/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2007/11/26/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

Ubuletteasac, i've tried to port the lcd subpixel patch for the cairo lib bundled in ff3 (for bug 164640). i've merged a part manually but it needs some work in the build system, mostly freetype2 stuff.00:24
ubotuLaunchpad bug 164640 in firefox-3.0 "Apply subpixel rendering patch to cairo" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/16464000:24
Ubulettethat's a lot of changes in the code. I don't think it's wise to do that now.00:26
asacwell ... that patch should be send upstream. If upstream doesn't do anything we won't be able to run system-cairo00:28
asac(upstreawm as in cairo upstream)00:28
asacso ... if its needed for mozilla we better get it in ;)00:29
asacor get something else that mozilla can use00:29
asacUbulette: b1 doesn't yet contain the gnome depends, right?00:29
Ubulettethe new icons ? no00:29
Ubuletteit's a b2pre stuff00:30
Ubuletteasac, should I close both changelogs ?00:30
UbuletteI wanted to push the cairo patch in as the user insisted it's trivial. it isn't so let's close with what we have and move on00:31
asacdo we know a cairo bug id?00:32
Ubuletteasac, no. Scott James Remnant (do you know him?) did the integration into ubuntu's cairo. seems it's based on David Turner's patches00:40
asacUbulette: yes i know scott00:41
asacUbulette:00:43
asac+00:43
asac+debian/debsearch.gif usr/share/firefox-addons/searchplugins00:43
asac+debian/debsearch.src usr/share/firefox-addons/searchplugins00:43
asac+00:43
asac+debian/wikipedia.gif usr/share/firefox-addons/searchplugins00:43
asac+debian/wikipedia.src usr/share/firefox-addons/searchplugins00:43
asacwe don't have five-home anymore?00:44
Ubuletteseems it's not useful00:44
Ubulettethe default is fine00:45
Ubulettefar better than using an empty one ;)00:45
Ubuletteor a broken one00:45
asacyeah00:46
asacanyway the searchplugin thing above looks wrong00:46
Ubulettewhy ?00:47
Ubuletteoh damn, the link is wrong00:48
asache?00:48
asaci mean you still use share there00:48
asacnot lib00:48
Ubulettethat's expected. that's the shared -addons like xul00:49
asacwhy do we need LIBDIR in firefox.sh00:49
Ubulettelast line00:49
asacshared?00:49
asacwhat do you mean?00:50
Ubulettewell, not shared but stable00:50
Ubuletteif any package wants to add a search plugin for ff, it uses that00:50
Ubuletteno ?00:50
asacand the usr/lib/firefox-addons/searchplugins dir contains what compared to the shared one?00:50
Ubulettei've made a mistake00:51
Ubulettefixing it00:51
asacyeah :)00:51
asacthey go to usr/lib/firefox-addons, right?00:51
Ubuletteyeah00:52
asacfeel free to add a link from there to share ;)00:52
asacbut i thought this change was about eliminating that ;)00:52
asaci just wonder why you do things like introducing DEBIAN_NAME in the same commit as all the versioned dir things00:53
Ubulettei should have done that long ago. I had to dig to see what was the package name and what was the hard path00:55
Ubulettenow it's clear00:55
asaclooks good from just looking at last commit00:57
asacbut its intrusive enough for me to try :)00:57
Ubuletteyep, sure01:00
Ubulettehttp://paste.ubuntu.com/2228/01:00
asacright01:01
asacdoes ffox with system xul install anything in /etc/gre.d?01:01
asac(i don't think nor hope so) :)01:01
Ubuletteno01:02
Ubulettehmm, looks like xul is leaking a file though. http://paste.ubuntu.com/2229/01:03
Ubulettestrange dpkg does not complain about it01:04
asacUbulette: purging doesn't remove it?01:05
Ubulettehow ? i don't want to remove xul01:29
* Hobbsee wonders if bugzilla accounts for the mozilla bugtracker expire.04:17
Hobbseenope, it appears they don't.  good.04:21
[reed]they don't :)04:27
[reed]they exist forever :)04:28
Hobbseeneat04:32
Hobbseeoh goody, bug is here, and i've been able to narrow it down04:32
Hobbseehttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31541604:34
ubotuMozilla bug 315416 in Password Manager "Passwords reappear after being deleted, some can never be deleted" [Normal,Resolved: incomplete]04:34
Hobbseenow...how do i reopen it?04:35
=== \sh_away is now known as \sh
salty-horsehi. I installed the adobe flash plugin + nspluginwrapper through the plugin finder. it prompted for the root password 3 times. can it be reduced to 1?09:28
asacsalty-horse: for me its only one time09:35
salty-horsedid you uninstall both first?09:35
asacyes09:36
asacwell ... not today ... but i certainly did it before ;)09:36
salty-horseon amd64?09:36
asacyes09:37
salty-horselet me try again09:37
salty-horseit asks once for the "add/remove" app, and twice for synaptic09:42
salty-horseI recorded a video09:42
asacsalty-horse: gnome session?09:50
salty-horseyes09:50
[reed]asac: think you can get around to reviewing mozilla bug 319965 soon?09:53
asacno idea ... gksudo shouldn't ask you twice09:54
ubotuMozilla bug 319965 in X-remote "Dual-monitors, FF opens in one or the other, not both." [Major,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31996509:54
salty-horsemaybe it's because gksudo is launched multiple times?09:55
asac[reed]: yes ... I just returned from holidays :) and a security update is waiting for me :) ...10:06
[reed]asac: ah, k10:06
[reed]yes, 2.0.0.10 is coming out today10:07
[reed]I think10:07
[reed]today or tomorrow10:07
[reed]who knows10:07
asac[reed]: the patch makes sense to me ... would like to look into the code surrounding this though.10:07
[reed]cool10:07
asacsalty-horse: usually not ... I can run gksudo echo hello multiple times ... only the first time i get ask for password10:09
salty-horsehmm.. trying another app10:09
salty-horseoh. I think I got it. I changed the sudo timeout to 010:10
asacsalty-horse: yeah :)10:10
salty-horsestill, is it possible to have the plugin finder call gksudo just once?10:10
asacthe plugin finder calls it just once10:10
asacits the synaptic thing apparently that does this10:11
salty-horseso add/remove calls synaptic twice10:11
asacfile a bug against apturl10:11
asac?10:11
asacwhy add/remove? i thought you are installing using the plugin finder wizard10:11
salty-horsethis is what I get in the password prompts:10:12
salty-horse1) "Add/Remove..." 2+3) "Synaptic Package Manager"10:13
asacsalty-horse: how do you instlal the plugins?10:15
salty-horsevia the plugin wizard.10:16
asacand how is add/remove ... involved? afaik there is just "install" in the plugin finder wizard10:16
salty-horsethe plugin wizard lists the available gnash and adobe plugin. after choosing the adobe one and clicking "next", I get a new dialog asking if I want to install the package 'flashplugin-nonfree'. answering yes prompts for a password (requested by the "add/remove" app). after typing it in, I get two more password prompts requested by synaptic10:20
asacah ok ... yes, then file a bug against apturl10:21
asacthe maintainer should reassign it appropriately10:21
salty-horseok10:21
asacno idea if its easy to fix though. i think its easiest to use a timeout of > 010:21
asac:)10:21
salty-horseit's insecure, IMO. even with just me by the computer, I want to be asked when doing potentially damaging things :)10:22
asacsalty-horse: yeah ... i think its a valid concern ... post a bug :)10:23
asacand keep me updated ;)10:23
salty-horsehttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apturl/+bug/16514710:31
ubotuLaunchpad bug 165147 in apturl "numerous password prompts when using plugin finder" [Undecided,New]10:31
asacsalty-horse: commented10:43
salty-horsethanks10:53
armin76asac: Ubulette: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40542411:58
ubotuMozilla bug 405424 in XPCOM "Updates for Linux/ia64" [Normal,Unconfirmed]11:58
asacarmin76: ok i will confirm12:07
asac[reed]: who to ask for ia64 review? (mozilla bug 405424)12:10
