[00:14] <Admiral_Chicago> asac: are you around?
[01:30] <Ubulette> asac, I have seamonkey 1.1.7 ready (3 MSA), too bad 1.1.6 is still unsponsored.
[01:31] <Ubulette> i'm sick of this, I'm thinking about dropping it. noone seems to care
[01:49] <[reed]> "sponsor"?
[01:58] <Ubulette> [reed], yep, i'm not allowed to push releases myself in ubuntu. I depend on already approved guys
[01:59] <[reed]> ah
[01:59] <[reed]> asac can't sponsor?
[02:00] <Ubulette> sure but someone else wanted to do it, like weeks ago
[02:01] <[reed]> ah
[14:10] <bluekuja> Ubulette, around?
[15:02] <bluekuja> Ubulette, it FTBFS in hardy
[15:03] <bluekuja> Ubulette, http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/2403/
[15:03] <bluekuja> Ubulette, builds fine with gutsy but that's the problem with hardy
[16:25] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: here
[16:25] <bluekuja> asac, seamonkey FTBFS in hardy
[16:25] <asac> bluekuja: we need a patch
[16:25] <asac> take it from firefox 2 in hardy
[16:26] <asac> gtk has changed :)
[16:26] <bluekuja> :)
[16:26] <bluekuja> I'll tell that to Ubulette
[16:26] <bluekuja> so he can prepare a fix
[16:26] <asac> bluekuja: just add it build and upload
[16:26] <asac> wait a sec
[16:27] <bluekuja> did you see the error?
[16:27] <asac> http://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/bz344818_att264996.patch
[16:27] <asac> yes ... the patch fixes it
[16:27] <bluekuja> ok, I'm quite off, so I'll do it tomorrow or monday
[16:28] <asac> is the package ok=
[16:28] <asac> ?
[16:28] <asac> (otherwise)?
[16:28] <bluekuja> yes, the final paths are ok, there is a strange linda warning
[16:28] <asac> which?
[16:28] <bluekuja> W: seamonkey-dev; File /usr/lib/pkgconfig/seamonkey-nspr.pc contained in /usr/lib of Architecture: all package.
[16:29] <bluekuja> and some other long desc ones, we can just skip
[16:29] <bluekuja> it installs fine
[16:29] <bluekuja> it works fine
[16:29] <bluekuja> (on gutsy)
[16:29] <asac> ok ... no need to bother about thta
[16:29] <bluekuja> ok
[16:29] <bluekuja> so we just need to add that patch
[16:29] <bluekuja> and we can upload it
[16:30] <asac> bluekuja: yes, i can upload it if you don't get to it tomorrow ... just let me know
[16:30] <bluekuja> asac, ok, I'll try to handle it tomorrow evening
[16:30] <bluekuja> if not, gonna ping you
[16:30] <asac> ok ... let me know
[16:30] <asac> thanks
[16:31] <bluekuja> perfect, and sorry for the delay
[16:32] <bluekuja> asac, too many stuff to do nowadays
[16:32] <asac> yeah ... not a problem ... next time you can probably do it faster because the package isn't really new to you anymore :)
[16:32] <asac> after all its a big one :)
[16:32] <bluekuja> yeah
[16:32] <bluekuja> an hour to build is a lot
[16:33] <bluekuja> and anyway that's my fault, had really a lot to do plus school/sport
[16:33] <asac> right ... hopefully this can be migrated to xulrunner ... but doesn't look like it will happen for hardy
[16:36] <bluekuja> yea, going to drink something in the town centre now
[16:36] <asac> have fun
[16:37] <bluekuja> thanks alex
[16:37] <bluekuja> :)
[16:37] <bluekuja> what about you?
[16:37] <asac> not today ;)
[16:37] <bluekuja> :)
[16:37] <bluekuja> have a great evening!
[16:37] <bluekuja> cu tomorrow :)
[16:37] <asac> thanks cu
[16:45] <asac> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10619116/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-hppa.lightning-sunbird_0.7%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[17:32] <Adri2000> hi
[17:33] <Adri2000> I'd like to know on what we should build-depend today in hardy, firefox-dev, libxul-dev, xulrunner-1.9-dev?
[18:19] <asac> Adri2000: which application?
[18:20] <Adri2000> asac: blam
[18:21] <asac> well xulrunner-1.9-dev is preferred and only supported option for hardy
[18:21] <asac> otherwise libxul-dev
[18:21] <Adri2000> asac: Debian b-d on libxul-dev and I changed that to firefox-dev during the feisty development cycle
[18:21] <asac> firefox-deb will be gone in the ed
[18:21] <asac> Adri2000: you should port that application to xulrunner-1.9 :)
[18:22] <asac> needs some coding though
[18:22] <Adri2000> errr... blam is mono :s
[18:22]  * Adri2000 wonders why he touched blam
[18:22] <Adri2000> well I'll try to build it with xulrunner-1.9 and see if it actually ftbfs
[18:23] <asac> it will
[18:23] <asac> (fail)
[18:23] <Adri2000> is there a doc somewhere about how to do the transition?
[18:24] <asac> will finish it tomorrow
[18:24] <asac> stay tune
[18:24] <asac> d
[18:24] <Adri2000> ok
[21:02] <Adri2000> asac: when you say xulrunner-1.9-dev is the only one supported in hardy, that means xulrunner-1.9 is/will be in main while xulrunner is in universe for hardy?
[21:53] <Adri2000> asac: blam built fine with xulrunner-1.9-dev...