nealmcb | mpt: I should clarify I'm looking for bzr support, translations, etc - a project to make it part of, otherwise I guess we should just make a new one, but this seems like it should be part of something bigger | 00:24 |
---|---|---|
nealmcb | so we could document it at help.launchpad.net, but I'm looking to develop it more first :-) | 00:25 |
ubotu | New bug: #175758 in launchpad "add not-null constraint to Person.visibility" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/175758 | 00:35 |
Laney | window level all | 01:17 |
Laney | oops :( | 01:17 |
nealmcb | hmm - another interesting launchpad-scraping tool - https://edge.launchpad.net/python-launchpad-code/ | 01:34 |
Hobbsee | yeesh. damn peopl.e. | 01:40 |
Hobbsee | sabdfl != launchpad-beta-testers, so why subscribe both? | 01:42 |
jelmer | ah, that explains why I get the occassional email about lp bugreports I'm not subscribed to... | 01:45 |
Hobbsee | i think so | 01:45 |
Hobbsee | they've got a tendancy to to do to ubuntu-core-dev, too | 01:46 |
Hobbsee | the people are only starting with launchpad now, it appears. | 01:46 |
Hobbsee | i'm not sure that people don't get why people who want to be subscribed stuff are already subscribed. | 01:46 |
Hobbsee | and that adding random teams, etc, is just spam. | 01:47 |
jelmer | They probably hope that more people knowing about the bug means a better chance of having it fixed quicker | 01:48 |
Hobbsee | probably | 01:48 |
Hobbsee | what they don't know is that some people may well ignore bugs like that, just to piss them off in return. | 01:48 |
jelmer | Having an option in launchpad to forbid others to subscribe you (or your team) would be useful. | 01:53 |
Hobbsee | well, i don't mind for users | 01:53 |
jelmer | Although restrictions that are too strict can hinder as well | 01:53 |
Hobbsee | but subscribing any team over 5 (or 10) members probably warrants an "are you sure? no really, are you really sure? often the required people are already subscribed, so don't subscribe big teams" | 01:54 |
jelmer | Yeah, indeed - I would hate not being able to subscribe another developer to a bug if I think they may be interested in a bug. | 01:54 |
Hobbsee | dialog | 01:54 |
Hobbsee | there are cases where you subscribe teams to bugs. | 01:54 |
jelmer | Yeah, just requiring extra confirmation may be a good compromise | 01:56 |
Hobbsee | not for everything though | 01:56 |
Hobbsee | they pushed that out to edge recently, and that was bloody ridiculous. | 01:56 |
jelmer | where? | 01:57 |
Hobbsee | the testing server | 01:57 |
Hobbsee | (edge.launchpad.net) | 01:57 |
Hobbsee | you probably get redirected there already, being in -beta-testers | 01:57 |
* jelmer hasn't noticed anything :-) | 01:57 | |
jelmer | then again, my use of launchpad is mainly limited to malone and the bazaar integration | 01:58 |
_polto_ | what does replace mozilla-config now pls ? | 02:21 |
ubotu | New bug: #175780 in launchpad "Validitiy problems in announcements Atom feed" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/175780 | 03:31 |
Hobbsee | edge is down. | 03:41 |
Hobbsee | wait, no | 03:43 |
ubotu | New bug: #175792 in launchpad "Announcements feed contains duplicate entry IDs" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/175792 | 05:56 |
* Hobbsee grumbles at cprov-away and infinity | 06:53 | |
Hobbsee | MOTU really doesn't want mail due to random PPA packages. thanks. | 06:53 |
Fujitsu | You refer to the existance of pkgbinarymangler in the PPA chroots? | 06:54 |
Hobbsee | yes | 06:54 |
Hobbsee | and the bug that has sat there for months, assigned to infinity, where he's done *nothing* about it. | 06:54 |
Fujitsu | I'm surprised there's more to it than just apt-get removing it, but I guess there's some black magic behind it. | 06:55 |
jamesh | or changing its configuration ... | 07:15 |
=== doko_ is now known as doko | ||
=== \sh_away is now known as \sh | ||
=== meduxa is now known as toscalix | ||
mrevell | howdy | 09:25 |
Fujitsu | Hi mrevell. | 09:25 |
zerok | morning :) just a question: what gpg key length is currently recommended? i guess with my 1024bit key i'm a little bit behind the time :P | 09:40 |
jamesh | zerok: it is up to you | 09:42 |
zerok | ok :) | 09:42 |
jamesh | a lot of people still have 1024 bit DSA keys though, so it isn't necessarily a problem | 09:42 |
zerok | *shrugs* i guess a new key won't hurt :) | 09:46 |
jamesh | if people have signed your old key, then it is probably worth keeping it | 09:47 |
zerok | not to my knowledge :) and i won't revoke the old key for now anyway :) | 09:48 |
jamesh | zerok: you can register multiple keys with your account, so there is no harm in adding both | 09:55 |
zerok | sweet. thanks :) | 09:55 |
