| === thumper_laptop is now known as thumper | ||
| === mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch | ||
| === mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell | ||
| * gmb dashes to get tea before the meeting. | 14:54 | |
| * statik does too | 14:54 | |
| * sinzui grabs a pot of coffee. | 14:55 | |
| * intellectronica just pops some amphetamines | 14:57 | |
| * sinzui hunts for some meth | 14:58 | |
| * danilos grabs a sandwich, a bottle of rakia, and asks the girl in the bar to give him a lap dance | 14:58 | |
| * barry goes to visit danilos | 14:59 | |
| intellectronica | danilos: rakia, is that like raki - the anise drink? | 15:00 |
|---|---|---|
| barry | #startmeeting | 15:00 |
| MootBot | Meeting started at 15:00. The chair is barry. | 15:00 |
| MootBot | Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE] | 15:00 |
| barry | hi everyone and welcome to this week's ameu reviewer meeting | 15:00 |
| barry | who's here today? | 15:00 |
| sinzui | me | 15:00 |
| gmb | me | 15:00 |
| danilos | intellectronica: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rakia ;) | 15:00 |
| intellectronica | me | 15:00 |
| danilos | me | 15:00 |
| bac | me | 15:00 |
| statik | me | 15:00 |
| allenap | me | 15:00 |
| barry | welcome danilos and allenap! | 15:01 |
| bac | welcome allenap! | 15:01 |
| allenap | cheers :) | 15:01 |
| danilos | thanks | 15:01 |
| barry | [TOPIC] agenda | 15:01 |
| MootBot | New Topic: agenda | 15:01 |
| danilos | allenap: are you a new recruit? :) | 15:01 |
| barry | * Roll call | 15:01 |
| barry | * Next meeting | 15:01 |
| barry | * Action items | 15:01 |
| barry | * Queue status | 15:01 |
| barry | * Mentoring update | 15:01 |
| barry | * allenap mentored by bac | 15:01 |
| barry | * bigjools mentored by barry | 15:01 |
| * flacoste hi-5 allenap and danilos | 15:01 | |
| barry | * Review process | 15:02 |
| barry | * on-callers use PendingReviews? | 15:02 |
| barry | * SteveA (or barry), use of properties instead of `__call__` in TALES | 15:02 |
| allenap | danilos: Yep, you? | 15:02 |
| barry | * SteveA (or barry), use of raw strings for regexps only | 15:02 |
| barry | * Tool update | 15:02 |
| barry | * On-call reviews | 15:02 |
| barry | * Keeping the time to around 8 hours | 15:02 |
| barry | it's a full one today, so let's jump right in! | 15:02 |
| barry | [TOPIC] next meeting | 15:02 |
| MootBot | New Topic: next meeting | 15:02 |
| * bigjools is here | 15:02 | |
| barry | bigjools: welcome! | 15:02 |
| danilos | allenap: yep | 15:02 |
| bigjools | thanks! | 15:02 |
| danilos | bigjools: hi, welcome as well :) | 15:02 |
| bigjools | backatcha danilos | 15:02 |
| * flacoste cheers bigjools | 15:02 | |
| barry | a bunch of us are going to be in florida sprinting next week. should we still have the meeting or skip it? | 15:02 |
| * bigjools high fives flacoste | 15:03 | |
| statik | i'd like to skip it | 15:03 |
| flacoste | +0 | 15:03 |
| barry | statik: me too | 15:03 |
| bac | +1 on skipping | 15:03 |
| sinzui | -1 | 15:03 |
| barry | [VOTE] skip the meeting next week? | 15:03 |
| MootBot | Please vote on: skip the meeting next week?. | 15:03 |
| MootBot | Public votes can be registered by saying +1/-1/+0 in the channel, private votes by messaging the channel followed by +1/-1/+0 to MootBot | 15:03 |
| MootBot | E.g. /msg MootBot +1 #launchpad-meeting | 15:03 |
| MootBot | -1 received from sinzui. 0 for, 1 against. 0 have abstained. Count is now -1 | 15:03 |
| danilos | -1 (I'll be here, not that I don't want you to skip it :) | 15:03 |
| MootBot | -1 received from danilos. 0 for, 2 against. 0 have abstained. Count is now -2 | 15:03 |
| statik | +1 | 15:03 |
| flacoste | +0 | 15:03 |
| MootBot | +1 received from statik. 1 for, 2 against. 0 have abstained. Count is now -1 | 15:03 |
| MootBot | Abstention received from flacoste. 1 for, 2 against. 1 have abstained. Count is now -1 | 15:03 |
| barry | +1 | 15:03 |
| MootBot | +1 received from barry. 2 for, 2 against. 1 have abstained. Count is now 0 | 15:03 |
| bac | +1 | 15:03 |
