| asac | armin76: ok, then pulling in the SetUnichar function and using that instead hopefully fixes it | 00:05 |
|---|---|---|
| Ubulette | asac, you should retrigger a build of epiphany, it has been built against nspr/nss from xul (not system) so it's linked against .so, not against .so.[01].d | 00:12 |
| asac | system xul is not yet in archive :) | 00:19 |
| Ubulette | damn | 00:20 |
| asac | once its in everything needs a respin | 00:20 |
| Ubulette | remember you missed nssutil | 00:20 |
| asac | i asked you if that causes any issues | 00:21 |
| asac | i don't see any | 00:21 |
| Ubulette | it did for me in xul trunk weeks ago, that's how i found out | 00:22 |
| asac | which symptoms? | 00:32 |
| Ubulette | missing symbols | 00:32 |
| Ubulette | moved in nssutil | 00:32 |
| asac | for which operations? it works here well | 00:33 |
| asac | for xul 1.9 + ffox + gtkmozembed | 00:33 |
| Ubulette | build time | 00:33 |
| Ubulette | oh, i see. epiphany is broken because you did -L/usr/lib/xulrunner-devel-1.9b1/lib -lplds4 -lplc4 -lnspr4 | 00:43 |
| Ubulette | there're only .so in there even if system nspr is also installed | 00:44 |
| Ubulette | too bad | 00:44 |
| asac | i don't see the point you are trying to make | 00:51 |
| Ubulette | nm | 00:52 |
| asac | unfortunately ephy needs to link nspr directly ... which causes all this | 00:53 |
| Ubulette | it could have worked with xul b1 + regular nspr using a different linking order | 00:54 |
| Ubulette | but nm, it's not my mess^Wbusiness | 00:56 |
| extracted | any one here know anything about subnetting ? | 04:51 |
| tonyyarusso | extracted: um, some, but why asking here? | 05:45 |
| armin76 | asac: shrug, so i'm going to do that stuff | 10:39 |
| armin76 | asac: seems to work fine, let me paste you the patch | 11:50 |
| readyx | give it to me baby - aha - aha! | 11:54 |
| armin76 | asac: http://rafb.net/p/gOCIKj67.html | 12:08 |
| asac | armin76: is the GetUnichar part needed? | 12:34 |
| asac | anyway: rock! | 12:34 |
| armin76 | asac: http://rafb.net/p/Pf6NJO18.html <- like that? | 12:44 |
| === \sh_away is now known as \sh | ||
| asdsadsda | :D | 12:49 |
| asac | armin76: no idea :) ... does it work? | 13:05 |
| asac | i can upload to debian ... finaly!!! | 13:12 |
| asac | (again) | 13:12 |
| CheGuevara | congrats :P | 13:25 |
| asac | armin76: :) ... looks good ... if you don | 13:30 |
| asac | t get bus errors we should update the bugzilla bug | 13:31 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| armin76 | asac: the latest patch seems to work fine | 14:39 |
| asac | @time | 14:40 |
| ubotu | Current time in Etc/UTC: December 29 2007, 14:40:10 - Next meeting: Edubuntu meeting in 3 days | 14:40 |
| asac | armin76: the one without GetUnichar? | 14:40 |
| asac | great! | 14:40 |
| armin76 | yeah | 14:40 |
| asac | please test a bit longer ... who knows if the <<get>> bus error might be harder to trigger | 14:40 |
| armin76 | sure, doing that atm | 14:41 |
| armin76 | although without the patch it takes some seconds, maybe 30 | 14:41 |
| asac | no idea if it makes a difference, but try to visit unicode sites too | 14:43 |
| armin76 | sites with special characters like üéíóú? | 14:46 |
| asac | depends ... they might use latin encoding ... at best go for some example unicode sites | 14:47 |
| asac | http://www.alanwood.net/unicode/#links | 14:47 |
| asac | http://www.alanwood.net/unicode/thai.html | 14:48 |
| asac | http://www.alanwood.net/unicode/cjk_compatibility.html | 14:48 |
| armin76 | http://www.i18nguy.com/unicode-example.html <- i was using that | 14:48 |
| armin76 | those links work fine as well | 14:49 |
| asac | ok looks good then ... do you use pango? | 14:49 |
| armin76 | yup | 14:50 |
| asac | Ubulette: btw, i have permission to update kaze in debian | 14:52 |
