| Jayc_ | Now I get the error "E: Couldn't find package telepathy-mission-control" | 00:10 |
|---|---|---|
| Jayc_ | StevenK, HappyCamp: This method is not working. so I will create a crownbeach-full image and then download the PPA deb package and install it on the target. I hope it should work. | 00:44 |
| StevenK | Jayc_: If you do so, you'll need to mount /boot manually before you install it. | 01:06 |
| Jayc_ | well, The initial image doesn't boot to stat with :-( | 01:08 |
| === davidm_ is now known as davidm | ||
| === cprov-out is now known as cprov | ||
| lool | asac: /usr/bin/ld: warning: libsqlite3.so, needed by /usr/lib/xulrunner-devel-1.9b1/lib/libxul.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) | 11:12 |
| lool | /usr/bin/ld: warning: libmozjs.so, needed by /usr/lib/xulrunner-devel-1.9b1/lib/libxul.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) | 11:12 |
| lool | asac: This is a bit weird | 11:12 |
| lool | asac: And this seems worse: /usr/lib/xulrunner-devel-1.9b1/lib/libxul.so: undefined reference to `JS_SetContextPrivate' | 11:12 |
| lool | But then this might be tinymail's fault | 11:13 |
| StevenK | But I don't see those | 11:13 |
| lool | I think I saw something related as the second error in some Debian package a while ago | 11:17 |
| lool | Somehow, upstream doesn't require js stuff when you use xul, I think it was in totem | 11:17 |
| lool | Ah, xulrunner has its own libsqlite3 | 11:18 |
| lool | asac: Hmm why does /usr/lib/xulrunner-devel-1.9b1/lib/libxul.so link to libsqlite3.so but doesn't have any rpath to the sqlite3.so in the package? | 11:19 |
| jussi01 | Is it possible to run ubuntu mobile on Arm (ie. is there images compiled for arm?) | 11:22 |
| mjg59 | No | 11:22 |
| asac | lool: what are you doing? | 11:23 |
| asac | lool: what are you trying to port? | 11:24 |
| lool | asac: tinymail | 11:24 |
| asac | he? ... StevenK already built that :) | 11:24 |
| lool | asac: His version doesn't build here; didn't build for Mithrandir either, but I don't know why | 11:24 |
| asac | lool: lets see if i still have the patch | 11:24 |
| lool | asac: One thing wrong with the patch is to test for xulrunner last in the list; this prevents building on e.g. my environment where I have firefox | 11:25 |
| lool | -dev | 11:25 |
| lool | asac: I have an updated patch whic fails at this place if you like | 11:25 |
| asac | lool: cant you say: --with-gecko=xulrunner or something? | 11:25 |
| asac | please show me | 11:25 |
| lool | asac: There's no such arg; but I planned adding one | 11:26 |
| lool | asac: In fact I made the macros checking the module parametrizable, but didn't implement ac_arg_with yet | 11:26 |
| jussi01 | Ok, cool. is it possible to compile it for Arm11 ? | 11:26 |
| mjg59 | jussi01: It should be | 11:26 |
| mjg59 | But we don't build Ubuntu for arm at all right now | 11:27 |
| lool | asac: http://people.ubuntu.com/~lool/xul-fixes.dpatch is what I use ATM | 11:27 |
| lool | asac: But the "libxul-1.9 mozilla-js-1.9" in configure.ac I plan to drop as it didn't help | 11:27 |
| jussi01 | mjg59: great. Is it something ubuntu mobile would like to pursue in the future? | 11:27 |
| asac | lool: http://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/tinymail.xul19.patch | 11:28 |
| asac | s/libxul-embedding/libxul-embedding-1.9/ | 11:28 |
| asac | that should work | 11:28 |
| mjg59 | jussi01: I don't think we're looking at it right now | 11:28 |
| mjg59 | jussi01: It'll depend on demand | 11:28 |
| jussi01 | mjg59: Ah, I understand. Thanks for your time. :) | 11:29 |
| asac | lool: for me it builds against the trunnk tinymail | 11:29 |
| lool | asac: Perhaps trunk builds | 11:30 |
| asac | StevenK told me that you need trunk | 11:30 |
| StevenK | ... but 0.0.5 builds for me.... | 11:30 |
| asac | because of some features that modest needs | 11:30 |
| StevenK | I took one patch from SVN | 11:30 |
| lool | asac: Do you have libsqlite3-dev installed? | 11:33 |