ubotuMozilla bug 405424 in XPCOM "Updates for Linux/ia64" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40542412:10
* asac lunch12:18
asacshaky freenode today :/12:55
armin76[reed]: why did you assign me the bug?16:08
=== \sh is now known as \sh_away
=== asac_ is now known as asac
armin76asac: Ubulette: is the ppc/powerppc in md/unix/Makefile a known issue?17:18
armin76i mean, is there a bug upstream?17:20
asacarmin76: is it the same for gentoo?17:31
armin76yup17:31
armin76target_cpu is from the toolchain, and the toolchain in ppc is powerpc, not ppc17:31
armin76i think it's a regression of bug 37242817:32
armin76mozilla bug 37242817:32
ubotuMozilla bug 372428 in Build Config "firefox configure.in does not work currently with a 64 bit kernel and a full 32 bit userland" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37242817:32
bluekujaasac, heya alex17:44
bluekujaasac, had a chance to build the package?17:45
bluekujaasac, just finished to study....I can call them 11 hours17:45
bluekujatoday :/17:45
asacarmin76: yes ... but will it reregress?17:48
asacbluekuja: i think i built it yesterday ... but didn't come to anything else afaik17:48
asaccompletely forgot since it was late17:49
bluekujaasac, that means it did *not* FTBFS?17:49
asacno idea either17:49
asacnever looked at that terminal17:49
bluekujaah damn17:49
bluekuja:/17:49
bluekujaare you able to retry?17:50
asacbluekuja: 0.2.3-3~ppa1 builds in sid17:51
bluekujaasac, mmm...17:51
bluekujacrazy then17:51
bluekujaWTH it fails on Debian build machines then=17:51
asacbluekuja: missing depends?17:52
asaci don't use pbuilder so i wont catch those17:52
bluekujaasac, impossible...it fails on using gconf17:52
bluekujaand works in some archs17:53
bluekujabut fails on amd6417:53
bluekujaand one-two more17:53
asacbuild machine broken then i guess17:53
bluekujayep17:53
bluekujais give-back possible in Debian?17:53
bluekujaasac: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=diff-ext&ver=0.2.3-2&arch=amd64&stamp=1195237138&file=log17:56
bluekujathis is the FTBFS on adm6417:58
asacGCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=xml:readwrite:/home/buildd/.gconf /usr/bin/gconftool-2 --makefile-install-rule diff-ext.schemas17:59
asac(gconftool-2:19515): GConf-WARNING **: Failed to load source "xml:readwrite:/home/buildd/.gconf": Failed: Could not make directory `/home/buildd/.gconf': No such file or directory17:59
asacGConf-ERROR **: file gconftool.c: line 918 (main): assertion failed: (err == NULL)17:59
bluekujayes17:59
asacaborting...17:59
asacthe buildd has not writable home apparently17:59
asacthe build shouldn't rely on that17:59
asacfix that :)17:59
bluekujaactually there is a work-around for this18:00
bluekujaI can just move schemas installation18:00
bluekujaafter make-install18:00
bluekujaand not before18:00
bluekujamaybe in a postinst file18:00
bluekujathat will fix this issue actually18:00
bluekujabecause schemas will be installed not during build18:01
bluekujabut after18:01
bluekujathat's suggested from gconf itself18:01
bluekujatoo18:02
bluekujacool :)18:02
asaclook how other software deals with schema and fix the build system i would say18:02
bluekujaactually I have to follow gconf policy18:02
bluekujathat suggests to install schemas *after* the build18:02
bluekujaand not during make install18:02
bluekuja(which is our case)18:02
asacso you patch the Makefile.am ?18:03
bluekujaasac, yep18:03
asacanyway, do whatever is necessary to fix this and let me know :)18:03
asaci will be out for a while18:03
asacwill come back later18:03
bluekujaasac, perfect mate :)18:04
bluekujaasac, having no testing machines to test this sux!18:05
bluekuja:)18:05
asacbluekuja: he?18:05
asacjust make your home not-writable18:06
bluekujamm...is it possible on pbuilder too?18:06
bluekuja*without* logging in18:06
asacits nothing amd specific18:06
bluekujaI'll have to work on logging inside a pbuilder18:07
