[04:05] <ubotu> New bug: #172715 in xorg (main) "[hardy] Xorg crash" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/172715
[07:55] <bryce> heya jcristau
[15:10] <ubotu> New bug: #172821 in xorg-server (main) "[hardy] only get 800x600 in vmware" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/172821
[17:56] <tjaalton> whee, new kernel. I wonder if it'll be used for alpha1
[18:03] <tjaalton> probably not, since it would need lrm also
[18:05] <seb128> no it'll not
[18:05] <seb128> it has been source NEWed so it can build but it'll not been binary newed
[18:06] <seb128> alpha1 is supposed to be today so it's late to get a linux update ;-)
[18:09] <tjaalton> that's what I thought :)
[18:17] <mvo> bryce, tjaalton: should I file a bugreport about a file-overwrite problem on dapper->hardy for fix the missing replaces myself and just upload (libx11-data overwrites stuff in libx11-6)
[18:20] <tjaalton> mvo: is it just a Replaces: libx11-6 for -data?
[18:23] <mvo> tjaalton: Replaces: libx11-6 (<< something approriate) (in -data)
[18:23] <mvo> tjaalton: the version depends on in what version the files moved of course
[18:23] <tjaalton> right
[18:24] <tjaalton> jcristau: could that ^^ be committed to git?
[18:25] <mvo> somewhere in 1.0.3 it seems but the changelog is not very clear
[18:26] <tjaalton> what files were moved?
[18:28] <mvo> tjaalton: http://paste.ubuntu.com/2359/
[18:28] <mvo> tjaalton: and more, it goes on like this for some pages :)
[18:28] <mvo> this is dapper->hardy
[18:29] <mvo> oh, and failsafe X fails to start for me in hardy, if that is not known I can report that too
[18:29] <mvo> error in line 47
[18:30] <mvo> of failsafeXServer
[18:30]  * mvo needs food
[18:40] <bryce> yeah report that if there's not already a bug on it
[18:43] <tjaalton> mvo: oh, that change has been there before, but was lost due to a sync
[18:43]  * tjaalton runs
[18:45] <tjaalton> Replaces: libx11-6 (<= 2:1.0.0-1)
[18:46] <tjaalton> I don't think it would be a problem to commit that in debian-unstable
[18:46] <tjaalton> since there already are similar fixes that should be reverted when hardy releases
[18:47] <mvo> tjaalton: ok, thanks. it would be cool that could be done
[18:48] <tjaalton> mvo: is it needed for alpha1?
[18:48] <tjaalton> maybe too late already
[20:10] <tjaalton> mvo: change pushed
[21:50] <ubotu> New bug: #31211 in xserver-xorg-video-nv (main) "Dapper: Xorg (nv) takes all CPU% when running tvtime" [Low,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/31211
[21:52] <mvo> tjaalton: thanks for the quick fix :) ! its not needed for alpha1
[21:56] <ubotu> New bug: #44389 in xserver-xorg-video-nv (main) "X crashes after a few days of usage" [Medium,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/44389
[21:56] <ubotu> New bug: #172569 in xserver-xorg-video-intel (universe) "Wine couses logout when starting exe file in 64-bit Gutsy" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/172569
[22:00] <tjaalton> mvo: ok, thanks. It'll get in hardy when the new libx11 is uploaded to unstable (which should be soonish)
[22:01] <mvo> ok, that should be fine. the update-manager GUI that can do dapper->hardy is not finished anyway
[22:01] <mvo> currently all that works is a non-interactive upgrader that is great for testing
[22:01] <mvo> but not so great for anything else :)
[22:03] <tjaalton> heh
[23:07] <bryce> heya tjaalton
[23:07] <bryce> tjaalton: I've been working on tormod's script quite a bit
[23:08] <bryce> one issue I've run into though is that when the debian tree is merged onto the xorg tree for a package, there's various merge conflicts
[23:08] <bryce> I went through all the conflicts for xorg-server and did them manually - in all cases I just accepted xorg's versions of things over debian
[23:09] <bryce> but I'm wondering, is there a way to force the git-pull command to prefer the xorg versions over debian, and merge things more automatically?
[23:10] <ubotu> New bug: #164434 in x11-xserver-utils (main) "package should build depends on x11proto-xf86misc-dev" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/164434
[23:18] <tjaalton> bryce: I really don't know
[23:19] <bryce> hm
[23:20] <tjaalton> bryce: what about patches? do you disable them completely? that's another source of conflicts ;)
[23:20] <bryce> well, the good news is I've updated tormod's script to also work with all the X libs and protos and such
[23:20] <bryce> yeah I added an option to just drop all patches
[23:21] <bryce> it's working ok for some packages - http://bryceharrington.org/files/xpkg.out
[23:24] <bryce> I gather the successful packages are ones with no changes to merge (ho hum)
[23:25] <tjaalton> I haven't had time to look at the script yet
[23:27] <tjaalton> maybe the conflicts are due to autoreconf
[23:27] <bryce> could be yeah
[23:28] <bryce> I wonder if we should set up a git repo for these tools
[23:30] <tjaalton> for the script?
[23:30] <tjaalton> why not
[23:30] <ubotu> New bug: #36359 in xorg (main) "i2c hangs Thinkpad T21 (Dapper)" [Low,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/36359
[23:31] <tjaalton> ok, I'm tired.. good night!
[23:31] <bryce> night