Ubulette | lol "Upgraded the NSPR tag to NSPR_HEAD_20080129_PLUS_414997 for the fix for bug 414997. [a1.9b3=beltzner]" | 00:00 |
---|---|---|
cheguevara | ooh new icons in ff3 :P | 01:01 |
[reed] | yes :) | 01:09 |
Ubulette | where ? | 01:10 |
Ubulette | i'm sick of seamonkey. it runs fine from dist/bin but not after make install: Error: [Exception... "Component returned failure code: 0x80040154 (NS_ERROR_FACTORY_NOT_REGISTERED) [nsIDocShellHistory.useGlobalHistory]" nsresult: "0x80040154 (NS_ERROR_FACTORY_NOT_REGISTERED)" location: "JS frame :: chrome://global/content/bindings/browser.xml :: :: line 647" data: no] | 01:11 |
cheguevara | in options | 01:11 |
Ubulette | oohhh | 01:13 |
Ubulette | nice | 01:13 |
Ubulette | cheguevara, which build are you using ? | 01:14 |
cheguevara | your latest one | 01:14 |
cheguevara | the live rss icon is different as well i believe | 01:15 |
cheguevara | and loads of other ones | 01:15 |
Ubulette | does it look nice on kde now ? | 01:15 |
cheguevara | looks the same really | 01:17 |
cheguevara | and the new icons are very gtkish :P | 01:17 |
[reed] | there's zero KDE/Qt code | 01:18 |
[reed] | in Firefox | 01:18 |
[reed] | all because nobody wants to step up and own it | 01:18 |
Ubulette | i know but before, there was no icon at all making it look primitive to me | 01:18 |
Ubulette | at bit like mosaic 12 years ago | 01:19 |
cheguevara | lol | 01:19 |
cheguevara | [reed], yeah, novell were gonna work on it, but they were never gives cvs or gave up or something like that | 01:19 |
[reed] | their fault | 01:19 |
[reed] | you don't need CVS access to contribute | 01:20 |
[reed] | it's easy to get your patches checked-in | 01:20 |
[reed] | just got to write them! | 01:20 |
[reed] | and get review | 01:20 |
cheguevara | heh true | 01:20 |
cheguevara | with gtk-qt on kde 3 it works more or less acceptable | 01:20 |
cheguevara | on kde 4 its just plain old ugly | 01:21 |
cheguevara | very gray :P | 01:21 |
Ubulette | yeah, very gray is what i meant with mosaic. I should have said 15 years old, not 12. damn, it passes so fast. | 01:40 |
cheguevara | lol | 01:44 |
cheguevara | konqueror is still inferior though | 01:45 |
cheguevara | we'll see what happenes when its webkit :P | 01:45 |
[reed] | any gnome people you know? | 01:49 |
[reed] | that are familiar with moz code | 01:50 |
[reed] | where does chpe hang out? | 01:50 |
=== asac_ is now known as asac | ||
[reed] | asac: new NSPR branch | 03:11 |
[reed] | NSPR_HEAD_20080129_PLUS_414997 | 03:11 |
armin76 | [reed]: what about me!? :P | 10:06 |
asac | armin76: you can stay behind :) | 10:20 |
asac | mozilla bug 414997 | 10:21 |
ubotu | Mozilla bug 414997 in NSPR "PR_NewThreadPrivateIndex contract is violated by PR_CreateThread impls" [Major,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414997 | 10:21 |
asac | yay ... mozilla did a last minute landing for mozilla bug 413250 a few hours ago | 10:22 |
ubotu | Mozilla bug 413250 in General "chrome directory traversal (local disk access via "flat" addons)" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413250 | 10:22 |
asac | how unfortunate that i had the release bits ready :( | 10:22 |
asac | bug 175904 | 10:26 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 175904 in firefox-3.0 "Firefox-3.0 window moves to current workspace" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/175904 | 10:26 |
asac | [reed]: know a bug in bugzilla that matches bug 186771 ? | 10:27 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 186771 in firefox-3.0 "use more GTK stock icons." [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/186771 | 10:27 |
Ubulette | http://standblog.org/blog/post/2008/02/01/Firefox-market-share-in-Europe | 12:09 |
