[01:15] <macogw> Ubulette: thank you!
[01:15] <Ubulette> np
[09:11] <Mirv> asac: hi. any plan on when to include the Finnish and Russian translations for ubufox? (the bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubufox/+bug/139380 )
[09:11] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 139380 in ubufox "Untranslated strings in ubufox" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[09:12] <Mirv> also, the https://code.launchpad.net/ubufox/ page is a bit fuzzy with so many branches.. is "main" or "ubuntu" the trunk, or which..
[09:13] <Mirv> Danial Abmarov's branch has the ru-ru and fi-FI locales, so they could be merged from there most easily
[09:15] <asac> Mirv: yes we should clean up the ubufox branches
[09:15] <asac> the point about the translations is that it should be done by rosetta
[09:15] <asac> (for hardy)
[09:15] <asac> in gutsy it was my fault
[09:18] <Mirv> yep, Rosetta is easier for most, I originally provided those indeed for gutsy
[11:43] <asac_> damn connection
[12:01] <asac>  \o/ i am back
[12:03] <asac> well ... not for long as it looks like
[14:15] <asac> Ubulette_: which changes did you want to land for the b1 update?
[14:15] <asac> let me know ... i could pull them for this update
[14:15] <asac> or are those b2 only?
[14:16]  * asac gateway updated ... rebooting
[14:35] <persia> Hi.  I'm just trolling lintian output, and wanted to request a Maintainer: change from "Ubuntu-Mozilla-Team" to "Ubuntu Mozilla Team" to address some of http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/lintian/reports/Tmaintainer-not-full-name.html
[14:36] <asac> ok so its just sunbird?
[14:38] <persia> Well, 4 packages, but it looks that way.  I don't know how the sources are organised.
[14:39] <asac> same source
[14:40] <persia> Easy then :)  Thanks.
[14:40] <asac> persia: fixed in bzr
[14:41] <persia> Excellent!  Now to do something about the rest of the output :)
[15:04] <asac> xulrunner MIR submitted
[15:04] <asac> lets see
[17:11] <bluekuja> asac, ciao alex
[17:11] <bluekuja> Ubulette_, seamonkey accepted
[17:12] <bluekuja> if you didnt notice
[17:12] <asac> bluekuja: yes ... thanks
[17:12] <bluekuja> asac, sorry for the delay
[19:50] <Ubulette> hi
[21:45] <janimo> Ubulette: do you know what --enable-safe-browsing does in xulrunner-1.9 config options?
[21:46] <janimo> Ubulette: removing it made pyxpcom work fine whereas it crashed if left in. This is with the OLPC browser's python interface to xulrunner
[21:51] <Ubulette> that's the anti-fishing feature
[21:54] <Ubulette> janimo, did you open a bug upstream ?
[21:54] <janimo> didn;t cross my mind TBH
[21:55] <janimo> I am not sure it's an upstream bug or feature or caused by ubuntu patches or what
[21:56] <Ubulette> i don't think it's our patches
[23:15] <asac> ok back :)
[23:15] <asac> where is janimo?
[23:15] <asac> who is janimo?
[23:15] <asac> :=
[23:15] <asac> :)
[23:16] <Ubulette> the guys doing Sugar debs
[23:16] <Ubulette> -s
[23:16] <asac> ah
[23:16] <asac> so url-classifier breaks pyxpcom?
[23:16] <asac> strange
[23:16] <Ubulette> he said safe-browsing
[23:16] <asac> well ... we don't build with safe browsing, but url-classifier
[23:16] <asac> so i think its the classifier :)
[23:17]  * asac wonders if the problem is still there with our branch
[23:17] <Ubulette> we *do* safe browsing
[23:17] <asac> in xul?
[23:17] <Ubulette> yep
[23:18] <asac> oh right ... we should use --enable-url-classifier ... but its the same from what i saw in code
[23:18] <asac> (same for xul)
[23:19] <asac> lets wait for him to return :)
[23:22] <Ubulette> still no advocate for prism
[23:23] <asac> really?
