[08:06] <kraut> moin
[09:21] <ivoks> hi
[09:21] <thegodfather> hi ivoks 
[09:21] <ivoks> is there any chance to include drbd module into ubuntu kernel?
[09:21] <ivoks> thegodfather: hi :)
[09:22] <thegodfather> ivoks: i did add a new patch to the bug.. any luck with that one?
[09:22] <ivoks> thegodfather: i have to wait night to test that patch :)
[09:22] <thegodfather> ivoks: ok cool. thanks
[09:22] <thegodfather> ivoks: drbd isn't exactly stable and portable.. last time i checked at least
[09:23] <ivoks> not stable?
[09:23] <ivoks> hm... :)
[09:23] <thegodfather> well it didn't use to be
[09:23] <thegodfather> and didn't build on many arches
[09:24] <thegodfather> ivoks: i think i might know why you were not able to reproduce the problem on vmware too
[09:24] <thegodfather> there is a specific algo to select the source address of an outgoing connection
[09:24] <ivoks> you do? i was thinking that it could be driver related stuff :/
[09:25] <thegodfather> when the IP's are all in the same subnet
[09:25] <thegodfather> it matters only the last octet
[09:25] <thegodfather> let say:
[09:25] <thegodfather> node1: x.y.z.101
[09:25] <thegodfather> node2: x.y.z.102
[09:25] <thegodfather> node3: x.y.z.103
[09:25] <thegodfather> etc.
[09:25] <thegodfather> and you slam the VIP's in the range from 1 to 100
[09:25] <thegodfather> i don't remember if the lower is privileged
[09:25] <thegodfather> or the higher is
[09:26] <thegodfather> so perhaps you want to compare the real ip's on the running cluster
[09:26] <thegodfather> with the vmware setup
[09:26] <thegodfather> if you understand what I mean
[09:26] <thegodfather> perhaps on the running cluster the VIPs are below or up the real IP's
[09:26] <thegodfather> and in the vmware setup they are inverted
[09:26] <ivoks> on these nodes i have two addess on every node
[09:26] <ivoks> one is private and one is public
[09:27] <ivoks> so, one range is 192.168.0.x, and the other is xx.xx.xx.x
[09:27] <hytham__> hi every one ...can some one help me in this issue (after compinilng a new kernel i recievd the following error "run-init:nuking initramfs contents:directory not empty" and kernel panics ???
[09:27] <ivoks> i tried with the same setup on vmware, but all ips were from the private range
[09:27] <thegodfather> ivoks: right.. that can change a lot
[09:27] <thegodfather> because of the selection algo
[09:27] <ivoks> yeah, probably
[09:28] <thegodfather> do you have a chance to test the exact copy on vmware?
[09:28] <thegodfather> including real ips?
[09:29] <ivoks> not really at the moment
[09:29] <thegodfather> if so.. you might be able to reproduce the issue without a patched kernel
[09:29] <thegodfather> ok
[09:29] <ivoks> i'll test the patch on real systems tonight
[09:29] <thegodfather> ok
[09:29] <thegodfather> it was just to avoid you any more troubles
[09:29] <thegodfather> with the production system
[09:30] <thegodfather> ivoks: otherwise is there a way i can get the real config with real ip's?
[09:30] <ivoks> well, system is still in alpha stage, so i can get along with it :D
[09:30] <thegodfather> of course as NDA or something
[09:30] <thegodfather> that way i can set it up here in my vmware environment
[09:30] <thegodfather> ok
[09:30] <thegodfather> that case.. it's all good :) 
[09:30] <ivoks> it the patch doesn't work, i think we can't talk about providing real config
[09:31] <ivoks> sorry... can
[09:31] <ivoks> not can't :)
[09:31] <thegodfather> ok
[09:31] <thegodfather> take into account that the new patch sucks in all changes in lowcomms.c that have been done to fix issues up till today
[09:31] <thegodfather> if this isn't working, we are probably experiencing another bug that we think
[09:31] <thegodfather> so that will require much more debugging
[09:32] <ivoks> well, i'll do everything i can to help you out
[09:32] <thegodfather> i really appreciate
[09:32] <thegodfather> thanks
[09:32] <ivoks> it's in my intrest to make it work too 
[09:33] <thegodfather> yeps..
[10:31] <ivoks> thegodfather: cross your fingers :)
[10:31]  * thegodfather crosses his fingers...
[10:34] <ivoks> i hate rebooting system in testing kernel
[10:34] <ivoks> specially when they are thousands of kilometers away :)
[10:37] <ivoks> they're up!
[10:37] <ivoks> and printk shows stuff gets executed
[10:41] <ivoks> thegodfather: :* works for me :D
[10:43] <thegodfather> ivoks: rock on
[10:43] <thegodfather> ivoks: please report it in the bug report
[10:43] <ivoks> i'm doing last test just to be sure...
[10:43] <ivoks> will do, of course...
[10:48] <ivoks> yes, it works... kudos to thegodfather :)
[10:51] <thegodfather> perfect
[10:51] <thegodfather> thanks for testing man
[10:52] <ivoks> np
[11:16] <ivoks> thegodfather: funny thing... bringing old kernel back results in oopsing :)
[11:18] <thegodfather> well no idea.. sorry
[11:18] <ivoks> dlm_lock crashes on one node, not both... well, never mind, if patched one works, that's all i need :)