[00:00] Trewas: The difference is - I report this to nvidia they do nothing [00:01] If XiG is broken I belive that they will fix it (or at least that is what they said when I enquired) [00:03] If you are not one of the customers Nvidia actually makes the drivers for then you are so out of luck [00:04] I guess that is true for a large corporation, they don't have much reason to listen for single customers [00:10] but for me, nvidia cards and drivers have so far worked fine unlike others... matrox never had working tv-out, has pitifully slow 3d, and currently has no working multi-head in xorg anymore, intel has been pretty better but some problems playing video especially with compiz where nvidia works perfectly fine [00:10] and ati has always had reputation for horrible drivers (in windows and linux) so I have never seen any reason to try them :) [00:12] Reputations change over time (I had the original geforce DDR and the drivers were beyond terrible) [00:15] sure, but ati still seems to have lots of horror stories in linux whereas for nvidia most of the whining is because the drivers are closed source [00:16] Trewas: fglrx was pants - I don't think the same thing applies to Windows (my brother has a high end ati and it seems alot more powerful than my similar range nvidia) [00:18] I think the newer version is supposed to be better but I dunno I won't get one of those ati's (The ones that work with XiG cannot be bought on a pci-e card) [00:21] yep, and hopefully the ati drivers will get better if they actually get around to opensourcing them [00:26] Hopefully but that in itself doesn't always mean better drivers [00:28] yeah I know, as I said I have been using matrox cards for a long time ;) (which have free drivers which are bad and miss many of the features the card supports) [00:37] crimsun: Are you still here? [00:58] are there any plans to make fstab work better in the future? [00:58] :-p [02:07] lol, still lots of work to do for hardy, uh? the 'about' page of alpha 1 still says it's 7.10 =P [02:07] ....you expect differently? [02:10] Hobbsee: in no way =) i like to see how it progresses [02:12] so why did you comment on it? [02:14] LiMaO im not sure if that would require a bug to be posted, but on random note i did post one to ubuntu-website for a typo the other week, it was updated inside 24hours :) [02:15] they sure are actively working on it.. better to wait a few more weeks before posting about that.. i guess they're working on more critical stuff at the moment =) [02:15] i'm pretty sure the 'about' page will be updated before the official release ;) === DM| is now known as DM === DM is now known as Delvien [05:38] yay alpha :D [07:10] is there a way to show the things ubuntu-desktop suggests that aren't already installed? [07:12] pwnguin: I believe there is, in synaptic. === Aishiko_ is now known as Aishiko === Sebast1an is now known as Sebastian [09:03] hello [09:04] after upgraded, grub still display ubuntu 7.10 [09:05] anyone here? [09:07] no [09:08] gerr: looks like no one has updated it [09:10] oh === Hobbsee_ is now known as Hobbsee [12:14] my KDE dcop broke [12:15] fix it? [12:15] i cant start my kde3 session anymore. im now in my kde4 session [12:16] try moving .kde or deleting it [12:16] what version of dbus? [12:17] and what happens when you run "dcopserver &" from a commadn line? [12:21] dcopserver works [12:21] then how did your kde dcop break? [12:23] i also cannot login to consele when i press crt alt f1 [12:24] mingetty processes are running [12:24] just getty [12:51] gerr: that is strange mine says "title Ubuntu hardy (development branch), kernel 2.6.22-14-generic" [13:15] installing aplha1 on an hp dv9000 now, seems to work very well atleast on live cd, the gutsy stable dont even start without some parameters at boot :D [13:35] Aondo: Is that hppa ? [13:41] h3sp4wn if that means pavilion then yes. [13:42] Its an architecture [13:43] https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-hppa [13:44] h3sp4wn: dv9000 looks to be a pavilion laptop which must be x86 [13:44] indeed [13:45] I was thinking of the HP Visualise 9000 [13:46] or maybe its just HP 9000 [14:38] very impressive first alpha release--have it installed without trouble--one question though: is the kmenu item (kubuntu heron) 'lost and found' a stop gap? There are something like 30 items in it. [14:38] probably gnome items or something? [14:39] mostly system settings type things normally found in the kcontrol section--presumably waiting