| MootBot | +1 received from bac. 3 for, 2 against. 1 have abstained. Count is now 1 | 15:03 |
| statik | +1 | 15:04 |
| bac | cheater | 15:04 |
| * statik couldn't resist trying to cheat | 15:04 | |
| barry | /msg mootbot stop cheaters! | 15:04 |
| flacoste | statik: i think i have a game for you... | 15:04 |
| barry | any other votes? | 15:04 |
| barry | 5 | 15:04 |
| barry | 4 | 15:04 |
| barry | 3 | 15:04 |
| bigjools | +0 | 15:05 |
| MootBot | Abstention received from bigjools. 3 for, 2 against. 2 have abstained. Count is now 1 | 15:05 |
| barry | 2 | 15:05 |
| barry | 1 | 15:05 |
| barry | #endvote | 15:05 |
| flacoste | [ENDVOTE] | 15:05 |
| danilos | does that still not work? | 15:05 |
| barry | /msg mootbot fix yourself already! | 15:05 |
| bac | changing topic should end it, too | 15:05 |
| danilos | (it ends when the meeting is done, that happened last time) | 15:05 |
| barry | okay, we're split, so i rule :) | 15:05 |
| barry | [AGREED] skip the meeting next week | 15:06 |
| MootBot | AGREED received: skip the meeting next week | 15:06 |
| barry | [TOPIC] action items | 15:06 |
| MootBot | Vote is in progress. Finishing now. | 15:06 |
| MootBot | Final result is 3 for, 2 against. 2 abstained. Total: 1 | 15:06 |
| MootBot | New Topic: action items | 15:06 |
| intellectronica | barry: all of us, or only the florida sprint participants? | 15:06 |
| flacoste | barry: we're not splitted, 3 for, 2 against, 2 abstentions | 15:06 |
| barry | flacoste: statik cheated | 15:06 |
| barry | intellectronica: everyone, but i won't stop you from meeting if you want :) | 15:06 |
| flacoste | barry: but his cheat didn't work | 15:06 |
| * barry shamefully unwields his power | 15:07 | |
| barry | flacoste: great! then motion carried | 15:07 |
| barry | [TOPIC] action items | 15:07 |
| MootBot | New Topic: action items | 15:07 |
| bigjools | meta argument alert :) | 15:07 |
| barry | bigjools: do you want the floor? | 15:08 |
| * bigjools humbly disappears | 15:08 | |
| intellectronica | i promised to create a cover letter and integrate it with the submission plugin. i have created a cover letter and am hacking on using it interactively from the plugin today | 15:08 |
| barry | * intellectronica to work on a cover letter template (wait for mwh) | 15:08 |
| barry | intellectronica: awesome! | 15:08 |
| intellectronica | should be ready for when mwh is back in business | 15:08 |
| flacoste | intellectronica: you could put it out on the wiki | 15:09 |
| flacoste | that way we could edit/improve it | 15:09 |
| flacoste | and use it by pasting it in our editor | 15:09 |
| barry | flacoste: +1 | 15:09 |
| danilos | I was personally having problems using lpreview plug in with my set-up (which pre-dates all the rocketfuel-get scripts and similar) | 15:09 |
| * flacoste used the plugin for the first time yesterday | 15:09 | |
| flacoste | didn't work too great :/ | 15:09 |
| danilos | flacoste: I've had the same experience | 15:09 |
| flacoste | i reported my feedback to the list | 15:10 |
| flacoste | danilos: did you? | 15:10 |
| barry | danilos: my setup predates th rf-get scripts and i've had fairly good luck with the script | 15:10 |
| bigjools | it should be registered in LP so we can track bugs | 15:10 |
| danilos | flacoste: no, I'll certainly do that | 15:10 |
| barry | bigjools: +1 | 15:10 |
| allenap | danilos: Same for me as for barry, except that it tries to find the paste script in the wrong place. | 15:10 |
| danilos | +1 from me as well | 15:10 |
| sinzui | I always write my cover letter and make my diff separate from the plugin--I think it is faster, and safer. | 15:10 |
| barry | utilities/paste doesn't work for me though | 15:10 |
| flacoste | sinzui: i'll take your advice! | 15:11 |
| flacoste | i did for the diff, but not the cover letter | 15:11 |
| bigjools | barry: why not? | 15:11 |
| flacoste | but losing it twice, is kind of sucky | 15:11 |
| barry | sinzui: i usually write my cover separately but let the plugin do the diff | 15:11 |
| flacoste | barry: that's because your missing the magic password file | 15:11 |
