=== bigon is now known as bigon` | ||
=== bigon` is now known as bigon | ||
=== bigon is now known as bigon` | ||
spiv | Hmm, I just got an OOPS when filing a bug. | 00:24 |
---|---|---|
spiv | OOPS-759EA12 | 00:24 |
kiko | spiv, known bug, use launchpad until edge is refreshed | 00:25 |
spiv | kiko: ta | 00:25 |
kiko | it's fixed already btw -- an issue with the attachments | 00:26 |
spiv | Yeah, I saw the traceback. It looked pretty shallow. | 00:26 |
spiv | (I'm a bit surprised it passed the test suite, but I assume that's already been investigated) | 00:27 |
kiko | well, the issue is that testbrowser doesn't simulate a browser very well in this case | 00:27 |
spiv | Ah. | 00:27 |
kiko | it doesn't send the field for an empty field input; a regular browser sends an empty string (usually) | 00:27 |
spiv | Heh, productino just gave me a timeout on the same report :P | 00:28 |
spiv | (OOPS-759E73) | 00:29 |
ubotu | https://devpad.canonical.com/~jamesh/oops.cgi/759E73 | 00:29 |
kiko | that's another problem | 00:29 |
kiko | reload! | 00:29 |
spiv | I already did, do you want another OOPS code? :P | 00:29 |
spiv | Fourth reload appears to be the charm. | 00:31 |
spiv | Next time I'll probably just use email... | 00:31 |
kiko | it's a problem we have to fix for this cycle | 00:31 |
kiko | anyway | 00:31 |
=== kiko is now known as kiko-zzz | ||
spiv | kiko-zzz: g'night | 00:32 |
Legendario | had the following error when uploading a package to my PPA and can't find out why: http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/53923/ | 00:43 |
Legendario | can anyone help me out? No one on the #ubuntu-motu could | 00:45 |
Legendario | before you guys ask me, that's the .dsc file: http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/53924/ | 00:45 |
cprov | Legendario: does your orig matches the one in ubuntu PRIMARY archive, https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/musictracker/0.4.1-1 ? | 00:51 |
=== bigon` is now known as bigon | ||
cprov | Legendario: also, you should use a version higher than the one published in ubuntu archive if you want the package to be easily installable. | 00:54 |
LaserJock | cprov: his package isn't in Ubuntu | 00:58 |
cprov | LaserJock: I know but PPA reuses origs from the primary archive. | 00:59 |
LaserJock | right, that's what I'm saying | 00:59 |
LaserJock | the orig isn't in Ubuntu | 01:00 |
LaserJock | so it shouldn't be an issue, right? | 01:00 |
LaserJock | oohhh, wait a sec | 01:02 |
LaserJock | it is in Ubuntu | 01:02 |
Legendario | sorry, but i am not understanding it... | 01:02 |
cprov | LaserJock: yes, it is in ubuntu | 01:03 |
LaserJock | it didn't show up in my search initially | 01:03 |
LaserJock | that changes everything | 01:03 |
cprov | Legendario: you have to use the same orig.tar.gz available in ubuntu for musictracker or bump the version of your (but AFAICS it's the same upstream) | 01:04 |
cprov | LaserJock: yup | 01:04 |
LaserJock | cprov: that's why #ubuntu-motu couldn't figure it out ;-) | 01:04 |
Legendario | the ppa rejects source files which are different from the one that can be on the launchpad. Is it right? | 01:04 |
LaserJock | Legendario: the PPA uses the .orig.tar.gz from Ubuntu if it exists | 01:05 |
cprov | Legendario: different contents for the same filename ... | 01:05 |
LaserJock | and it has to have the same Md5sum as your .orig.tar.gz | 01:05 |
cprov | Legendario: it's a feature, in fact, it allows you to save bandwidth and do not include the orig in you upload. | 01:06 |
LaserJock | Legendario: so just make sure to get the .orig.tar.gz from Launchpad when you're working on your package | 01:06 |
Legendario | LaserJock, if there is one on Launchpad, right? | 01:08 |
LaserJock | yep | 01:08 |
LaserJock | that's why I asked you 1.5 hrs ago if the package was already in Ubuntu :-) | 01:09 |
Legendario | LaserJock, the problem is that i often make a search on the launchpad home and just can't find something which is already there | 01:10 |
LaserJock | well, don't use the launchpad home search, that's your first problem :-) | 01:10 |
Legendario | what should i use? | 01:11 |
LaserJock | when you are looking for a package use https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/ | 01:11 |
Legendario | isn't it supposed to be shown on the search? | 01:11 |
LaserJock | not on the home page | 01:11 |
LaserJock | that's a search of projects, which is utterly confusing | 01:12 |
