/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2007/11/25/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

=== DarkMageZ_ is now known as DarkMageZ
=== \sh_away is now known as \sh
=== \sh is now known as \sh_away
asacsorry ... got lost in an ad-hoc trip to denmark :/15:59
asacUbulette: there?15:59
Ubuletteasac, yes15:59
Ubuletteasac, hi, how are you ?15:59
asacwell ... first i thought ... damn no internet16:00
Ubulettei'm fighting with prism on revu :)16:00
asacbut now i don't want to get back at all :)16:00
asacgot used just doing nothing ;)16:00
Ubulettelol16:00
asacfun is i have to work all night now because ffox will be out tomorrow :(16:00
asacand i think my sponsor backlog is pretty big as well16:00
asacprism? any serious issues?16:01
Ubuletteyep16:01
Ubuletteno16:01
asacgood16:01
asacso gnomefreak is gone?16:01
asacwhat happened?16:01
asaclast thing i see is that he complained about doing unrecognized work16:01
Ubulettehe burst in flames once again and disappeared without giving me a chance to clarify.16:02
Ubulettewhile there was nothing new at all16:02
Ubulettei was just explaining stuff to bluekuja for sm116:03
Ubuletteresult is that bluekuja is gone too16:03
asachuh?16:03
Ubuletteand sm1 is still stuck16:03
Ubulettemaybe he got scared. I have no idea16:03
bluekujaUbulette, no16:03
asacok ... didn't i sign it of in launchpad?16:03
bluekujaI just told you it's the weekend16:03
bluekujaIt's the first time I touch my pc since friday16:04
asaci confirmed something ... ah right xulrunner 1.8 ... was that uploaded?16:04
asacbluekuja: hey :)16:04
bluekujaasac: heya alex! :)16:04
bluekujaasac, first P&P answered16:04
bluekujaasac, it was....nice!16:04
asacbluekuja: cool!16:04
Ubuletteasac, yep, my merge for xul 1.8 has been sponsored in a blink16:04
asacgood16:04
bluekujaasac, I've seen you aren't an AM now16:05
bluekujadecided to stop?16:05
bluekuja:)16:05
bluekujaUbulette, gnomefreak was a little less angry16:05
bluekuja<gnomefreak> i cant see real good the drops they gave me i found out im allergic to. Ubulette you cant add nobinonly to gutsy and you cant change iceape -> seamonkey in gutsy, why did you do iceape at all since i already did it and pushed it to review? ONLY security fixes can be put into stable rlease unless it is oked by a SRU and nobinonly doesnt fit within that AFAIK16:06
bluekuja<gnomefreak> Ubulette: if my package isnt good enough for gutsy than tell me and ill fix it but I REALLY FUCKING HATE DOING WORK FOR NO REASON! ill be back some other time16:06
bluekuja* gnomefreak รจ uscito ("Lost terminal")16:06
asacbluekuja: well i think they understood that i currently don't have much time :)(16:06
bluekujaasac, lol16:06
bluekujaasac, yeah^^16:06
bluekujaasac, that's the backlog from john16:06
asacbluekuja: yes16:07
asaci saw that16:07
bluekujaasac, any idea on how we can move on?16:07
asacon what?16:07
bluekujaon seamonkey16:07
bluekujaI've seen a package waiting for sponsorship in the queue16:08
armin76asac: you doing anything about xulrunner-1.9, or fx-3.0?16:08
bluekujaabout iceape16:08
bluekujaand maybe john was complaining about that16:08
bluekujaasac, anyway PPA security issue got fixed finally16:08
bluekujaasac, e.g changes files signed by keys in the keyring for the main archive16:08
Ubulettearmin76, i have updated both for ~b1, ready for review16:08
asacbluekuja: seamonkey to hardy ... iceape to gutsy16:09
Ubuletteasac, yes, i thought it was clear for everyone16:09
bluekujaasac, yes, but why john was complaining about that?16:09
armin76Ubulette: you have a link where i could see it?16:09
asacbluekuja: no idea ... i think he was pissed of because his package didn't get sponsored.16:09