| bac | flacoste: did you check to see if "cover.txt" actually exists? | 15:11 |
| barry | bigjools: i get some error output and no paste | 15:11 |
| barry | flacoste: no, i have that! | 15:11 |
| danilos | I had to do both manually | 15:11 |
| flacoste | bac: oops, right, it does! | 15:11 |
| barry | but maybe we can debug that off-line (it's low priority for me) | 15:11 |
| bigjools | ok | 15:12 |
| bac | flacoste: i've documented that on the wiki | 15:12 |
| flacoste | yeah, i lured us off-topic, sorry | 15:12 |
| allenap | bac: Do you have a link for that? | 15:12 |
| barry | mwh is off-line. gmb, in the meantime would you register the plugin on LP? | 15:12 |
| bac | https://launchpad.canonical.com/LPReviewPluginDocs | 15:12 |
| gmb | barry: Sure. Should I register two separate products, one for the webapp, too, or do you think that can wait? | 15:12 |
| allenap | bac: Thanks. | 15:13 |
| barry | gmb: i think that can wait (and should be separate when it's time) | 15:13 |
| gmb | Okay. Will do. | 15:13 |
| barry | [ACTION] gmb to register lpreview plugin on lp so we can track bugs | 15:13 |
| MootBot | ACTION received: gmb to register lpreview plugin on lp so we can track bugs | 15:13 |
| barry | moving on... :) | 15:13 |
| barry | * barry will communicate the on-call process to launchpad developers | 15:13 |
| barry | done, though there is discussion about some details (which we'll get to later) | 15:14 |
| barry | * barry will contact devs who have previously expressed an interest in revieweing | 15:14 |
| danilos | obviously done, hi bigjools, allenap :) | 15:14 |
| barry | done, and welcome new recruits! :) | 15:14 |
| * bigjools waves | 15:14 | |
| barry | * gmb to work on the review web site next week (hopefully) | 15:14 |
| bigjools | schwuk wanted to start too, what happened to him? | 15:14 |
| barry | bigjools: i think he's looking for a mentor | 15:14 |
| bigjools | ok | 15:15 |
| * allenap drowns, no, waves | 15:15 | |
| gmb | barry: No work done yet. I'm hoping to get some time tomorrow and Friday. | 15:15 |
| gmb | Too many other things are taking priority at this point. | 15:15 |
| barry | gmb: understood! np, thanks for the update. | 15:15 |
| barry | * sinzui to look into running `make lint` and output PR stanza by default in `review-submit` | 15:15 |
| sinzui | I did not act on that one. | 15:16 |
| * sinzui looks at his shoes | 15:16 | |
| bigjools | PR begone | 15:16 |
| barry | sinzui: np, should we just carry that over? | 15:16 |
| sinzui | I considered updating the plugin to generate the PendingReview fragment, Since I do no know the URL of the cover letter before it is archived, I don't see much point in the effort. | 15:16 |
| flacoste | sinzui: there is --pr option to generate the fragment already | 15:17 |
| intellectronica | flacoste: is that not for creating a paste with the diff, actually? | 15:17 |
| flacoste | intellectronica: no, it outpus something you can paste in PR | 15:17 |
| flacoste | outputs even | 15:17 |
| flacoste | even though PR stuff could be linked to pus | 15:17 |
| sinzui | flacoste: It doesn't have the cover letter link | 15:17 |
| === salgado is now known as salgado-lunch | ||
| barry | :-D | 15:17 |
| flacoste | sinzui: hmm, i thought that was simply because the paste fails | 15:18 |
| flacoste | because of path problems | 15:18 |
| barry | well, gmb is gonna kill of PR soon enough anyway <wink> so maybe that's not the biggest bang for the buck | 15:18 |
| flacoste | but that may be a wrong assumptions | 15:18 |
| sinzui | I will look into this in more detail | 15:18 |
| barry | sinzui: i think 'make lint' could be pretty useful tho | 15:18 |
| sinzui | Faster gmb, kill, kill! | 15:18 |
| bigjools | gmb will be my new best friend when he kills PR | 15:19 |
| sinzui | barry: I will work on lint first. | 15:19 |
| * gmb needs little encouragement | 15:19 | |
| intellectronica | gmb: now if that's not an incentive i don't know what is | 15:19 |
| barry | sinzui: excellent, thanks | 15:19 |