| asac | did we go ahead in ubuntu? or did we wait for debian? (can't remember exactly) | 14:53 |
| armin76 | asac: do you use external cairo? | 14:54 |
| asac | for 2.x? yes! | 14:55 |
| asac | for 2.x: pending | 14:55 |
| asac | (waiting for someone to let new nss into the archive) | 14:55 |
| asac | s/2.x: pe/3.x: pe/ | 14:56 |
| asac | cairo in ubuntu is ready for system-cairo on ffox 3 | 14:56 |
| armin76 | remember to test my patch :P | 14:56 |
| asac | sorry i forgot :( | 14:56 |
| asac | which? | 14:57 |
| asac | is there a bug? | 14:57 |
| armin76 | lame :P | 14:58 |
| armin76 | mozilla bug 409976 | 14:58 |
| ubotu | Mozilla bug 409976 in GFX: Thebes "Cairo in trunk gives SIGBUS on SPARC" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409976 | 14:58 |
| asac | no idea how to test :) | 14:59 |
| armin76 | well, just apply to your firefox tarball, compile with internal cairo, and try | 14:59 |
| asac | we can include the patch if you want ... but we appear to have close to zero sparc desktop users | 14:59 |
| asac | the "and try" is my problem | 14:59 |
| asac | i have no access to sparc desktop | 14:59 |
| welpie | well, but test on whatever you can | 15:00 |
| asac | ah | 15:00 |
| welpie | i know it works on sparc, but i don't want to break other arches | 15:00 |
| asac | welpie: ? | 15:00 |
| asac | hehe | 15:00 |
| welpie | yeah, it's me | 15:01 |
| === welpie is now known as armin76_ | ||
| asac | i thought so :) | 15:01 |
| armin76_ | testing ff on sparc :P | 15:01 |
| asac | armin76_: i think attaching the actual patch might help :) | 15:03 |
| armin76 | nod | 15:04 |
| * asac out shopping + food et al | 15:05 | |
| CheGuevara | has anyone tried building xulrunner against latest glib | 15:21 |
| Ubulette | hi | 15:37 |
| Ubulette | CheGuevara, which glib ? i use the lastest in hardy, ie 2.15.0 | 15:39 |
| armin76 | asac: i attached the patch | 15:40 |
| Ubulette | asac, about epiphnay, even with a respin, it will ftbfs | 15:41 |
| CheGuevara | Ubulette: yeah | 15:41 |
| CheGuevara | does it build fine? | 15:41 |
| CheGuevara | because we just encountered a problem when building kmplayer | 15:41 |
| CheGuevara | which should affect glib as well | 15:41 |
| CheGuevara | i mean | 15:41 |
| CheGuevara | xulrunner as well | 15:42 |
| CheGuevara | http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/glib?view=revision&revision=6185 | 15:42 |
| Ubulette | CheGuevara, sure. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11086860/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-i386.xulrunner-1.9_1.9~b2%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1~fta2_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz | 15:42 |
| Ubulette | oh, that looks like my bug 179119 | 15:43 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 179119 in glib2.0 "glib 2.15 not clean with -pedantic" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/179119 | 15:43 |
| CheGuevara | very likely :P | 15:43 |
| CheGuevara | i am building an updated glib right now | 15:44 |
| CheGuevara | Ubulette: do you mind looking at debdiff when its done building, since i am not exactly the packaging master | 15:46 |
| Ubulette | sure, but remember i can't sponsor you | 15:48 |
| CheGuevara | yeah i know :) | 15:49 |
| CheGuevara | now at least it closes a bug :P | 15:50 |
| Ubulette | asac, for epiphany, you need to patch m4/gecko.m4, or improve you xul1.9 patch a bit further | 15:50 |
| === \sh is now known as \sh_away | ||
| CheGuevara | Ubulette: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11089726/glib.debdiff | 15:55 |
| Ubulette | looks good. i would have named the patch differently but it's ok | 15:58 |
| CheGuevara | ok thanks Ubulette | 16:00 |
| Ubulette | asac, what about kaze ? | 16:13 |
| Ubulette | btw, 0.5.1 has been released today | 16:14 |