bluekujaah damn16:09
Ubulettearmin76, either the corresponding brz branches or my ppa.16:10
armin76rofl16:10
UbuletteI haven't tried to push that to motu/revu because we usually review those here16:10
armin76Ubulette: i'm not an ubuntu user, so i don't have any idea what you're talking about :P16:11
asacyes we will upload beta directly16:11
asacarmin76: so what is your question about?16:11
Ubulettearmin76, hmm, so why do you aks here ? it's an ubuntu channel16:11
armin76:D16:11
armin76just looking what you guys did16:12
armin76and to say that it doesn't compile on alpha or ia6416:12
Ubuletteoh, you're gentoo16:12
bluekujaarmin76, gentoo doesnt rock16:12
bluekujaarmin76, migrate to Ubuntu please16:12
bluekuja:)16:12
armin76bluekuja: no, thanks, ubuntu doesn't have support for alpha hppa sparc ia64, which are the archs i use :P16:13
bluekujaarmin76, huh?16:13
bluekujaarmin76, Ubuntu support them as well16:14
armin76since when?16:14
armin76packages.ubuntu.com only show amd64 i386 and ppc16:15
bluekujaarmin76, check exaile package for instance16:15
bluekujaarmin76, https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exaile/0.2.11.1-0ubuntu116:15
bluekujaarmin76, check the builds16:15
armin76alpha is missing :P16:17
asacarmin76: how does it fail?16:17
bluekujaarmin76, yes, but anyway migrate16:17
bluekuja:)16:17
armin76asac: fails to compile, it detects the arch and so, but fails16:18
armin76different errors, though16:18
armin76asac: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10370744/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-ia64.xulrunner-1.9_1.9%7Eb1%7Erc3%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz <- f. ex :)16:19
asacyeah not updated xpt16:19
asacdon't think that there is a fix yet16:20
armin76do you think there will be? :P16:23
Ubulettearmin76, I don't have access to an ia64 box so it's difficult for me to fix. patches are welcome16:25
asacusually someone interested in that architecture has to come up with a fix16:25
Ubuletteasac, for prism: "There is a build-dependency on unzip. but all packages are architecture independent: this probably should be a build-depends-indep: "16:28
UbuletteI have to move unzip to build-depends-indep ??16:28
asacUbulette: no its ok to have it in depends16:30
asacthe build-depends-indep are ment for specific depends to build only the binary indep16:30
Ubulettei know but that's a comment i got in REVU..16:30
asaci think its neglectable16:31
asacdo you have a link to revu?16:31
Ubulettehttp://revu.tauware.de/details.py?package=prism16:31
Ubulettei'm commenting right now16:31
Ubulettewhat's wrong with my manpage.. it was right before.. hmm16:33
asacmost comments are valid16:40
Ubuletteno16:40
asaci wouldn't mind some though16:41
Ubulette10) Please put prism-google-docs in Section: doc16:41
Ubulettelol16:41
asacyeah16:41
Ubulettethat's lintian non sense16:41
asacreviewers faith16:41
Ubulette11) prism is architecture: all, but ships data in /usr/lib (please use /usr/share)16:41
Ubulettei did move chrome but I can't move the whole thing16:41
asacwhich files are install in pkglibdir?16:42
Ubulettewell, maybe I can16:42
asaci wouldn't bother linking components16:42
asac(javascript ones)16:42
asacconfigs + chromes16:42
asacthough configs are not a big problem either16:43
Ubulettewell, as a whole, he's damn picky, none of our packages here respect any of those16:43
asacyeah16:44
asaci don't think that he can't live with some16:44
asache just wants to point out everything16:44
asacwhile some are neglectable16:44
asac8 + 9 should be fixed16:45
UbuletteI think it was good before. I'll check, maybe a last minute regression16:45
Ubulettesame for my manpage16:46