| bigjools | yes, please lint it as part of review-submit | 15:19 |
| gmb | :) | 15:19 |
| barry | * barry will require `bzr review-submit` with exceptions. | 15:19 |
| barry | done | 15:19 |
| barry | (in the sense that i emailed that policy) | 15:20 |
| barry | [TOPIC] queue status | 15:20 |
| MootBot | New Topic: queue status | 15:20 |
| barry | there are still a few long standing items in the queue over the sla | 15:20 |
| barry | i know stub's branch that jtv is reviewing will just take a while | 15:21 |
| barry | i'm not sure what the status is of adeuring's branch w/ jamesh | 15:21 |
| barry | gmb, salgado, BjornT what are the statuses of your older branches? | 15:21 |
| jtv | barry: stub's branch is also not completely finished yet. | 15:21 |
| intellectronica | barry: there's another branch of stub which danilo and i decided not to touch for now, since it a zope branch. i think stub should make arrangements for someone to review it | 15:22 |
| barry | jtv: should it be moved to work-in-progress then? | 15:22 |
| barry | intellectronica: is that stub/zope/devel? | 15:22 |
| jtv | barry: I'm not sure it matters much at this stage, it's an "interactive" review. | 15:22 |
| intellectronica | barry: BjornT is absent today, he's in meetings | 15:22 |
| gmb | barry: The needs-review* one is actually now a wip, I think, due to a discussion with mpt. I'll talk to abently about it later today. | 15:22 |
| intellectronica | barry: yes, that's the one | 15:22 |
| barry | jtv: okay, cool | 15:23 |
| flacoste | intellectronica: there is nothing in it! | 15:23 |
| intellectronica | flacoste: in that case, i don't mind reviewing it | 15:23 |
| barry | intellectronica: rs'ing it even :) | 15:23 |
| barry | gmb: thanks | 15:24 |
| barry | gmb: feel free to move it to wip if that's what it is | 15:24 |
| gmb | Sure. | 15:24 |
| barry | any other comments about the current queue? | 15:24 |
| sinzui | I think should remind developers to clear their merged branches from PendingReviews. | 15:24 |
| barry | sinzui: good point | 15:24 |
| gmb | sinzui: +1 | 15:25 |
| barry | [ACTION] barry will remind developers to clear merged branches from PR | 15:25 |
| MootBot | ACTION received: barry will remind developers to clear merged branches from PR | 15:25 |
| barry | 5 | 15:25 |
| barry | 4 | 15:25 |
| barry | 3 | 15:25 |
| barry | 2 | 15:25 |
| barry | 1 | 15:25 |
| barry | [TOPIC] mentoring update | 15:25 |
| MootBot | New Topic: mentoring update | 15:25 |
| barry | * allenap mentored by bac | 15:25 |
| barry | * bigjools mentored by barry | 15:25 |
| barry | we have new victim^H^H^H^H^H^Hrecruits... yay! | 15:26 |
| barry | and hopefully one more for next cycle | 15:26 |
| gmb | Cool. Even more on-call coverage. | 15:26 |
| bigjools | I am not starting until Feb 4 though | 15:26 |
| bac | i would like to talk to someone off-line about how mentoring and on-call work. | 15:26 |
| barry | if anybody feels like they could mentor someone, let me know | 15:26 |
| barry | bac: maybe we can chat about that next week f2f? | 15:27 |
| barry | bigjools: yep | 15:27 |
| bac | barry: good idea | 15:27 |
| barry | also, any mentors who feel their recruits are ready to graduate, please let me know | 15:27 |
| bigjools | and I am on leave the following week :) | 15:27 |
| barry | bigjools: cool. just means more piling up for you when you get back :) | 15:28 |
| bigjools | barry: in more ways than you can imagine | 15:28 |
| barry | moving on because we only have 15 minutes and lots more to cover :/ | 15:28 |
| barry | [TOPIC] review process | 15:28 |
| MootBot | New Topic: review process | 15:28 |
| barry | i'll do the quick ones first (hopefully) | 15:29 |
| barry | * SteveA (or barry), use of properties instead of `__call__` in TALES | 15:29 |
| barry | * SteveA (or barry), use of raw strings for regexps only | 15:29 |
| barry | steve asked me to communicate two coding policies, if we all agree | 15:29 |
| barry | i'll bring these up on the m.l. but briefly... | 15:29 |
| barry | we want to discourage __call__ in TALES in favor of properties | 15:30 |
