/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2007/12/20/#ubuntu-motu.txt

zulevening00:07
StevenKblueyed: The kbuild Build-Depends was because it doesn't build with anything less00:43
blueyedThanks, StevenK. I'll forward it to Debian.01:22
bddebianHeya gang01:39
somerville32Heya01:39
bddebian:-)01:40
superm1hey bddebian01:40
bddebianHi superm101:40
superm1feeling revuee?01:41
bddebianSure why not01:42
superm1cool.01:42
superm1ical2sqlite is what i sent up01:42
bddebiansuperm1: OK, gotta update my hardy pbuilder quick01:46
superm1okay, i'm gonna run an errand for a little bit anyhow.  i'll be back in ~2001:46
=== DarkMageZ_ is now known as DarkMageZ
=== TheMuso_ is now known as TheMuso
TheMusoYay for circuit breakers.01:59
StevenKTheMuso: Er, yes. I've a friend who would have gotten a mains jump start if it weren't for the safety switch02:00
TheMusoWell this has happened for the third time with the same power outlet.02:00
* TheMuso suspects bad wiring02:00
StevenKMmmm, that outlet could be dodgy02:02
TheMusoYeah. And it hasn't been touched in our work on the house either.02:02
=== bigon is now known as bigon`
* Hobbsee wishes people would'nt send her private email that is not in english.02:03
TheMusolol02:03
TheMusospam02:03
cheguevara_lol02:03
* ajmitch send Hobbsee an email in New Zealandish02:04
HobbseeI please do not understand ingles to translate it in Castilian02:04
Hobbsee...right then...02:04
Hobbseeso, uh, you're replying to an email that i've sent....why not translate it yourself?02:04
StevenKBecause apparently they don't understand "ingles" (English)02:05
Hobbseethere are online translators02:05
Hobbseewhich is how i got that translation02:05
=== freeflying_ is now known as freeflying
slangasekHobbsee: you need to find a better online translator, if only for the humor value of getting "ingles" properly translated as "groins"02:36
Hobbseeslangasek: hah :)02:36
Hobbseeslangasek: that was babelfish02:36
slangasekHobbsee: http://www.mail-archive.com/debconf-team@lists.debconf.org/msg01112.html02:43
Hobbseeslangasek: hah!  nice.02:44
=== Hobbsee_ is now known as Hobbsee
=== asac__ is now known as asac
=== asac_ is now known as asac
ScottKkeescook: I've been watching for the clamav security update for Gutsy to appear and I haven't see it yet ...04:08
FujitsuScottK: It has to all build, then be (manually, I think) pushed to LP, which will pick it up at the next */55. LP has been turned off for a while, so it might appear soon.04:10
ScottKFujitsu: Thanks.04:11
* ScottK can't ask for the feisty-backport until it's at least published ...04:11
harrisonyIf someone uploads a package to REVU, it has errors is there a procedure if a new person wants to upload an updated version (its been a month since the person uploaded the package and feedback was given)04:13
Hobbseeharrisony: go ahead, probably, if it's been a month04:16
harrisonyHobbsee: so just upload it?04:17
Hobbseeyeah04:17
harrisonyyou people dont need to do any ninja hacks04:17
Hobbseemaybe emailing the person that they haven't done a new version in a while, and did get feedback on it04:18
Hobbseenope04:18
harrisonyHobbsee: should i add like previously created by .. in the changelog or delete their entry or04:32
Hobbseebased on the packaing of <user> would be a good idea04:34
harrisony:)04:34
superm1harrisony, well assuming of course that you *are* basing it on their packaging :)04:45
j1mchi superm1 - if a package name doesn't have "ubuntu" in the package name, does that mean it is no different than the debian package?04:46
superm1hi j1mc, if its not in the version number then correct, there are no ubuntu changes to it04:47
harrisonysuperm1: im pretty much downloading it, fixing the errors and reuploading04:47
superm1the package source name should be the same as in debian however (and typically doesnt have ubuntu in it)04:47
j1mcthere is a piece of software that i was looking to update, tilda.  both debian unstable and ubuntu hardy archives show it as being at 0.09.4+cvs20071012-1, but the new version is 0.09.5.  i'm just getting started with this - would i still read up on merging?04:49
superm1j1mc, so if the same version is in debian unstable,  but you want to get the newer version in hardy, then the first thing i'd do is check if debian is already working on it04:50
superm1via a svn tree or anything like that04:50
superm1that way you dont double up the work04:50
superm1if you dont see any such thing, then you would then work on doing the new upstream version yourself04:51
superm1and the new version number would be like this:04:51
superm10.09.5-0ubuntu104:51
j1mcso check debian's svn tree for the package?04:51
superm1yeah that's usually a good idea to start out04:51
j1mcok, if i don't see any activity there, would i read up on merges to start the 0ubuntu1 package?04:52
superm1well usually not too much work is needed to handle a new upstream version like that04:53
superm1i'd try to drop the debian directory in the new extracted upstream tarball04:53
superm1and see if it can build04:53
superm1if so, then its a very easy package and you just need to increment the changelog and submit it04:53
j1mcok... thanks.  i'll keep that in mind.04:54
j1mcthe guy who wrote tilda is in the chicago-lug, so . . . i figured it would be something good to start with.04:54
superm1oh neat :)04:55
j1mcthis is where i'm looking to see if there's any activity on this package update in debian: http://packages.debian.org/sid/tilda04:57
j1mcshould i be looking somewhere else?04:57
j1mci've checked the bug reports, and developer information that is linked off of that page.04:57
nxvlfinaly i can dget LP packages!04:58
j1mcnaw, wait... i got it...  http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=tilda04:59
=== j1mc is now known as j1mc-afk
keescookScottK: ppc still hadn't built yet -- I've pushed the rest, I can push ppc when it finishes later on05:39
* somerville32 now has 30 uploads.05:44
StevenKkeescook: So, how do we fix mk-sbuild-lv? :-)05:44
keescookStevenK: hmmm... what's wrong?  I haven't used it recently...05:45
StevenKkeescook: This is going back to our discussion at AllHands, about using one LV for everything.05:45
keescookStevenK: ah! right. context-shift complete.05:46
keescookuhm05:46
keescookwell.... basically, schroot needs to be taught to use a subdirectory of a snapshot instead of the root directory05:46
keescookthen mk-sbuild-lv needs to be adjusted to grow a master lv instead of making a new one and drop in the right schroot conf05:47
keescookso, mostly, trick schroot.05:47
StevenKAh05:48
=== zakame__ is now known as zakame