asac1, 4, 6, 14, 15(maybe), 17,16:46
asacthose i think are fixworthy too16:46
asacthe others are nice-to-have16:46
Ubulette1 and 5 are debian stuff, too new for ubuntu16:46
asacfor mpl you should include MPL in docs16:46
asacUbulette: no vcs headers are needed16:47
asacso 1 is important16:47
asacX-Vcs-Bzr: bzrurl16:47
Ubuletteno16:47
UbuletteI have that one16:47
asache?16:47
asacah16:47
Ubulettehe wants Vcs-Bzr16:47
asacnow i see16:47
asacyes16:47
asacyou are right16:47
Ubulettehttp://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/11/msg00006.html16:47
Ubulettehow come was I supposed to know ?16:48
asaci don't think so16:53
Ubuletteasac, bluekuja; so, what about seamonkey ?16:56
bluekujaUbulette, whatever is fine for asac is fine for me as well16:58
Ubuletteasac, asac_ ^^17:03
asac_got reconnected17:07
Ubulette<Ubulette> asac, bluekuja; so, what about seamonkey ?17:08
Ubulette<bluekuja> Ubulette, whatever is fine for asac is fine for me as well17:08
Ubuletteasac_ ^^17:10
=== asac_ is now known as asac
asacUbulette: can you reiterate the problem with sm?17:15
asacare there things that bluekuja wants to see improved?17:15
Ubulettewe've just discussed the wording of the dummy packages. I reused the debian one, he wanted a different one17:16
Ubulettethat's it17:16
Ubulettei just said it's minor and it could wait the next version17:17
bluekujaasac, actually dummy packages should have a specific description17:18
bluekujaasac, and not a default one as far as they are empty17:18
asacusually dummy packages read like: this is a transional package bla bla bla ... you can safely remove it once the package bla bla bla is installed17:19
bluekujaexactly17:20
Ubuletteso tell debian17:21
Ubulettefile a bug there ;)17:21
Ubulettewell, if you really want to, i can fix it in this version17:21
asaci don't mind ... for the new transitional packages (e.g. iceape -> seamonkey) the wording should be right imo ... for mozilla -> iceape ... i have no opinion17:22
asacbluekuja: is that all?17:23
asacor anything else that needs to be fixed/checked before upload?17:23
bluekujaasac, I need to build it on hardy17:23
bluekujaasac, lintian was complaining about long-desc17:23
bluekujabut it's just minor17:23
asacyes17:23
bluekujaalso for  postinst-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig17:24
bluekujabut I don't see why it reports that17:24
bluekujaasac: I need to build that on hardy, checking final files dirs17:24
bluekujaand then testing it17:25
bluekujaa bit17:25
bluekujaand then should be ready17:25
Ubuletteasac, please review ff3 / xul from the .dev branches17:40
Ubulettebtw, both tarballs contain the same thing as rc317:41
asacUbulette: i have bug 156187 for mozilla_five_home ... what was your bug number?18:03
ubotuLaunchpad bug 156187 in firefox "core dump with application compied by firefox-dev under gutsy" [Medium,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/15618718:03
Ubulettebug 15712618:09
ubotuLaunchpad bug 157126 in mozilla-firefox "FF2 without default mozilla-five-home" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/15712618:09
Ubuletteasac, ^^18:12
asacUbulette: ok18:13
Ubuletteasac, that was an ff2 bug only.18:13
Ubulettea18:14
asacyes18:16
Ubuletteasac, i'm done with the 18 changes for prism. what should I do, repost an updated package with the exact same version or bump ?18:47
asacUbulette: hmm ... i think you have to bump the version otherwise revu will choke on it18:49
asacbut not sure18:50
asacask persia18:50
asacUbulette: so you said that the bits are the same for xul and ffox rc3 -> beta1 ?18:52
asac(the origs)18:52
Ubuletteyes19:01
asacUbulette: so you didn't upload anything? i can just reuse the origs?=19:03