| asac | Ubulette: build error? | 16:25 |
| asac | (ephy) | 16:25 |
| Ubulette | asac, you will get that: | 16:32 |
| Ubulette | checking whether we have a gtk 2 gecko build... yes | 16:32 |
| Ubulette | checking whether we have a gecko debug build... no | 16:32 |
| Ubulette | checking whether we have a xpcom glue... yes | 16:32 |
| Ubulette | checking for gecko version... 1.9 | 16:32 |
| Ubulette | checking nspr in gecko... no | 16:32 |
| Ubulette | checking nspr in system... yes | 16:32 |
| Ubulette | checking whether we can compile and run XPCOM programs... no | 16:32 |
| Ubulette | configure: error: Cannot compile and run XPCOM programs | 16:32 |
| Ubulette | it's because the last test never uses -I/usr/include/nspr detected earlier | 16:33 |
| asac | Ubulette: ah right | 16:34 |
| asac | ok | 16:34 |
| asac | i think thats fixed here already | 16:34 |
| asac | Ubulette: you started to port kaze once ... can you give me what you got so far? | 16:35 |
| Ubulette | hmm, i can't find my branch, neither on lp nor locally | 16:41 |
| Ubulette | wtf? | 16:41 |
| asac | Ubulette: http://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/ephy.ubulette.patch | 16:54 |
| Ubulette | updated patch ? | 16:54 |
| asac | yes | 16:54 |
| asac | its not clean | 16:54 |
| asac | the interdiff is: | 16:54 |
| asac | http://paste.ubuntu.com/3091/ | 16:55 |
| asac | the important part for you is most likely line 30 | 16:55 |
| asac | and line 51- | 16:55 |
| asac | if you xul has the fixed mozilla-nspr patch from the mozillateam branch then line 30 should be enough for the nspr thing | 16:55 |
| asac | the rest was just some dirty hacking i did before i decided to fix xul .pc | 16:56 |
| asac | (no clue which patch seb used ... i think he used something between this and the patch in gnome (which is the old.patch in the diff) | 16:57 |
| asac | anyway ... replacing the full patch with this new one should be fine for system-nspr | 16:57 |
| asac | well ... dpatch hell of course :) | 16:58 |
| asac | aka no fold avail | 16:58 |
| asac | no idea why interdiff strips whitespaces though :/ | 16:59 |
| Ubulette | http://paste.ubuntu.com/3093/ | 17:00 |
| Ubulette | between seb and your new patch | 17:01 |
| asac | you didn't use interdiff, right? | 17:02 |
| Ubulette | no | 17:02 |
| asac | yes ... but should be ok i guess | 17:02 |
| asac | though unsure why seb does have the doc/reference/Makefile.am patch | 17:03 |
| asac | i remember that i developed that for him in order to build the docs | 17:03 |
| asac | doc/reference/tmpl/ephy-embed.sgml -> garbage of course | 17:03 |
| asac | we need a fix for mozilla bug 408791 | 17:04 |
| ubotu | Mozilla bug 408791 in Password Manager "nsLoginManagerPrompter.js does not work with TestGtkEmbed prompt." [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=408791 | 17:04 |
| asac | so if you have some splendid idea :) | 17:05 |
| armin76 | http://dev.gentoo.org/~armin76/ffdialog.png <- i need a fix for that when compiling against xulrunner :P | 17:09 |
| asac | could be everything | 17:10 |
| asac | xul 1.9 + ffxo 3? | 17:10 |
| armin76 | yep | 17:10 |
| armin76 | however building it without a shared xulrunner, works fine | 17:10 |
| armin76 | weird, huh? | 17:11 |
| asac | armin76: do you have all our patches? | 17:11 |
| armin76 | for xul? i have a lot :P | 17:12 |
| CheGuevara | asac: is it possible for you to sponsor a glib2.0 upload, or do you only stick to mozilla stuff | 17:12 |
| asac | CheGuevara: depends on what kind of fix it is | 17:13 |
| CheGuevara | asac: bug 179119 | 17:13 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 179119 in glib2.0 "glib 2.15 not clean with -pedantic" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/179119 | 17:13 |
