=== bigon is now known as bigon` === jelmer is now known as JELMER [11:03] happy new year from UTC+13 [11:08] Happy new year, thumper. === bigon` is now known as bigon [13:20] ``Cube, are you here? [13:20] <``Cube> jep [13:20] <``Cube> what's the matter? [13:21] <``Cube> LucidFox: ?? [13:21] I'd like Tango icons for gtkpod [13:22] <``Cube> sure! [13:22] <``Cube> do you have a webpage? [13:22] <``Cube> your project? [13:22] http://www.gtkpod.org :) [13:23] <``Cube> yea, just found that as well :P [13:24] preferably GPL or LGPL [13:24] <``Cube> LucidFox: we have many iPod icons in Gadgetango, why not use one from there? [13:24] Hmm. [13:24] Let me google. [13:24] <``Cube> I think they are GPL [13:24] What is its license? [13:24] Cool. [13:24] <``Cube> but checking this, wait please [13:25] <``Cube> its not that I don't want to make any icons for gtkpod, but as there are already some, I thought you might use them [13:26] Well, I can always use these: http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=21941 [13:27] http://svn.gnome.org/svn/gnome-icon-theme-extras/trunk/Gadgetango/scalable/devices/ <-- oh, yes, found [13:27] thanks! [13:46] Could you tailor http://svn.gnome.org/svn/gnome-icon-theme-extras/trunk/Gadgetango/scalable/devices/multimedia-player-apple-ipod-video-white.svg for low resolutions? [13:46] and optionally get rid of the earpieces as well, leave just the iPod itself [13:58] hi [13:59] I'm trying to build a deb packet for ppa but the building fails. I know why! How can I make that "export QMAKE=/usr/bin/qmake-qt4" is executed before ./configure and ./configure with a switch --disable-debug? [14:00] I'm creating the package with dh_make and dbuild -S [14:00] Adnarim> edit debian/rules [14:00] find the call to ./configure [params] and replace it with: QMAKE=/usr/bin/qmake-qt4 ./configure [params] === bigon is now known as bigon` [14:18] this doesn't work :( [14:25] can someone tell me what are valid sections for the debian/control files? there I have to fill sections.. if I use misc I'M always getting errors while pbuilder build === JELMER is now known as jelemr === jelemr is now known as jelmer === bigon` is now known as bigon [15:31] Goooooooooooooooooood afternoon Launchpadders! [15:31] afternoon mpt [15:32] Ah, my pin! Thank you. [15:40] New bug: #179561 in launchpad "[wishlist] Check which projects I can join to" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/179561 === Ubulette_ is now known as Ubulette [15:55] New bug: #179564 in launchpad "Structural heading is misleading on poll page" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/179564 [16:06] New bug: #179567 in launchpad "Poll secrecy options are too long for an option menu" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/179567 [16:16] New bug: #179568 in launchpad "No preview for polls" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/179568 [17:25] Anybody else getting "Not allowed here Sorry, you don't have permission to access this page. " when trying to view a bug? [17:26] mattismyname, you might get that if the bug is marked private [17:26] aha [17:26] Was the bug linked to from within Launchpad? [17:26] Or were you following a link from a mailing list message or something? [17:26] Yes...it is the duplicate of another bug in launchpad [17:27] #136371 [17:27] I have had the same crash on my system and was trying to do a bit of research before submitting my own bug report. [17:28] You mean bug 136371 is a duplicate of another bug, or another bug is a duplicate of bug 136371? [17:28] Bug 136371 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/136371 is private [17:28] Bug 136371 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/136371 is private [17:28] ubotu, shut up [17:28] Sorry, I don't know anything about shut up - try searching on http://ubotu.ubuntu-nl.org/factoids.cgi [17:28] Probably we should do a better job of explaining why you don't have permission [17:29] Another bug (176568) is a duplicate of 136371. [17:29] that's an apport bug report, which is probably why it's been marked as private [17:29] gr [17:30] What would be the recommended way to add a "me too" report to a bug like that? I suppose they could find the debug trace from my system useful in working on it. [17:31] Hopefully once apport is posting to its own database, we'll be able to have a stronger guideline that public bug reports shouldn't be duplicates of private ones [17:32] Why would apport be marked private anyway? [17:32] Because it might contain private information such as passwords etc [17:33] that happened to be in memory when the crash occurred [17:33] I see [17:33] Well, I will go ahead and submit my own report of the bug and let them triage it as they will. [17:33] ok [17:34] A public bug report containing a carefully sanitized traceback is more helpful than a private bug report containing a complete traceback [17:34] because more people can see it to have a go at fixing the bug :-) [17:34] So, perhaps suggest in your version that the private one be marked as a duplicate of your one [17:46] New bug: #179587 in malone ""Sorry, you don't have permission to access this" bug report -- well, why not?" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/179587 [19:00] New bug: #179598 in malone "Bug listing isn't sortable by project/package" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/179598 [19:11] New bug: #179600 in malone "Offer summaries of bug listings subtotalled by project/package/assignee/milestone/etc" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/179600 [19:32] holy crap [19:32] "Latest memberships" has been completely broken all this time and we haven't noticed [19:45] New bug: #179605 in launchpad ""Latest memberships" is actually "Alphabetically lowest memberships"" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/179605 [20:20] New bug: #179607 in launchpad-bazaar "Trunk-only import policy seems incompatible with MythTV" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/179607 [22:49] * somerville32 had noticed. [22:49] lol