zerok | ROFL i'm retarded. the original key had 4096bits for the private key anyway ^_^ | 10:01 |
Kmos | morning! | 11:54 |
kiko | morning | 11:56 |
=== ddaa is now known as thaa | ||
=== thaa is now known as ddaa | ||
Kmos | kiko :) | 12:05 |
ubotu | New bug: #175860 in malone "/+text bug page subscribers don't include bug contacts (also notified)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/175860 | 12:25 |
kiko | of course not. it only includes direct subscribers | 12:31 |
=== kiko is now known as kiko-fud | ||
=== cprov-away is now known as cprov | ||
=== kiko-fud is now known as kiko | ||
mrevell | Hey Hobbsee | 14:19 |
* Hobbsee waves to mrevell | 14:19 | |
Hobbsee | how goes it? | 14:20 |
=== Hobbsee is now known as Peer | ||
=== Peer is now known as Hobbsee | ||
mrevell | Well, thanks. You? | 14:21 |
Hobbsee | mrevell: do you want the real answer to that? :) | 14:21 |
mrevell | Hobbsee: Of course. If you're having a bad day, there's no shame in that. | 14:22 |
* Hobbsee is throwing a guy off the network repeatedly, and is frustrated at various launchpad bugs. | 14:22 | |
mrevell | What bugs in particular are frustrating you? | 14:23 |
Hobbsee | mrevell: 2 soyuz ones. the one that sends all binaries to main, and the one that makes all ppa bugs get mangled as ubuntu packages do. | 14:23 |
* Hobbsee can look up numbers, if required. | 14:24 | |
mrevell | Yeah, numbers would be cool, if you have them to hand. | 14:24 |
Hobbsee | https://launchpad.net/bugs/120052 | 14:24 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 120052 in soyuz "Component mapping for new source packages" [Medium,Confirmed] | 14:24 |
Hobbsee | and https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/soyuz/+bug/136399 | 14:25 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 136399 in soyuz "PPA builders performing normal Ubuntu binary mangling" [High,Confirmed] - Assigned to Adam Conrad (adconrad) | 14:25 |
Hobbsee | mrevell: and general frustration about getting constant mailouts about packages / bugs that i do not care for. | 14:25 |
Hobbsee | which i think is because someone is assigning bugs to big teams, or people in the team have uploaded something, etc. | 14:25 |
* mrevell looks at the bug pages | 14:27 | |
mrevell | Sorry Hobbsee, just a sec, I'm in about three conversations atm :) | 14:31 |
Hobbsee | mrevell: no problem. just be sure to perfect the art of cloning yourself in the next 12 hours. | 14:33 |
mrevell | Hobbsee: haha :) | 14:33 |
=== kiko is now known as kiko-afk | ||
=== cprov is now known as cprov-lunch | ||
=== valles_ is now known as effie_jayx | ||
statik | reviewer meeting starting now in #launchpad-meeting | 14:59 |
statik | kiko: reviewers meeting in #launchpad-meeting if you are interested | 15:01 |
=== cprov-lunch is now known as cprov | ||
Ubulette | is it just me or the amd64 ppa builder(s) is/are broken ? | 15:37 |
Ubulette | http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10862144/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-amd64.firefox-3.0_3.0%7Eb2%7Erc1%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1%7Efta1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 15:37 |
Hobbsee | looks strange. | 15:41 |
Hobbsee | does libgnomeui-0 actually install on a hardy chroot? | 15:41 |
Hobbsee | libgnomeui 2.20.1.1-1 produces uninstallable binaries: | 15:41 |
Hobbsee | * libgnomeui-0 (amd64) | 15:41 |
Hobbsee | * libgnomeui-0-dbg (amd64) | 15:41 |
Hobbsee | * libgnomeui-dev (amd64) | 15:41 |
Hobbsee | no | 15:41 |
Hobbsee | from http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-archive/testing/hardy_probs.html | 15:41 |
Hobbsee | Totals by arch: | 15:42 |
Hobbsee | * sparc:20 | 15:42 |
Hobbsee | * i386:18 | 15:42 |
Hobbsee | * amd64:688 | 15:42 |
Hobbsee | whee! that's an impressive figure | 15:42 |
Hobbsee | Ubulette: that woudl be broken hardy, rather than broken ppa builds. | 15:43 |
Ubulette | i386 and lpia are fine | 15:44 |
Hobbsee | obviously. they don't show up on that list | 15:44 |
Ubulette | and the xulrunner missing is in my own ppa | 15:44 |
* Hobbsee would expect that also depends on some of the core gnome stuff, as the version in the ubuntu archives also fails to install, as shown on that list. | 15:45 | |
Hobbsee | therefore, will not install. | 15:45 |
=== flukierdonut is now known as profanephobia | ||
Ubulette | Hobbsee, the link above shows mostly amd64 issues | 16:14 |
* Hobbsee wondesr what to say to that, and decides to say nothing at all. | 16:20 | |
Ubulette | :) | 16:20 |
=== \sh is now known as \sh_away | ||
=== Hobbsee_ is now known as Essope | ||
ubotu | New bug: #175908 in launchpad "Permalinks for individual announcements" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/175908 | 16:51 |
