johanbr | According to the topic, the latest kernel upload seems to have been in progress for about a month now. :) | 02:16 |
---|---|---|
pwnguin | seems true | 02:16 |
pwnguin | at the moment, the package "linux" holds the 2.6.24 kernel | 02:17 |
pwnguin | but im missing a few restricted drivers and iwl | 02:17 |
johanbr | It does? My mirror doesn't have a 2.6.24 kernel at least. | 02:17 |
pwnguin | in hardy? | 02:18 |
pwnguin | apt-cache show linux | 02:18 |
pwnguin | oh | 02:18 |
johanbr | Right. No 2.6.24 kernel. | 02:18 |
pwnguin | good point | 02:18 |
pwnguin | apt-cache show 2.6.24 does show up though | 02:19 |
johanbr | Oh, never mind. I'm stupid. Found it. | 02:21 |
pwnguin | but i dont think its finished uploading / building / something | 02:21 |
johanbr | No, it's done: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+source/linux/2.6.24-1.1 | 02:22 |
pwnguin | hmm. well i guess once im done updating, i'll go back and see why wireless isnt working | 02:27 |
=== ajmitch_ is now known as ajmitch | ||
imbrandon | BenC: ping, how much trubble ( or what do you need from me to make is easier/faster ) to get "omfs-source" from the archives into l-u-m | 06:00 |
kraut | moin | 08:22 |
Kano | hi pkl_ | 08:41 |
=== macd_ is now known as macd | ||
=== \sh_away is now known as \sh | ||
Kano | could someone tell me how to check for the kernelversion used in a rules.modules file? | 08:42 |
Kano | i have got KVER in there as var... | 08:44 |
Kano | ok, found a solution for that, but that only fixes things for 2.6.23 (avm drivers) | 10:17 |
=== andres__ is now known as andres | ||
gaspa | there's someone with slub/slab experience? i want to understand when to use the first, when the latter... | 10:41 |
andres | gaspa: Except for bugs in slab I dont think there are many valid reasons using slab. | 10:57 |
andres | Replace first slab with slub. | 10:58 |
gaspa | andres: there are no cases in which slab if more efficient? | 10:58 |
andres | Maybe there are some, but not out of architectural reasons. | 11:00 |
andres | And be aware that there were some bugs making slub way much slower in 24-rc? releases. | 11:02 |
pitti | BenC: so, maybe I'm confused | 13:44 |
pitti | But https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.15/+bug/57233/comments/12 | 13:44 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 57233 in linux-source-2.6.15 "Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST" [High,In progress] | 13:44 |
pitti | seems to indicate that this bit was a regression: | 13:44 |
pitti | linux-source-2.6.15 (2.6.15-51.63) dapper-proposed; urgency=low | 13:44 |
pitti | * megaraid: Move AMI/Megaraid3 IDs from megaraid_mbox.ko to megaraid.ko | 13:44 |
pitti | * megaraid: Move AMI/Megaraid3 IDs from megaraid_mbox.ko to megaraid.ko | 13:44 |
pitti | - LP: #57233 | 13:44 |
pitti | (oops, sorry for the double line) | 13:44 |
pitti | BenC: ah, so you do plan to back out that change to get back to the current dapper-security behaviour, and fix the bug in lbm instead? | 13:45 |
BenC | pitti: right | 13:45 |
pitti | ok, then I just misunderstood you | 13:45 |
pitti | BenC: ok, so the backing out of this bit should be easy and do little harm, right? | 13:46 |
BenC | pitti: right, now we're on track :) | 13:46 |
pitti | let's hope that Vide tests the new lbm then | 13:47 |
pitti | BenC: but unless you have some other showstoppers, shall we get this uploaded and new CDs built for testing? | 13:48 |
BenC | pitti: I think that's a good idea, ppl can test in the meantime | 13:48 |
BenC | pitti: I'll get the uploads done once I've had a cup of coffee | 13:49 |
pitti | BenC: enjoy, and thanks | 13:49 |
=== \sh is now known as \sh_away | ||
BenC | pitti: lbm-2.6.15 is in dapper-proposed awaiting approval | 15:47 |
pitti | BenC: nudged, thanks | 15:50 |
BenC | pitti: I'm checking if this megaraid change breaks ABI, after that I'll upload | 16:17 |
pitti | BenC: *crossing fingers that it won't* :) | 16:17 |
=== Traxer is now known as Traxer|on | ||
=== Traxer|on is now known as Traxer | ||
=== _fs is now known as fs | ||
BenC | pitti: good news, no change in ABI | 17:14 |
pitti | phew | 17:14 |
pitti | BenC: so, dapper.2 meeting in 5? | 17:54 |
BenC | pitti: yeah | 17:54 |
pitti | BenC: ah, I know why I didn't notice the mpt symbol error in my existing dapper install | 20:01 |
pitti | BenC: in d-i, it prefers the driver from lbm, but in an installed system it prefers the one from linux-image | 20:01 |
pitti | BenC: at least I get 3.03.04 loaded | 20:02 |
pitti | BenC: that's both in my permanent dapper vmware as well as the one I just test-installed | 20:05 |
pitti | BenC: modules.dep does not have any "/updates/" in it; after a depmod -a it has | 20:07 |
pitti | BenC: might the reason be that the one in /updates had the faulty symbols? | 20:13 |
BenC | pitti: make sure depmod -a is run, and update-initramfs -u afterwards | 20:14 |
pitti | BenC: right, after depmod -a I get the new version | 20:16 |
pitti | BenC: my concern is, if in a fresh install the old version is used, then that sounds like a bug? | 20:16 |
pitti | (i. e. the default modules.dep is wrong) | 20:16 |
BenC | pitti: lbm should be running depmod, and update-initramfs, at least it did on my system | 20:17 |
* pitti upgrades to the new lbm in -proposed and tests further | 20:17 | |
maks_ | BenC: initramfs-tools in unstable has pretty stabilized | 20:23 |
maks_ | so if you wana go for long term support a merge would be cool | 20:23 |
maks_ | can lend my eyes to the resulting diff | 20:23 |
maks_ | :) | 20:23 |
pitti | BenC: ah, after upgrading to new lbm I get 3.03.09 by default on boot, so that looks good | 20:24 |
pitti | BenC: I'll test it again tomorrow when it's on the CD (the modules.dep issue) | 20:24 |
pitti | BenC: hmm: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.15/+bug/56885/comments/6 :( | 20:38 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 56885 in linux-source-2.6.15 "e1000 driver not working properly on x86_64?" [Medium,Fix committed] | 20:38 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!