| barry | and we want to discourage the use of raw strings for anything except regexp patterns | 15:30 |
| barry | does anybody not know what those mean? | 15:30 |
| allenap | barry: Can you explain the reasons? | 15:30 |
| barry | allenap: i think it's a consistency thing and easy of reading for #1 | 15:31 |
| barry | for #2, steve observed cargo culting of raw strings in places where they weren't needed | 15:31 |
| flacoste | i'm all for #2 | 15:31 |
| intellectronica | barry: actually, there's a more important reason for #1 | 15:31 |
| barry | so suggested that devs may not understand what raw strings are for | 15:31 |
| danilos | if we're ever to go into localising launchpad, we'll have to get more raw strings in views (as compared to page templates) | 15:32 |
| barry | and suggested that a good rule of thumb is to always use them for regexps and never for anything else | 15:32 |
| flacoste | and i usually don't mind #1 | 15:32 |
| intellectronica | because of the way zope traverses in expressions | 15:32 |
| sinzui | barry: +1 | 15:32 |
| barry | (although it would be good to explain why raw strings are in python of course) | 15:32 |
| barry | intellectronica: go ahead... | 15:32 |
| intellectronica | zope traverses properties, but stops at the result of a method call | 15:32 |
| barry | danilos: we can cross that bridge when we get there :) | 15:32 |
| flacoste | actually | 15:32 |
| intellectronica | so my_object/my_property/an_attribute is fine | 15:33 |
| danilos | other than that, parsing specially formatted textual files like PO files requires a lot of hard-coded strings as well | 15:33 |
| intellectronica | but my_object/result_of_method_call/an_attribute doesn't work | 15:33 |
| flacoste | i think what #1 is about is not to use method call in TALES | 15:33 |
| danilos | flacoste: that's how I read it as well | 15:33 |
| intellectronica | oh, in that case i don't understand | 15:33 |
| barry | danilos: exceptions are okay, if you really need them, but reviewers should scrutinize raw string usage carefully | 15:34 |
| flacoste | because TALES will always implicitely call the end result | 15:34 |
| flacoste | that's why there is no nocall: expression | 15:34 |
| danilos | barry: ok, point taken, we should probably take the discussion on-list | 15:34 |
| barry | danilos: +1 | 15:34 |
| bac | barry: are you proposing raw strings used nowhere but regex AND regex must use raw strings? or just the former? | 15:34 |
| barry | [ACTION] barry to take raw string coding standard to the ml | 15:35 |
| MootBot | ACTION received: barry to take raw string coding standard to the ml | 15:35 |
| barry | bac: both | 15:35 |
| barry | intellectronica: would you like to bring up the __call__ thing on the ml? | 15:36 |
| intellectronica | barry: if flacoste is right then i have no idea what it's about - i rather have someone else clarify first | 15:36 |
| danilos | btw, does the no string rule include docstrings? ;) | 15:36 |
| * danilos runs away... | 15:37 | |
| barry | intellectronica: okay. i'll ask SteveA to do it since he brought it up :) | 15:37 |
| barry | danilos: we'll take that to the ml | 15:37 |
| barry | moving on since i really want to get to sinzui's item | 15:37 |
| barry | * on-callers use PendingReviews? | 15:37 |
| sinzui | \o/ | 15:37 |
| barry | i just want to take a quick vote and we can discuss more on the ml | 15:38 |
| barry | [VOTE] do you as an on-caller want to use PR +1 or not -1? | 15:38 |
| MootBot | Please vote on: do you as an on-caller want to use PR +1 or not -1?. | 15:38 |
| MootBot | Public votes can be registered by saying +1/-1/+0 in the channel, private votes by messaging the channel followed by +1/-1/+0 to MootBot | 15:38 |
| MootBot | E.g. /msg MootBot +1 #launchpad-meeting | 15:38 |
| flacoste | +0 | 15:38 |
| MootBot | Abstention received from flacoste. 0 for, 0 against. 1 have abstained. Count is now 0 | 15:38 |
| barry | +1 | 15:38 |
| MootBot | +1 received from barry. 1 for, 0 against. 1 have abstained. Count is now 1 | 15:38 |
