/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2008/01/07/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

nenolodhaha cool, firefox-3.0 crashes and then apport crashes trying to generate a crash report03:05
nenolod:D03:06
[reed]submit breakpad reports03:31
[reed]oh, no03:31
[reed]don't03:31
=== asac_ is now known as asac
asachi08:50
saivannasac : Are you there?08:52
asacMirv: i have some local changes.08:52
asacsaivann: obviously ... yes ;)08:52
saivannasac : good :) sunbird-locales and lightning-extension locales are ready, if you want to take a look08:52
saivannhttps://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sunbird-locales/+bug/17429008:53
ubotuLaunchpad bug 174290 in sunbird-locales "[hardy] new upstream release 0.7" [Wishlist,Fix committed]08:53
saivannasac : I can upload to REVU if you prefer08:53
asacgreat ... will take a look right after reading email08:54
asacno its fine08:54
asacno need for REVU08:54
saivannasac : Great, I can stay here if you want08:54
saivannasac : I fixed the sunbird-locales rules file because it didn't update debian/control file automatically. All the same for lightning-extension-locales which is now automatic08:55
asacsaivann: ok ... i think we should split up the build target and move things control file generation and postinst et al to a separate rule09:29
asacs/things/things like/09:30
saivannasac : into regen_package.sh ?09:32
asacmaybe ... bug regen_packages.sh should not be automatically done. updating the control file et al during build is not right.09:33
asace.g.09:33
asacif you update the .xpi the maintainer should run:09:33
asac./debian/rules regen-package09:33
saivannasac : Ok! I get it09:33
asacand then control file and postrm/postinst should not be touched during build09:33
saivannasac : Actually, there's only the control file part which should not be in the build-stamp?09:35
asacyes i think that would be good enough.09:36
asacthe build-stamp should fail if there is a locale in the control file that isn't in .xpi09:36
asacand maybe print a warning if there are locales in the .xpi not yet in the control so it gets the uploaders attention09:36
saivannasac : Let me work on this and I'll have a solution for this very soon for both sunbird and lightining-extension..09:36
saivannasac : Ok, I'll see what I can do, that would be great09:37
asacrock!09:37
saivannasac : :)09:37
saivannasac : I have to learn very quickly, but I love it, I hope that I do a good job09:38
asacyou sure that creating post/pre things with ln --symbolic works?09:38
asace.g. is the link resolved and the file copied to the package? ... otherwise just use cp09:38
saivannI think that it always worked, but I'll look deeper around that too09:40
saivannasac : concerning the regen_package section in the rules file, should-I put this section at the end of the rules file?09:40
saivannasac : no matter ?09:44
asacin the end it doesn't matter .... but its good practice to put non-.standard rules at the end09:46
saivannasac : That's what I thought09:47
saivannasac : And concerning lightning-extension-locales package, there's actually a jar_to_xpi.sh and a regen_package.sh script. I suggest to include them all into the rules file, would that be a good idea?09:47
saivannasac : The rules file would be very long, a compromise can be to include regen_package.sh only09:47
saivannasac : It's better since I completely cleaned up jar_to_xpi.sh, but it's still long09:48
asaci think its ok to keep helper scripts09:52
asacthough you should consider to move all those cat << EOF chunks to .tmpl files09:52
asacbtw, the var/lib/mozilla-thunderbird/extensions.d directory isn't needed since 1.5 branch anymore09:53
asacyou can just drop that09:53
asaclightningmaxVERSION=0.8 should be 0.7.* ... like what you did for tbird09:53
saivannasac : I'll fix all these problems!09:55
saivannasac : Do you see something else that should be fixed/improved on these packages?09:56
asacnot atm. but no guarantees ;)10:01
asaci added these points to the bug10:01