| asac | +- // g_print ("LOOPSTATE: subtest_running=%d subtest_io_pending=%d\n", subtest_running, subtest_io_pending); | 17:15 |
| asac | is that really C99 ? | 17:16 |
| CheGuevara | / comments are not allowed in C99 | 17:16 |
| CheGuevara | umm // i mean | 17:16 |
| asac | you mean "not allowed in C95" = | 17:17 |
| asac | ? | 17:17 |
| asac | aeh whatever was before 99 :) | 17:17 |
| CheGuevara | i am honestly not sure | 17:18 |
| CheGuevara | i always thought that // was only dis-allowed in C99 though | 17:18 |
| CheGuevara | oooh i am talking rubish | 17:20 |
| asac | well ... i think its just the ; | 17:20 |
| CheGuevara | // was introduced in C99 | 17:20 |
| asac | the rest is glib code-convention | 17:20 |
| CheGuevara | i was getting it the other way around | 17:20 |
| asac | yeah ... thats what i mean ... but i am not even sure about that | 17:20 |
| CheGuevara | C99 standard says it is :P | 17:20 |
| CheGuevara | / style comments, ala C++, are now available in C99. A comment of this form starts with // and ends at the end of the line. | 17:20 |
| CheGuevara | http://www.comeaucomputing.com/techtalk/c99/#slashslashcomments | 17:20 |
| asac | ok | 17:20 |
| CheGuevara | kmplayer fails to compile with | 17:21 |
| CheGuevara | /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gtestutils.h:108: error: expected identifier or '(' before '/' token | 17:21 |
| CheGuevara | /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gtestutils.h:109: error: expected identifier or '(' before '/' token | 17:21 |
| asac | probably was available everywhere before it was standardized :) | 17:21 |
| asac | they use -ansi ? | 17:21 |
| CheGuevara | yeah | 17:21 |
| CheGuevara | most weir thing kmplayer compiles perfectly fine locally with pbuilder | 17:22 |
| CheGuevara | but fails on ubuntu build servers | 17:22 |
| asac | hmm ... maybe you still have old compiler? | 17:23 |
| asac | and 4.2 became more anal about this? | 17:23 |
| CheGuevara | its a hardy pbuilder chroot | 17:24 |
| CheGuevara | so it should be same as there :P | 17:24 |
| CheGuevara | but the patch is basic and straight from upstream svn, so it shouldn't do any harm | 17:25 |
| Ubulette | pedantic is anal about C using // which is supposed to be C++ only | 17:25 |
| CheGuevara | yep | 17:26 |
| asac | i wait a few minutes to see if someone from desktop team replies | 17:26 |
| asac | otherwise i will sponsor this thing | 17:26 |
| CheGuevara | weirdest thing we don't use pedantic in kmplayer | 17:26 |
| CheGuevara | but it still fails | 17:26 |
| CheGuevara | thats what puzzles me most | 17:26 |
| asac | well ... pedantic in c++ appears to choke because of ; | 17:26 |
| Ubulette | what other flags do you have ? | 17:26 |
| asac | plain C appears to be pedantic when using -ansi | 17:26 |
| CheGuevara | http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11089417/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-i386.kmplayer_1%3A0.10.0c-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 17:27 |
| asac | Ubulette: could build ephy? | 17:27 |
| asac | with pre3?` | 17:27 |
| asac | b3pre | 17:27 |
| CheGuevara | yeah it must be -ansi then | 17:27 |
| Ubulette | asac, locally yes. I've pushed it to my ppa | 17:29 |
| CheGuevara | which still on't explain why its doesn't fail locally :P | 17:29 |
| asac | Ubulette: fine ... does it work? | 17:31 |
| CheGuevara | does gcc 4.2 set ansi by default? | 17:35 |
| armin76 | asac: i get unaligned access on ia64 with 3.0 | 17:40 |
| asac | armin76: in cairo? | 17:40 |
| armin76 | no | 17:40 |
| armin76 | cairo is okay, tested on ia64 and alpha, checking with amd64 | 17:40 |
| armin76 | but it doesn't matter, on ia64 it doesn't segfault | 17:41 |
| armin76 | http://rafb.net/p/y1747Y58.html | 17:41 |
| asac | CheGuevara: ls -l /etc/alternatives/c89 | 17:45 |