slytherinHi all. I am trying to fix lucene2 FTBFS. The core classes compile with GCJ but there appears to be failure in unit tests. This cause the package not to build. Is unit tests failure a good enough reason not to build a package. If it is not then what is the way by which I can ignore failures?06:38
dholbachgood morning06:39
TheMusoHey dholbach.06:39
dholbachhey TheMuso06:40
slytherindholbach: hi. :-)06:40
dholbachheya slytherin :)06:40
TheMusoc06:40
TheMusowrong tab06:40
slytherindholbach: One question specifically for you. What is the next step for bug 177477? The Debian package maintainer has fixed it in debian as per my hints. Do we now sync that package and drop Ubuntu changes?06:42
ubotuLaunchpad bug 177477 in libglazedlists-java "Fix FTBFS by adding java-gcj-compat-dev as build dependency" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/17747706:42
dholbachslytherin: you need to find out if there are any ubuntu changes worth keeping, if not, we can sync it06:42
slytherindholbach: No. There was no specific changes in Ubuntu. So I guess once the fixed package is uploaded in Debian unstable I will have to log a bug for sync again, right?06:44
dholbachslytherin: you can turn the bug into a sync bug then :)06:44
slytherindholbach: by adding tag? or just adding a comment?06:45
dholbachchanging the bug title and summary06:46
nixternalhola06:48
slytherindholbach: Actually I was thinking to keep that bug to track other packages which can be fixed in similar way.06:48
dholbachslytherin: usually we file a sync bug per package06:49
dholbachhttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess06:49
slytherindholbach: No you didn't understand me. I meant keeping the bug summary to track packages which can be fixed by putting java-gcj-compat-dev in builde depends. I will just go on adding the debdiff for packages which can be fixed this way.06:50
persiaslytherin: If the package is failing unit tests, it usually means something went wrong in the build process, and should be properly fixed (rather than ignoring the tests).06:51
dholbachslytherin: ahhhh ok06:51
slytherinpersia: I will have to check what is the reason of unit tests failure. Will get back in 2-3 hours. :-)06:51
persiaslytherin: You'll want a new bug for the sync then, to avoid spamming the archive-admins with all the debdiffs.06:52
warp10Hi all!07:38
FujitsuWooo, I think we have a very hungry Soyuz tonight.07:43
persiaIs it really true there are no current or pending builds?07:53
slangasekit's true that we don't have them :)07:53
slangasekit's just not /right/ that we don't have them. ;)07:53
FujitsuRight, Soyuz is rather hungry.07:54
FujitsuThe build records aren't just some strange status - they're actually gone.07:54
persiaAh.  That's actually better then.  If Soyuz managed to get ahead of the developers, it would be bad.  One part of Soyuz not feeding another is a different issue.07:54
* Fujitsu commented on this a while ago in #launchpad.07:55
FujitsuHm, seems most of them are actually marked as being for superseded sources.07:59
dholbachhey luisbg08:10
luisbghey dholbach08:19
gesergood morning09:07
mok0good morning09:09
RomesI'm not getting any help at the ubuntu channel... anybody in here bored that wants to deal with an utter noob?09:23
RomesI think something about the philosophy of linux is confusing me09:24
RomesI seem to have to install the most basic things to get something to work :S09:24
RomesI'm getting an error... and I googled it, and I got a forum telling me to "install kernel sources"09:25
Romes... I don't even know what that means09:25
mok0Romes: this is not a forum for that type of questions, but just for once.... what is the error you got?09:27
Romesoh man... sorry... bah09:28
Romeser... let me copy/paste09:28
Fujitsu!paste09:28
ubotupastebin is a service to post large texts so you don't flood the channel. The Ubuntu pastebin is at http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org (make sure you give us the URL for your paste - see also the #ubuntu channel topic)09:28
Romesoh, it's just a one-liner ;)09:28
FujitsuAh.09:28
Romeshttp://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/49002/09:32
Romessorry about that, turns out it was multiline afterall09:32
Romessorry again, I had to change it... left something out09:33
Romeshttp://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/49003/09:33
Romesif it seems like I'm taking forever, it's because I have to type out the errors manually (no internet on my ubuntu comp)09:34
mok0Romes: why are you running make?09:35
RomesI'm getting a lot of "x is undeclared"09:35
Romesthe "INSTALL" file tells me to :P09:35
mok0Romes: install what?09:35
Romesndiswrapper, sorry09:35
Romesoh yeah, I forgot that I didn't give any background09:35
RomesUm... my wireless card didn't work out of the box, so I tried to install ASUS linux drivers, but that install failed, so my friend (who's gone) told me to install ndiswrapper... which also isn't working... so I caved and came onto IRC :P09:36
mok0Romes: you should install ndiswrapper via apt-get09:36
Romesno internet :(09:37
mok0Romes: put it on an USB stick09:37
RomesI put the tar.gz file on a usb stick09:37
RomesI'm feeling stupider by the second09:37
mok0Romes: if you use the .deb you don't need to compile it; that can be tricky09:38
Romes.deb? Ah, I'll look for that!09:38
mok0Romes: what version is your system running?09:38
Romeslet me check... what's the command again? uname -a? or something?09:39
mok0yeah09:39
Romes2.6.22-1409:39
pochulsb_release, too09:39
pochuThat should be Gutsy09:40
Romesyup09:40
Romessorry, didn't know what you meant by version09:40
RomesI'm migrating from Vista, so you can imagine that this is an entirely new world to me :P09:40
mok0Romes: welcome to a great world09:41
Romeslol... thanks mok0 :D09:41
RomesI'll feel more "liberated" once I understand how this stuff works... hah09:41
Romesanyways, back to looking for the .deb09:41
RomesI'll update you :P09:42
mok0Romes: http://packages.ubuntu.com/gutsy/misc/ndiswrapper-common09:42
Romesthanks! I don't see a .deb download on that page, though. That's where I got the .tar.gz file09:43
mok0Romes: http://packages.ubuntu.com/gutsy/net/ndisgtk09:44
Romesalright, new question... I'm on a regular old intel... am I i386?09:45
mok0Romes: yes09:45
Romesawesome09:46
mok0Romes: i386 for binary packages and "all" for the arch. independent packages09:47
Romesah, okay... is there an advantage to binary packages? are the independent ones the packages that you have to compile on your machine?09:48
Romesmakes sense if that's the case09:48
mok0Romes: No, the all packages are common for all the archs09:48