| asac | ii libsqlite3-dev 3.4.2-1build1 SQLite 3 development files | 11:33 |
| lool | Might explain why you don't get the ld warnings as above | 11:33 |
| lool | asac: Do you agree there should be a rpath? | 11:34 |
| asac | no | 11:34 |
| asac | thats the idea | 11:34 |
| asac | just use libxul-embedding and the GLUE | 11:34 |
| lool | asac: So should we drop the libsqlite3.so from xul then? | 11:34 |
| asac | thats what you see in code | 11:34 |
| asac | no not either | 11:34 |
| asac | or wait | 11:34 |
| asac | sorry | 11:34 |
| lool | I mean a rpath on sqlite, not on xul | 11:34 |
| asac | lool: please try just the patch i gave you and give me the error you get then | 11:37 |
| lool | asac: I'll have to change it to pull xul first | 11:37 |
| asac | you can also uninstall firefox-dev for a minute ;) | 11:37 |
| === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach | ||
| lool | asac: aha | 11:43 |
| lool | asac: It built at first, but it stopped doing so when configured like the deb package --with-platform=maemo --enable-demoui --enable-gnome --enable-tp --with-html-component=mozembed | 11:44 |
| lool | asac: configure: error: "You need Mozilla's XPCOM" | 11:44 |
| asac | interesting | 11:44 |
| asac | config.log? | 11:44 |
| lool | Well it's broekn configure:26275: checking Mozilla XPCOM pkg-config module name | 11:44 |
| asac | for me it builds with: sh autogen.sh --with-html-component=mozembed | 11:45 |
| lool | (no module name printed) | 11:45 |
| asac | lool: yes you have to use libxul-embedding-1.9 | 11:45 |
| asac | the patch has just libxul-embedding | 11:45 |
| asac | (as i told you in the beginning ... sorry should have repeated) | 11:45 |
| lool | asac: Ah my mistake, sorry | 11:45 |
| * asac building without libsqlite3-dev | 11:46 | |
| lool | Right, configure passes with -1.9 | 11:46 |
| asac | works as well | 11:47 |
| lool | asac: Indeed, it built fine | 11:47 |
| asac | cool ... now lets go for modest | 11:47 |
| asac | whats the point of having the zoom method in there? | 11:48 |
| asac | i think that logic should be moved to tinymail | 11:48 |
| asac | can you do that? | 11:48 |
| asac | that would simplify things a lot | 11:48 |
| lool | asac: Aha, for some reason I used "mozilla-nspr-1.9" instead of "nspr"; why shouldn't I use that? | 11:53 |
| asac | lool: in basic embedding cases you don't need nspr anymore | 11:54 |
| asac | try to drop that | 11:54 |
| lool | asac: Upstream is using nspr | 11:54 |
| asac | yeah ... its for 1.8 | 11:54 |
| asac | if you link against glue only and it builds without -DXPCOM_GLUE_USE_NSPR ... then you won't need it anymore | 11:55 |
| lool | asac: I'm not sure I want to patch upstream to stop pulling nspr; the fact is they are right now, and I wonder why we have multiple versions and why one should be preferred and not the other (I hope I'm not too annoying in asking you to teach me about this :) | 11:55 |
| lool | asac: Also, why did you use libxul-embedding-1.9 for mozilla_xpcom_pcs instead of libxul-1.9 ?! | 11:57 |
| asac | lool: libxul-embedding is for standalone things ... libxul-1.9 is for dependent things (e.g. things that get loaded in an already running xpcom/xul environment (like plugins/native extensions) | 11:59 |
| asac | lool: http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/XPCOM_Glue | 11:59 |
| lool | asac: Ok, I got my version to build now by changing to the libnss nss the libnspr nspr and using -embedding everywhere | 11:59 |
| lool | asac: The upstream m4 macros used mozilla_xpcom_pcs to lookup xpcom (I think) and mozilla_gtkmozembed_pcs to lookup gtkmozembed; why not use libxul for xpcom? Isn't xpcom the same in both? | 12:00 |
| lool | asac: Ok, I think I got it | 12:01 |
| lool | asac: What was previously only firefox-xpcom now is libxul-embedding-1.9 or libxul-1.9 depending on whether you're starting xul or whether you're started from xul; correct? | 12:02 |