[23:23] <asac> didn't persia look at it?
[23:24] <Ubulette> persia said it's a really good package but he can't test it as he's not a user of the webapps web sites
[23:24] <Ubulette> he did the review, but no test
[23:26] <asac> did he comment on revu?
[23:27] <Ubulette> he contacted me by email
[23:27] <Ubulette> and we've discussed a lot on irc
[23:27] <Ubulette> but my last update has no comment at all
[23:28] <asac> ok i will try to remember to bug him tomorrow on that
[23:28] <asac> he should drop his packaging comments
[23:28] <asac> to revu
[23:28] <asac> then we will find a sponsor
[23:29] <Ubulette> he's in JST so he'll be here soon
[23:30] <asac> JST?
[23:30] <Ubulette> it's 8:30am JST
[23:30] <asac> what corner of the world is that?
[23:30] <asac> must be pretty boring there :)
[23:30] <Ubulette> japan
[23:30] <asac> oh
[23:30] <asac> ok
[23:30] <asac> Japan standard time :)
[23:30] <asac> well i will probably be off ... but i think he is a hobbiest ... so best to catch in his after work hours ... aka tomorrow
[23:31] <Ubulette> i should try my japanese on him ;)
[23:31] <asac> hehe
[23:31] <asac> if its not too bad :)
[23:32] <Ubulette> in fact, he said "I live on JST", not i'm in japan or i'm japanese so I don't know if he speaks japanese at all ;)
[23:33] <asac> yeah :)
[23:35] <asac> probably he just has adjusted his day-live to be night-live and vv
[23:35] <asac> @time tokyo
[23:35] <ubotu> Current time in Asia/Tokyo: December 05 2007, 08:35:29 - Next meeting: Xubuntu meeting in 20 hours 54 minutes
[23:37] <Ubulette> install intlclock :)
[23:37] <asac> heh
[23:37] <asac> :)
[23:38] <asac> i am happy with the bot ;)
[23:39] <Ubulette> http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/intlclock.png
[23:39] <asac> if we cannot get feedback from persia, i can sponsor prism
[23:40] <asac> we already achieved what we wanted ... get them to know you
[23:40] <asac> if we do that a few more times they know you good enough ;)
[23:40] <Ubulette> I can post seamonkey 1.1.7 there too
[23:41] <asac> isn't it NEWed already?
[23:41] <asac> bluekuja said it was NEWed
[23:43] <Ubulette> https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/seamonkey/1.1.6+nobinonly-0ubuntu1
[23:44] <asac> ok .... but the bins for i386 are not in NEw
[23:44] <asac> so they should be available already
[23:44] <asac>  \o/
[23:44] <Ubulette> http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/s/seamonkey/
[23:44] <Ubulette> strange
[23:44] <asac> hmm ... lets review that tomorrow :)
[23:48] <Ubulette> https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+queue?queue_state=3&queue_text=seamonkey
[23:49] <asac> yes ... looks good
[23:51] <asac> are you interested in security ?
[23:51] <Ubulette> that's part of my real job
[23:51] <asac> the one thing i like about mozilla is that its big enough ... has had enough security issues to pursue statistical analysis on it :)
[23:52] <asac> http://www.st.cs.uni-sb.de/softevo/vulnerabilities.php
[23:52] <asac> its not the first paper that looks into security stats based on mozilla :)
[23:53] <asac> http://www.st.cs.uni-sb.de/publications/files/neuhaus-tr-2007.pdf
[23:53] <asac> thats the actual paper
[23:53] <Ubulette> nice chart
[23:57] <Ubulette> interesting
[23:59] <asac> yeah ... i find table 1 on page 5 interesting .)
[23:59] <asac> i remember how much pain it was to backport security fixes for nsCSSFrameConstructor
[23:59] <asac> and how easy all those js things were
[23:59] <asac>  :)