RomesAh09:48
mok0Romes: The source comes in "source" packages, which consist of 3 files: a .dsc, a .diff.gz and a .orig.tar.gz09:49
RomesAhhhhh09:49
mok0Romes: but you shouldn't need to worry about source packages09:50
RomesStupid me, I didn't catch on to that.09:50
Romeshmm, there's no readme in this file09:51
mok0Romes: binary packages have been built from the source code09:51
mok0Romes: Can't you get an internet connection somehow?09:51
RomesSo I just added an unnecessary step, essentially.09:51
RomesMy router is nowhere near me09:51
mok0Romes: yes09:51
mok0Romes: It makes things a million times easier... you can install ndiswrapper with one command09:52
Romeshehe, I know, that's what my friend was telling me... it all depends on an internet connection, though :P09:52
mok0Romes: ... and it will automatically pull in other packages that it depends on09:52
Romesvery nice09:52
Romesso should I run the makefile?09:53
pochuRomes: double click the .deb file.09:53
Romesthere... I might be blind... but I don't see it09:53
mok0Romes: In the window manager09:53
Romesthere's a .desktop, .8, .glade, and a couple image files09:53
pochuRomes: don't unpack it! :)09:54
Romesbahaha09:54
mok0Romes: I don't know ndiswrapper, but ndiswrapper-common is only one of the debs you need (pretty sure of that)09:55
Fujitsu!ndiswrapper09:55
ubotuWireless documentation can be found at https://help.ubuntu.com/community/WifiDocs09:55
Romeslol, man... okay09:55
mok0Gotta go, se you later09:57
Romesokay it's installing09:58
Romesthank you so much mok0 :d09:58
Romes:d09:58
Romesthanks to others as well09:58
Romespochu ;)09:58
Romescheers09:58
=== Igorot_ is now known as Igorot
slytherindholbach: One more FTBFS fixed in similar way. Added debdiff to same bug. :-)10:03
geserslytherin: which bug is it?10:04
=== ember_ is now known as ember
slytheringeser: bug 177477.10:04
ubotuLaunchpad bug 177477 in libglazedlists-java "Fix FTBFS by adding java-gcj-compat-dev as build dependency" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/17747710:05
slytheringeser: Affects more than one packages. I am using it as tracker bug.10:05
TheMusoAlright. Time to hit up the sponsors queue.10:09
TheMusodholbach: That was bloody quick.10:11
dholbachTheMuso: you deserve it :)10:12
TheMusoPerhaps, but i sent that email not 5 minutes ago. :)10:12
dholbachmaybe that's my new year's pledge: reply on MC mails a bit quicker :)10:12
TheMusolol10:12
totopalmanorsetto, hi :)10:32
norsettohi there totopalma10:33
mok0norsetto: I think we never arrived at a conclusion wrt xtide. Are you prepared to sponsor it?10:38
norsettomok0: Its u-u-s subscribed? If so its just a matter of waiting until its your turn in the queue10:39
mok0norsetto: yes, u-u-s is subscribed. I wasn't sure about the procedure. What does "subscribed" imply? I assumed it just meant that an email is sent somewhere...10:40
norsettomok0: when you suscribe it shows up in the u-u-s list of bugs10:41
mok0norsetto: Ah, cool.10:41
mok0norsetto: Is that something us mortals can look at??10:41
norsettomok0: you are about half way so it shouldn't take too long10:42
* TheMuso notes that he picks at random.10:42
norsettomok0: https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-universe-sponsors/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&search=Search&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&field.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED&field.assignee=&field.bug_reporter=&field.omit_dupes=on&field.has_patch=&field.has_no_package=10:43
TheMusoa lot of the time10:43
TheMusoOr, https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-universe-sponsors10:43
mok0norsetto: So part of the job of a MOTU is to help processing this list?10:43
TheMusomok0: Yes.10:44
mok0TheMuso: :-)10:44
norsettomok0: if you are nice with TheMuso he will look at it right away ....10:44
mok0norsetto: I'm nice with everyone ;-)10:45
TheMusoI've actually glanced over it, I'll make it my next one.10:45
mok0TheMuso: Great. I'll remain online in case you have any questions10:45
=== ember_ is now known as ember
TheMusomok0: Reviewing xtide.11:21
mok0TheMuso: cool11:21
TheMusomok0: Also taking care of the xtide-data bug.11:35
mok0TheMuso: yes, xtide-data needs to be fixed11:35
TheMusoYep, thats what I'm saying. I'll attend to that after I've done xtide.11:36
mok0TheMuso: DD developer is responsive, so these mods will appear from upstream sooner or later11:36
TheMusoNice.11:37
LucidFoxWow, packages.qa.debian.org has been redesigned11:38
TheMusomok0: Um, there is a newer version of xtide-data in debian.11:41
TheMusoand ubuntu11:41
TheMusomok0: Mind rebasing against that?11:41
MenZaooh pretty, LucidFox11:42
mok0TheMuso: NP11:43
mok0mok0: My guess it that the debdiff still works ;-)11:43
TheMusono it doesn't.11:43
mok0Ah ok11:44
TheMusoDoesn't apply at least11:44
mok0TheMuso: I was interrupted11:48
TheMusomok0: np11:48
zulmorning11:52
TheMusoHey zul.11:52
zulhey TheMuso how goes it?11:52
TheMusozul: Well thanks. Yourself?11:52
zulgood just woke up11:52
mok0TheMuso: What is the point of having Build-Depends-Indep: and Build-Depends: both mention debhelper??12:06
TheMusomok0: Sorry, I am unable to help. I'm not 100% thinking straight, and am about to turn in for the night.12:07
TheMusoThere are the debian policy docs.12:07
mok0TheMuso: I'll just leave it there, then12:07
TheMusoSorry I can't be of further help at the moment.12:08
mok0TheMuso: Do you want me to upload the new debdiff to LP, or do you want it via DCC?12:08
TheMusomok0: Upload to LP, I can't look at it now.12:09
TheMusoand subscribe universe sponsors12:09
* persia thinks debhelper is Build-Depends, and not Build-Depends-Indep, and that arch:all policies are broken in subtle and unfixable ways.12:09
mok0TheMuso: Thanks12:09
mok0persia: But this package has both12:09
persiamok0: And it shouldn't, but it doesn't break anything if it does.12:09
mok0I12:10
mok0I'll just leave it there, then12:10
=== LucidFox is now known as Sikon_Stargate
=== Kmos_ is now known as Kmos
=== dholbach_ is now known as dholbach
slytherinis revu down?12:31
persiaslytherin: works from here12:31
slytherinpersia: working with http://revu.tauware.de/ but not http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/12:32
persiaslytherin: The latter works from here12:33
=== bigon` is now known as bigon
Kmoshttp://packages.qa.debian.org got a new face today =)12:41
* persia requests someone to please look at bug #133888 & upload the patch. I just can't make a clean build for local reasons, and am becoming tempted to upload without the final build test.12:49