bluekujaI think it's not possible to make my home not-writable18:07
bluekujain the tarball18:07
bluekujaitself18:07
asacbluekuja: build without pbuilder18:14
bluekujaasac, yep18:14
bluekujaor I can log inside it as well18:14
bluekujaso I have a clean chroot18:14
bluekujaok, home dir not-writable now18:16
bluekujatest-building18:16
bluekujaok, it fails18:19
bluekujanow let's make the fix18:20
bluekujaasac, fix ready to go19:00
bluekujaasac, patching makefiles wasnt necessary19:03
bluekujaI used a configure rule to disable schemas installation ;)19:03
Ubulettehi19:03
bluekujaUbulette, heya19:04
armin76asac: re: reregression, no, it won't, actually it's broken19:05
bluekujaUbulette, are you good wirh schemas? (gconf)19:06
bluekuja*with19:06
Ubulettedepends19:06
Ubulettefixing or writing ?19:06
bluekujajust for an hint19:07
asacbluekuja: ok if thats common practice go ahead19:07
bluekujaUbulette, does gconf-schemas works fine for installing schemas?19:07
bluekujainstead of using gconftool-219:07
asacbluekuja: why don't you test19:07
asac?19:07
asacthe installed schemas should be visible in gconf-editor19:08
bluekujaright19:08
bluekujalet me see19:08
asacUbulette: i fixed the url classifier thingy19:09
asacUbulette: now i see more issues :/19:09
asacwhat issues have you been talking about?19:09
asac(you talked about some issues with b2pre, didn't you)?19:09
Ubulettegive me half an hour. we'll discuss that19:10
asacUbulette: ok19:10
bluekujaasac, plus lintian complains about using gconftool-219:10
bluekujain a maintainer script19:10
bluekujaand it suggests gconf-schemas instead19:11
bluekuja^^19:11
asacbluekuja: there should be a policy document in debian somewhere19:11
asacdon't ask me where19:11
bluekujaasac, anyway yes, using gconftool-219:12
bluekujaand gconf-schemas is the same19:12
bluekujaschemas gets installed correctly19:12
bluekujaso it should be fine to disable the installation of schemas via a rule19:12
bluekujaand it will fix the FTBFS19:12
bluekujaasac, updating the branch19:13
bluekujaasac, are you able to check/upload that today?19:13
bluekujagonna give you branch links when done in a while19:13
asacto debian? i would like to try ;)19:13
bluekujayes, to Debian :)19:14
bluekujaperfect19:14
bluekujagive me some minutes19:14
bluekujaupdating19:14
Ubuletteback19:34
[reed]armin76: we assign bugs to the person who writes the patch19:34
[reed]you wrote the patch19:34
[reed]so, the bug is assigned to you19:34
Ubuletteasac, so what did you do with url classifier ?19:38
armin76[reed]: oh, sorry then19:38
bluekujaasac, done19:48
bluekujaasac, back19:49
bluekujaasac, branch is ready19:49
bluekujaasac, let me upload you the tarball19:49
bluekujaasac, or you prefer the upstream branch?19:50
Ubulettebluekuja, seems most package install those schemas manually19:50
bluekujaUbulette, yep19:50
bluekujapostinst handle that19:50
bluekujawith gconf-schemas19:50
Ubulettehttp://paste.ubuntu.com/2261/  here is file-roller19:51
bluekujaUbulette, yes, they stop installing schemas on build19:51
bluekujathat's right19:51
bluekujaI've used --disable-schemas-install configure variable19:51
bluekujafor that19:51
bluekujaso I don't have to hack makefiles using autotools19:52
asacbluekuja: why do i need a new tarball? i already have one ;)19:52
bluekujaah fine :)19:52
bluekujaasac: bzr branch http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~bluekuja/diff-ext/debian.source19:52
asacbluekuja: i won't verify that it really works ... just upload20:08
bluekujaasac, actually I just deleted the FTBFS cause20:08
bluekujaand schemas are still registered20:08
bluekujawith postinst20:08
bluekujabut not on build run20:08
bluekuja;)20:08
asacbluekuja: the orig is already in debian?20:09
bluekujaasac, yes, let me grab you the link20:09
bluekujaasac, http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/d/diff-ext/diff-ext_0.2.3.orig.tar.gz20:10