| asac | maybe your alternative points somewhere else? or CC=c89 is used on buildd by default ... otherwise: no clue :) | 17:46 |
| CheGuevara | lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 2007-12-29 13:58 /etc/alternatives/c89 -> /usr/bin/c89-gcc | 17:46 |
| CheGuevara | $magic++ | 17:47 |
| CheGuevara | :P | 17:47 |
| CheGuevara | asac: let me know when you upload please | 17:48 |
| asac | CheGuevara: sure ... doing a testbuild of ice* | 17:51 |
| CheGuevara | kk thanks :) | 17:52 |
| asac | CheGuevara: uploaded | 18:34 |
| asac | lets see how quick the idle buildd's kick in :) | 18:39 |
| Ubulette | hope it's faster than ppas | 18:43 |
| Ubulette | 1h15 avg in ppa just to enter the queue | 18:43 |
| CheGuevara | w00t | 18:45 |
| CheGuevara | thanks a lot asac | 18:45 |
| Ubulette | asac, http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=652917 | 18:47 |
| asac | no idea ... didn't change a thing | 18:54 |
| Ubulette | could be anything | 18:57 |
| asac | Ubulette: does ephy work? | 19:19 |
| Ubulette | asac, http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/epihany.png | 19:23 |
| === \sh_away is now known as \sh | ||
| asac | Ubulette: does the homepage work? | 19:24 |
| Ubulette | homepage ? | 19:24 |
| asac | do forms work? e.g. password manager | 19:25 |
| asac | well ... you have the ubuntu homepage ... i don't have that because locale is not properly recognized | 19:25 |
| asac | but my build might just be too old and %l is fixed upstream most likely | 19:25 |
| Ubulette | i can login on lp | 19:27 |
| asac | well ... does it remember your credentials? | 19:29 |
| Ubulette | lp, yes. | 19:29 |
| Ubulette | but seb complained about htaccess, not cookies auth | 19:30 |
| Ubulette | hmm self signed certificates.. I get the same error as ff3 but how do I add the exception in epiphany ?? | 19:32 |
| Ubulette | crash | 19:34 |
| asac | Ubulette: yes he complained about http auth ... but auto password in forms didn't work either | 19:36 |
| Ubulette | start epiphany-browser, Edit / Personal data => click on properties => crash | 19:36 |
| asac | most likely fixed by microb backout ... which is why i asked | 19:36 |
| Ubulette | backout was post b2, i'm still running b2 here | 19:37 |
| asac | great chpe landed a bunch of the xul fixes | 19:37 |
| * asac updating patch | 19:37 | |
| Ubulette | strange, update manager still wants to upgrade epiphany-gecko | 19:39 |
| Ubulette | http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/Update-Manager.png | 19:40 |
| Ubulette | over and over again | 19:40 |
| asac | maybe let him do it? | 19:43 |
| Ubulette | i did | 19:44 |
| Ubulette | same for apt-get | 19:44 |
| Ubulette | Preparing to replace epiphany-gecko 2.21.4-0ubuntu2+fta2 (using .../epiphany-gecko_2.21.4-0ubuntu2+fta2_i386.deb) ... | 19:44 |
| asac | no idea ... if it doesn't go away by doing the upgrade | 19:49 |
| asac | damn thing ... try to convince someone who didn't even try to build against xr 1.9 that we have no real choice but use the glue :) | 20:53 |
| Ubulette | who ? mike ? | 21:16 |
| === \sh is now known as \sh_away | ||
| asac | no chpe | 21:37 |
| asac | he has no idea ... at least caillon stated that he wants -embedding in the end as well ... but fedora needs to figure out some things for lib32/lib64 mixed setups | 21:37 |
| Ubulette | miro is damn too slow. | 21:41 |
| Ubulette | 15~20sec of intense disk activity to have the 1st window | 21:41 |
| asac | with the miro patch i provide? | 21:42 |
| Ubulette | yes, but even without it. it's by design | 21:44 |
| asac | ok | 21:44 |
| asac | then i feel good | 21:44 |
| asac | Ubulette: tbird is up ... sorry for the branch mess btw, but you started on top of a lame branch that didn't have all revisions | 21:50 |
| asac | http://paste.ubuntu.com/3105/ | 21:52 |