asac | france is behind :) | 12:11 |
Ubulette | i don't count, i block xiti | 12:15 |
cheguevara | lol | 12:15 |
Ubulette | FIREFOX_2_0_0_12_RC3 rc3... last minute fixes ? | 12:18 |
Ubulette | SEAMONKEY_1_1_8_RELEASE, no rc ? | 12:18 |
Ubulette | and no FIREFOX_3_0b3_RC1 yet :( | 12:19 |
asac | Ubulette: yes ... they landed another patch yesterday | 12:19 |
asac | i have to re-roll my QA packages and all | 12:20 |
asac | Ubulette: they moved all 3 beta 3 QA resources to get 2.0 fix out quick | 12:22 |
Ubulette | oh, ok, makes sense | 12:22 |
Ubulette | [reed], do you know if the <video> patch from Chris will land in ff3 before final ? | 12:29 |
cheguevara | w00t | 12:37 |
cheguevara | screen corruption in ff3 | 12:37 |
cheguevara | ... and its gone after minimize maximize | 12:38 |
asac | cheguevara: compiz enabled? | 12:45 |
cheguevara | nah | 12:45 |
cheguevara | compiz and kde are not great friends | 12:46 |
asac | which win manager does kde use btw? | 12:46 |
asac | is it metacity as well? | 12:46 |
cheguevara | no kwin | 12:46 |
asac | k | 12:46 |
cheguevara | i think its a driver issue | 12:51 |
cheguevara | xchat has occasional corruption as well | 12:51 |
asac | but exa vs xaa doesn't make a difference, right? | 12:52 |
cheguevara | not sure | 12:53 |
cheguevara | i got Option "AccelMethod" "xaa" | 12:53 |
cheguevara | because exa decreases performance for me | 12:53 |
asac | xaa is legacy though | 12:54 |
cheguevara | yeah but .24 kernel's drm doesn't have the bits to make exa work nicely | 12:57 |
cheguevara | they are in -mm to be merged for .25 | 12:57 |
cheguevara | Unfortunately, to make EXA performance better it needs the new memory manager upstream is working on (TTM). It's too intrusive for hardy, so we'll probably switch back to XAA after alpha3. | 13:01 |
cheguevara | meh | 13:01 |
cheguevara | i was so hoping it would be merged for ubuntu | 13:01 |
asac | have you asked on kernel ML? or our X maintainer about this particular issu? | 13:06 |
asac | cheguevara: ? | 13:06 |
cheguevara | yeah i think i should talk to someone, because leaving people with XAA in an LTS release is just wrong | 13:07 |
cheguevara | asac, whos the best to poke on irc | 13:07 |
asac | no idea ... start in user-space: bryce is the X maintainer | 13:08 |
asac | then on ubuntu-kernel i am not sure who currently does graphics driver stuff ... maybe mjg | 13:08 |
cheguevara | or BenC i guess | 13:08 |
asac | yes. but i think he isn't doing graphics on his own | 13:09 |
asac | but he should probably know | 13:10 |
cheguevara | yeah i'll try talking to X people first though | 13:10 |
asac | thank! keep me updated plz | 13:11 |
cheguevara | i will | 13:11 |
cheguevara | asac, do you have any machines with intel cards yourself? | 13:11 |
asac | unfortunately not | 13:12 |
asac | soonish i will, but not right now | 13:12 |
asac | but there should be plenty around in dev community | 13:12 |
asac | if youneed someone to confirm something | 13:12 |
cheguevara | yeah loads of laptops have them | 13:13 |
cheguevara | thats another reason i am so concerned about this | 13:13 |
Ubulette | http://www.osnews.com/story/19254 | 13:52 |
cheguevara | damn | 13:57 |
asac | hmmm ... yhoo + msft .. letts see | 13:59 |
asac | i am almost offline now pushing allsec balls again | 13:59 |
Ubulette | incremental changelog is too difficult to script because of merge conflicts | 14:32 |
Ubulette | it's not worth it | 14:33 |
asac | what are you talking about? | 14:35 |
Ubulette | i'm scripting my ppa uploads | 14:36 |
asac | ah | 14:37 |
Ubulette | asac, I guess you now want mozclient to do an embedded tarball for xul, right ? | 15:41 |