for the kde4 bits to be integrated. [14:41] yeah, probably [14:41] if they do get integrated into kde 3 menus at all [14:42] very impressed with the amount of work that has gone into this thus far--reading the mailing list for hardy-changes is quite fascinating--though my mailbox gets really clogged on Friday afternoon :} [14:42] seen your name on quite a few of those, Hobbsee :} [14:43] hehe [14:43] and i used to upload more, too [14:43] unreal [14:43] i'd give out mails of blocks of 10 diffs, to upload. [14:43] not sure they liked it :P [14:44] no second life for you--more like second second life :} [14:44] :P === marcel__ is now known as marcel === Sebast1an is now known as Sebastian [14:57] only real noob "problem" i went into was with the nvidia restricted driver installation, i used the manager, but it wasnt very happy when it didnt find the /etc/X11/xorg.conf file, but going around the manager worked fine. [15:00] there is a launchpad firefox plugin that allows you to track launchpad bugs, and search ubuntu packages--presumably one could file bugs there as well; in the Gutsy repos now [15:01] Theres also a whole bunch on http://mycroft.mozdev.com [15:01] it's in hardy too [15:01] unfortunately, it doesnt work with ff3 [15:02] and since the topic is Hardy Heron and X breakage, one would imagine that X breakage is almost compulsory at this point :] none on my install (yet). [15:02] it's mostly stopped breaking [15:02] great topic though :} [15:03] I still have this nice AMD Testing Only watermark on my screen... [15:39] hey [15:39] hi [15:39] Im i the only one tasting that a kernel update is in the air :D [15:39] or atleast linux-libc headers : [15:40] !info linux-image-generic hardy [15:40] linux-image-generic: Generic Linux kernel image. In component main, is optional. Version 2.6.22.14.21 (hardy), package size 24 kB, installed size 52 kB === addos is now known as nallemantlyperad [15:47] @now New York [15:47] Current time in America/New_York: December 03 2007, 10:47:12 - Next meeting: Server Team meeting in 1 day === ggilbert_ is now known as ggilbert === x-spec-t is now known as Spec [18:17] is there a known-issues wiki or something like that for hardy alpha 1? === malnilion__ is now known as malnilion === Sebast1an is now known as Sebastian [18:31] looks like ubuntu deteced my primary harddisk as sdb and thus installed grub on the wrong harddisk [18:51] dr_evil: You can fix that quite easily [18:58] h3sp4wn well, I think I fixed it by setting installation of bootloader to hd1 [18:59] but this is a new system and the BIOS does insist that no bootable volumes are found [19:01] dr_evil: Did you set it to boot from hd1 in the bios ? [19:02] sure, but this BIOS sucks big time, I doubt I'll ever buy an intel board again, its not even allowed to setup memory clock options [19:03] an Intel DG33TL, the only board with embedded graphics and DVI output I could find [19:52] h3sp4wn after bios update things are looking better, I also edited grub command line and it booted successfuly === roe is now known as roe_ [19:59] dr_evil: It took me a year to get a working bios for this gigabyte motherboard [19:59] (i.e every feature properly working) [20:00] So I will just replace the cpu shortly (keep the board / ram etc) [20:01] the Bios on the board was the "initial production release" from january, there have been 5 or 6 updates inbetween. but the Intel BIOS still sucks imo [20:05] dr_evil: Is virtualisation working ? (i.e kvm) [20:05] and is it stable (if it is that is all I am bothered about) [20:05] sorry I never used that, don't know how to test [20:06] sudo modprobe kvm-intel [20:07] then you can try loading hardy inside hardy [20:08] FATAL: Error inserting kvm_intel (/lib ...): operation not supported [20:09] It may have to be enabled in the bios - or the cpu might not support it [20:10] Q6600 and it's not disabled in the bios [20:10] Its specifically enabled ? [20:10] no I think there is no such setting, but wait, I'll look again [20:11] dr_evil: see if intel mentions it on the webpage its nice to have [20:11] https://help.ubuntu.com/community/KVM [20:15] have an AMD testing use only sign in the bottom right of my screen.. does anyone know what that is? is it my video card? [20:17] "VT technology" was disabled, but the IDE/RAID/AHCI setting in the bios is misbhaving again now :/ [20:20] asker: I don't know but it a common issue by the sounds of it [20:20] asker: did you check launchpad ? [20:20] dr_evil: You should use ahci [20:21] Do