Ubuletteasac, I didn't upload anything but I did fetch new tarballs using mozclient, so dirnames/filenames are ok19:10
Ubuletteasac, oh, i've pushed those to my ppa19:10
asacok19:13
asacdebian has now nspr 4.7.0~1.9b119:27
asacor is that in experimental?19:27
Ubuletteno idea19:28
asacyeah its in unstable19:29
asacbluekuja: did your upload get sponsored?19:29
asacbluekuja: to debian?19:29
asacbluekuja: would like to reupload and see if anything got fixed19:30
asac;)19:30
bluekujaasac, diff-ext upload?19:30
bluekujaor cgmail?19:30
asacno idea ... whatever failed because of my key19:30
asacyes cgmail it was19:30
bluekujayep, it's already in...but I'm fixing a FTBFS on some archs for diff-ext19:30
bluekujaso you can test your key again19:30
bluekuja:)19:30
bluekujaasac, do you have an amd64 box?19:31
asacyes19:31
bluekujaasac, actually I cannot build that on PPA19:31
asache?19:31
bluekujait builds fine there19:31
asacwhat do you mean?19:31
bluekujabut fails on debian builds machines19:31
asacah19:31
Ubuletteasac, is that something similar to our package or completely unrelated ?19:31
asaci have a sid chroot19:31
asacUbulette: we have a sync19:32
asacatm19:32
Ubulette?19:32
bluekujaasac, it would be great if you can test the package before and after the fix19:32
asacUbulette: e.g. unless we do something we will always get exactly the debian version auto-synched19:32
bluekujaasac, in the sid chroot as far as it FTBFS only19:32
asacUbulette: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspr/19:32
bluekujaand it's not a program issue19:32
asaclook at -- Ubuntu Archive Auto-Sync < archive@ubuntu.com>   Tue,  23 Oct 2007 17:59:35 +010019:32
asacbluekuja: give me branches :-P19:33
bluekujaasac, can I give you a dgettable url?19:33
Ubuletteasac, I'd prefer to keep ours. it's quiltified and now uses our nobinonly19:33
asacwhat happend to your branches?19:33
bluekujaasac, nothing, they are updated19:34
bluekuja:)19:34
bluekujaand unstable got the latest revision19:34
bluekujadgettable url for the fixed package19:34
bluekujawant to see if it fixes the issue before pushing it19:34
bluekujalet me grab the branches url19:34
asacUbulette: yes. maybe mike would accept the quiltification ... is the diff minimal? so we can send it to him?19:35
bluekujaasac, https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~bluekuja/diff-ext/debian.source19:35
bluekujaand19:35
asacbluekuja: the upstream branch has diverged19:35
bluekujammm...are you sure about that?19:35
bluekujaI merged19:35
bluekujathe changes19:36
Ubuletteasac, i've kept the changes minimal because you wanted to convince mike to use quilt remember ? but I haven't checked debian in a long while so I don't know19:36
bluekujaasac, actually you can just branch out the debian.source branch19:36
bluekujaand get the tarball from upstream19:36
bluekujaI grab you the link19:36
bluekujaso you bzr bd --merge19:36
bluekujaand that's all19:36
Ubuletteasac, yet i know that nss b1 is not enough to do sm2 / xul trunk19:36
asacbluekuja: ok so your branches are still a mess :)19:37
asacjust give me the dgettable url19:37
asacor all three urls19:37
bluekujaasac, ok, but I don't know why you get them as diverged19:37
bluekujaI'm *sure* I merged the changes back19:37
bluekujastrange then19:37
asacbluekuja: no idea ... you did different thing in your upstream branch ... e.g. you patched it et al19:37
asacbluekuja: merged back? upstream branches never need to be merged ... just updated19:38
bluekujano, I mean debian.source19:38
bluekujagot merged19:38
asacbluekuja: anyway ... just give me orig.diff.gzand dsc thing19:39
bluekujayep19:39
asacbluekuja: fix your upstream branch at some point :)19:39
bluekujaI will19:39
