:32] is your branch up to date [00:32] branch yes. you want to build that ? [00:32] https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-3.0.dev [00:32] is that the one [00:32] i might as well than i can test tomorrow [00:33] you want to push a fresh one to ppa ? [00:33] i will if it builds ok here [00:34] 5 days ago was last update to branch?: [00:34] not really, you need the temporary .head branch (xul) as asac didn't want me to touch the .dev branch until final b1 [00:34] ok so ill build that than install it than build ff [00:35] and you'd better not push to mt-ppa either, same reason, users will never use real b1 if you do that [00:35] you can also try my daily build :) [00:35] i will push to mine [00:35] as normal :) mine is a dumping ground until i can remove packages [00:36] try mine, you can remove them anytime [00:36] i cant push to your PPA and i cant remove them yet [00:36] http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/minirepos/ [00:38] is that xul the .head? [00:38] all head [00:38] everything [00:39] read the README :) [00:39] there is no readme until i grab packages [00:39] there is, in the url above [00:40] oh i didnt see it [00:42] nss nspr dont need to be upgraded right? [00:44] yes, upstream keeps bumping nss [00:44] nspr is kind of staled [00:45] i'm running those and i've never had any issue with anything [00:47] ok ill work on getting these done should be tomorrow sometime === IR9927 is now known as Supersayano [05:30] Ubulette: i get the right icons in ff3 after building and installing it, its b2 [05:30] * gnomefreak off to bed === \sh_away is now known as \sh [12:34] Ubulette: when do you plan on getting sm1 into hardy? once that is ready i need to file a bug report [12:50] Hi, anyone trying out Firefox Beta here? [12:51] Lord_Illidan: yes [12:52] Lord_Illidan: its in gutsy repos [12:52] I have an issue with font handling. Namely it looks v. jagged [12:52] And in the repos, there is the alpha, not the beta [12:53] Lord_Illidan: the person you should talk to isnt here. if you built it yourself or running upstreams we are not responsible for that. get it from here https://edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive [12:54] I got it from mozilla's build.. well the ppl at #ubuntu directed me here [12:54] as for that link, I can only see alpha versions [12:54] Lord_Illidan: for mozilla builds you would need to talk to mozilla we only build for ubuntu [12:55] firefox-3.0 - 3.0~alpha9~cvs20071003t0648-0ubuntu1~mt1 [12:55] ok [12:55] oh yeah we didnt update it yet waiting on more space [12:55] we are at our limit on ppas [12:56] I tried Gran Paradiso from Gutsy repos, same problem [12:57] Ubulette: Lord_Illidan file a bug on it from our packages and please provide screenshot of problem [12:58] sure, ok === \sh is now known as \sh_away === asac_ is now known as asac [19:06] Hey, folks! Is anybody here? I'm building qt_firefox and can't do that === \sh_away is now known as \sh [19:53] hi everyone [19:54] Hi! [19:56] Ubulette, did you build ff? [19:56] ff3, yes [19:56] And ff2? [19:56] A'm playing with 2 version. I'm interesting in qt_mozilla [19:57] And also, what gtk does it use by default? 1 or 2? [19:57] gtk2 [19:58] Demn ((( I was looking through gtk1 sources [19:58] well, i don't build ff2 as someone else is already taking care of it but that's not a problem either [19:58] Did you build qt_ff3? [19:59] I need some non_gtk2 ff to test some bug. [19:59] And non-windows of cource [20:00] no sorry, i've never even heard of qq_ff [20:00] gt [20:00] qt( [20:00] gasp [20:01] ff2 uses libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.8) [20:01] Ubulette: thanks a lot [20:06] powerfox, if you tell me what's wrong, i may be able to help. depends [20:06] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69230 [20:06] Mozilla bug 69230 in Keyboard: Navigation "Accelerators should not be affected by keyboard group/level" [Normal,New] [20:07] asac: im gonna run dist-upgrade atm and i was informed that networkmanager broke but i think its just knetworkmanager [20:07] I decide to try myself in it. And first of all to locolize it. If everything in windows