[09:44] <dade`> how can i revert to a specific version using git commands ?
[10:04] <Mithrandir> git checkout $id?
[10:36] <dade`> Mithrandir: $id is just the rev number ?
[10:36] <Mithrandir> the sha1, yes
[10:36] <dade`> i need to revert to 2.6.22-12.NN
[10:37] <Mithrandir> or, do you mean to revert as in remove the commits or as in make your working directory reflect a particular commit?
[10:47] <dade`> i don't understand the difference
[10:47] <dade`> I need that kernel source that's no more in gutsy 'cause now there is -14 version
[10:47] <dade`> so i've been told to use git to roll back to that source
[10:48] <dade`> i guess i have to reflect a particular commit
[10:56] <Mithrandir> find the tag with git tag -l and do a git checkout on that 
[12:40] <mcnster> anyone awake?
[14:44] <ppum> hey guys, just wanted to ask when the linux-restricted-modules 2.6.24 will be out ?
[14:52] <tjaalton> ppum: since yesterday
[14:53] <ppum> allready in the package list ?
[14:53] <tjaalton> built only on sparc
[14:54] <chuck> l
[14:56] <zul> hah hah...i just called bylaw enforcement on our neighbors because they didnt park the car in the laneway when the snowplow came
[16:46] <rtg_> reynaldo: I don't have a registered nick. I did get your email. I'm kind of buried right now.
[16:48] <reynaldo> rtg_: glad to know that, sorry. I just wanted to be sure.
[16:56] <reynaldo> BenC: Hi, maybe I'm wrong but yesterday I somewhat understood you'd give me some advice/hints on where the ongoing discussion about the device managaer is taking place?
[16:56] <BenC> reynaldo: yes, and I apologize for not getting back to you
[16:56] <BenC> reynaldo: very busy before holiday break, but I will get the ball rolling
[16:56] <reynaldo> no, not a problem, you must be bussy, everyone is
[16:58] <rtg_> BenC: are we going to carry ipw3945 into Hardy? I advocate that we drop it. Intel seems to be supporting iwl3945 whole hog.
[16:58] <reynaldo> BenC: I'd appreciate that, thanks, I will do my best to make the time you spent worth it
[16:58] <BenC> rtg_: that's my vote too
[16:58] <rtg_> BenC: its gone...
[16:59] <BenC> rtg_: may it rest in peace
[16:59] <reynaldo> oh, I got one of those cards in my laptop.
[16:59] <rtg_> iw3945 is supported in mainline kernel now.
[17:00] <rtg_> s/iw3945/iwl3945/
[17:10] <reynaldo> one less notinhouse module to take care off :-) congrats guys.
[17:11] <reynaldo> oh, and the fcc binary daemon need died too :) amazing.
[17:11] <reynaldo> maybe this one even works! -yay
[17:34] <reynaldo> brb
[18:30] <Kano> BenC: when do you sync to rc5?
[18:51] <rtg_> Kano: I've started an -rc5 branch, but its not yet pushed. I'll get it updated in a day or so. Dunno about aufs vs unionfs. You'll have to ask pkl about it tomorrow when he is back.
[18:57] <Kano> ok
[18:58] <Kano> with 2.6.24-1 i had dma off for me dvd drive, it was always on before...
[18:58] <Kano> nvidia ide driver, why not the new pata one?
[18:59] <Kano> how about adding a target without old ide active
[19:00] <Kano> on 64 bit, initramfs is unable to load fbcon/vesafb
[19:00] <Kano> when vga=791 specified. should be done in the framebuffer init-top script but it is not working
[19:02] <Kano> fb did not work on gutsy 64 bit too
[19:04] <rtg_> Kano: you have the wherewithal to figure out how to fix some of these problems. develop a patch and send it to the kernel-team mailing list.
[19:05] <Kano> most easy way: use =Y instaed M
[19:05] <Kano> for those
[19:13] <rtg_> lamont: are you a kernel-team mailing list moderator?
[19:14] <Kano> rtg_: maybe you would not need to patch the kernel when you would use AUFS=Y
[19:15] <rtg_> Kano: I'm not going to make the decision. That is Phillip's area of expertise.
[19:50] <lamont> rtg_: one of them
[19:51] <lamont> rtg_: why, you wanna be too?
[19:51] <rtg_> lamont: can you add me? 
[19:51] <lamont> rtg_: I'll mail you the moderator password in a bit... getting ready for a meeting now
[19:51] <rtg_> lamont: thanks.
[19:55] <rtg_> BenC: I built powerpc64-smp for -rc5 and did not see the section issue.  I think we can ignore the FTBS until I get the -rc5 upload done.
[20:44] <BenC> rtg_: any chance we can get it, and lum/lrm done by Friday with a -2 ABI?
[20:45] <rtg_> BenC: I think so.