bluekujaI'll have to check stuff there again19:39
asacor only maintain debian/ directory + patchsystem19:39
asacmakes things easier i guess19:39
bluekujayep, as Ubulette does19:41
bluekujait's better19:41
bluekuja^^19:41
bluekujaasac, http://incoming.ibluepaper.com/diff-ext_0.2.3-3~ppa1.dsc19:41
bluekujaasac, this *should* FTBFS at some point19:42
bluekujaasac, going to eat in the meantime19:42
bluekujadon't worry about versioning ~ppa1.dsc19:42
bluekujait's just a test19:42
bluekuja;)19:42
Ubulettei've posted my comments and the updated package on revu. no idea what's next.19:49
asacUbulette: let him confirm it19:50
asache will from what i know19:50
Ubuletteasac, persia complained about the length of changelog. what should I do ?19:50
asacthen it gets sponsored19:50
Ubuletteread my answer: http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?package=prism19:50
asacUbulette: ping him on iRC and say that you fixed all those bugs, but not those ones et al.19:50
Ubulettei discussed with him earlier today19:51
Ubulette[16:17] <persia> Ubulette: some comments added to start.  There's likely more, but I'm to bed, and there's enough there for another revision.19:51
Ubulettedon't know what TZ he's in so i'll wait19:51
asacUbulette: did you reupload?19:52
Ubuletteyes19:52
asacUbulette: ok then fine19:52
Ubuletteread #1219:52
asacyeah ... i don't think its a problem19:53
asacif he gets too anal, i can comment as well ... but let him go ahead ... i think once you went through all this he will like you more than before and he has a strong council involvement.19:54
Ubulettelol19:54
Ubuletteasac, for xul post 1.9b1 (and sm2 trunk), we need nss at least NSS_3_12_ALPHA_2B which is ahead of 1.9b1 so the debian one is no good for us20:00
Ubulettewe can do a real 3.12.0~a2b20:01
bluekujaasac, back20:01
asacthis upload will be still without system-nss20:01
bluekujaasac, did it FTBFS?20:01
asacUbulette: lets try to target new system nss for b220:01
asacmaybe before20:01
Ubuletteasac, sure (b1)20:02
asaci have to write the roadmap for xul migration tomorrow20:02
Ubulettei've faced the problem within my ppa. 3.12.0~a2b < 3.12.0~cvs :(20:02
asaci will include it in that document20:02
asacwhat is a2b?20:02
UbuletteNSS_3_12_ALPHA_2B20:03
Ubulettecurrent req in 1.9b2pre20:03
Ubulettemozilla bug 40368020:03
ubotuMozilla bug 403680 in Libraries "CERT_PKIXVerifyCert fails if CRLs are missing" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40368020:03
asacwell its still cvs so lets name it ~cvs+a2b :)20:03
asacbluekuja: nope ... haven't even grabbed it :)20:04
bluekujaasac, lol20:04
bluekujaasac, I'll go for a showa then20:04
bluekuja:P20:04
Ubuletteand btw, i've moved the addons in xul b120:04
bluekujabbl20:04
asacUbulette: yes i saw that t... thanks20:07
asaci planned that as yet-another-last-minute change this morning ;)20:07
asacdo we have a global plugins dir as well now?20:08
asacfor xul?20:08
Ubuletteyes20:08
Ubuletteasac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/2224/20:08
asacfine20:09
asacUbulette: ok ... i plan to have all main plugins migrated to xul 1.9 by alpha 320:09
asacso at best starting before alpha 220:09
Ubulettei still preserved /usr/lib/firefox-3.0/plugins for b1 as we need to figure out what could be shared or not20:10
asacUbulette: why don't we have /usr/lib/firefox-addons/ ?20:11
asacany reason?20:11
asacor just by evolution?20:11
Ubulettenone. ff3 is not shipping any plugin at the moment20:11
Ubuletteall i have in there is links i've done myself a long time ago20:12
asacUbulette: hmm ... i just wonder why we still have the unversioned directory?20:12
asacfor ffox20:12
Ubulettewe did it intentionally remember ?20:12