ubotu | New bug: #175936 in launchpad "Announcements action (edit, publish & delete) links too close" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/175936 | 18:40 |
mtaylor | anybody around an admin or can doing anything about ppa builders? | 18:55 |
mtaylor | I had "mono-gmcs mono-devel" | 18:55 |
mtaylor | in my build-deps | 18:55 |
mtaylor | and I got: | 18:56 |
mtaylor | mono-devel: Depends: mono-mcs but it is not going to be installed | 18:56 |
mtaylor | mono-gmcs: Depends: mono-runtime (>= 1.1.8.1) but it is not going to be installed | 18:56 |
mtaylor | Depends: libmono-microsoft-build2.0-cil (>= 1.0) but it is not going to be installed | 18:56 |
mtaylor | Depends: libmono2.0-cil (>= 1.2.4) but it is not going to be installed | 18:56 |
mtaylor | but that's not an error I get on my gutsy install | 18:56 |
mtaylor | so I'm not sure what's wrong | 18:56 |
kiko | mtaylor, are all those package versions available in your PPA or in Ubuntu? | 18:57 |
mtaylor | kiko: mono-devel and mono-gmcs are avail in ubuntu | 18:57 |
kiko | what about libmono-microsoft-build2.0-cil mono-runtime libmono2.0-cil | 18:58 |
mtaylor | kiko: they seem to be in ubuntu... let me get rid of backports real quick to be sure | 18:59 |
mtaylor | kiko: yeah - with only gutsy sources in my sources.list, apt-get install mono-gmcs mono-devel works fine | 19:01 |
mtaylor | kiko: but I will say this... | 19:01 |
mtaylor | my machine shows mono-gmcs depending on mono (= 1.2.4-6ubuntu6) | 19:01 |
mtaylor | and mono-runtime is not in the list | 19:02 |
mtaylor | so I'm not sure why I show 1.2.4 and ppa shows 1.1.8 | 19:03 |
kiko | did you apt-get update after cleaning up your sources.list, mtaylor? | 19:04 |
mtaylor | kiko: yup | 19:04 |
mtaylor | kiko: and I already de-installed all mono-related packages | 19:04 |
kiko | weird. | 19:05 |
kiko | mtaylor, well, I can tell you this much: | 19:05 |
mtaylor | yeah | 19:05 |
kiko | a PPA can depend on two things | 19:05 |
kiko | - itself | 19:05 |
kiko | - ubuntu gutsy | 19:05 |
kiko | that's it. | 19:05 |
mtaylor | yup. that's all I'm depending on... how _weird_ | 19:05 |
kiko | well, ubuntu X, where X is what distro series you uploaded your package for | 19:06 |
mtaylor | maybe I'll debootstrap a gutsy and try in there... | 19:06 |
mtaylor | btw, what's lpia? | 19:08 |
kiko | yeah, if I had a gutsy I could help you, but here in london I don't | 19:08 |
mtaylor | I consider that london's fault | 19:08 |
mtaylor | :) | 19:08 |
kiko | I think it stands for low-power intel architecture. it's a mobile chip. | 19:08 |
mtaylor | oh. how interesting | 19:08 |
kiko | there are many things to blame london for | 19:08 |
kiko | yeah, it's super-new; I'm not sure there are even released products on it | 19:08 |
kiko | ah, it's not even out yet, so there you go. | 19:09 |
=== Martinp24 is now known as Martinp23 | ||
kergoth | anyone know how to disable parts of launchpad for a project, like if i don't want to make use of, the answers section, or the code repo? | 19:28 |
pochu | kergoth: Change details, on the top left corner of the project's main page | 19:30 |
mtaylor | kiko: aha... the mono errors are only on lpia | 19:30 |
kergoth | " People can ask questions in Launchpad Answers" is unchecked, yet i can click on the answers tab and ask a question | 19:30 |
mtaylor | kiko: I have _different_ weird errors on amd64 | 19:31 |
kergoth | bugs are set to 'somewhere else', but the tab seems functional there too | 19:31 |
* kergoth scratches head | 19:31 | |
ddaa | for code, you cannot forbid other from attaching branches to your project | 19:31 |
ddaa | kergoth: what is the name of your project? | 19:32 |
ddaa | I mean, it's launchpad id? | 19:32 |
pochu | kergoth: the tab is there, and you can click it. Yet I don't think it will allow you to report a bug. Have you tried it? | 20:26 |
pochu | kergoth: there's a bug about it not been clear that the project doesn't use bugs. the bugs page will display it too soon I think. | 20:26 |
pochu | kergoth: for the answers it could be the same, although I don't use them so I'm not sure... | 20:27 |
pochu | I mean, maybe it let's you click the tab and go to the page, but not report them | 20:27 |
pochu | If so, it should be clearer too... | 20:27 |
=== ember_ is now known as ember | ||
=== Adri2000_ is now known as Adri2000 | ||
=== meduxa is now known as toscalix | ||
=== cprov is now known as cprov-away | ||
ubotu | New bug: #175978 in launchpad "HWDB: Define a list of allowed units for the <answer> tag in submissionn data" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/175978 | 21:26 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!