ubotuLaunchpad bug 133888 in wxwidgets2.8 "upgrade wxwidgets2.8 to the 2.8.6.1 release" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/13388812:49
mruizhi all12:52
dfilonipersia: yesterday I talk with DktrKranz. For he my package appears good but he want to test it whit some programs12:52
persiadfiloni: OK.  As long as someone is working on it.  I don't like to see something sitting in the sponsors queue for 10 days, and shouldn't upload that without a local build test.\12:53
dfilonipersia: I know... now I'm working at 2.8.7.1 version, it's very hard this version12:54
persiadfiloni: What makes 2.8.7.1 harder than 2.8.6.1?12:55
dfilonipersia: Editra editor12:56
dfilonipersia: this is my latest lintian output: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/2882/12:56
persiaUrk!  I wouldn't have expected that much given how clean you'd gotten 2.8.6.1.  Seems a little frustrating.  Thanks for wrestling with it.12:58
=== Sikon_Stargate is now known as LucidFox
Kmospersia: how much it takes to build on pbuilder ?12:58
persiaKmos: how much what?  If you mean space: it's around 6-8GB.  If you mean time, at least a couple hours.12:59
mruizKmos, it depends on the package13:00
Kmospersia: space isn't a problem here..13:00
persiaKmos: There's already a build log in the bug, so it doesn't need another: just some testing by someone who didn't artificially constrain their build environments.13:00
dfilonipersia: why you changed the bug?13:05
persiadfiloni: Bugs awaiting sponsorship shouldn't be assigned to non-sponsors.13:05
dfiloniok13:06
dfilonipersia: the same think also in the atanks bug?13:09
slytherinWhat does >> sign means when specifying version for a build dependency?13:11
persiadfiloni: I haven't looked at the atanks bug recently, but if it's queued for the sponsors, and assigned to a non-sponsor, it won't get sponsored for a while.13:11
persiaslytherin: Really more than.13:11
slytherincan a build fail if a universe package depends on multiverse package for build?13:13
persiaslytherin: Yes, but it likely won't, but it's a bug, so don't do that.13:13
slytherinpersia: I am not doing it. I was just checking docbook-xsl-saxon build logs. I see and entry 'libsaxon-java has no candidate'. libsaxon-java is in multiverse.13:15
persiaslytherin: In that case, the "universe cannot build-dep on multiverse" rule was working that day.  This is good.  One of the two likely needs to move.13:15
slytherinpersia: Just checked in debian. libsaxon-java is in main, build with GCJ so it can be moved to universe. :-)13:16
persiaslytherin: Excellent.  You've practice filing the "please move to universe" bugs, right?13:17
* persia cheers the new "Java in universe" effort13:18
slytherinpersia: I am trying to squash as many java related FTBFS as possible. And most of the times solutions have been simple except in case of batik. :-)13:18
persiabatik was the one that had all sorts of new build-deps, right?13:18
slytherinpersia: Not exactly. current version in Ubuntu uses loads of sun specific apis. the latest beta solves that problem to great extent but depends on another library. :-)13:20
persiaslytherin: Right.  I only remembered the bit about the extra library.13:20
slytherinI have uploaded that library to revu and waiting for someone to hammer it. :-)13:21
persiaslytherin: Is it both source & binary lintian & linda clean?13:22
slytherinpersia: As far as I understand it, it is clean.13:23
persiaslytherin: OK.  You ran both checkers with all the options against the source and binary .changes files?  Neither had any output?13:23
slytherinpersia: Let me check once again.13:24
persiaslytherin: In case you don't remember all the switches for maximum verbosity, they are listed on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing13:24
=== iceman_ is now known as iceman
slytherinpersia: Both clean13:28
persiaslytherin: In that case, you need to upgrade your lintian and linda.  The current versions don't agree on one point, so it would be impossible for them to be clean :)13:28
* persia agrees with lintian about the disagreement, but hasn't figured out the secret trick required prior to the linda update yet13:29
slytherinpersia: I am on gutsy. So that might be problem.13:29
LucidFoxpersia> What "Java in universe" effort?13:30
* Hobbsee waves13:30
persiaslytherin: There are backports for both available in -backports.  You can download them directly from the pool (http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/l/) if you like.13:30
persiaLucidFox: slytherin's new "Java in universe" effort, to follow Debian's "Java in main".13:31
slytherinOk. I will. perhaps tomorrow. :-)13:31
persiaLucidFox: Essentially, a lot of the Java packages actually work with the latest free compilers & VMs, so don't need to be in multiverse anymore.  It requires manual investigation for each package, but when complete, they can be promoted.13:32
persiaHi Hobbsee13:32
LucidFoxBut icedtea isn't in Debian yet, is it?13:32
LucidFoxOr do they mean other tools?13:32
persiaLucidFox: A lot of them work even with gcj13:32
LucidFoxAh.13:32
persiablueyed: There's no need to close bugs twice in a changelog :)13:34
geserHi Hobbsee13:36
Hobbseeheya13:37
blueyedpersia: IIRC this was just for reference (the second one)13:39
persiablueyed: Hrm.  I'm not sure if it breaks anything to do that: maybe worth an experiment.  The upload was stalled for other reasons though :(13:40
=== apache|mobile__ is now known as apache|mobile
blueyedpersia: which one is this?13:43
persiablueyed: I forget already: I'll check my mail (but it should be in yours as well)13:43
blueyedpersia: cuetag? It's set to in progress by you.13:44
persiablueyed: Ah.  Yes.  That was it.  Assigned to you for the last little change.13:45
blueyedI see. Thanks.13:45
persiasomerville32: Please close the sponsoring request bugs with your candidates :)13:46
slytherinLucidFox: The main problem is that it looks like package maintainers are underestimating GCJ and simply don't try building package with it. So you will find Sun's jdk as the first or only build dependency in many packages.13:46
Hobbseeeffie_jayx: hahaha :D13:47
LucidFoxTrue.13:47
effie_jayxHobbsee,  ;)13:47
effie_jayxI got scared when you said ... You're late...13:48
LucidFoxlibhiglayout-java built with free-java-sdk, and when I pointed that out to the maintainer, he said he was unaware that free Java build tools even existed.13:48
slytherinLOL13:48
Hobbseeeffie_jayx: either that, or you were a lot early for hte next one :)13:48
* persia notes that the main merge push is over, and we should be looking at bugfixing & integration & features (which may also mean some merging)13:48