Legendario | ok. thanks | 01:18 |
Legendario | LaserJock, do i have to go through all the packaging process againg? | 01:23 |
Legendario | cprov, can u answer me this, please? | 01:24 |
cprov | Legendario: yes, the .diff, the DSC and .changes will be different | 01:24 |
cprov | Legendario: just replace the orig you had with the one you've downloaded from LP and run 'debuild -S' on you old unpackaged directory | 01:25 |
cprov | Legendario: yes, you don't need to upload the orig again (the the lack of '-sa' in the debuild line) | 01:26 |
Legendario | cprov, ok. that's easier than editing all the files on the /debian folder again... | 01:26 |
cprov | Legendario: yes, easier is good :) don't forget to tweak you version a bit otherwise apt won't be able to install it w/o modifying the repository priorities. | 01:28 |
cprov | Legendario: call it 0.4.1-2~ppa1 (higher than ubuntu version but lower than the next candidate) | 01:29 |
Legendario | the version on launchpad is on the hardy universe, is it right? | 01:33 |
Legendario | cprov | 01:36 |
cprov | Legendario: yes, check https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/musictracker/0.4.1-1 | 01:37 |
cprov | Legendario: but your PPA version will be overridden to 'main' component | 01:37 |
Legendario | cprov, i didn't understand. sorry. My version is the same 0.4.1, so how do i change the name of it? | 01:39 |
cprov | Legendario: you mean "change the version number" (the name word is confusing in this context) | 01:40 |
cprov | Legendario: change the entry in debian/changelog to the version you want. `dch` is your friend. | 01:41 |
Legendario | cprov, yes. the version number | 01:43 |
Legendario | cprov, could u try to explaim me better why is changing the version number necessary? | 02:09 |
cprov | Legendario: because if you have 2 packages with the same name & version apt wouldn't know which one to install | 02:12 |
Legendario | cprov, ok, thanks | 02:20 |
cprov | Legendario: np | 02:20 |
=== bigon is now known as bigon` | ||
ubotu | New bug: #186900 in rosetta "timeouts" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/186900 | 04:03 |
* jtv is off to lunch | 06:40 | |
=== \sh_away is now known as \sh | ||
=== \sh is now known as \sh_away | ||
Aloha | i can't run debuild -S because it complains about binary files being changed. how do i remedy this? | 08:14 |
=== doko_ is now known as doko | ||
RAOF | Don't modify binary files? | 08:16 |
Aloha | RAOF, um anyway to _fix_ it? ;) | 08:19 |
RAOF | Well, what is modifying the binary files? | 08:19 |
RAOF | What files are being modified? | 08:19 |
RAOF | It's often a good fallback to just unpack the upstream tarball over the top of your source package. | 08:20 |
Odd_Bloke | IIUC from #bzr, Aloha is the upstream. | 08:21 |
Aloha | yeah | 08:21 |
RAOF | Ooooooh, upstream bzr dev? Awesome :) | 08:21 |
Odd_Bloke | Not for bzr, for whatever it is that he's packaging. | 08:22 |
Odd_Bloke | Again, IIUC. :p | 08:22 |
Aloha | whats IIUC? | 08:22 |
RAOF | So, the problem is: a package is basically the original tarball + a patch to that (which contains the debian directory). When constructing that patch, dpkg-buildpackage will fail if there's a binary file in your source package tree that is different to the one found in the original tarball. | 08:23 |
Aloha | yeah | 08:23 |
Aloha | im wondering where to go from there | 08:24 |
RAOF | Well, what binaries are in the upstream tarball? | 08:24 |
RAOF | (This is a trick question ;)) | 08:24 |
RAOF | And why have you changed them? | 08:25 |
Aloha | because i am editing the code | 08:25 |
Odd_Bloke | Aloha: If I Understand Correctly | 08:26 |
Aloha | binaries are graphic files used in the program | 08:26 |
RAOF | Aloha: Aaah, right. | 08:26 |
RAOF | So, you probably want to uuencode the images. | 08:26 |
Aloha | why? i have a dh_install that moves them to /usr/share/pixmaps | 08:26 |
RAOF | Which will convert them to text. | 08:26 |
RAOF | Aloha: Because you can't add or change binary files in the packaging? :) | 08:27 |
Aloha | oh | 08:27 |
Aloha | why not? | 08:27 |
RAOF | Because dpkg cannot represent binary diffs. | 08:27 |
Aloha | gotcha. that makes sense | 08:27 |
RAOF | And all the things you change/add in the tarball are stored in a gzipped diff. | 08:28 |
Aloha | it also complains about .bzr directory cause i started controlling with bzr after i created first package | 08:28 |
