[00:14] asac: are you around? [01:30] asac, I have seamonkey 1.1.7 ready (3 MSA), too bad 1.1.6 is still unsponsored. [01:31] i'm sick of this, I'm thinking about dropping it. noone seems to care [01:49] <[reed]> "sponsor"? [01:58] [reed], yep, i'm not allowed to push releases myself in ubuntu. I depend on already approved guys [01:59] <[reed]> ah [01:59] <[reed]> asac can't sponsor? [02:00] sure but someone else wanted to do it, like weeks ago [02:01] <[reed]> ah === Ubulette_ is now known as Ubulette [14:10] Ubulette, around? [15:02] Ubulette, it FTBFS in hardy [15:03] Ubulette, http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/2403/ [15:03] Ubulette, builds fine with gutsy but that's the problem with hardy [16:25] Admiral_Chicago: here [16:25] asac, seamonkey FTBFS in hardy [16:25] bluekuja: we need a patch [16:25] take it from firefox 2 in hardy [16:26] gtk has changed :) [16:26] :) [16:26] I'll tell that to Ubulette [16:26] so he can prepare a fix [16:26] bluekuja: just add it build and upload [16:26] wait a sec [16:27] did you see the error? [16:27] http://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/bz344818_att264996.patch [16:27] yes ... the patch fixes it [16:27] ok, I'm quite off, so I'll do it tomorrow or monday [16:28] is the package ok= [16:28] ? [16:28] (otherwise)? [16:28] yes, the final paths are ok, there is a strange linda warning [16:28] which? [16:28] W: seamonkey-dev; File /usr/lib/pkgconfig/seamonkey-nspr.pc contained in /usr/lib of Architecture: all package. [16:29] and some other long desc ones, we can just skip [16:29] it installs fine [16:29] it works fine [16:29] (on gutsy) [16:29] ok ... no need to bother about thta [16:29] ok [16:29] so we just need to add that patch [16:29] and we can upload it [16:30] bluekuja: yes, i can upload it if you don't get to it tomorrow ... just let me know [16:30] asac, ok, I'll try to handle it tomorrow evening [16:30] if not, gonna ping you [16:30] ok ... let me know [16:30] thanks [16:31] perfect, and sorry for the delay [16:32] asac, too many stuff to do nowadays [16:32] yeah ... not a problem ... next time you can probably do it faster because the package isn't really new to you anymore :) [16:32] after all its a big one :) [16:32] yeah [16:32] an hour to build is a lot [16:33] and anyway that's my fault, had really a lot to do plus school/sport [16:33] right ... hopefully this can be migrated to xulrunner ... but doesn't look like it will happen for hardy [16:36] yea, going to drink something in the town centre now [16:36] have fun [16:37] thanks alex [16:37] :) [16:37] what about you? [16:37] not today ;) [16:37] :) [16:37] have a great evening! [16:37] cu tomorrow :) [16:37] thanks cu [16:45] http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10619116/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-hppa.lightning-sunbird_0.7%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [17:32] hi [17:33] I'd like to know on what we should build-depend today in hardy, firefox-dev, libxul-dev, xulrunner-1.9-dev? === \sh_away is now known as \sh [18:19] Adri2000: which application? [18:20] asac: blam [18:21] well xulrunner-1.9-dev is preferred and only supported option for hardy [18:21] otherwise libxul-dev [18:21] asac: Debian b-d on libxul-dev and I changed that to firefox-dev during the feisty development cycle [18:21] firefox-deb will be gone in the ed [18:21] Adri2000: you should port that application to xulrunner-1.9 :) [18:22] needs some coding though [18:22] errr... blam is mono :s [18:22] * Adri2000 wonders why he touched blam [18:22] well I'll try to build it with xulrunner-1.9 and see if it actually ftbfs [18:23] it will [18:23] (fail) [18:23] is there a doc somewhere about how to do the transition? [18:24] will finish it tomorrow [18:24] stay tune [18:24] d [18:24] ok === \sh is now known as \sh_away === asac_ is now known as asac === asac_ is now known as asac [21:02] asac: when you say xulrunner-1.9-dev is the only one supported in hardy, that means xulrunner-1.9 is/will be in main while xulrunner is in universe for hardy? [21:53] asac: blam built fine with xulrunner-1.9-dev...