blueyedpersia: Fixed the diff. Should I assign u-u-s sponsors again, or will you do it?13:50
blueyeds/assign/subscribe/13:50
slytherinblueyed: Add subscription yourself.13:51
persiablueyed: Better if you subscribe again.  I'm just hitting what would be my last queue request for the evening.  If I end up doing more later, I'm more likely to find it in the queue than in my bug subscriptions.13:51
blueyedMakes sense. Done.13:52
gpocentekpersia: onless you already work on it I can take care of the xffm patch14:28
persiagpocentek: That'd be great.  I wasn't going to chase it: more just trying to push rainct's maintainer mangling completion effort.14:28
gpocentekI wonder if we should keep xffm in the archive to be honnest14:29
gpocenteklooks like debian got ride of it14:29
persiagpocentek: Now I'm confused.  I can't see that Debian ever had xffm-icons14:31
gpocentekpersia: it was in sarge14:32
gpocentekxffm4-icons14:32
gpocentekpersia: do you think we should really update the maintainer?14:33
gpocentekI don't find this useful14:33
persiagpocentek: Yes.  I firmly believe that we should not have any packages with ubuntu versions that don't have ubuntu Maintainers.14:34
gpocentekok14:34
persiaFurther, in cases like this, it helps identify things that should be dropped from the archive.  If we just ignore the corner cases of things that haven't been updated in a while, we end up with lots of cruft.14:34
gpocentekagreed14:35
* gpocentek wonders why devscripts should be a build-dep14:35
persiagpocentek: Is xffm actually useful for Xubuntu these days?  If not, I think we ought drop both xffm-* and xffm4-* (and libxffm3 which seems to still be present as well)14:35
gpocentekpersia: they are not used in xubuntu14:36
persiagpocentek: OK.  Do you want to keep them?14:37
gpocentekno14:37
gpocentekpersia: I'll go through the list of packages and report bugs to remove them14:38
persiagpocentek: Well, since you seem to be Maintainer for a few, I say it's your call :)14:39
gpocentekI wonder if it the packages have been used since we get thunar in the archive14:39
persiaI'd think one bug would be better as they are all related.  Saves the archive-admins chasing all the bugs for various interdependencies.  Maybe multiple tasks.14:39
gpocentekright14:40
dfilonipersia: do you think I should fix image-file-in-usr-lib lintian warnings? I can override warnings or try to fix they. What I should do14:49
persiadfiloni: I think images belong in /usr/share/ .  If you're talking about wxwidgets, please put them in the right place.  If you're asking about a different package, it's best to ignore the warning (not override) if the package comes from Debian, and fix it if the package is only in Ubuntu.14:51
dfilonipersia: I'm talking about wxwidgets. Images are a parts of a theme, if I put them in the right place the package cannot working14:53
dfilonipersia: I think I should link the icons14:53
persiadfiloni: Can something else be adjusted to make it work, perhaps with a patch?  There's no reason for themes to be architecture-specific (as far as I know).14:53
dfilonipersia: I don't know14:54
persiadfiloni: Depending on your interest, I'd suggest either patching the source to make themes in /usr/share/ work, or leaving the lintian warning so someone else can see the bug.  In this case, an override would be bad, as it would hide the problem.  Also, since the package is already in the archive, it doesn't have to be lintian clean to upload (although that is nice).14:55
dfilonipersia: I will try to patch the source, I want a clean package14:56
persiadfiloni: Thanks.  If you get stuck on that, feel free to request upload of the rest, and keep working on that.  Since it won't change the library version, it is very unlikely to break rdepends, so it is safe to do later.  The upgrade should be done sooner to make sure it gets tested properly.14:57
dfilonipersia: ok14:58
=== apachelogger__ is now known as apachelogger
=== Gunirus_ is now known as Gunirus
=== MenZano is now known as MenZa
bddebianHeya gang15:20
geserHi bddebian15:23
* persia wonders if MOTU SWAT wishes nominations for closed CVEs possibly exposed in previous releases to be approved to highlight the subscribed queue15:24
bddebianHi geser, persia15:28
persiahey bddebian15:28
MenZapersia, that sentence needed more acronyms15:31
bddebianheh15:34
persiaMenZa: Why?  I actually prefer that to my far-too-common "DIFe is available from UUS, especially for FTBFS, UEHS, or NBS stuff", which is less comprehensible to the newcomer.15:34
MenZaI was being serious. :(15:34
slytherinpersia: One question. You were handling gnusim8085 packaging in which you asked me to add watch file. I have added watch file. Is it ok if I assign the bug back to you now?15:35
dholbachpersia: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/Abbreviations :)15:36
persiaslytherin: I'd recommend assigning nobody and subscribing the sponsors queue.  Take a look at my assigned bugs list if you don't believe me.  Among other things, I have now owned the most-duplicated bug in LP for 5 releases.15:36
persiadholbach: Thanks.  I'm not up much longer, but I'll add to that :)15:37
dholbachpersia: you ROCK15:37
slytherinOk. Actually previously it was assigned to nobody. But looks like since it was set 'In Progress' it was not considered by other sponsors. I will set it to confirmed.15:37
persiaslytherin: Thanks :)15:37
* slytherin agrees with dholbach :-D15:37
* persia has filed some needs-packaging bugs for audio-plugins if anyone is interested. Early & frequent review available.15:39
pochupersia, dfiloni: have you seen the yet again recent discussion about wx2.8 in debian-devel?15:46
dfilonipochu: yes15:47
persiadholbach: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/Abbreviations updated, with a special inclusion, just for you :)15:47
dholbachpersia: HAHAHA :-)15:47
* dholbach hugs persia15:47
persiapochu: pointer?  Also, isn't it still blocking on the only-two-versions-of-a-library policy?15:47
RainCTpersia: some url for those needs-packaging?15:49
pochupersia: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/12/msg00520.html, specially15:50
persiaRainCT: bugs #177672 #177673 #177678 #17767915:50
ubotuLaunchpad bug 177672 in ubuntu "Please package wildmidi" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/17767215:51
pochupersia: specially Daniel Baumann's plan:  * review and upload the package from Vadim in the next days.15:51
pochu  * try to really get rid of wxwidget2.4.15:51
pochu  * try to get rid of wxwidget2.6 if possible.15:51
pochuSounds like an ambitious plan ;-)15:51
