[03:06] <Kano> hi pkl_ 
[03:07] <Kano> pkl_: how about adding aufs to lum?
[03:07] <Kano> many live cds have already switched from unionfs to aufs
[03:20] <Kano> pkl_: btw. ndiswrapper is still 1.45.. not a tiny bit outdated?
[03:37] <Kano> pkl_: btw. unionfs does NOT work
[04:56] <mdomsch> rtg ping
[05:09] <Kano> mdomsch: ?
[08:05] <kraut> moin
[08:25] <cathyal> moin
[09:14] <TheMuso> c
[09:14] <TheMuso> argh
[15:22] <Keybuk> BenC: that reminds me, my kernel config changes didn't get made for the current 2.6.24 images?
[15:22] <Keybuk> rtg: ^
[15:25] <rtg> Keybuk: which changes?
[15:26] <rtg> Keybuk: I think I did them once, but they might have gotten lost.
[15:42] <Keybuk> #
[15:42] <Keybuk> CONFIG_USB_DEVICE_CLASS=n: This drops /sys/class/usb_device/ which is subject to race conditions when using libusb. With 'n' they get replaced by additional attributes to the actual USB device.
[15:42] <Keybuk> #
[15:42] <Keybuk> CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED=n: Get rid of the /class hierarchy so that all data will be under /devices where it should be.
[15:42] <Keybuk> #
[15:42] <Keybuk> CONFIG_TMPFS_POSIX_ACL=y: Required for hal's ConsoleKit integration to set ACLs on device nodes.
[15:42] <Keybuk> #
[15:43] <rtg> Keybuk: ok
[17:07] <bdmurray> BenC: The new Malone package for the kernel is just 'linux' - is that right?
[17:08] <BenC> bdmurray: yeah
[17:09] <bdmurray> BenC: why not linux-source-2.6.24 ?
[17:09] <BenC> bdmurray: to consolidate bugs better
[17:10] <bdmurray> BenC: I'm not sure I understand.  How will we know which kernel is affected by a bug?
[17:11] <BenC> bdmurray: affects -> hardy, affects -> hardy+1, etc.
[17:12] <bdmurray> BenC: okay, so going forward this will make more sense
[17:12] <BenC> bdmurray: yeah, it's a move we should have made a long time ago, but we never weighed the pros/cons until this UDS
[17:13] <bdmurray> BenC: I think the word 'linux' is open to a lot of confusion though.  You might get a lot of erroneous bug reports in their.
[17:14] <BenC> bdmurray: we might catch some we've been missing too :)
[17:14] <bdmurray> BenC: My money is on more wrong
[17:15] <bdmurray> I think linux-kernel would be more descriptive and less error prone
[17:16] <BenC> bdmurray: probably, but we followed upstream naming...and it is more correct
[17:17] <maks_> right linux-2.6 is the upstream name, but no 2.7 in sight
[18:35] <rtg> Keybuk: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-hardy.git;a=commitdiff;h=451938883144978c531ee97cd35587d04d5229ac
[18:36] <Keybuk> thanks