Aloha | maybe i shouldjust tarball my current directory and dh_make that | 08:29 |
RAOF | Aloha: What sort of project is it? | 08:29 |
RAOF | As you're upstream, you should be aware that people will expect certain things from release tarballs. Such as not having .bzr directories in them :) | 08:29 |
Aloha | RAOF, simple ruby/gtk program | 08:30 |
RAOF | So your build system is pretty simple. Do you have any build system at all? | 08:30 |
Aloha | RAOF, ok can i automate that or just remove .bzr from source release? | 08:30 |
Aloha | RAOF, nope i just use dh_install for images and one shell script and a .desktop file | 08:31 |
RAOF | Just remove .bzr from your source release. | 08:31 |
mpt | Goooooooood morning Launchpadders! | 08:32 |
Aloha | RAOF, so i guess re tarballing and running dh_make on it is best bet yeah? | 08:32 |
RAOF | Yeah. Or just copying your existing debian directory. | 08:33 |
Aloha | mpt, its only 10:30pm here ;) | 08:33 |
Aloha | RAOF, oh into existing tarball? didn't even think of that heh | 08:33 |
RAOF | That shouldn't be in your release tarball - unless this package will only ever be useful for Ubuntu, you shouldn't make it unnecessarily difficult for other distributions to use your code :) | 08:34 |
mtaylor | Aloha: the bzr-builddeb I was discussing earlier will make you tarballs withouth .bzr dirs and stuff | 08:34 |
Aloha | RAOF, im not trying to make a release tarball im just trying to use debuild -S to generate .changes file so i can upload to PPA | 08:35 |
Aloha | mtaylor, cool thnx | 08:35 |
mpt | Aloha, Samoa? Tuvalu? | 08:37 |
Aloha | mpt, you mean my location? | 08:37 |
Aloha | mpt, well... the name will give you a hint ;) | 08:37 |
Aloha | RAOF, cool i just added files to original tarball and it worked. thnx | 08:40 |
Aloha | ppa said it might reject it due to it tryng to upload new original tarball.. i guess i'll wait and see | 08:42 |
mpt | Aloha, ah, aloha ahiahi | 08:45 |
* Aloha likes ahi poke | 08:46 | |
Aloha | dang | 08:49 |
Aloha | it rejected it | 08:50 |
Aloha | should i have a seperate build and packaging directory? | 08:54 |
Aloha | mrevell, hihi :) | 08:57 |
mrevell | Aloha: Aloha! | 08:57 |
Hobbsee | mrevell! | 08:58 |
mrevell | Hobbsee: Howdy | 08:58 |
Aloha | how i do upgrade my code from 0.1 to 0.2? | 09:11 |
Aloha | i renamed the directory, created a new tarball and edited the changelog. is that the right way to do it? | 09:12 |
=== kiko-zzz is now known as kiko | ||
=== Ubulette_ is now known as Ubulette | ||
Hobbsee | mpt: yes, there is a bug. | 11:34 |
mpt | Hobbsee, what? | 11:41 |
Hobbsee | mpt: you asked me a couple of days ago if there was a bug for the lack of a queue UI for ppa. | 11:42 |
Hobbsee | the answer is yes, there is | 11:42 |
mpt | ok | 11:42 |
mpt | well, obviously, I know it's a bug, I think I aasked whether it was reported :-) | 11:43 |
Hobbsee | mpt: that's what i was answering. yes there is :) | 11:43 |
Hobbsee | mpt: (https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/soyuz/+bug/155758) | 11:46 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 155758 in soyuz "Global PPA +builds would be useful" [Medium,Confirmed] - Assigned to Julian Edwards (julian-edwards) | 11:46 |
mpt | thanks | 11:52 |
ubotu | New bug: #187013 in malone ""You have been subscribed to this bug" is misleading if you subscribed yourself" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/187013 | 12:00 |
=== bigon` is now known as bigon | ||
ubotu | New bug: #187018 in launchpad "html links to older source files are pointing to nowhere" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/187018 | 12:21 |
Hobbsee | dupe | 12:41 |
Hobbsee | i thought they fixed that. | 12:41 |
Hobbsee | Fujitsu: what's the master bug # for that? | 12:41 |
kiko | one of my favorite bugs is making that stop 404ing | 12:43 |
Hobbsee | doko: there is no current solutions to that | 12:43 |
Hobbsee | kiko: oh? | 12:43 |
Hobbsee | s/solutions/solution/ | 12:43 |
kiko | yeah, it's a bug that the page is 404ed | 12:44 |
ubotu | New bug: #187028 in launchpad "The count by launchpad page id should display 0 instead of None and the section moved below the initial stats" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/187028 | 12:45 |
Fujitsu | Hobbsee, doko: You can find old sources through the queue. | 12:46 |
* Fujitsu digs up the bug number. | 12:46 | |
Hobbsee | Fujitsu: you can? | 12:46 |
Fujitsu | Hobbsee: I've done it, so I presume so. | 12:47 |