is ok, so it's a gtk bug (on the page they wrote about gtk1, but know it's on the gtk2 with the same bug). [20:08] wasnt that a no fix as it was a feature or was that something else that im thinking of [20:08] if i leave suddenly get asac to fix it [20:08] It was. But I want to play with the code [20:09] powerfox, the bug started in 2001 so it was gtk1 at that time. [20:09] I'm building debug version rigth now. So, maybe is says somethnig. [20:09] and it's a damn long bug to read [20:09] Ubulette: just skip it - nothing interesting [20:10] Just chatting. Only few guys were talking a deel [20:10] how come is it related to QT ? i don't anything like that in there [20:10] If there is no such bug in qt version, so it's 100% that it is in the gtk2 directory [20:11] But if windows version have the only difference in GUI (I mean hotkeys), so it's in the gtk2 [20:13] I'm shocked nobody have fixed it. It shouldn't be so difficult [20:13] I thing it's a little localization mistake [20:13] * think [20:14] But, devil knows what it is :) [20:16] gnomefreak, wtf with nspr/nss in your ppa ? [20:17] Ubulette: i screwed something up but also seems like glibc is messed up [20:17] your diff is empty [20:17] nss i can fix but everything is still gonna FTBFS [20:17] nspr diff [20:17] http://ppa.launchpad.net/gnomefreak/ubuntu/pool/main/n/nspr/ [20:17] * gnomefreak can fix the diff issue but glibc needs to be fixed as well [20:18] nspr didnt build [20:18] nspr FTBFS on glibc [20:18] nss is my fault [20:19] it built locally but PPA and hobbsee it both failed on with glibc errors. nss is my messup [20:21] it will be fixed tonight or tomorrow [20:22] asac, ping [20:22] Ubulette: is he off this week? [20:22] i havent seen him in like 3 days [20:23] yes, he said so [20:23] he is off? [20:23] * gnomefreak hasnt heard this but good to know [20:25] "Firefox 3 Beta 1 is available for download" :) [20:25] Are you build-team? Or bugfixing too? [20:25] Really? [20:26] Ubulette: can we get them pushed to repos there is a bug i think agaisnt gutsy to upgrade firefox-gp [20:26] i saw it in email a bit agao [20:26] i'm preparing the package, but i'll need a sponsor [20:26] ago [20:26] Ubulette: join the crowd [20:27] i have 2 that need to be pushed and motus dont like to test moz apps. i havent seen bluekuja or asac to ask them to push them [20:28] yep, i realized that too. I have sm1 and xul1.8 waiting [20:28] maybe ill ask jdong as a new motu to push them [20:29] i might contact dh in the next day or 2, i wont be around much if at all on thursday [20:31] gnomefreak, Nov 14 12:19:39 i start holiday tomorrow till nov 23 [20:34] ok ty i missed that [20:34] SEAMONKEY_1_1_7_RELEASE [20:34] damb [20:35] damn [20:35] damnit [20:35] see what i mean [20:35] i build it it doesnt go anywhere [20:35] next release comes out [20:35] same here [20:35] * gnomefreak gonna contact daniel tomorrow [20:35] FIREFOX_2_0_0_10_RELEASE [20:36] we havent put out 9 yet [20:36] afaik [20:36] i guess ill do iceape for gutsy now [20:37] are you sure its released? [20:37] http://www.seamonkey-project.org/ [20:37] ff 2.0.0.10 is still in QA, kind of RC1, iirc [20:37] seamonkey hasnt been released anywhere [20:38] but cvs is taggued anyway [20:38] i see source in nightly [20:39] * gnomefreak might wait till tomorrow incase there is something they missed [20:39] yeah we've been turning around a lot or security releases lately :( [20:40] rhelmer, i don't see any new cvs tag for ff3b1. is that expected ? [20:41] Ubulette: no there should be one [20:42] * rhelmer cheks [20:42] er, checks [20:42] rhelmer: whats the chances of seamonkey staying the way it is for 1.1.7? [20:42] I need xulrunner sources matching ff3b1 [20:42] should be a FIREFOX_3_0b1_RELEASE tag [20:43] * gnomefreak makes a list of contacts for when i get home if i can still see [20:44] gnomefreak: well we always hope there's one RC but that's not always the case :) [20:44] oh Ubulette btw i have eye dr. appy. tomorrow so i might not beable to see for some time [20:44] File: seamonkey-1.1.7.source.tar.gz [20:44] gnomefreak: seamonkey releases are done by robert kaiser (kairo) but he usually only respins for