Ubulette | i don't understand why you used DEBIAN_MOZCLIENT_EMBEDDED while I've defined MOZCLIENT_EMBEDDED for that purpose | 15:44 |
Ubulette | oh, you set it afterwards. | 15:45 |
Ubulette | but why is it conditional ? it's a 1 line change in mozclient that I can add anytime | 15:46 |
Ubulette | and it's better to do your test the other way around, ie test if MOZCLIENT_EMBEDDED is set.. but that means really depends on mozilla-devscripts | 15:47 |
asac | Ubulette: i thought about those options. for me the contract of the package rules should be explicil and not implicit by what is included | 15:50 |
asac | usually it shouldn't be conditional ... i just want to build xulrunner for real uploads to use embedded layout because i now have lots of pain with those firefox tarballs | 15:51 |
asac | so adding automagic to detect whether a package is embedded or not should not be done in mozclient (e.g. dirty) | 15:51 |
Ubulette | ? I thought you preferred embedded tarballs | 15:51 |
asac | yes, but you don't... so i want to allow both options for those packages that have a huge amount of data | 15:52 |
asac | for small packages i don't care | 15:52 |
Ubulette | i don't care embedded or not, my pc is fast ;) if you want xul to be embedded, ok, no problem | 15:53 |
asac | (i see that non-embedded is better for development so i like to be able to change this for a single upload) | 15:53 |
asac | well ... for development not embedded is better ... we could make it embedded by default ... i don't care. i think we can keep it like its now. but if you have NIHS, go ahead and make it beautiful for your eyes;) | 15:57 |
Ubulette | NIHS ? | 15:58 |
asac | maybe we should just consolidate this ... e.g. use embedded everywhere, but allow to use not-embedded easily/explicitly | 15:59 |
asac | nevermind ;) | 16:00 |
raji | asac: you there? I have some input about adhoc network creation | 16:08 |
asac | raji go ahead | 16:09 |
asac | raji: will be outinj about 10 minutes for today ... you can write here ... or send mail then | 16:15 |
asac | (i will read this channel backlog when coming back) | 16:15 |
armin76 | asac: Ubulette you guys use glitz? | 16:40 |
Ubulette | nope | 16:40 |
shirish | Ubulette: hi | 16:44 |
Ubulette | hi | 16:45 |
raji | asac, in network manager code, nm-device-802-11-wireless.c , in nm_device_802_11_wireless_set_mode() method , iw_set_ext() is always returning errno 22, mode passed to that method is always 2 . I made the wpasupplicant use wext instead of madwifi. but when I look in the wpasupplicant code driver_wext.c, there is no iw_set_ext function, it is only available in driver_ndiswrapper.c, My... | 16:45 |
raji | ...question is what code this iw_set_ext executing, where it is found. ( I added the adhoc patch you suggested me to try, but the code is not hitting that path). | 16:46 |
shirish | Ubulette: did u give any thought to updating kazahakese (the browser) ? | 16:47 |
raji | asac, I used network-manager 0.6.5 , wpasupplicant 0.6.0+0.5.8 | 16:47 |
Ubulette | shirish, i didn't have time and as i'm not using it, it doesn't help :P | 16:48 |
shirish | Ubulette: how about giving a shot at elinks? | 16:49 |
shirish | Ubulette: i tried links2 the other day & that too is pretty sexy. | 16:49 |
Ubulette | links2 ? the text mode browser ? | 16:50 |
shirish | yup, do links2 -g & see the difference | 16:50 |
shirish | I dig it, although if it had javascript support it would be a scream. | 16:52 |
Ubulette | screenshots ? | 17:02 |
shirish | Ubulette: you want screenies of links2 in action? | 17:04 |
Ubulette | you said it's worth the look, show me :) | 17:04 |
shirish | ok here goes nothing | 17:04 |
shirish | know any good image-sharing site? | 17:08 |