persiapochu: I trust Vadim regarding the package, but suggest coordination between Vadim & dfiloni, as there's lots of distro-specific tweaking dfiloni has don that vadim might not be familiar with, but which would be good for Debian as well as Ubuntu.15:52
persiaFor really getting rid of wxwidget2.4, we're really, really close (except that jugglemaster annoyed me).15:53
pochudfiloni: wanna comaintain wx in Debian? ;-)15:53
* pochu hides :)15:53
persiaFor getting rid of wxwidgets2.6, we're likely a year away: there's still a large number of FTBFS due to API shift, and it needs upstream pressure (a Debian migration to support 2.8 will help).15:53
dfilonipersia: I think I can help debian because I don't know more about packaging, I'm learning15:55
persiadfiloni: You can certainly help, but I'd agree you're just learning, so probably shouldn't be a maintainer by yourself.  pochu has a bit more experience, and together I think you'd do a good job.15:55
pochupersia: lol, me?15:55
pochupersia: well yes, I'm experienced with 'pbuilder-hardy build wx*dsc' ;-)15:56
persiapochu: Why not?  You dare touch the package, you seem to have the right attitude as a package maintainer, and most of your work is pretty good.15:56
pochupersia: wx scares me :-(15:56
pochuAnd I prefer pure Gtk ;)15:57
persiapochu: Scares everyone, but Vadim would be happy to help with that part :)15:57
pochuHeh, right.15:57
pochuWell actually there are a couple of wx developers, and a DD willing to take care of it. Of course, the more the better15:57
dfilonipersia: sorry, I wanted to write I can'T15:57
dfilonipersia: I think I can't help debian because I don't know more about packaging, I'm learning15:58
persiadfiloni: I read it that way.  My answer still stands.15:58
dfilonipersia: ok15:58
* RainCT decides he doesn't like audio packages :P16:04
persiaRainCT: :)  No worries.  Thanks for looking.16:05
Kmosdholbach: i got the mail, thanks.. i need to reply to it accepting it or not ?16:09
dholbachKmos: the MC is going to vote, but if you have anything to say about it, please do16:12
Kmosok16:12
Kmosdholbach: thanks16:13
=== lamalex_2 is now known as lamalex
dfilonipersia: I found in wxPython/wx/tools/setup.py lines that contain pixmaps dir16:42
persiadfiloni: Excellent :)16:42
dfiloni*Editra/setup.py16:42
dfilonipersia: can't debian use 2.8.6.1 that I've done?16:58
dfiloniif will be approved16:59
=== TomaszD_ is now known as TomaszD
=== DreamThi1f is now known as DreamThief
=== warp10 is now known as Adriana
=== dfiloni is now known as dfiloni-ROCKY
=== Adriana is now known as warp10
=== dfiloni-ROCKY is now known as dfiloni
=== neversfelde_ is now known as neversfelde
jonnymindhello18:54
pochuhey jonnymind18:54
jonnymind:-)18:55
jonnymindpochu: have you checked my last upload?18:55
pochuI don't think so, link?18:56
jonnymindjustsec18:57
jonnymindbug 17447019:01
nxvl_workwhich is the URL for bitsize bugs on LP?19:01
ubotuLaunchpad bug 174470 in ubuntu "Package for the Falcon Programming Language" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/17447019:01
nxvl_work!bitsize19:01
ubotuSorry, I don't know anything about bitsize - try searching on http://ubotu.ubuntu-nl.org/factoids.cgi19:01
imbrandon!bitesize19:02
ubotuA list of bugs that are considered easy to fix and good for beginners to attempt can be found at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=bitesize19:02
=== warp10 is now known as warp10_it
=== warp10_it is now known as warp10
pochujonnymind: checking19:04
nxvl_workoh i miss the "e"19:04
nxvl_work:P19:04
jonnymindpochu: thnx19:04
nxvl_workimbrandon: thnx :D19:04
tonyyarussoimbrandon: oh btw - did you have an idea of when flashplugin-nonfree's fix would be available for released versions?19:06
pochujonnymind: no documentation for falcon other than the manpages?19:07
jonnymindon the site19:07
jonnymindabout 180 pages function ref + manual19:07
jonnyminda419:07
jonnymindPlus embedding guide, various tools help and so on19:07
jonnymindHowever, I am refining it all. On 0.8.6, there will be even more.19:08
pochuHow much space do they take? Might be a good idea to make a -doc package19:08
jonnymindexcellent idea.19:08
jonnymindthey are relatively small pdf, smaller if rendered on html.19:08
pochujonnymind: you could ship the source in the tarballs, and build them as html at build time.19:09
jonnymind... source is odt.19:09
jonnymind(gpl doc 1.219:09
pochuOuch.19:09
imbrandontonyyarusso: yes i'm working on a sru, i'll probably have it uploaded today19:10
pochuGFDL, right?19:10
jonnymindyes19:10
tonyyarussoimbrandon: cool19:10
pochujonnymind: hehe, this is funny: W: falcon-dev: unusual-interpreter ./usr/bin/falconeer.fal #!/usr/bin/falcon19:11
jonnymind:-) hai!19:11
pochu      (C) 2007-2012 Giancarlo Niccolai19:12
pochujonnymind: 2012?19:12
jonnymindoh well, I really DIDN'T know WHAT to put there.19:12
jonnymindI don't even get the meaning of copyright on a free software...19:13
pochuwell put $beginning_of_your_work - $current_year19:13
jonnymindOh, that's a great idea.19:13
pochujonnymind: If you are not putting it in the Public Domain, then it needs to have a copyright holder, afaik.19:13
jonnymindconsider it done.19:13
pochuIANAL though, so don't listen to me ;)19:14
=== Pici` is now known as Pici
jonnymindI see. IMHO, authorship right should be more important, and last 75 years. But americans are so fond in copyright...19:14
pochujonnymind: the copyright file needs a bit of work. Would you mind using the dh_make template?19:14
jonnymindpochu: yes19:15
jonnymindI mean, yes, I do mind.19:15
pochuAnd it needs to say exactly what files are under GFDL (e.g. docs/*)19:15
pochujonnymind: may I ask why? :)19:15
jonnymindThe package build process is automatized and is upstreamed in our build system,19:15
=== Ubulette_ is now known as Ubulette
jonnymindwhich is a multiplatform build system made of several scripts.19:16
pochujonnymind: heh, I mean debian/copyright :-)19:16
jonnymindI tried to use auto things from debian, but it just didn't stand.19:16
imbrandonyour package modifies debian/copyright on every build? nasty19:16
jonnymindpochu: there's no gfdl in that package (atm)19:16
jonnymindyes19:16
jonnymindOf course it does: the VERSION changes at every build.19:17
imbrandonVERSION in debian/copyright ?19:17
jonnymindpossibly yes.19:17
jonnymindFalcon 0.8.5, Falcon 0.8.6 ... Falcon 1.0...19:18
imbrandonvery nasty way to do things imho, glad i'm not sponsoring it19:18
pochujonnymind: you *can't* change anything in debian/ automatically19:18
pochuat least AFAIK19:18
jonnymindimbradon: honestly, I don't see why.19:18