| asac | right | 12:02 |
| lool | asac: Still, shouldn't it build would I use the libxul-1.9's xpcom? | 12:03 |
| asac | lool: point is that they enforce frozen linkage now ... so directly linking doesn't give you any benefit over glue | 12:03 |
| asac | lool: no ... because you lack symbols ... like you saw above | 12:03 |
| lool | Ok | 12:04 |
| lool | asac: And what's the story with nss? | 12:04 |
| lool | and nspr | 12:04 |
| asac | after all the libs are shipped in pkglibdir ... which means ... don't like against us :) | 12:04 |
| lool | Are we moving to using these separate libs? | 12:04 |
| asac | s/like/link/ | 12:04 |
| lool | It would sound "logical" to me that if you try to link to xulrunner-1.9's gtkmozembed stuff, you would do good to try to link to ist nss and nspr at the same time | 12:05 |
| asac | lool: apps that don't use xpcom can stay the same ... they use the system nspr/nss as usual | 12:05 |
| asac | the other apps should drop the linkage as its not needed and more portable. for those few cases where you need to use the glue with -DXPCOM_GLUE_USE_NSPR we need to link against system-nspr/nss | 12:05 |
| asac | lool: well ... if you don't use it you shouldn't do that because the glue loads the right nspr for you at runtime | 12:06 |
| lool | asac: Concretely, I wonder whether I should be adding b-deps on libnss-dev and libnspr-dev as to explicitely reference these which are used in m4/moz.m4 | 12:06 |
| lool | asac: Ah ok, nss and nspr are pulled over xpcom | 12:07 |
| asac | lool: they shouldn't be used in xul 1.9 anymore ... just for 1.8 :) ... otherwise xulrunner-1.9-dev should give you the dependencies i guess? | 12:07 |
| lool | asac: Yeah, but as I said hte macros are explicitely pulling these deps | 12:07 |
| asac | yes ... the macro needs to be fixed then. | 12:08 |
| asac | and my patch already touches it anyways | 12:08 |
| lool | asac: Did you discuss the xulrunner 1.9 issues with upstream? | 12:09 |
| asac | which issues? | 12:09 |
| lool | I mean merging the changes you did and not checking for nss and nspr when xulrunner 1.9 is used? | 12:09 |
| asac | mozilla upstream? | 12:09 |
| lool | No, tinymail | 12:10 |
| lool | Sorry, I wasn't clear :) | 12:10 |
| asac | why would i? I first heard of tinymail yesterday :) ... my idea is to develop the patch here and send it upstream. They will need it if they want to support xulrunner 1.9 anyways. | 12:11 |
| lool | asac: Oh ok; I have no idea of the date the patch was written at; I was just wondering what they though of this, whether they would take it etc. | 12:12 |
| asac | yeah ... please send it upstream :) | 12:13 |
| asac | if they have a bts you can cc me | 12:13 |
| lool | asac: The reason I ask is because I'd like to know whether $mozilla_xpcom_includedir/unstable makes sense for older xulrunner versions as well | 12:13 |
| asac | no it doesn't ... the diff should test if its there and otherwise don't use it | 12:13 |
| lool | Since how long do they have /unstable and /stable? | 12:13 |
| asac | since 1.9 | 12:14 |
| asac | before it was different | 12:14 |
| asac | as everything :) | 12:14 |
| lool | haha | 12:14 |
| lool | asac: The numbering in the .pc files sucks I think, is this temporary or is upstream also shipping with this -$major.$minor.pc naming scheme? | 12:15 |
| asac | thats we only atm ... we will drop it with next upload. | 12:16 |
| lool | asac: So the libxul-embedding-1.9 stuff shouldn't be sent upstream, rather it should be libxul-embedding I guess or the AC_ARG_WITH | 12:18 |
| asac | yes | 12:18 |
| asac | but please try to remove the nspr/nss linkage if you have 1.9 | 12:19 |
| lool | asac: Is it ok to do that if MOZILLA_VERSION_U >= 1.9? | 12:20 |
| asac | lool: for current xul its: #define MOZILLA_VERSION_U 1.9b1 | 12:21 |
| asac | no idea if moz.m4 cuts of after 9 | 12:21 |
| lool | asac: I'll tell you: #define MOZEMBED_MOZILLA_VERSION "$mozilla_version" | 12:24 |