core changes [20:44] -File: [20:45] rhelmer, so it's the same tarball as RC3 ? FIREFOX_3_0b1_RELEASE was already there when I did RC3 here. [20:45] I'm puzzled [20:45] * gnomefreak needs to figure out how to do multiple servers [20:45] FIREFOX_3_0b1_RC3 (revision: 1.352.2.2) [20:45] FIREFOX_3_0b1_RC2 (revision: 1.352.2.2) [20:45] FIREFOX_3_0b1_RC1 (revision: 1.352.2.2) [20:45] FIREFOX_3_0b1_RELEASE (revision: 1.352.2.2) [20:46] same change for all releases? [20:46] Ubulette: yeah it's kind of weird, what we do is re-apply _RELEASE every time there is a new RC [20:46] that would mean nothing has changed i find that hard to believe [20:47] Ubulette: the reason why has to do with tool limitations mostly (client.mk, tinderbox, etc) [20:47] 8 days ago, it was already revision: 1.352.2.2 [20:48] so you says it's okay to just use FIREFOX_3_0b1_RELEASE.. hmm. I can try and compare with my rc3 tarball [20:48] Ubulette: which file are you looking at? [20:48] Ubulette: yeah the rc3 tarball should be a CVS checkout of FIREFOX_3_0b1_RELEASE [20:48] status from client.mk [20:48] which at the time of the tarball's creation would be equiv to RC3 [20:49] what is the chatnet for irc.mozilla.org [20:49] ok, i'm trying that. [20:50] too bad I can't copy urls from prism [20:50] gnomefreak: er not sure what a chatnet is :( [20:51] Ubulette: really? i was able to, although i'm booted on livecd right now (hdd died) so i don't have it installed :) [20:51] rhelmer: me neither [20:51] ok im gonna try this out in a sec [20:51] Ubulette: there was "copy link location" on the context menu iirc [20:54] yes, i see it but using the greader webapp, if one feed is a google group one, if i click on one article, instead of going to the browser, i get a new prism window (i'd like not to) and in that new window, I have no control [20:55] oh wait, i can copy the link now (i had a selection active) [20:56] gnomefreak, http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey/browse_thread/thread/985bc94f0f5aef2a/6dd333d0afc8e2c6?#6dd333d0afc8e2c6 [21:07] ok think i got this set up im going for smoke [21:22] now i need to figure out what channels are good to be in on mozilla.org im in seamonkey and mozilla atm [21:24] rhelmer, a diff between b1rc3 (got using FIREFOX_3_0b1_RC3 ~9 days ago) and b1 (using FIREFOX_3_0b1_RELEASE just now) shows absolutely nothing. [21:24] both browser and xulrunner [21:34] hm [21:35] Ubulette: yeah that sounds right [21:36] rhelmer, so what was rc3 about ? just packaging ? [21:36] Ubulette: no it's an RC so it should be identical [21:36] to release [21:36] Ubulette: maybe i am misunderstanding the question? [21:36] RC is literally a release candidate, if QA passes and noone finds anything then we post them [21:37] the files do get renamed and signed afterwards in some cases which is a bug imho [21:37] but the sources of the latest RC should match the RELEASE [21:37] i'm just trying to understand what happened in the last two weeks [21:37] Ubulette: you could diff RC1 and RC2 versus RC3 [21:37] so ok, i'll take for granted that no blocker was found and sources remained untouched [21:38] I can't, tags are pointing to the same thing now [21:38] Ubulette: well RC1 and RC2 should be different, not sure i understand? [21:38] Ubulette: RELEASE and RC3 should be the same [21:38] RC1, RC2 and RC3 should not be the same [21:38] FIREFOX_3_0b1_RC3 (revision: 1.352.2.2) [21:38] FIREFOX_3_0b1_RC2 (revision: 1.352.2.2) [21:38] FIREFOX_3_0b1_RC1 (revision: 1.352.2.2) [21:38] FIREFOX_3_0b1_RELEASE (revision: 1.352.2.2) [21:39] Ubulette: which file is that? [21:39] same revision ? [21:39] client.mk? [21:39] Ubulette: yeah but it's CVS so every file has a revision [21:39] Ubulette: and since we retag _RELEASE client.mk does not need to be bumped [21:39] Ubulette: you need to diff the whole tree to see the changes [21:40] Ubulette: does that make sense or am I missing something? certainly possible :) [21:41] grrrrrrrrrrrrr [21:41] rhelmer, i'm just troubled to release rc3 and release with the exact same sources but a new name. well, if it's expected, i don't minf [21:41] mind [21:46] * gnomefreak wonders if i can use 2 different ~/.irssi/config [21:46] this way i get 2 windows [21:47] <\sh> gnomefreak, for what? ;) [21:47] this single window is hard [21:47] \sh: for 2 servers [21:47] <\sh> gnomefreak, use a proxy [21:47] <\sh> gnomefreak, and setup window creates in config [21:48] Ubulette: yeah it's literally a "release candidate", once we have one we like we ship it :) [21:48] that sounds harder than opening up irssi killing it and joining other server [21:49] rhelmer, good enough. I take it :) [21:49] <\sh> gnomefreak, no..actually...you setup your dircproxy e.g. and have all channels online...you connect via irssi to your proxy on a special port and setup irssi to create the necessary windows [21:49] <\sh> gnomefreak, or use a graphical client ;) [21:52] eh i use xchat when i have to and only when i have to ;) irssi is easier to use for general things === tonyy is now known as tonyyarusso === \sh is now known as \sh_away [22:14] its so damn hard to get an answer on this damn server :( [22:14] answer on what? [22:14] Greenery: anything on mozilla.org server [22:15] oh heh [22:15] gnomefreak: so true.... [22:17] they dont give cloaks [22:17] :( [22:18] they cloak part of it by default [22:18] kind of strange but works [22:21] now i just need to learn to set up a pause for mozilla.org [22:23] "a pause" ? what's that ? [22:23] wait -freenode 100000"; [22:23] eh? [22:24] server pauses before joining channels [22:25] ok lets seee if this works [22:28] rhelmer, did you have the time to check prism ? I think all that mime/icons stuff is fixed. [22:30] Ubulette: well my hard drive is dead so i am on a livecd right now :) i can try installing it though but not much space :) [22:30] prism alone is tuny but you need xulrunner-1.9 [22:30] tiny [22:30] xulrunner is huge [22:32] yeah [22:32] Ubulette: i'll try to pick up a drive today and i can look once i get reinstalled [22:33] or maybe if my wife lets me use hers, it has gutsy also [22:33] but she does not like me screwing around on her computer :) [22:34] :) [22:36] rhelmer: who was it that maintains seamonkey again? [22:36] all the quits i lost it [22:36] gnomefreak: robert kaiser (kairo) does releases [22:36] ty [22:36] sure [22:37] gnomefreak, him: http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey/browse_thread/thread/985bc94f0f5aef2a/6dd333d0afc8e2c6?#6dd333d0afc8e2c6 [22:37] Ubulette: i have him in channel [22:37] well hes there but he might be afk [22:38] gnomefreak, what do you need from him ? [22:38] Ubulette: if todays nightlies would be final [22:38] .win 25 [22:40] lol it was canadates i was looking at anyway :( [22:42] gnomefreak: yeah he is in austria or something iirc [22:43] gnomefreak: you can join #build to hang out with mozilla build and release if you like as well :) [22:43] everyone always trys to cofuse the hell out of me :( [22:43] there is a #build/ [22:43] ? [22:44] gnomefreak: yeah on irc.mozilla.org [22:44] k [22:46] Ubulette: where did you read about 1.1.7 released [23:24] bug 164123 [23:24] Launchpad bug 164123 in firefox-3.0 "Firefox 3 Gran Paradiso need upgrade" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/164123 [23:34] http://flickr.com/photos/nobihaya/1386721368/ [23:35] lol what a fanatic [23:42] wow... what a car. a bit scary, though :)... [23:43] i'm very much concern abt the windshield [23:44] Naaah... I suppose it's safe enough :P... just kidding :) [23:44] lol [23:46] not a very green car [23:48] as in environmentally friendly? [23:49] yes [23:50] most sports car aren't green, kinda sad [23:52] this is greener: http://www.velectris.com/catalog/electric-bike-electra-townie-pi-96.html [23:52] :) [23:53] So is this: http://www.teslamotors.com/ [23:53] And it's named "Tesla" :)... [23:54] s/named/made by/g [23:56] wow nice cars they got there [23:56] US company? [23:56] I think it is... [23:56] <[reed]> Ubulette: see, that was easy! [23:57] [reed], what ? [23:57] <[reed]> Ubulette: getting your patch reviewed and committed :) [23:57] well, sort of [23:59] I think i would have waited a long time without asac 1st check and 2 or 3 calls for review in the motu channel. Good thing it's finally done *before* the next upstream release