[00:13] <bryce> cya
[02:45] <ubotu> New bug: #177373 in xorg (main) "[hardy alpha 1 amd64] touchpad not detected / configured during install" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/177373
[06:23] <superm1> are the current daily disks supposed to be booting up entirely without an xorg.conf every time?
[09:29] <seb128> do you guys know about bug #175774?
[09:29] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 175774 in compiz "[hardy] Enabling "Normal" effects produces badly drawn window shadows." [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/175774
[09:30] <seb128> that doesn't happen when using XAA
[09:30] <tjaalton> seb128: yep
[09:30] <seb128> tjaalton: do you have an xorg or intel bug about it already?
[09:30] <seb128> or should I reassign this one?
[09:31] <tjaalton> I don't know if there's a bug already, but saw it with my new X61 (which has 965GM)
[09:31] <tjaalton> and there's a bug about it on debian
[09:31] <tjaalton> the same happens with ati r200
[09:31] <tjaalton> so it's not necessarily a driver bug, but could be
[09:32] <seb128> I've reassigned to the intel driver
[09:32] <tjaalton> ok, it's fine
[09:41] <ubotu> New bug: #175774 in compiz (main) "[hardy] Enabling "Normal" effects produces badly drawn window shadows." [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/175774
[11:06] <ubotu> New bug: #176318 in libxft (main) "X applications crash after upgrade" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/176318
[13:51] <ubotu> New bug: #177097 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.22 (restricted) "nvidia-glx-new driver in gutsy 64 freezes the system with Geforce 7300" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/177097
[15:45] <ubotu> New bug: #177492 in xserver-xorg-video-intel (main) "EXA is balls-achingly slow (945)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/177492
[18:20] <pochu> bryce: your package in bug 173265 didn't work for me
[18:20] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 173265 in xorg-server "Xorg crashed with SIGSEGV" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/173265
[18:21] <pochu> (I haven't tried the upstream patch btw)
[18:31] <bryce> pochu: oh I'd assumed you'd already tested the patch, so it just needed to be brought in.
[18:31] <bryce> pochu, ok let me know when you have a confirmed fix for it
[18:32] <seb128> hey bryce
[18:32] <bryce> heya seb128
[18:32] <seb128> bryce: have you seen the compiz EXA bug I mentionned something like 10 hours ago?
[18:32] <bryce> no I hadn't
[18:33] <seb128> let me get the bug number ;-)
[18:34] <seb128> bryce: bug #175774
[18:34] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 175774 in compiz "[hardy] Enabling "Normal" effects produces badly drawn window shadows." [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/175774
[18:34] <seb128> bryce: not sure if that's an intel bug, but if you need extra informations let me know, there was no such issue in gutsy and using XAA workaround the issue
[18:35] <seb128> ah, tjaalton commented on the bug already ;-)
[18:35] <seb128> bryce: anyway just mentionning it because I get the issue on my laptop and can provide debug informations if required
[18:36] <bryce> erf, switching to EXA instead of XAA was supposed to fix the 965gm compiz issues
[18:36] <bryce> seb128: ok thanks, noted.  I'll triage the bug and keep track of it
[18:37] <bryce> I have a couple 965gm systems I can test on as well
[18:37] <seb128> ok
[18:37] <seb128> on gutsy compiz was working correctly out of the video overlay issue
[18:37] <bryce> I may not get to it soon, but I'm building a list of high priority bugs to work on after the holidays and will add this to it
[18:38] <bryce> from timo's comment, sounds like this is a known issue, so maybe it's already being worked
[18:38] <bryce> but I can mention it to Intel at my next meeting with them, mid-january if it's not fixed by then
[18:57] <tjaalton> yes, michel dänzer apparently is on it
[18:58] <tjaalton> bryce: did you notice that the l-r-m for .24 don't have the changes we made (dropping libGL diversion for fglrx etc) :(
[19:00] <bryce> tjaalton: no I didn't
[19:00] <bryce> tjaalton: was any reason given for dropping it?
[19:01] <tjaalton> no, BenC didn't reply yet
[19:08] <tjaalton> maybe it was just an oversight.. and it has not been built on other than sparc anyway (any of the uploads), so there's still hope ;)
[19:09] <pochu> bryce: sorry, I didnt had the time. Will ping you once I have a working patch
[19:11] <bryce> pochu: cool thanks
[19:30] <tjaalton> bah, another lrm upload..
[19:41] <bryce> you know, I suspected switching Inkscape to Launchpad would be beneficial for bug triaging compared with sourceforge, but I really had no idea just how significant it'd be
[19:41] <bryce> http://people.ubuntu.com/~brian/project-graphs/inkscape/plots/inkscape-month-new.png
[19:42] <bryce> that is all over just 2 weeks
[19:42] <bryce> well, 3 weeks, but the most intense activity has been the last 2 weeks
[19:43] <tjaalton> how come we have ~40000 open bugs on ubuntu then :P
[19:43] <bryce> maybe just because Inkscape kicks ass?  ;-)
[19:43] <tjaalton> hehe
[19:44] <bryce> actually yeah I need to figure out how to recruit one or two of the triagers to work on xorg bugs next ;-)
[19:45] <tjaalton> first we unsubscribe from all l-r-m bugs :)
[19:45] <tjaalton> that would "close" third of all our bugs
[19:46] <tjaalton> 1800 -> 1200
[19:46] <tjaalton> I'll do another sweep of xorg bugs
[19:46] <tjaalton> soon
[19:46] <bryce> cool
[19:47] <bryce> I'll lend a hand
[19:47] <jcristau> if you could do a sweep of http://bugs.debian.org/debian-x@lists.debian.org while you're at it... ;)
[19:47] <tjaalton> hehe
[19:47] <bryce> heh, in our ample free time sure
[19:48] <tjaalton> actually, I've thought about checking those to see where we have dupes. the rest should be just noise :)
[19:50] <bryce> on a few occasions I've tried going through debian|freedesktop bugs while looking at launchpad, to find matching bugs.  However, in practice I found it a lot harder to link up bugs than I'd expected.
[19:52] <bryce> partly since Lauchpad bug reporters don't provide the wealth of detail that the average fdo or deb bug reporter does
[19:52] <jcristau> i'm only able to do that when i recognize something i've already seen on xorg-team@
[21:40] <ubotu> New bug: #177552 in xterm (main) "Fontconfig settings not used in all applications" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/177552
[22:20] <ubotu> New bug: #177559 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.22 (restricted) "package nvidia-glx-new None failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/nvidia-xconfig', which is also in package nvidia-xconfig" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/177559
[23:25] <bryce> hey tjaalton, now that the new xorg.conf-lite xorg is uploaded, how do you think we should handle xorg.conf when upgrading from gutsy (and dapper)?  Should we force a regeneration of it, or try to do something clever to fix up the xorg.conf automatically, or...?
[23:45] <ubotu> New bug: #132232 in xorg (main) "E-VGA GeForce 6200 LE non-compatible?" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/132232