| lool | :-P | 12:24 |
| lool | 1.9b1 gives "1 9 1" in m4/moz.m4's logic, bad | 12:25 |
| === jussio1 is now known as jussi01 | ||
| asac | lool: why we want >= 1.9 ... isn't that true then? | 12:33 |
| lool | asac: Yeah, it's true, but it's true for a broken reason | 12:33 |
| asac | ;) | 12:33 |
| lool | seems like two wrongs do make a right :) | 12:33 |
| lool | asac: So thanks for all your help and explanations | 12:34 |
| asac | lool: please do modest as well :) | 12:34 |
| asac | ... would be great if we could get that working asap | 12:35 |
| lool | asac: Do you think we could have libxul*.pc set includedir to /usr/include/xulrunner-1.9b1/{includetype}? This would allow querying the proper dir | 12:35 |
| lool | asac: tinymail + modest are StevenK's babies; you wouldn't be to take away a baby, would you? I just chimed in because it wouldn't build for me (due to firefox-dev) which made me go through the whole patch again | 12:36 |
| lool | Now I guess I'll pursue until I have something to send upstream, since I learnt about it all :) | 12:37 |
| asac | hmm ... i will think about the includedir variable thing. thanks for the suggestion | 12:38 |
| StevenK | lool: Does that mean modest builds too? | 12:39 |
| asac | StevenK: we didn't try that | 12:39 |
| * StevenK has been distracted | 12:39 | |
| asac | i thought you ran into issues yesterday | 12:40 |
| StevenK | I did, I fixed those and ran into more :-) | 12:40 |
| asac | hehe | 12:41 |
| lool | StevenK: I guess it will build better soon, but then you poked Mithrandir on that already; I'm happy yo help if Mithrandir doesn't find out (unlikely) or ends up being too busy | 12:43 |
| StevenK | lool: So, does tinymail require patching? | 12:46 |
| lool | StevenK: At the very least to prevent usage of firefox-dev, yes | 13:00 |
| StevenK | lool: Right, okay. Mind sending me the diff? | 13:01 |
| StevenK | lool: And it seems Mithrandir is too busy, would you mind terribly poking at modest? | 13:02 |
| lool | StevenK: Of course I will; if it builds for you that perhaps can wait until I cleanup some stuff as to render the patch acceptabel upstream? | 13:02 |
| lool | StevenK: Ok | 13:02 |
| StevenK | lool: Yeah, I was pondering sending Philip the patch, but only when I verified it could build against both | 13:03 |
| === jussi01 is now known as jussio1 | ||
| === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach | ||
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| === cprov is now known as cprov-lunch | ||
| === cprov-lunch is now known as cprov | ||
| raji | asac, you there? | 15:57 |
| asac | j | 15:57 |
| asac | y | 15:57 |
| raji | asac, 'Create new network' does not work on moblin environment. Driver times out , | 15:58 |
| asac | you see in log that it calls the supplicant? | 15:59 |
| raji | asac, yes | 15:59 |
| asac | raji: ok same game then ... reproduce with supplicant alone and see which error you get | 16:01 |
| raji | asac, do I need to give any different command to wpasupplicant, for telling it to create a new network? or is it just like testing connectivity? | 16:03 |
| kyleN | davidm, bfiller: will mobile support backup? upgrade spec says backup occurs before upgrade. finalizing prd now | 16:05 |
| raji | asac, Is it same as testing connectivity | 16:11 |
| asac | raji: you can also hack network-manager to start wpasupplicant with -dd | 16:34 |
| bfiller | Mithrandir: is there a problem with the nightly UME builds? Looks like none have updated on cdimage.ubuntu.com/moblin since 11-26 | 17:14 |
| bfiller | kyleN: 3.4.17 there is a new sound control panel, I'll email you the screen shot (it's in yesterdays image) | 17:25 |
| smagoun | bfiller: wrong channel - this one's public | 17:26 |
| kyleN | ok | 17:26 |
| bfiller | smagoun: right | 17:26 |
| raji | asac, How do I hack? | 17:54 |
| === cprov is now known as cprov-out | ||
| === doko_ is now known as doko | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!