saivannasac : Thanks, I already noted everything and it will get fixed very soon. Maybe one last question : What would be the best way to use templates file rather than cat OEF, sed?10:03
asacyes sed/awk is a viable option10:04
saivannasac : Great, thanks for your guidance, I'll give you some news very soon10:05
asacat some point we should try to make things a bit more makefile'ish ... but for now using complex .sh is good10:05
saivannasac : Ok10:06
asacmozilla Bug 40221610:06
ubotuMozilla bug 402216 in English Other "Page isn't redirecting properly -- but this redirection works for Firefox 2.0.0.8  under Windows" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40221610:06
asac[reed]: thanks for the mozilla.in patch10:28
[reed]yw10:29
[reed]not sure why schrep stopped in the middle of approvals tonight10:29
[reed]or I would have landed it tonight10:29
asacstrange ... mozilla bug 411037 appears to be a regression. It worked here back in pre beta2 times afaik10:55
ubotuMozilla bug 411037 in Build Config "SSL error page when built using libxul doesn't have the two buttons for get me out of here/add exception" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41103710:55
asacwell ... it didn't have "get me out of here" ... but maybe i just mix this up with a a non-libxul testbuild i did back then10:56
asacarmin76: there?11:00
armin76yah11:00
asacnevermind ... will come back in a minute ;)11:03
asacarmin76: can you test if  patch in mozilla bug 411037 doesn't break in-browser-xul builds?11:53
ubotuMozilla bug 411037 in Build Config "SSL error page when built using libxul doesn't have the two buttons for get me out of here/add exception" [Normal,Assigned] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41103711:53
asacworks for libxul-sdk here11:53
armin76sure11:54
armin76compiling...11:56
asac[reed]: we have this patch against mozilla/extensions/inspector/install.rdf to support prism ... you think its worth to submit this to bugzilla?11:59
asac[reed]: you know if gavin is really the man in charge for the AMO feature of addons?12:08
asacRAOF: which ppa?12:12
RAOFUm...12:12
asacasac?12:13
RAOFdeb http://ppa.launchpad.net/mozillateam/ubuntu hardy main12:13
asacah right12:13
RAOFI think.12:13
RAOFYup, that'd be it.12:13
asacRAOF: did you update the package in the archive in the meantime?12:14
RAOFNo.12:14
RAOFI don't think there's any obvious bugs to be fixed at the moment.12:15
RAOFThere's nothing to pull from Debian, certainly :)12:15
asachmm ... the upload to ppa happened on 11th dec12:15
asacthe upload to ubuntu on 11th dec as well12:15
asacsomehow i doubt that ppa is based on latest :)12:16
RAOFThe versioning suggests that it is, but I'll have a check.12:16
asachmm ... looking at version it looks it is in deed on top of latest archive12:16
asacok ... could you check that and review+upload?12:17
RAOFOk.12:17
asacgreat12:18
asacRAOF: someone complained that miro is slow on startup ... you don't know something about that, right?12:18
RAOFDoesn't seem unusually slow to me.12:20
RAOFAre we likely to want to xul-1.9ify monodevelop, incidentally?12:20
RAOFasac: Can we send the xul-1.9 patch upstream?12:23
asaclet me see12:23
armin76asac: did you read what i said about sparc?12:25
armin76you have it broken atm12:26
asacarmin76: that we broke it?12:26
armin76yeah12:26
armin76mozilla's cairo got fixed, but i guess yours didn't12:26
armin76and you build with external, right?12:26
asachmmm ... i remember that patch ... did we open a LP bug against libcairo for that?12:27
armin76no idea12:27
armin76at least i didn't :P12:27
asaclets see12:27
asacarmin76: you have bz id at hand?12:28
armin76mozilla bug 40997612:28
ubotuMozilla bug 409976 in GFX: Thebes "Cairo in trunk gives SIGBUS on SPARC" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40997612:28
asacarmin76: why are the commitids different in bugreport?12:31
armin76asac: because there were more fixes after i filed the bug12:32
armin76regarding with alignment, so i just put the latest change on that stuff12:32