imbrandonpochu: right its against policy iirc19:18
jonnymindpochu: again, I don't see why.19:18
jonnymind... Ok, point out the policy line.19:19
pochujonnymind: and I don't see 0.8.5 there19:19
imbrandonjonnymind: because policy states anything automaticly generated needs to be checked by hand before completion19:19
imbrandonjonnymind: sure one sec19:19
jonnymindpochu: it MIGHT be there.19:19
pochuemilio@pochu:~/tmp/tmp/falcon-0.8.5/debian$ grep '0.8.5' copyright19:19
pochuemilio@pochu:~/tmp/tmp/falcon-0.8.5/debian$19:19
jonnymindimbradon: Oh, I do.19:19
jonnymindand everyone in charge will.19:19
imbrandonif your build system does it you cant19:20
jonnymindOf course we can:19:20
imbrandonnot if it does it automagicly on every build19:20
jonnymindAh,... no.19:20
pochuStill. Changing anything in your upstream tarball is alright. Changing it in debian/ isn't, IMHO.19:20
jonnymindSorry, I meant every RELEASE.19:20
jonnymindI have script to set up things when the release is ready.19:20
jonnymindAnd they setup a skeleton that is then checked by hand.19:20
jonnymindthey prepare the ground for the releases.19:21
imbrandonyou repackage on every release?19:21
imbrandonnasty19:21
jonnymindWell. I see no other way to change the things in a package than repackaging.19:21
imbrandonmodify the existing package on new releases is the way19:21
pochujonnymind: we are talking about debian/copyright here, not copyright19:22
pochu(just in case :)19:22
jonnymindpochu: oic.19:22
jonnymindpochu: in this case, I don't mind what it goes there as long as it is compliant.19:22
pochujonnymind: you are completely free to do whatever you want with copyright!19:22
pochu:-)19:22
imbrandonright19:22
imbrandonthis all pertains to debian/*19:23
jonnymindAHHH, now I get it.19:23
pochuSorry for the confusion :-)19:23
jonnymindWell, there is nothing automated in that case.19:23
jonnymindI had a script to put the version on binary packages, but I removed it because source packages determines it automagically19:23
jonnymindthe things in the /debian dir are full static.19:24
imbrandonhrm i thought falcon was on 2.0beta3 anyhow, was last time i looked19:24
jonnymind1.0beta3.19:24
jonnymindI changed numbering to be compliant with different distros.19:24
jonnymindI.e. redhat is a mess with "beta" in names.19:25
jonnymindAnd I won't descend into magic of win version numbering.19:25
pochujonnymind: in debian/copyright, you need to list the license of all the files. So just saying that everything is released under the Falcon license but the files under docs/ are under the DFDL is fine.19:25
imbrandonjonnymind: nope 2.0.0~beta3 http://falcon.kaarsemaker.net/19:25
imbrandonjust checked19:25
jonnymindpochu: ok19:26
jonnymindimbradon: not mine.19:26
jonnymindhttp://www.falconpl.org19:26
imbrandonahh looks like a namspace conflict, have you got with the other falcon maintainers to resolve this ?19:27
pochujonnymind: so you need to explictly say what files are licensed under GFDL, and put something like this:19:27
pochuOn Debian systems, the complete text of the GNU General19:27
pochuPublic License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL'.19:27
pochus/GPL/GFDL-1.2/19:27
pochuand s/General Public/Free Documentation/19:28
imbrandonpochu: s/GPL/GPL-2 now because it defaults to 3 now19:28
pochuimbrandon: well it's not GPLed, but GFDLed (the documentation) ;)19:28
imbrandon:)19:28
jonnymindimbradon: I proposed (many times) falconpl.19:30
jonnymindbut Everyone here said: it's fine this way...19:31
jonnymindI am *willing* to change the name into falconpl, if just needed19:32
imbrandoni dont care either way, the correct thing to do would be get with the other falcon software makers and come up with a solution19:33
nxvl_workwhere can i get information about how the menu entries are placed?19:34
jonnymindpochu: I will fix license/copyright things asap.19:35
jonnymindimbradon: I didn't even know about that software. we'll discuss the topic.19:35
imbrandonkk, sure thats all i was pointing out :)19:36
jonnymind(although, there should be nothing to discuss if I just change the name of the package in falconpl.19:36
jonnymindWhich is ok to me, for various reasons.19:36
imbrandonwell you would both still produce a "falcon" binary though19:36
imbrandoni'm sure19:36
jonnymindthat would be a problem.19:37
imbrandonright19:37
jonnymindwhat is that other falcon thing?19:37
JanCa .deb repository "builder"19:37
imbrandonits a apt repository maintainer19:37
jonnymindimbradon: no we can't.19:38
pochujonnymind: the shlibs looks wrong to me. You currently have $library_name SONAME, but it should be $library_name SONAME binary_package_name19:38
jonnymindfrom their site: Falcon plugins, like falcon itself, are written in python.19:38
pochujonnymind: i.e. you need to add libfalcon-engine119:38
imbrandonjonnymind: what does that matter ?19:39
jonnymindthey won't produce a binary.19:39
imbrandonjonnymind: ok a "falcon" command19:39
jonnymindhowever, I'll check with them,19:39
imbrandonsame diffrence in this case19:40
imbrandonok i got to run19:40
jonnymindpochu: I don't get it.19:40
jonnymindMay you please specify the line to the comments in the bug?19:40
jonnymindGot to go: dinner. Bll.19:40
jonnymindThanks everyone.19:41
mruizhi all19:55
TheMusoHey folks.19:57
=== [Supremus] is now known as Supremus
mruizTime ago I had an account on REVU, but it disappeared. How can I get a new one?20:01
pochumruiz: are you subscribed to ubuntu-universe-contributors in LP?20:04
pochuAnd do you have a gpg key in your lp account?20:04
mruizpochu, yes20:09
mruizAll accounts from the old REVU instance have been removed, all MOTU accounts should have been recreate ... from REVU page20:10
Supremusnorsetto, hi !! :D20:13
norsettoHi supremus20:13
Supremusnorsetto, How are you?20:15
norsettoSupremus: quite well, you too I hope20:15
totopalmanorsetto, hi :)20:15
Supremusyes :D20:16
dfiloniHi norsetto :)20:17
mruizpochu, thanks for your help... I recreated my account :-)20:18
norsettoHola dfiloni20:19
norsettosuperm1: I was wondering about the kernel modules in your ppa .... do you have a ralink wireless yourself?20:20
superm1norsetto, no i dont20:21
superm1i didnt realize i had ralink support on any of my packages though?20:21
=== txwikinger3 is now known as txwikinger
superm1i have an updated linux-ubuntu-modules, but the fix should be in -proposed right now too afaik20:21
norsettosuperm1: sure, you have the legacy drivers in the modules one20:21
superm1ah.  well nothing has been changed in that20:22
=== txwikinger3 is now known as txwikinger
norsettosuperm1: ah ok! I was hoping they were finally getting rid of the rt2x00 crap and install the legacy ones20:23