| asac | you didn't have any missing symbols in pre? | 21:53 |
| Ubulette | damn, i was about to push the pedantic thing | 21:53 |
| asac | he? | 21:53 |
| asac | the pedantic thing isn't needed anymore | 21:53 |
| Ubulette | was test building from scratch | 21:53 |
| asac | i didn't include it | 21:53 |
| Ubulette | you could have told me you were working on that | 21:53 |
| asac | Ubulette: what do you mean? | 21:53 |
| Ubulette | i've lost 1h once again | 21:54 |
| asac | on what? | 21:54 |
| Ubulette | tb | 21:54 |
| asac | sorry ... don't get what you were working on | 21:54 |
| asac | dropping -pendantic change? | 21:54 |
| Ubulette | yes, and testing it | 21:55 |
| Ubulette | all for nothing :( | 21:55 |
| asac | ok ... sorry about it ... i said above that i will do test builds before sponsoring ... you probably missed that :( | 21:55 |
| Ubulette | no, i didn't | 21:56 |
| Ubulette | you never mentioned tb | 21:56 |
| asac | yeah ... i now see that that comment was in motu (because CheGuevara pinged me there) | 21:56 |
| Ubulette | i've waited for glib to hit the repo, then i've updated & rebuilt tb, and i was about to push | 21:57 |
| asac | yeah ... but the branch was lost anyway, because it started in the past | 21:58 |
| Ubulette | I used your most recent public branch | 21:58 |
| asac | which could have been prevented if you'd told me that you start working on a new tbird branch :) | 21:58 |
| Ubulette | if you don't push your stuff, how people are supposed to know ? | 21:59 |
| Ubulette | grrr, i'm pissed | 21:59 |
| Ubulette | nm | 21:59 |
| asac | your work has been reused ... i cherry-picked the patches et al | 21:59 |
| Ubulette | but once again, you took ownership while i requested sponsorship. tell me if you don't want to sponsor me. | 22:01 |
| asac | and remember that i would have preferred to just use your branch ... so i suffered already from my lameness of not pushing the stable branch | 22:02 |
| asac | i really don't get what you complain about ... your contributions are clearly acknowledged in the changelog | 22:25 |
| asac | maybe its launchpad that leads you to the false impression that contributions within one changelog are worth less or something. this is a deficiency of launchpad for sure. Usually in team-maintenance people commit and add their changes to changelog. the one who uploads signs the release off by using dch -r | 22:29 |
| Ubulette | it's not the 1st time that i complain about the exact same thing. if you're not happy with something, you should tell it publicly and give a chance to the contributor to fix it, instead of redoing it silently on your side and at the same time gaining ownership of almost everything. that's frustrating. | 22:31 |
| Ubulette | i feel spoiled | 22:32 |
| asac | i don't get ownership of anything | 22:32 |
| Ubulette | where are my commits ? | 22:32 |
| Ubulette | even from the changelogs, you did 2.0.0.9 | 22:32 |
| asac | and? | 22:33 |
| Ubulette | and nothing. i just don't like that kind of practice | 22:34 |
| Ubulette | i won't work on that ever again | 22:34 |
| asac | so you would have preferred if i had told you that you need to redo everything based on the branch i forgot to push? | 22:35 |
| Ubulette | yes | 22:35 |
| Ubulette | at least ask me if i would like to do it | 22:35 |
| asac | but again ... the name in the changelog just means: uploader | 22:36 |
| asac | what is done by whome is annotated _in_ the changelog | 22:36 |
| Ubulette | I remember i've asked you to sponsor it, you never said the branch was wrong or anything | 22:36 |
| asac | yes ... because i didn't want to waste your time with these messy things | 22:37 |
| Ubulette | but forget it, you clearly protect your job, i can understand it | 22:37 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