you need raid ? [20:23] I don't need RAID, I'm trying to use AHCI, but the bios is, errrm, strange [20:24] I wrote a AHCI driver for Haiku OS a few weeks ago, so I know what I'm doing here. however, the bios doesn't load grub when AHCI is selected [20:25] and it makes a looong pause during boot whenever I change the boot order [20:27] and bios is sooo slow anyway, this board just doesn't like me [20:32] this is insane [20:33] Most boards seem to be poor these days I thought intel was one of the better makes [20:34] this is the worst bios I've seen so far [20:35] Recent ATI/Amd ones are pants that I have [20:35] Or should I say the one I have [20:35] seems to only work when "Load Optimal defaults" is selected. any (correct) change, and it wont work anymore [20:37] there we go, "Load Optimal defaults", then "VT enabled", boots fast, no strange delay, and grub is loaded [20:37] but thats ide mode [20:38] (sure this is using a SATA disk) [20:40] booting again, this just took 35 minutes to setup... [20:41] modeprobe kvm-intel worked this time [20:41] So you can use kvm if you want [20:42] I need to configure the hardware raid now (7TB), it's unfortunate that hardy still includes the broken parted 1.7.1 [20:43] Why do you need parted ? [20:43] to create a GPT partition table, and a single partition [20:47] dr_evil: with lvm2 ? [20:47] is network configuration broken? ifconfig doesn't show what I entered in "Network Settings" (and it doesn't work of cause) [20:54] h3sp4wn I never used that. It's also not installed. I successfully used gnu parted (current version) before to setup up a >2TB partition [20:57] ok I configured networking (fixed IP) from Terminal, seems like the GUI config is broken [21:01] dr_evil: With lvm2 you can grow and shrink partitions [21:01] dr_evil: and take snapshots of partitions and loads of other funky stuff that really makes sense with so much space [21:03] I really don't want to try that. I'm using a hardware raid controller (Areca ARC-1261ML) that presents the harddisks as a single scsi device. I know that parted 1.8.8 from ftp.gnu.org works, and that Ubunutu still includes stuff that doesn't work [21:06] dr_evil: Does the controller have nvram ? [21:07] Still makes sense to have a volume manager [21:07] dr_evil: http://blogs.sun.com/bonwick/entry/raid_z (If you don't have NVRAM or raidz (on Solaris) you have that issue) [21:08] yes it has, see http://www.areca.com.tw/products/pcie341.htm if you want more into === malnilion_ is now known as malnilion [21:09] I think there is one you have anyway but nevermind (people have used volume managers since forever) [21:10] Its too bad hardy alpha doesnt boot in qemu :( [21:11] telexicon: just qemu or kvm ? [21:14] h3sp4wn, just qemu, full emulation no kqemu [21:14] h3sp4wn, i keep ending up with a busybox shell [21:14] i guess it cant find the cdrom once it boots [21:15] telexicon: Interesting strange as it has the hardy kernel afaik [21:15] gutsy? [21:21] ok.. ideas of what I could modprobe to make it load the cdrom? [21:24] yeah the gutsy kernel (or at least that is the one in the repos I never actually used the CD) [21:27] I installed the alpha 1 and have no xorg.conf, although the system runs fine... is this an issue or by design? should I run dpkg-reconf to make one? [21:28] Raptor45: Its by design [21:28] h3sp4wn: is there no way to get the restricted manager to go atm now? to install the nvidia driver? [21:28] Raptor45: You theoretically only need to add changes (although if you need to change something I think using the whole file might be easier for the time being) [21:29] Raptor45: No clue [21:30] anyone know the "right" way to do nvidia in hardy, then? [21:31] hmm I'll wait and see if anyone else responds, thanks h3sp4wn [21:31] Raptor45: Don't think there is a right way yet - install it and nvidia-xconfig should work [21:32] Actually there is that linking hack - I don't know [21:32] so I read on the hardy blueprints page that there is going to be a windows installer based on wubi that will install to c:\ubuntu if you choose or format and do a full install. any case where can I get this so I can test on my xp box [21:32] ? [21:32] IdleOne: Its unlikely it yet exists [21:32] h3sp4wn, think i should report it as a bug? [21:33] telexicon: You could do - I think they do alot of testing on vmware so you could try it in vmware player if you wanted [21:34] h3sp4wn: so would you just recommend doing the manual nvidia install for now then? [21:34] yea, i tend to want to use open source tools just because :) .. but I guess I could use vmware [21:34] Raptor45: I would try to use the nvidia-glx in the repos [21:35] Raptor45: If that didn't work - I think I would build the one from Debian Sid (as apposed to using the nvidia.com installer) [21:36] h3sp4wn, it was the same in gutsy i guess.. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.22/+bug/120316 [21:36] Launchpad bug 120316 in linux-source-2.6.22 "gutsy install cd (alternate or desktop) will not detect cdrom within qemu" [Medium,Triaged] [21:37] telexicon: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.22/+bug/120316/comments/7 [21:37] Launchpad bug 120316 in linux-source-2.6.22 "gutsy install cd (alternate or desktop) will not detect cdrom within qemu" [Medium,Triaged] [21:37] h3sp4wn: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/installer-for-windows says there is a beta available [21:37] h3sp4wn, yea i saw that :) im trying it out [21:39] h3sp4wn: nvidia-glx-new installed okay. do I have to do anything to make sure it prioritizes the nvidia driver over nv or vesa? [21:40] !info nvidia-kernel-source [21:40] nvidia-kernel-source: NVIDIA binary kernel module source. In component multiverse, is optional. Version 1:1.0.9639+2.6.22.4-14.10 (gutsy), package size 1723 kB, installed size 1820 kB [21:40] !info nvidia-kernel-source hardy [21:40] nvidia-kernel-source: NVIDIA binary kernel module source. In component multiverse, is optional. Version 1:96.43.01+2.6.22.5-14.1 (hardy), package size 1725 kB, installed size 1820 kB [21:41] Thats not nice - who knows what hackery it normally uses [21:41] ah, perhaps this is it "To enable the driver, run "sudo nvidia-glx-config enable"." [21:42] "Error: /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 or /var/lib/x11/XF86Config-4.md5sum [21:42] are missing from your system. Please be sure that your xserver package is [21:42] installed correctly." seems related to the lack of an xorg.conf [21:42] oops didn't mean to spam that [21:42] do you have the kernel module ? [21:43] yes, modinfo nvidia returns stuff... appears to be in order [21:43] should I just restart x and see what happens? [21:43] Raptor45: No but remember now there is 3 nvidia.ko's [21:44] and the normal one I would guess is 96.43.01 [21:45] brb [21:47] still seems to be using the other driver [21:50] perhaps I'll just wait for the restricted manager to get updated [21:51] do I need 854.687.744 inodes? [21:57] is it correct that I need 1 inode for every single file that is stored? [22:06] yes [22:07] thanks, I thought so [22:08] still 850E6 files is more than I need [22:08] reducing to 150E6, I know I will regret that someday ;) === Spec is now known as x-spec-t [22:14] You might regret not using zfs one day [22:16] sure, but I decided on ext3 now, since I'm afraid of reiser and know too little about zfs [22:18] 7TB with maxomum 150E6 files, that errmm [22:18] If you have a ups then xfs is pretty safe - jfs is pretty safe - ext3 is safe but not very fast [22:19] I had an ups but it turned into getting quite hot, and I removed it a few years ago [22:19] but power is very stable here in germany [22:20] dr_evil left the room (quit: power loss) [22:20] :p [22:30] h3sp4wn well it seems to work now. and hardy looks pretty good, too, except the broken network config and outdated parted. I need some sleep :) [22:31] dr_evil: It looks identical to gutsy to me [22:31] Just without most of the slowdown (as it usually is) [22:31] well I had a lot of strange issues with gutsy, and never updated it [22:32] and kept runnung edgy on my other machine [22:32] I did until I changed the kernel [22:32] is hardy "jerky" for anyone? it seems that opens to open smoothly - but instead jerk. [22:32] hey how come xorg 7.3 isn't in the repository? [22:32] !info xserver-xorg [22:32] xserver-xorg: the X.Org X server. In component main, is optional. Version 1:7.2-5ubuntu13 (gutsy), package size 409 kB, installed size 1272 kB [22:33] !info xserver-xorg-core [22:33] xserver-xorg-core: X.Org X server -- core server. In component main, is optional. Version 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-12ubuntu8 (gutsy), package size 3591 kB, installed size 10288 kB [22:33] !info xserver-xorg-core hardy [22:33] xserver-xorg-core: Xorg X server - core server. In component main, is optional. Version 2:1.4.1~git20071119-1ubuntu1 (hardy), package size 3983 kB, installed size 10904 kB [22:33] !info xserver-xorg hardy (sorry for spam) [22:33] xserver-xorg: the X.Org X server. In component main, is optional. Version 1:7.3+7ubuntu2 (hardy), package size 298 kB, installed size 976 kB [22:33] sigh [22:33] It is ^^ [22:33] hrmrm [22:33] what are you doing and can't you seriously get that information anywhere else? ;) [22:34] you'd think there was a database of the packages... [22:34] eh, this channel is low traffic enough [22:35] i appreciated it, h3sp4wn :) [22:35] ah, shared information :) [22:35] fair enough then [22:36] finalbeta, aren't you here a bit early? ;) [22:37] nanonyme: that's a typo, he meant to call himself finalberta, after the famous Canadian angler [22:37] nanonyme: no my last name is vista [22:43] What is this - "System restart required" WTF [22:43] what about it? [22:43] Shouldn't be necessary [22:44] except to boot a new kernel [22:44] they say that when its not strictly necessary sometimes, when its just the simplest solution I think [22:45] like display drivers for example [22:45] just restart X no issue with that (remove a kernel module if you need to) [22:46] to a random user "restarting X" would be unnecessarily confusing [22:46] and I guess they haven't gotten a way to handle it nicely yet [22:46] if the thing is showing them a system restart dialog, why can't it show a restart X dialog instead? [22:46] . [22:46] don't know, probably just that no one has done it yet [22:47] not fun enough [22:47] umm, and remove kernelmodule for you? etc etc [22:47] Think about how much wasted time that will be (everyone needlessly rebooting) [22:47] h3sp4wn: nah [22:48] Tm_T: If it takes 1m and everyone running ubuntu does it then thats alot of minutes [22:49] Can I disable update manager easily ? [22:49] . [22:51] h3sp4wn: yeah, its in software sources [22:53] Raptor45: So If I turn off Check for updates then that is it ? [22:53] yes [22:54] Thanks - I usually mess with gconf-editor when I want to change stuff as I can never find anything :/ [22:55] Raptor45: restricted driver manager is back unless you didn't notice [22:55] (well at least on the mirror I am using) [22:56] h3sp4wn: well it was in the repo, but if you try using it it complains about the lack of xorg.conf [22:57] Raptor45: I don't know anything about Gnome, I won't comment anything to do with it again (only ask questions) [22:58] 1st - how to add a run button somewhere sane (top level of applications or right mouse click ? either is ok) [22:58] hmm what do you mean? [22:59] alt-f2 does run [23:00] if you want to add an app to applications, right click on applications and hit edit menu [23:00] Ah that is ok - I must have pressed ctrl when I tried it 5 mins ago (Although Solaris Express does have it as a button by default) [23:00] oh okay, that's what you watned [23:00] Thats good enough [23:04] what's this new KDE vesion in hardy? [23:04] is it just to be compatible with xorg 7.3? [23:06] graft: the idea is to move to kde4 in sync with the debian repos, i believe [23:07] i compile from svn [23:08] InfinityCircuit: definitely not - i doubt kde4 will be the default in hardy [23:08] InfinityCircuit: the version is 3.5.8 anyway [23:10] it will be the 3.5.8, but kde 4 packages will be available [23:11] its an LTS remember [23:24] pvandewyngaerde: Hopefully this time it means more than last time [23:25] (e.g on Servers if something is supposed to be LTS it should be able to be installed on New Server hardware throughout the period) [23:25] Letst Test Somenting [23:30] Hey guys [23:30] I've got some complex initrd.img questions to ask [23:30] !ask > javaJake [23:30] I'm trying to debug a modprobe issue with a friend, and I'm editing /conf/functions' load_modules() to do it [23:30] magnetron, getting to it, getting to it [23:31] Now, I'm thinking of at least using sleep, or perhaps less [23:31] The question is, in initrd.img's limited scope, will they work? [23:33] OK, wait [23:33] Answered myself... [23:33] I ran "find | grep sleep" and see ./bin/sleep exists [23:34] But I don't see less [23:34] So I'll just have the sleep command run, have my friend write down whatever he sees, and then it can go some more, he'll write down some more, etc... fun fun fun [23:34] :) [23:35] when filing bugs against hardy are we supposed to tag or subscribe something? [23:47] would anyone be willing to help me take a look at WPA2? [23:48] When i was running 7.10, ubuntu would connect to my wpa secured wlan [23:48] since 8.04, i can only get it to connect to WEP [23:49] :-( [23:49] thanks in advance if anyone can help me look at it.