superm1norsetto, not all too sure on that :)20:23
Adri2000TheMuso: regarding bug #176837, I thought the process was to assign to the contributor when there are things to fix?20:24
ubotuLaunchpad bug 176837 in audacious-plugins "Please merge audacious-plugins 1.4.2-1 (universe) from Debian unstable" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/17683720:25
TheMusoAdri2000: not as far as I know. I haven't read the policy for a while, but I don't try and rigidly stick to it.20:25
jonnymindback20:25
Adri2000" If the patch needs work20:27
Adri2000    *20:27
Adri2000      Set the Status to "Incomplete"20:27
Adri2000    *20:27
Adri2000      Assign the patch submitter20:27
Adri2000"20:27
TheMusoAh well.20:28
Adri2000but then I guess it's the contributor who should unassign himself when he provides a new debdiff20:28
TheMusoAs I said, I don't like ridigly sticking to policy20:28
TheMusoAs long as I'm aware of the guidelines, thats fine for me.20:28
=== ubiq_ is now known as lucid
gilirhi21:04
mruizhi all, I uploaded a package to revu and I need a review: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=adtool, thanks!21:06
giliris there someone nice and available to review awn-extras-applet on REVU ? :)21:07
rzrhi there21:14
rzrany cannonical guys arround ? I've been contacted for a job21:14
imbrandonrzr: probably best to contact them back the same way they contacted you21:15
rzrthat's what i've just done21:16
imbrandon:)21:16
rzri wanted to have take the temperature from inside :)21:16
imbrandonthere are a few Canonical employes arround and more in #ubuntu-devel and #launchpad and a few other places :)21:17
pochurzr: may I ask you which position? :)21:18
rzrlike #debian-*21:18
rzrsure21:18
rzrsomething like ...blanblah... LinuxOS21:18
slangasekrzr: the temperature in this part of Canonical is about 58°F according to the thermostat21:21
imbrandonslangasek: :)21:22
rzrtoo cold anyway ...21:22
rzrlet's work from crimosoft instead ;)21:22
slangasekthey're farther north, it's 54° there21:23
rzrmetric system please :)21:24
Ubulettehttp://intlstore.mozilla.org/images/MZ9011E.jpg   lol21:41
=== Tonio__ is now known as Tonio_
pochuUbulette: :-)21:55
Flare183What are all the section?21:55
Flare183I need a list21:55
Flare183please21:55
geserFlare183: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-subsections21:56
Flare183thanks21:57
kane77hi, what needs to be done to get package into next ubuntu release? (t22:00
kane77(I'd like to have groovy package included in hardy)22:02
pochuIt's already there, but DEPWAITing22:03
pochu    groovy | 0.1.0beta10-3 | http://archive.ubuntu.com hardy/multiverse Sources22:03
pochuhttps://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/groovy/22:03
somerville32What is groovy do?22:04
Ubulettewhy isn't packages.u.c working with hardy ? it's been broken for several week now22:06
cyberixHow do you fix "Binary contains unneeded section comment." or "Binary is not stripped."?22:17
zorglu_q. is there something like .pdi (pcbsd installer) but on linux ?22:24
=== asac_ is now known as asac
kane77somerville32, it's a scripting language with javaish syntax22:35
geserUbulette: how is p.u.c broken?22:35
Ubulettegeser, in "Search the contents of packages", hardy is no longer listed22:38
Ubulettegeser, and in pkg descriptions, "files" now says "no current information available"22:39
Ubulettelike in http://packages.ubuntu.com/hardy/libs/gstreamer0.10-plugins-base22:39
geserah, that one. The Contents.gz files aren't generated for hardy yet22:39
Ubulettethey were, up to a few weeks ago22:39
geserGenerating them is time-consuming and they're outdated really fast now22:40
Ubulettebut it's difficult to track moving files without that22:40
gesermy guess it that they will generated in the future again, when hardy has less changes22:40
geseryes, unfortunately22:41
Ubulettegeser, should be pretty easy to make on the fly using one of the dh_ script so it updates only what needs to be updated22:50
geserUbulette: I don't know how exactly those Content files are generated22:51
geserUbulette: adding should be easy: add the dpkg-deb -c output to that file but what about removals of old data?22:51
Ubulettejust add the package name as a key, then remove everything for that key 1st22:52
geserUbulette: ask in #ubuntu-devel or #launchpad about the Contents files. I don't know where the right place is.22:57
Ubulettegeser, well, i don't have much to add. I miss the feature and i think it could be light just by doing the task on the fly, that's about it.23:03
geserUbulette: I guess if it was that easy, it would probably be done23:04
Ubulettemaybe not with the current design, no idea of what it looks like now23:04
geserme neither23:05
norsettoubulette: whats wrong with apt-file?23:06
gesernorsetto: it needs also the same Content files which aren't there yet23:06
cyberixMy last package, being a sourceless binary application, raised lots of discussion. So this time I packaged public domain software!23:06
cyberixhttp://revu.tauware.de/details.py?package=malbolge23:06
cyberixBe the first one to review it.23:07
cyberixHere on R-E-V-U23:07
=== nuu is now known as nu
=== nu is now known as nuu
norsettogeser: does it? mine seems to work pretty happily (but then perhaps its not looking at hardy)23:07
gesernorsetto: gutsy has Content files therefore it works on packages.u.c but hardy has no Content files23:08
Ubuletteyep, apt-files uses sources.list to see where to fetch the indices so in my case, it tries and fails on http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/hardy/Contents-i386.gz23:15
=== rzr is now known as rZr
norsettooh well ... time for bed23:38
norsettog'night all23:38
cyberixWhen is the next revu day going to be?23:47
pochucyberix: It's every Monday afaik23:48
pochuSo next Monday ;)23:48
cyberixoh23:48
pochuAlthough it'll be December 24th, so there might be few activity here ;)23:48
cyberix:-(23:49
cyberixWhat a pity there is no reverse D23:49
pfeinis there a quick guide/howto on building a .deb?  I need to version bump an existing ubuntu package...23:50
TheMuso!packagingguide | pfein23:51
ubotupfein: packagingguide is The packaging guide is at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide - See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages for information on getting a package integrated into Ubuntu - Other developer resources are at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment - See also !backports23:51
TheMusopfein: That should have the info you need.23:51

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!