asacdid we?20:13
asaci think we did ... just wonder if the reason is still valid ;)20:13
Ubulette-installdir     = $(libdir)/$(MOZ_APP_NAME)-$(MOZ_APP_VERSION)20:14
Ubulette+installdir     = $(libdir)/$(MOZ_APP_NAME)20:14
Ubulettethe plugin dir is one reason20:14
asacyes i think thats from the time when i started the package based on what i had in 2.x20:14
asacbut now that we have started to host extenssions/ plugins for xul in some other dir, we could do the same for ffox i guess20:14
Ubulettebzr blame firefox-fsh20:15
Ubuletteoops20:15
asacUbulette: i am sure thats my hack20:15
Ubulette39  asac@jw | -installdir       = $(libdir)/$(MOZ_APP_NAME)-$(MOZ_APP_VERSION)20:15
Ubulette44  fta+lau | +installdir       = $(libdir)/$(MOZ_APP_NAME)20:15
Ubulettenope :)20:15
asachmm ... i had the -instaldir ;)20:15
asacso it probably is pretty similar ;)20:15
asaci think i had firefox-3.0 hardcoded20:16
asacor something :)20:16
Ubuletteit's easy to revert.20:16
Ubulettewell maybe not20:16
asacyeah ... we have to fix the extensions + plugins dir i think20:16
Ubuletteworse.20:17
Ubulettethe usr/lib vs usr/share20:17
Ubuletteand the gnome split20:17
Ubuletteeasy with hardcoded paths, not so easy with dynamic paths20:18
Ubulettein xul, we don't do usr/share20:18
asacUbulette: wildcards in .install doesn't work?20:18
asacand then using wildcards in rules fo dh_link?20:19
asaclike we did in xul?20:19
armin76Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux ia64; en-US; rv:1.9b1) Gecko/2007112520 Firefox/3.0b120:19
* armin76 throws stuff at asac 20:19
asacarmin76: well done20:19
asacyou patch or did you find any?20:19
armin76mine20:19
asacarmin76: you can decide: either submit it upstream and let us include the patch from there or let us include first and if all works out well submit upstream20:20
armin76you pay :P20:21
Ubuletteasac, I can revert the path but do we really want that in b1 or post b1 ?20:23
asacbluekuja: sid chroot still upgrading ... takes ages i guzess20:23
asacUbulette: hmm ... i would prefer to have the final paths in ffox 3 so we can start to migrate things right away20:24
asac(not yet sure how to proceed with gutsy though)20:24
asacUbulette: if its too much work we can update after b1 release20:24
asace.g. do another upload in a week or so20:24
Ubulettelet me try to see the impact20:25
Ubulettein the meantime, feel free to review my changes in xul since rc320:25
Ubulettei'm sure you'll find some last minute thing ;)20:26
asacfrom what i saw it look good ... yeah :)20:26
asacanyway, still working on security builds20:26
asacbut last build should finish soon ... then i have to QA them and upload20:27
asacbut i can spin xul and ffox 3 while QAing i guess20:27
Ubulettei've waited for you before closing changelog, that's the only thing left i could think of.20:28
Ubuletteasac, we'll have to think about the langpacks soon. who did the ff2 ones ?20:30
armin76asac: i'll give you the patch when i fix it, i want to clean it up first :)20:32
bluekujaasac, back20:33
bluekujaasac, if you can't make it for today, I might go to watch tv20:34
bluekuja:)20:34
* Ubulette is sitting on seamonkey20:36
bluekujaUbulette, at the end everything is fine for asac about sm?20:37
Ubuletteyou told him you'll check so he didn't20:37
Ubuletteasac, right ?20:38
bluekujak, fine20:38
asacUbulette: we got them from debian ... then i updated them20:40
asacUbulette: we need someone to take over mass langpacks + mass extension packaging ;)20:40
asacUbulette: i hoped for jazzva or mertiki ;)20:40
bluekujaasac, where is mertiki?20:41
bluekujaI don't see him since weeks20:41
asacUbulette: spell checking works right, right?20:41
asacbluekuja: no idea :)20:41