Hobbsee | nice | 12:47 |
Fujitsu | Bug #179028 | 12:47 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 179028 in soyuz "+files doesn't work for removed SPRs" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/179028 - Assigned to Celso Providelo (cprov) | 12:48 |
ubotu | New bug: #187031 in malone "Adding an attachment when filing a bug should only send out one email notification" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/187031 | 12:56 |
ubotu | New bug: #187033 in launchpad "Use color codes for oops reports" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/187033 | 13:01 |
ubotu | New bug: #187036 in launchpad "Oops reports should aim to report in the first few lines of the report the most interesting information" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/187036 | 13:20 |
=== \sh_away is now known as \sh | ||
=== bigon is now known as bigon` | ||
=== bigon` is now known as bigon | ||
=== matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch | ||
=== kiko is now known as kiko-fud | ||
=== kiko-fud is now known as kiko | ||
ubotu | New bug: #187093 in launchpad "Unable to unsubscribe a user from an "Answer"" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/187093 | 16:15 |
=== matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara | ||
=== hexmode` is now known as hexmode | ||
alex-weej | is bug dependency on the todo list for launchpad or is it intentionally omitted? | 17:01 |
kiko | alex-weej, it's kinda intentionally omitted, but we'd like to be able to indicate 'related bugs" | 17:14 |
alex-weej | hm | 17:17 |
alex-weej | the dependency system with blueprints is pretty good | 17:17 |
alex-weej | and it's a good way to track abstract higher level problems | 17:17 |
kiko | and I think that's the right level of granularity for dependency | 17:23 |
kiko | bugs, they are usually much finer-grained | 17:23 |
lbm | i am still not able to merge my accounts | 18:18 |
lbm | OOPS-759D2129 | 18:18 |
ubotu | https://devpad.canonical.com/~jamesh/oops.cgi/759D2129 | 18:18 |
kiko | lbm, hmmmm. ping me in 5 minutes. | 18:19 |
lbm | kiko, i will do that, thanks | 18:19 |
kiko | when's the first you tried lbm? | 18:19 |
lbm | well, the merge token was mailed to me september last year | 18:20 |
lbm | 25th | 18:20 |
lbm | i've tried well, like 10 times since afair | 18:21 |
kiko | lbm, wow, why didn't you say so before. | 18:28 |
lbm | kiko, well i mentioned it inhere in september :) | 18:29 |
lbm | but i forgot about it | 18:29 |
matsubara | kiko: is it related to bug 162510? | 18:31 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 162510 in launchpad "Merging people times out updating POSubmission and POMsgSet" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/162510 | 18:31 |
kiko | matsubara, in this case it's TranslationMessage | 18:32 |
kiko | but yes. | 18:32 |
kiko | similar | 18:32 |
kiko | lbm, I'm going to run parts of the merge manually with mthaddon | 18:32 |
kiko | lbm, when that sort of thing happens, please ask a question in answers.l.n | 18:32 |
kiko | lbm, please retry. if it times out, give me the OOPS code again. | 18:33 |
matsubara | kiko: there's no posubmission and pomsgset anymore | 18:33 |
kiko | matsubara, touché! you mock me in front of my enemies!!! | 18:33 |
lbm | kiko: i will do that | 18:34 |
lbm | "The accounts have been merged successfully." | 18:34 |
lbm | wuhu | 18:34 |
kiko | lbm, rock on | 18:34 |
kiko | thanks mthaddon, one more down! | 18:35 |
lbm | so, is everything merged or do you still need to do some manually? | 18:35 |
mthaddon | cool | 18:35 |
kiko | lbm, it's all good | 18:35 |
Laibsch | I am getted repeated rejects with "MD5 sum of uploaded file does not match existing file in archive. Files specified in DSC are broken or missing, skipping package unpack verification." | 18:36 |
lbm | i'm curious, what happened? | 18:36 |
Laibsch | I verified the md5sums and everything is OK | 18:36 |
lbm | kiko, thanks | 18:36 |
Laibsch | What is the likely problem? | 18:36 |
kiko | lbm, it timed out because you're such a prolific translator. :) | 18:36 |
lbm | kiko, oh, i guess that's a good thing :) | 18:38 |
=== salgado_ is now known as salgado | ||
=== matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk | ||
=== matsubara-afk is now known as matsubara | ||
=== salgado_ is now known as salgado | ||
=== \sh is now known as \sh_away | ||