shirish | which doesn't need a sign-up | 17:09 |
Ubulette | http://pix.nofrag.com/ | 17:12 |
shirish | sorry for that pidgin closed unexpectadly | 17:14 |
shirish | unexpectedly | 17:14 |
shirish | and now links2 -g does the same. | 17:15 |
shirish | Ubulette: i hope its ok if I send the screenie by mail | 17:17 |
shirish | Ubulette: you up buddy? | 19:02 |
shirish | or asac for that matter? | 19:02 |
shirish | I have filed a bug https://bugs..launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/188140 can somebody have a look at that? | 19:03 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 188140 in firefox "firefox crashed while surfing" [Undecided,New] | 19:03 |
asac | shirish: can you reproduce this? | 19:22 |
Ubulette | ff3 crashes a lot in the addons UI | 20:19 |
Ubulette | also in the bookmarks ui | 20:19 |
[reed] | how up-to-date are you? | 20:40 |
armin76 | Ubulette: http://patches.ubuntu.com/by-release/extracted/ubuntu/s/seamonkey/1.1.7+nobinonly-0ubuntu2/12_fix_ftbfs_with_nss.patch <- did you submit that upstream? | 21:29 |
Ubulette | no, last time i did for a similar patch, they told me they don't care about fixing that in the stable tree | 21:31 |
armin76 | rofl | 21:33 |
armin76 | [reed]: ^^ fix | 21:33 |
Ubulette | good, I've completed my script to update my ppa in a blink of an eye, merging branches, solving conflicts, rewriting deps and all automatically. | 21:49 |
Ubulette | let's see if it builds correctly now | 21:49 |
Ubulette | asac, do you install dom and venkman ? they are broken for me now. dom reports b2 instead of b3pre (strange) and venkman is not even listed | 21:52 |
DarkMageZ | hey guys, under firefox 3 (ubuntu hardy build). have any of you run across the issue where random parts of the gnome menu will be rendered inside the page? it's not malicious code at play. | 22:09 |
Ubulette | yes, several times | 22:09 |
DarkMageZ | is there an open bug? | 22:09 |
Ubulette | it seems to depend on the X driver | 22:09 |
Ubulette | maybe also on the AccelMethod, xaa vs exa | 22:10 |
DarkMageZ | i've been told (by a reliable source) that it happens under xorg's ati. i've personally just replicated it with fglrx. | 22:10 |
DarkMageZ | i'm using xaa (not that i have much choice). i'm not sure what he was running on ati | 22:11 |
Ubulette | i've got it too with fglrx; never with (non free) nvidia. people are reporting nv too | 22:12 |
Ubulette | we've got bug 182038 but it may be different | 22:14 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 182038 in xorg-server "Black rectangle instead of image in FF3 [Hardy]" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/182038 | 22:14 |
DarkMageZ | na, that's different | 22:15 |
DarkMageZ | i can replicate that one as well ? | 22:15 |
Ubulette | i can't find a dedicated bug for the corrupted display using part of the background, yet asac and me reproduced it easily before for sure | 22:18 |
Ubulette | i can't reproduce at home so i can't help. did/can you try with a nightly from mozilla, just to be sure it's not ubuntu's fault ? | 22:22 |
DarkMageZ | it takes a fair amount of effort for me to replicate | 22:24 |
DarkMageZ | like switching it to my primary browser and using it for everything for 2 weeks style. | 22:24 |
Ubulette | the corruption ? or the black rectangles ? | 22:24 |
DarkMageZ | corruption | 22:25 |
Ubulette | hm, the corruption we know is easy to trigger | 22:25 |
DarkMageZ | i don't know the trigger | 22:27 |
DarkMageZ | the black rectangles is easy to replicate ? | 22:27 |
Ubulette | Jan 31 12:13:15 <asac> http://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/corrupted.png | 22:28 |
DarkMageZ | tho the rectangles doesn't appear to happen on fglrx. only ati | 22:28 |