asacarmin76: he? ... ah so you say the last commit is really sufficient on its own? does it apply cleanly without the other?12:33
armin76yep12:33
armin76okay, ff finished compiling12:37
armin76works fine12:37
asacarmin76: thanks! ... just to re-confirm: this is without system libxul, right?12:41
armin76yep12:41
armin76it took 40mins, so yes :P12:41
armin76now i've tried with system libxul, 2 mins, works fine12:41
armin76good job :)12:42
* armin76 applies the patch12:42
RAOFasac: You don't mind if I rewrite your changelog a little and upload with your name on it, do you?12:43
asacrequested review12:45
asacRAOF: if you want to explicitly show that i am to blame for that ... you can do, yes ... but i don't mind. feel free to upload with your name ... you can add [ Alexander Sack ] on top of it12:45
RAOFNah.  It's just that since I haven't contributed anything but changing the changelog to fit my arbitary preferences it seemed fitting for you to have the credit :)12:46
asac:)12:47
asacyeah feel free to sponsor then ;)12:47
asacarmin76: maybe ack in the bug.13:03
asacUbulette: i pushed your mozclient.dev branch to mozillateam as referenced in debian/control13:13
=== IdleOne is now known as ActiveOne
=== \sh_away is now known as \sh
=== ActiveOne is now known as IdleOne
bluekuja[reed], new cloak?17:31
bluekuja[reed], ^^17:34
[reed]bluekuja: no... old clock17:36
[reed]cloak17:36
[reed]had this one for a long time :)17:36
bluekujaah, it's the first time I see it17:36
bluekujastrange then17:37
bluekujamaybe you did not use it a lot17:37
[reed]asac> [reed]: we have this patch against mozilla/extensions/inspector/install.rdf to support prism ... you think its worth to submit this to bugzilla? <-- sure... Other Applications :: DOM Inspector17:37
[reed]<asac> [reed]: you know if gavin is really the man in charge for the AMO feature of addons? <-- gavin has nothing to do with AMO17:37
asac[reed]: strange mconnor told me once that he would be the right contact (but was a few month ago) ... so who is doing this? any idea?17:51
[reed]Mossop17:52
[reed]Mossop is the Firefox developer working on the AMO integration17:52
[reed](Dave Townsend)17:52
asacok great thanks. is he responsive on irc? or mail?17:52
[reed]IRC works fine17:53
[reed]he's dtownsend@mozilla.com if you need to mail him17:53
asacthx17:55
Ubulette_<asac> Ubulette: i pushed your mozclient.dev branch to mozillateam as referenced in debian/control <= eh ?18:39
=== Ubulette_ is now known as Ubulette
Ubuletteasac, ^^18:40
Ubuletteoh ok, i see18:43
Ubulettenm18:43
armin76[reed]: quiiiiick! :)19:01
[reed];)19:01
[reed]I'll check-in stuff in a bit19:02
Ubuletteiceowl is in hardy now ? what about sunbird ?21:29
asachuh?21:38
Ubulettehttps://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+source/iceowl/0.7-221:39
asacoh ... iceowl was already in for 0.5-221:39
asacsunbird + lightning are in for some time as well21:39
asachttps://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightning-sunbird21:39
asac 0.7+nobinonly-0ubuntu121:40
Ubuletteit's not the same thing ?21:40
asacSuperseded in hardy-release on 2007-11-2621:40
asacits just different branding21:40
asaclightning-sunbird is ubuntu only21:40
asacand iceowl was just auto-synched21:40
asaci never asked for it :)21:40
Ubuletteno need to keep both then. one should go21:41
asacwell ... i don't mind to keep both21:41
asaclets see ...21:42
asacok iceowl has not been in gutsy ... so we maybe can remove it without transition21:42
=== \sh is now known as \sh_away
Ubuletteasac, why is mozilla-devscripts still NEW src ?22:56
asacwhy would i know? my guess would be that its because of the holiday backlog in the queue23:08
asaci can ask tomorrow23:09
asaci will raise the issues you have on next platform meeting23:10
asacslowness of sponsored contributions (revu et al) ... and slowness of NEW src23:11
asacyou can also raise those points ... the next platform meeting is wed 1700 i guess23:13

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!