[16:26] <Ubulette> rhelmer, fullerscreen has been updated. prefs ui is fixed
[16:26] <Ubulette> rhelmer, now, prism shows: Error: window.opener.opener.document.getElementById("navigator-toolbox") is null. Source File: chrome://fullerscreen/content/fs_prefs.js Line: 42
[16:27] <Ubulette> which i guess is expected
[17:15]  * armin76 yawns
[17:29] <bluekuja> hi armin76
[17:29] <bluekuja> are you still around?
[17:31] <armin76> yup
[17:31] <Ubulette> bluekuja, so ?
[17:31] <bluekuja> Ubulette, http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/2170/
[17:32] <Ubulette> bluekuja, all the iceape*_all.deb and mozilla*_all.deb are dummy transitional packages (empty)
[17:33] <bluekuja> Ubulette, are they needed?
[17:33] <bluekuja> Ubulette, I mean now if this package gets uploaded
[17:33] <bluekuja> it will install them as well
[17:33] <bluekuja> I don't think it's good
[17:34] <Ubulette> this is required for the iceape->seamonkey migration and the previously missed mozilla->iceape migration that I fixed as mozilla->seamonkey
[17:34] <Ubulette> asac wanted that
[17:37] <bluekuja> it should be noted that they are just transitional packages then
[17:37] <bluekuja> maybe in the package description
[17:40] <bluekuja> but we may wait asac to hear what he thinks about that
[17:40] <bluekuja> anyway it builds fine
[17:44] <Ubulette> I just reused the wording from debian that has been dropped in ubuntu
[17:48] <Ubulette> bluekuja, why do you want to wait ? just read the logs of this channel from two weeks ago
[17:48] <Ubulette> Nov 07 20:40:37
[17:48] <bluekuja> Ubulette, usually dummy packages
[17:49] <bluekuja> got a description that explains
[17:49] <bluekuja> they are empty and so on
[17:49] <bluekuja> from what I see here, it seems they are like normal packages
[17:49] <bluekuja> with content
[17:49] <Ubulette> i know. i've done those for ff3 from ff-trunk and ff-grandparadiso but here, I've just reused the debian stuff for control
[17:50] <Ubulette> so it matches with current debian iceape
[17:50] <Ubulette> sure I can improve but if it's good enough for debian, it should be for you
[17:51] <bluekuja> are they transitional for Debian as well?
[17:54] <bluekuja> Ubulette, ^^
[17:55] <Ubulette> Nov 07 20:47:58 <Ubulette>      i dont remember me dropping them, it has been dropped earlier
[17:55] <Ubulette> Nov 07 20:48:49 <asac>  hmm ... oh yeah ... thats then a bug of gnomefreak ... e.g. debian dropped them becausethey  already did that transition
[17:55] <Ubulette> Nov 07 20:49:05 <asac>  and gnomefreak probably didn't readd them
[17:55] <Ubulette> Nov 07 20:49:22 <Ubulette>      so ?
[17:55] <Ubulette> Nov 07 20:49:49 <asac>  either readd them or file a detailed bug against update-manager :) ... e.g. which packages need to migrate to which
[17:55] <Ubulette> Nov 07 20:49:57 <asac>  or bug gnomefreak to add them ;)
[17:55] <Ubulette> bluekuja, ^^ see ?
[17:56] <bluekuja> so Debian already did the transition
[17:56] <Ubulette> yes
[17:56] <bluekuja> mm..
[17:56] <Ubulette> debian did the mozilla-* -> iceape-*
[17:56] <bluekuja> yes
[17:57] <Ubulette> i did mozilla-* + iceape-* => seamonkey-* based on the same scheme
[17:57] <bluekuja> Ubulette, did Debian add some special transitional descriptions when they did the transition?
[17:57] <bluekuja> e.g (dummy package)
[17:57] <bluekuja> and so on
[17:58] <Ubulette> maybe my english is bad. "I did reuse the exact same debian/control file for those packages"
[17:58] <bluekuja> understood
[18:00] <bluekuja> Ubulette, checking lintian
[18:01] <bluekuja> Ubulette, W: seamonkey-mailnews: extended-description-line-too-long
[18:01] <bluekuja> but we can skip that
[18:01] <bluekuja> :)
[18:01] <bluekuja> and W: seamonkey-chatzilla: extended-description-line-too-long
[18:01] <bluekuja> damn
[18:01] <bluekuja> W: seamonkey-browser: postinst-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig
[18:01] <Ubulette> nope, it doesn't
[18:02] <bluekuja> lintian is crazy then
[18:02] <bluekuja> :)
[18:02] <Ubulette> just look, you'll see it doesn't
[18:03] <bluekuja> true
[18:03] <bluekuja> crazy then
[18:04] <bluekuja> I'm going to have dinner now
[18:04] <bluekuja> then I'm off for sport
[18:04] <bluekuja> the package looks fine
[18:04] <bluekuja> I need to do some more tests
[18:04] <Ubulette> so ?
[18:04] <Ubulette> ok
[18:04] <bluekuja> and then I upload it
[18:04] <bluekuja> ;)
[18:04] <bluekuja> need to see dest paths
[18:04] <bluekuja> build it on hardy
[18:04] <bluekuja> and so on
[18:05] <Ubulette> please don't disappear for days :)
[18:05] <bluekuja> lol
[18:05] <bluekuja> I had really a lot to do this week
[18:05] <bluekuja> :)
[18:05] <bluekuja> but please remind me
[18:05] <bluekuja> when you see I'm up
[18:05] <bluekuja> :)
[18:07] <Ubulette> i know you're busy but if you don't intend to finish it, please tell me so I can ask someone else. no offense but it's been blocked for a while now.
[18:08] <Ubulette> that was my 1st request for sponsoring, it's still not in while I now have 4 other packages in as big as this one.
[18:11] <Ubulette> bluekuja, ^^, and I'd hate to see the next upstream release out before this gets in. I'd have work for nothing.
[18:36] <gnomefreak> i cant see real good the drops they gave me i found out im allergic to. Ubulette you cant add nobinonly to gutsy and you cant change iceape -> seamonkey in gutsy, why did you do iceape at all since i already did it and pushed it to review? ONLY security fixes can be put into stable rlease unless it is oked by a SRU and nobinonly doesnt fit within that AFAIK
[18:37] <gnomefreak> Ubulette: if my package isnt good enough for gutsy than tell me and ill fix it but I REALLY FUCKING HATE DOING WORK FOR NO REASON! ill be back some other time
[18:39] <bluekuja> lol
[18:40] <Ubulette> that's the 3rd time asac and me explained.. hmm
[20:16] <Ubulette> if someone sees gnomefreak, please tell him to check his gmails