arnetheduck | thumper, hi...the svn import for dcplusplus has been running for more than a week now - is that still normal+ | 20:29 |
=== hexmode` is now known as hexmode | ||
thumper | arnetheduck: it had failed with a connection error after days of running | 20:38 |
thumper | arnetheduck: I've poked it again, sometimes this helps | 20:39 |
arnetheduck | thumper, hm, sounds like that import tool could use some love then...for example to support partial imports (I guess it imports revision by revision to also get the history into bazaar)... | 20:49 |
thumper | arnetheduck: yes it does need some love | 20:50 |
arnetheduck | thumper, what is it written in / can it be downloaded? maybe I can to a quick patch... | 20:52 |
thumper | arnetheduck: it is the cscvs project on Launchpad | 20:52 |
kiko | arnetheduck, it does do partial imports, though | 20:53 |
kiko | thumper, arnetheduck: it's actually https://edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-cscvs | 20:54 |
thumper | yeah, the big hurdle is the initial import | 20:54 |
arnetheduck | kiko, well, it doesn't seem to be working very well - maybe it fails on the first import if all of the import doesn't go well? | 21:30 |
kiko | arnetheduck, right, that's exactly what happens. | 21:32 |
arnetheduck | kiko, right, that maybe makes sense if you run the script manually, but in the launchpad case where the script is run on schedule, wouldn't it make more sense to either get a few revisions at a time or a single revision at a time until it fails? | 21:35 |
arnetheduck | thumper, kiko, I though that script imported into bazaar whereas it seems to be made for cvs / arch? | 21:40 |
kiko | arnetheduck, don't read the README. it's actually for bzr. | 21:41 |
kiko | arnetheduck, as you see it needs some love. | 21:41 |
thumper | arnetheduck: it was originally in the dawn of time | 21:41 |
arnetheduck | so erm...why isn't something like bzr-svn used? | 21:42 |
arnetheduck | or svn2bzr? | 21:43 |
thumper | arnetheduck: histerical raisins, we are looking at other tools | 21:44 |
thumper | arnetheduck: right now though we are looking at better infrastructure to report failures, and improve communcition and information dissemination to people interested in imports | 21:45 |
kiko | arnetheduck, thumper: one of the problems with using svn2bzr is that it is not well-suited to continuous imports | 21:48 |
kiko | and bzr-svn only support svn, not CVS which is one of our targets | 21:48 |
kiko | migrating to a new system is also painful because the historical revision ids will be incompatible between systems | 21:48 |
arnetheduck | kiko, thumper, ouch, that script is really hairy, particularily since 90% seems to be aimed at things not having to do with bzr imports... | 21:58 |
* thumper ndos | 22:01 | |
* thumper nods | 22:01 | |
arnetheduck | thumper, can you give me the command line that is run on the initial import? | 22:02 |
thumper | arnetheduck: I'll have to go and look at it | 22:03 |
thumper | I don't know off the top of my head | 22:03 |
arnetheduck | thumper, I have no intentions of doing any big things on that script but this way maybe I can find a quick fix for the initial import issue at least... | 22:04 |
arnetheduck | thumper, gotta go, I'll be back later - if you happen to find that command line you're welcome to send it to duckspammer@gmail.com | 22:23 |
CarlFK | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+search?text=clearsilver lots of dups? ? | 22:25 |
ubotu | New bug: #187170 in launchpad "Message.owner is nullable" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/187170 | 22:25 |
=== kiko is now known as kiko-fud | ||
don_ | hi, somebody here? | 22:45 |
don_ | i have a question: is it possible to make a search/replace on a whole package translation? turns out there's one unappropriate word i repeatedly chose... | 22:46 |
Rinchen | don_, the easiest way I know of is to export the package, fix it, and then import it back in | 22:54 |
don_ | ah ok. i'll take a look at that (it's the dpgk, long one ) :) | 22:54 |
don_ | thanks though! | 22:54 |
don_ | btw: mi ĵus sendis retpoŝton al vi! | 22:55 |
Rinchen | don_, kaj mi ankxau vi! | 22:59 |
Rinchen | er | 22:59 |
Rinchen | al vi | 22:59 |
Rinchen | I am sooo out of practice. | 23:00 |
don_ | =) well, luckiliy it's easy to pick up :) | 23:00 |
don_ | jam respondis | 23:05 |
don_ | (mi) | 23:05 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!