| bac | -0 | 15:38 |
| bigjools | -1 | 15:38 |
| gmb | -1 | 15:38 |
| MootBot | -1 received from bigjools. 1 for, 1 against. 1 have abstained. Count is now 0 | 15:38 |
| MootBot | -1 received from gmb. 1 for, 2 against. 1 have abstained. Count is now -1 | 15:38 |
| bac | +0 | 15:38 |
| MootBot | Abstention received from bac. 1 for, 2 against. 2 have abstained. Count is now -1 | 15:38 |
| intellectronica | +1 | 15:38 |
| MootBot | +1 received from intellectronica. 2 for, 2 against. 2 have abstained. Count is now 0 | 15:38 |
| danilos | -1 (when I'm provided with enough of the relevant information) | 15:38 |
| MootBot | -1 received from danilos. 2 for, 3 against. 2 have abstained. Count is now -1 | 15:39 |
| sinzui | +0 | 15:39 |
| MootBot | Abstention received from sinzui. 2 for, 3 against. 3 have abstained. Count is now -1 | 15:39 |
| statik | +0 | 15:39 |
| MootBot | Abstention received from statik. 2 for, 3 against. 4 have abstained. Count is now -1 | 15:39 |
| barry | cool, thanks for the feedback | 15:39 |
| intellectronica | i think that while PR sucks, the solution is to replace it with something better, not to give up on tracking reviews | 15:39 |
| bigjools | I would like to point out that the whole point of on-call is to speed up reviews after the Lean training suggested we do 1-day branches. If PR is needed for tracking, the branch is too big to do an on-call. | 15:39 |
| gmb | bigjools: Agreed. | 15:40 |
| intellectronica | bigjools: not so. unless there's exceptional load, almost everything can be done on call | 15:40 |
| bigjools | also true - so anything requiring PR is too big... | 15:40 |
| bac | yes, if a branch is handled during the on-call day, then no need for PR. throw it in PR if size of the branch or problems lead to it not being completed during the cycle. | 15:40 |
| barry | btw, i like it mostly for the pending-reviews page | 15:40 |
| barry | okay, sorry to cut this short. we'll continue discussion on the ml. | 15:41 |
| barry | [TOPIC] * On-call reviews | 15:41 |
| MootBot | Vote is in progress. Finishing now. | 15:41 |
| MootBot | Final result is 2 for, 3 against. 4 abstained. Total: -1 | 15:41 |
| MootBot | New Topic: * On-call reviews | 15:41 |
| barry | * Keeping the time to around 8 hours | 15:41 |
| barry | sinzui: you have the floor, 3 minutes :) | 15:41 |
| sinzui | bigjools: Not necessarily. I am a slow reviewer. 600 lines is 3h for me. If you want something reviewed near the end of my day, I may need to take that branch up another day. | 15:42 |
| bigjools | sinzui: if it's near the end of the day, I don't submit for review | 15:42 |
| barry | sinzui: don't accept big branches near the end of your day | 15:43 |
| sinzui | Without PendingReviews, YOU would have to sit on your branch until another on-call reviewer is available. We also have a practice of reassigning branches at the end of the day. | 15:43 |
| danilos | sinzui: wasn't this about on-call reviews and not about non-on-call reviews? i.e. if you are not using on-call, you just put it onto PendingReviews | 15:44 |
| barry | sinzui: i thought you were going to mention that you spend 20 hours doing reviews last week | 15:44 |
| sinzui | barry: It's not that simple, Some branches arrive, and run out to be needs-reply, and a conversation in IRC is not going to fix that | 15:44 |
| barry | sinzui: true | 15:45 |
| * sinzui appologises for the confusion, I was actually responding to a remark on IRC /before/ I was given the floor. | 15:45 | |
| barry | well, we've run out of time. sinzui can we take this to the ml? | 15:46 |
| barry | sorry about that :( | 15:46 |
| sinzui | I will | 15:46 |
| barry | sinzui: thanks! | 15:46 |
| barry | #endmeeting | 15:46 |
| MootBot | Meeting finished at 15:46. | 15:46 |
| barry | thanks everyone | 15:46 |
| bigjools | thanks barry | 15:46 |
| intellectronica | thanks barry | 15:46 |
| === salgado-lunch is now known as salgado | ||
| === salgado is now known as salgado-brb | ||
| === salgado-brb is now known as salgado | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!