DarkMageZ | looks about right ? | 22:28 |
Ubulette | i've never seen the black thing myself on fglrx | 22:29 |
Ubulette | as for the corruption using the background, this site shows it 100% of the time: http://www.topachat.com/accueil/index.php | 22:30 |
Ubulette | i mean, for me with fglrx | 22:30 |
DarkMageZ | your testcase doesn't work here oddly enough | 22:31 |
[reed] | Ubulette: submit it upstream; cc me on the bug | 22:32 |
Ubulette | [reed], i can't right now (nvidia box). must do that from work (my ati box) | 22:33 |
[reed] | k | 22:33 |
DarkMageZ | Ubulette, something slightly interesting for your testcase. if it has already been replicated on another tab, then you open your testcase up in a tab then it doesn't happen. | 22:34 |
[reed] | Ubulette: I'm talking about http://patches.ubuntu.com/by-release/extracted/ubuntu/s/seamonkey/1.1.7+nobinonly-0ubuntu2/12_fix_ftbfs_with_nss.patch | 22:51 |
[reed] | of course | 22:51 |
Ubulette | oh | 22:51 |
Ubulette | i have this one more complete: http://patches.ubuntu.com/by-release/extracted/ubuntu/x/xulrunner/1.8.1.11-1ubuntu1/88_bz399589_fix_missing_symbol_with_new_nss.dpatch | 22:54 |
[reed] | file a bug on bmo | 22:54 |
Ubulette | part of it was fixed in trunk mozilla bug 399589 | 22:57 |
ubotu | Mozilla bug 399589 in Security: PSM "PSM + tip of NSS, error ‘SECAlgorithmIDTemplate’ not declared" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399589 | 22:57 |
[reed] | then file a bug on the other part | 22:57 |
Ubulette | but it's not fixed in the branches | 22:58 |
Ubulette | 1.8.* | 22:58 |
Ubulette | the issue starts when you use a recent nss with an old ff2/xul1.8/sm1/... | 22:58 |
[reed] | did the branches pick up a new NSS version? | 22:59 |
[reed] | ah, so, it's just a Linux problem | 22:59 |
Ubulette | system nss | 22:59 |
[reed] | yeah | 22:59 |
[reed] | ok | 22:59 |
[reed] | well, you could attach a branch patch, get review, and get it on the branch | 22:59 |
Ubulette | same bug ? | 22:59 |
[reed] | yeah | 22:59 |
[reed] | don't include the not-fixed part | 22:59 |
[reed] | just the SECAlgorithmIDTemplate stuff | 23:00 |
[reed] | but on the branch | 23:00 |
[reed] | well | 23:00 |
[reed] | check if the patch in the bug applies first | 23:00 |
[reed] | if it applies on the branch without conflict, you can just request approval on it | 23:00 |
[reed] | if it doesn't apply, make a new patch, attach to bug, get review from kaie, and then request approval | 23:00 |
Ubulette | just tested against ff 2.0.0.12rc3, still perfect | 23:09 |
Ubulette | should I say 1.8 or 1.8.1 for the branch ? | 23:12 |
Ubulette | [reed], ^^ | 23:13 |
[reed] | 1.8 | 23:13 |
[reed] | so, you should request approval1.8.1.13 | 23:13 |
[reed] | on the patch | 23:13 |
[reed] | and explain why you need it | 23:13 |
Ubulette | oops; too late | 23:15 |
Ubulette | kaie didn't pass. | 23:17 |
Ubulette | :kaie ? | 23:17 |
Ubulette | or what? | 23:18 |
Ubulette | [reed], ^^ | 23:22 |
[reed] | ? | 23:22 |
[reed] | wait, what? | 23:22 |
[reed] | the patch in the bug applies on the branch fine, right? | 23:22 |
[reed] | or are you attaching a new bug? | 23:22 |
[reed] | er | 23:22 |
Ubulette | review is empty, i used kaie | 23:22 |
[reed] | s/new bug/new patch/ | 23:22 |
Ubulette | https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399589 | 23:23 |
ubotu | Mozilla bug 399589 in Security: PSM "PSM + tip of NSS, error ‘SECAlgorithmIDTemplate’ not declared" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] | 23:23 |
[reed] | ah | 23:23 |
[reed] | use kengert@redhat.com | 23:23 |
Ubulette | so it's kengert now | 23:24 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!