[09:50] <armin76> Ubulette: looks like it's cairo...
[09:52] <asac_the_2nd> ole
[09:52] <armin76> hi asac
[09:52] <asac_the_2nd> whats going on :)?
[09:53] <armin76> http://omploader.org/vYjN6
[09:53] <armin76> http://dev.gentoo.org/~maekke/ff3.png
[09:54] <asac_the_2nd> whats wrong with that?
[09:54] <armin76> zoom
[09:54] <armin76> it autozooms
[09:54] <armin76> and as you can see, the icons of the browser look ugly as well
[09:55] <asac_the_2nd> the icons are from winstripe theme? or is that native?
[09:55] <armin76> gnome
[09:56] <asac_the_2nd> the shading is ugly?
[09:56] <asac_the_2nd> oir what do you mean?
[09:57] <armin76> i mean that the icons are zoomed as well
[09:57] <asac_the_2nd> ah
[09:57] <armin76> and the zooming is auto
[09:57] <armin76> ctrl+0 doesn't fix it
[09:58] <armin76> doesn't happen with the binary from mozilla.org
[09:58] <armin76> so i've disabled using system cairo, and the guy told me it's fixed
[09:58] <armin76> cairo upstream doesn't like the mozilla hacks :(
[09:58] <asac_the_2nd> cairo is ahead of what mozilla ships?
[09:58] <armin76> yeah
[09:59] <armin76> mozilla ships an snapshot of 1.5.2, and latest is 1.5.6
[09:59] <armin76> http://dev.gentoo.org/~leio/firefox3-rendering.png
[10:00] <armin76> without patching it, that's what you get
[10:00] <armin76> you have to do the 24 -> 8 thing
[10:00] <armin76> but cairo upstream is not happy with that hack
[10:01] <asac_the_2nd> yeah ... cairo is crazy anyway ... i remember that when 1.4.0 came out it didn't have much in common with the latest 1.3.x version
[10:01] <armin76> http://dev.gentoo.org/~maekke/ff3.png
[10:01] <armin76> i have that problem now
[10:01] <asac_the_2nd> hmm
[10:01] <armin76> the zooming one and the bad rendering it's fixed when using internal cairo
[10:02] <asac_the_2nd> i think vlad told me that they will take the 24x8 patch
[10:02] <armin76> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=669262
[10:03] <asac_the_2nd> thanks
[10:04] <asac_the_2nd> i will bug our X guy
[10:04] <armin76> i think it's due to xorg
[10:04] <armin76> have to check it
[10:05] <armin76> have to check first the unaligned access patch...
[10:07] <asac_the_2nd> where did you get that from?
[10:09] <armin76> the patch from my bug
[10:09] <asac_the_2nd> gentoo should dump sparc :-P
[10:09] <armin76> mozilla bug 413143
[10:09] <ubotu> Mozilla bug 413143 in ImageLib "trunk is broken(sigbus) on SPARC since 20071221" [Normal,Assigned] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413143
[10:09] <asac_the_2nd> better focus on m68k :)
[10:10] <armin76> there's m68k as well :P
[10:11] <armin76> http://rafb.net/p/dAl4dM26.html
[10:11] <asac_the_2nd> i know ... thats why i said "focus" :)
[10:12] <asac_the_2nd> at leastyou appear not to care if all packages are available on all archs before releasing
[10:13] <armin76> because we test them :P
[10:13] <asac_the_2nd> what the hell is ppc-macos
[10:13] <asac_the_2nd> ?
[10:13] <asac_the_2nd> older ppc ?
[10:14] <armin76> err, no
[10:14] <armin76> using portage on macos
[10:15] <asac_the_2nd> and sh?
[10:16] <armin76> superh
[10:16] <armin76> dreamcast? :P
[10:17] <armin76> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gentoo-alt/prefix/index.xml
[10:17] <armin76> i've seen a lot of keywords, like ~ia64-hpux, ~macos-x86, ~x86-solaris, etc etc
[10:18] <armin76> but they're not in the main tree, in fact ppc-macos is getting moved from the tree to the overlay
[10:18] <asac_the_2nd> sounds reasonable :)
[10:21] <armin76> Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz)
 haubi * r15925 proj/alt/trunk/prefix-overlay/dev-libs/expat/ (Manifest expat-2.0.1.ebuild):
 fixed for and keyworded ~x86-interix
[10:21] <armin76> wtf is interix? :D
[10:24] <asac_the_2nd> jimmy_: i thought it doesn't matter which distribution is currently named in changelog ... so why do you always go back to gaston in git?
[10:25] <asac_the_2nd> jimmy_: in the end i don't mind, just wondering.
[10:26] <asac_the_2nd> i can just mindmap gaston == UNRELEASED :)
[11:44] <armin76> asac_the_2nd: Ubulette: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=669262 <- seems to happen only with latest xorg
[11:44] <armin76> in gentoo we have 1.3 stable, and this doesn't happen
[11:49] <asac_the_2nd> armin76: one of our X guys sent it upstream
[11:49] <asac_the_2nd> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/+bug/182038
[11:49] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 182038 in xserver-xorg-video-nv "Black rectangle instead of image in FF3 [Hardy]" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[19:28] <Ubulette> hi
[19:29] <armin76> yo
[19:29] <armin76> Ubulette: you know the black rectangles stuff?
[19:30] <armin76> ubuntu bug 182038?
[19:30] <Ubulette> i don't see it using X drivers fglrx and nvidia
[19:30] <armin76> well, whatever
[19:30] <Ubulette> bug 182038
[19:30] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 182038 in xserver-xorg-video-nv "Black rectangle instead of image in FF3 [Hardy]" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/182038
[19:31] <armin76> i have an user with an i810, using open source driver
[19:31] <armin76> with 2.1.1 it's broken, with 2.2.2 it's not
[19:37] <Ubulette> 2.2.2 ?
[19:37] <Ubulette> xserver-xorg-video-nv | 1:2.1.6-1ubuntu1 | http://archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Sources
[19:37] <Ubulette> we have 2.1.6
[19:37] <armin76> i'm talking about i810 :P
[19:37] <Ubulette> oh
[22:56] <saivann> asac : if you're here : I didn't have any news from the upstream translator for sunbird and lightning-extension for mk locale, did he send you something?