=== imbrando1 is now known as imbrandon === asac_ is now known as asac === doko_ is now known as doko === \sh_away is now known as \sh [09:44] how can i revert to a specific version using git commands ? [10:04] git checkout $id? [10:36] Mithrandir: $id is just the rev number ? [10:36] the sha1, yes [10:36] i need to revert to 2.6.22-12.NN [10:37] or, do you mean to revert as in remove the commits or as in make your working directory reflect a particular commit? [10:47] i don't understand the difference [10:47] I need that kernel source that's no more in gutsy 'cause now there is -14 version [10:47] so i've been told to use git to roll back to that source [10:48] i guess i have to reflect a particular commit [10:56] find the tag with git tag -l and do a git checkout on that [12:40] anyone awake? === chuck is now known as zul [14:44] hey guys, just wanted to ask when the linux-restricted-modules 2.6.24 will be out ? [14:52] ppum: since yesterday [14:53] allready in the package list ? [14:53] built only on sparc [14:54] l === chuck is now known as zul [14:56] hah hah...i just called bylaw enforcement on our neighbors because they didnt park the car in the laneway when the snowplow came === \sh is now known as \sh_away [16:46] reynaldo: I don't have a registered nick. I did get your email. I'm kind of buried right now. [16:48] rtg_: glad to know that, sorry. I just wanted to be sure. [16:56] BenC: Hi, maybe I'm wrong but yesterday I somewhat understood you'd give me some advice/hints on where the ongoing discussion about the device managaer is taking place? [16:56] reynaldo: yes, and I apologize for not getting back to you [16:56] reynaldo: very busy before holiday break, but I will get the ball rolling [16:56] no, not a problem, you must be bussy, everyone is [16:58] BenC: are we going to carry ipw3945 into Hardy? I advocate that we drop it. Intel seems to be supporting iwl3945 whole hog. [16:58] BenC: I'd appreciate that, thanks, I will do my best to make the time you spent worth it [16:58] rtg_: that's my vote too [16:58] BenC: its gone... [16:59] rtg_: may it rest in peace [16:59] oh, I got one of those cards in my laptop. [16:59] iw3945 is supported in mainline kernel now. [17:00] s/iw3945/iwl3945/ [17:10] one less notinhouse module to take care off :-) congrats guys. [17:11] oh, and the fcc binary daemon need died too :) amazing. [17:11] maybe this one even works! -yay [17:34] brb === chuck is now known as zul [18:30] BenC: when do you sync to rc5? [18:51] Kano: I've started an -rc5 branch, but its not yet pushed. I'll get it updated in a day or so. Dunno about aufs vs unionfs. You'll have to ask pkl about it tomorrow when he is back. [18:57] ok [18:58] with 2.6.24-1 i had dma off for me dvd drive, it was always on before... [18:58] nvidia ide driver, why not the new pata one? [18:59] how about adding a target without old ide active [19:00] on 64 bit, initramfs is unable to load fbcon/vesafb [19:00] when vga=791 specified. should be done in the framebuffer init-top script but it is not working [19:02] fb did not work on gutsy 64 bit too [19:04] Kano: you have the wherewithal to figure out how to fix some of these problems. develop a patch and send it to the kernel-team mailing list. [19:05] most easy way: use =Y instaed M [19:05] for those [19:13] lamont: are you a kernel-team mailing list moderator? [19:14] rtg_: maybe you would not need to patch the kernel when you would use AUFS=Y [19:15] Kano: I'm not going to make the decision. That is Phillip's area of expertise. [19:50] rtg_: one of them [19:51] rtg_: why, you wanna be too? [19:51] lamont: can you add me? [19:51] rtg_: I'll mail you the moderator password in a bit... getting ready for a meeting now [19:51] lamont: thanks. [19:55] BenC: I built powerpc64-smp for -rc5 and did not see the section issue. I think we can ignore the FTBS until I get the -rc5 upload done. === TheMuso_ is now known as TheMuso [20:44] rtg_: any chance we can get it, and lum/lrm done by Friday with a -2 ABI? [20:45] BenC: I think so.