bluekujaaww :/20:41
asacwhen was jazzva last seen?20:41
Ubuletteasac, yes. i'm using it all the time :)20:41
bluekuja!seen mertiki20:41
ubotuSorry, I don't know anything about seen mertiki - try searching on http://ubotu.ubuntu-nl.org/factoids.cgi20:41
bluekujadamn20:41
bluekujaUbulette, do you know a working !seen command for ubotu?20:43
Ubuletteno sorry20:43
asacUbulette: actually i think that the langpacks will be produced by translations.launchpad.net20:43
asacfrom what i know .xpis now work20:43
asacno idea what is produced in the end though20:43
armin76ubotu: seen mertiki20:43
ubotuSorry, I don't know anything about seen mertiki - try searching on http://ubotu.ubuntu-nl.org/factoids.cgi20:43
UbuletteOct 17 05:28:29 *       mertiki has quit (Client Quit)20:44
Ubulettelast time here20:44
asacyeah20:44
asacUbulette: i think the translation team will regularly import all langpacks20:44
asacand then export something for us20:44
asace.g. import .xpis from upstream ... then export whatever format ;)20:44
asaci think the translations guy who took the lead for xpis is on honeymoon for the rest of the year unfortunately20:45
Ubuletteupstream already has those langpacks (since b1)20:45
asacyes they have ... but we will be the new lead for ffox translations :)20:45
Ubulettehmm20:45
asacwell ... actually the langpacks often where not complete20:45
asacso we will add the content missing20:46
asacin the end i hope to push the work of packaging to those guys from launchpad :)20:46
asacno idea if it works though20:46
asaci will add it to the roadmap document i have to write20:46
asacextensions + langpacks + plugins :)20:47
asacfor extensions i would like to tap the community to pick the most important ones20:47
asaclike ... the top 50 extensions get into main ;)20:47
Ubuletteusr/lib/firefox-addons/plugins  .. hmm. looks weird20:50
Ubuletteas extensions go to usr/lib/xulrunner-addons/extensions20:50
asacwhy?20:50
asacUbulette: well ... the advice is: ship extensions that are of general nature (e.g. applicable for more than just firefox) in xulrunner addons20:50
Ubulettemeaning there's no usr/lib/firefox-addons/extensions20:50
asacthe firefox only ones in firefox-addons20:51
asacwe should have that20:51
asacoh ... now i remember :)20:51
Ubulettebut so far, the code only uses 1 dir20:51
asacright ... thats what i wanted to fix ... which is what i just remembered ;)20:51
* asac hates ever growing TODO lists20:53
asacbtw, i managed to port yelp and devhelp20:53
asacso there is just the epiphany beast left i guess20:53
asac(in main)20:54
Ubulettewhat about python ?20:54
asacthats done as well20:54
asacits just url-classifier breakage that persists20:54
Ubulettei still have those ugly warnings from xul1.920:54
asaci have a problem that i blame onto url-classifier in devhelp too: the .css file is not applied20:54
Ubuletteand I need to recheck miro once you land your python fix20:55
asacso it looks a bit funny ... but the gecko embed part is good apparently20:55
asacUbulette: yes. i would like url-classifier fixed before i can send xul to main20:55
asacthen the official porting would start20:55
asachmm ... i think we have to look into openoffice20:59
asacor at least assist the maintainer ... afaik it has a build-depend on firefox or xulrunner20:59
asacpainful i guess21:00
Ubulettedo we really need to split ff3 in usr/lib and usr/share ?? it's a pain in the **21:00
Ubuletteor can we do like xul ?21:01
Ubulettejust ship like upstream21:01
asacwell its 2.5M of 11M ... so its a good proportion for ffox 321:02
Ubuletteso ?21:02
asaci am not sure ... if the package is indep .. there isn't much use of share thing i guess21:04
asacbut thats just me21:04
