[00:50] <Ubulette> asac, still there ?
[01:19] <asac> Ubulette: yes
[01:19] <asac> but about to leave
 Ubulette: ok i think we should rename the pkgconfig files :)
[01:21] <Ubulette> I assume you mean revert s/-1.9//
[01:22] <asac> not sure anymore what i meant :) ... i think it was a temporary idea while porting totems build system
[01:22] <asac> but yes, maybe we should drop the version
[01:24] <Ubulette> I wanted to be able to install xul-dev, xul-1.9-dev and maybe xul-1.9.1-dev at the same time but maybe it's not needed/wanted
[01:24] <asac> would be nice ... but versioning those also makes configure.in file bloated
[01:26] <asac> i think its good enough to just support one dev package at the same time
[02:10] <Ubulette> asac, you're doing totem ?
[09:12] <asac> Ubulette: eventually yes .... while writing the migration guide :)
[14:27] <griffinc> asac: ping
[14:33] <asac> griffinc: pon
[14:34] <griffinc> asac: I just wanted to say hi as your new mentee.  :-)
[14:34] <griffinc> I am in ubuntu-motu as well
[14:34] <griffinc> working on a small merge
[14:34] <asac> yeah :) ... a pleasure to meet you
[14:35] <griffinc> nice to meet you too.  thanks for offering to mentor.
[14:35] <asac> lets discuss technical things that are motu related in that channel then ... other chat is good to do here :)
[14:35] <griffinc> sounds good
[15:07] <Ubulette> bug 451905
[15:07] <Ubulette> debian bug 451905
[15:07] <ubotu> Debian bug 451905 in gst-plugins-base0.10 "gst-plugins-base0.10 - FTBFS: /usr/bin/dh_gstscancodecs: gst-inspect-0.10 failed on debian/gstreamer0.10-gnomevfs/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstgnomevfs.so: 65280" [Serious,Fixed] http://bugs.debian.org/451905
[17:10] <janimo> is xulrunner 1.9 beta 1 planned for gutsy PPA?
[17:14] <asac> janimo: eevn for -security i guess
[17:14] <janimo> cool
[17:14] <janimo> I found the reson of the pyxpcom traceback I was getting with sugar
[17:15] <janimo> if I drop --enable-safe-browsing it no longer appears
[17:15] <janimo> not sure what else breaks though :)
[17:18] <asac> xulrunner? or firefox?
[17:18] <janimo> xulrunner
[17:19] <janimo> it appeared witha python wrapper around it
[17:19] <janimo> that is used in the OLPC interface
[17:20] <janimo> asac: after a debuild -us -uc inside the xulrunner-1.9 dir , debuild clean does not seen to remove all build related files (.o, .so. config)
[17:20] <janimo> known issue?
[20:46] <Ubulette> bluekuja, any progress with seamonkey ?
[20:47] <Ubulette> a new version has been released today :(
[23:39] <Ubulette> asac, did you do 2.0.0.11 ?
[23:40] <asac> Ubulette: for hardy we are up to date, dapper is not affected ... the others not yet uploaded, but its just a tiny patch.
[23:43] <Ubulette> really ? i still se 2.0.0.10 in hardy
[23:44] <asac> Ubulette: i proactively patched it up :)
[23:44] <asac> unfortunately the supported platforms had already been rolled out
[23:45] <asac> Ubulette: this whole release is about just one line change :)
[23:46] <Ubulette> problem is users just check the version, fell unsafe, go complain everywhere and some build their own and spread that
[23:47] <asac> as long as they spread debs i am not too mcuh concerned
[23:47] <asac> but you are right :)
[23:48] <asac> maybe i just upload hardy
[23:48] <asac> buildd are idle anyway :)
[23:49] <Ubulette> yes
[23:50] <asac> epiphany works now almost perfectly ... only thing that sucks is that password management is broken somehow ... but might as well be an epiphany bug