asacbluekuja: tell me md5sum please20:10
bluekujayes, just a sec20:10
asac8a82a8c76f1bd30cb3ee7dd8c270aab7 ?20:11
bluekujaasac, 8a82a8c76f1bd30cb3ee7dd8c270aab720:11
asacyes20:11
bluekujayep, that's it20:11
asacso lets see ;)20:11
asacuploaded20:11
asaci will look in an hour ;)20:11
asaclets hope20:11
bluekujagonna ping you20:11
bluekujawhen I see accepted20:12
bluekuja(hopefully=20:12
bluekuja*)20:12
bluekujaI really hope your key problem is fixed20:12
bluekuja:)20:12
[reed]ams is so stupid20:13
[reed]if any of you all know him20:13
bluekujammm...nope, never heard20:13
[reed]ah, then you're lucky20:14
bluekujawho is he?20:14
bluekujaand which channel?20:14
[reed]he's a GNU Hurd developer20:14
[reed]that should explain it all20:14
[reed]:p20:14
bluekujalol20:14
bluekuja[reed], have you ever tried to browse live spaces?20:15
bluekujafor msn20:16
[reed]no, I don't patronize Microsoft sites20:16
[reed]:P20:16
[reed]but I remember a bug on that20:16
bluekujasame here20:16
bluekujabut I'm just watching some cool photos20:16
bluekujaof a friend20:16
bluekuja(female)20:16
bluekuja:P20:16
bluekujaand I'm getting crazy20:16
bluekuja1-2 minutes to download a damn image20:17
bluekujatoo slow website20:17
bluekujadamn it20:17
[reed]mozilla bug 403481 has a reviewed patch, at least20:18
[reed]it should get committed today20:18
ubotuMozilla bug 403481 in GFX: Thebes "minefield memory usage keeps growing as png images are dynamically loaded (maps.google.com)" [Major,Assigned] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40348120:18
bluekujait simply doesn't load the page20:19
bluekuja: /20:19
bluekujaasac, no mails yet20:40
bluekujabad sign20:40
bluekujaasac, we should receive a REJECTED mail anyway, I guess20:41
Ubulettei'm fighting with prism20:42
bluekujagonna win?20:42
Ubulettepersia wants my get-orig-source to look less shellish, more makefileish ;)20:43
bluekuja^^20:43
Ubulettesure i'll win but if we ask him to review any of our moz package, we'd better trash our rules file and start from scratch20:45
bluekujalol20:45
bluekujais it NEW?20:46
Ubuletteit will20:46
bluekujayes, but is it a new package?20:46
bluekujae.g not the in the archive yet?20:46
Ubuletteyes20:46
bluekujaah ok20:46
bluekujaso on REVU20:46
Ubuletteyes20:46
bluekujaasac, still nothing... :/20:59
bluekujaI think dak won't send a rejected mail20:59
bluekujadon't know why20:59
bluekujabut that's strange20:59
asacwell its not a bug ... its a security feature i guess21:07
Ubuletteasac, with http://paste.ubuntu.com/2267/  persia seems happier :)21:38
bluekujaasac, found duplicate status token ('KEYEXPIRED').21:39
bluekujaRejected: internal error while performing signature check on diff-ext_0.2.3-3_amd64.changes.21:39
Ubuletteasac, if we don't ship xul soon, i'll have to ship dom inspector with prism instead of just a link23:31
asacUbulette: yes ... will happen tomorrow .. tuning the patch one more time ... will commmit in 30 minutes or so ... then you can take a look23:36
asacand close et al23:36
Ubuletteok23:36
asacwhy did we switch to slow diff.gz approach for xulrunner again? :) ?23:39
Ubuletteeh?23:39
asacnm23:39
asaci should get some speedy disks i guess23:39
Ubuletteyes23:40
Ubuletteyou do that :)23:40
UbuletteI can't do more than that http://paste.ubuntu.com/2276/23:43
asacUbulette: do you still install all prism apps in Internet menu?23:47
Ubuletteyes23:48
Ubuletteonly this default set23:48
asaci think it would be better to put the applications in the proper menu23:48
asace.g. office => office et al23:48
Ubuletteit is supposed to be integrated to the desktop, not split23:49
asacyes23:49
asacbut that would mean to put google calendar in office23:49
asacnot internet23:49
Ubulettethat would mean adding more logic to the rules23:57
Ubulettenot difficult but i'd like to get this one in23:57
asacy23:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!