asacs/package is indep/package isn't indep/21:04
Ubuletteit's not. there are still some .so21:04
asacother people appear to find it more important though21:04
asacin chrome?21:04
asacfor me there isn't an .so in chrome/ for xul21:05
asacbut i am not sure if all .jars are arch indep21:05
Ubulettecomponents21:05
asacyeah ... i just talk about chrome21:05
Ubulettetmp/usr/lib/firefox-3.0-3.0b1/components/libnkgnomevfs.so21:06
asacUbulette: i don't claim that ffox 3.0 is indep21:06
asaci just say that i don't see benefit out of putting things into /usr/share if those are shipped from an arch dependent .deb21:06
asacbut then ... i have not idea how people that share /usr/share across archs actually manage their packages so they stay in sync21:07
Ubulettegood. same for me. and it's less error prone21:07
asacbut maybe you know :)21:07
asacUbulette: be double sure that the upgrade path is correct :)21:08
asacif you go for pkglib only21:08
Ubulettei've managed a huge network with 7 unix vendors a longtime ago and that kind of split was important, here, I'm not aware of a single case of usr/share really shared21:09
Ubulettesearchplugins could be moved too21:15
Ubulettethat makes sense21:15
Ubuletteusr/share/firefox-addons/searchplugins  ?21:16
Ubulettehmmm. in fact, there's no plugins dir at all in debian/tmp. only in xul. good.21:24
asacUbulette: if use/share wasn't shared, then why did it matter except for archive size?21:28
asacyes21:28
asac(for searchplugins to -addons)21:28
Ubuletteasac, yesterday, i noticed that ff2008 is reporting a lot of corrupted jpg in wikipedia while ff3 is perfectly fine with the same pages21:32
asacUbulette: you have an example page?21:32
asac.10 will come tomorrow i hope21:33
Ubulettehmm. i can't reproduce.21:34
Ubuletteoh i see21:34
Ubuletteff2 was started from google earth, maybe ld_library_path is tweaked and pointed to another libjpeg21:35
Ubulettebingo. /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62.0.0 vs /usr/lib/googleearth/libjpeg.so.6221:39
asacyeah21:41
asaci wonder why people complain about google toolbar being broken with guty ffox21:41
asacit works for me21:41
asacoh it really loops21:42
asacapparently not default-five-home21:42
Ubulette?21:43
asacgreat google toolbar ships its .js file without linebreaks21:44
Ubulettelol21:47
asachow innovative ;)21:48
Ubuletteobfuscation21:48
asachttp://groups.google.com/group/FFToolbar-Group-Bugs/browse_thread/thread/d32b039cb2f92ff5/169b421268351699?lnk=gst&q=21:54
asac{try{var dir=Components.classes["@mozilla.org/file/directory_service;1"].getService(Components.interfaces.nsIProperties).get("ProfD",21:58
asacComponents.interfaces.nsIFile);dir.append("extensions");dir.append("staged-xpis");dir.append("{3112ca9c-de6d-4884-a869-9855de68056c}");if(dir.exists()){dir.remove(true)}}catch(e){}21:59
asacwhat are they doing?21:59
asachmmm thats in doXPIInstall ... guess thats just for seamonkey22:00
Ubulettehmm, remove ~/.mozilla/ff/extensions/staged-xpis/{3112ca9c-de6d-4884-a869-9855de68056c} if it exists ?22:03
asaci think its seamonkey only ... e.g. no-extension manager22:06
asacwell they ship libgoogletoolbar.so22:06
asacwhich expects libnspr4.so22:06
asacmaybe thats a problem?22:06
Ubuletteyou're talking about ff2 right ?22:08
asacyes22:08
asacdoes it work in 3?22:08
Ubulettei'm not using it22:13
Ubulettei think i'm done with ff3..22:32
Ubuletteasac, ok, pushed and tested23:26
Ubulettewell, tested, then pushed :)23:27
armin76Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux alpha; en-US; rv:1.9b1) Gecko/2007112521 Firefox/3.0b123:36
armin76plop :D23:36
Ubulettegood for you23:38

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!