| === keffie_jayx is now known as effie_jayx | ||
| eddyMul | after dput-ing to my PPA, I kept getting "MD5 sum of uploaded file does not match existing file in archive". Browsing under http://ppa.launchpad.net/eddymul/ubuntu/pool/main/ showed older files. How can I delete these? | 02:34 |
|---|---|---|
| jamesh | eddyMul: you should use different version numbers if you are rebuilding a package | 02:36 |
| eddyMul | jamesh: so I should increment the ppa number? | 02:36 |
| jamesh | eddyMul: which file did not match? | 02:36 |
| eddyMul | jamesh: the (debian) diff.gz | 02:37 |
| eddyMul | jamesh: I'll try incrementing the +ppan | 02:37 |
| jamesh | eddyMul: Okay. You should be incrementing the package release number when rolling a new package, yes. | 02:38 |
| jamesh | eddyMul: the new build will supersede the existing package, causing it to be removed from the archive after a bit. | 02:38 |
| eddyMul | i c | 02:39 |
| eddyMul | jamesh: thanx. I'll do that | 02:39 |
| jamesh | eddyMul: if you were able to upload new packages with the same version number, how would apt know that it needs to install the update? | 02:39 |
| eddyMul | jamesh: If I understand correctly, this time, I don't need to dput the orig.tar.gz. Am I right? | 02:40 |
| jamesh | eddyMul: nope. | 02:40 |
| jamesh | only when you are building with a new .orig.tar.gz | 02:40 |
| eddyMul | jamesh: apt: I was hoping to keep changing +ppa1, but I guess that's bad for users other than me.... | 02:40 |
| eddyMul | any advice to tell debuild to not package the emacs backup files (*~) ? | 02:43 |
| mtaylor | eddyMul: are you using bzr at all? | 02:44 |
| mtaylor | eddyMul: if so, you can use bzr-builddeb and it'll not package up that stuff | 02:44 |
| mtaylor | eddyMul: otherwise, you can put something like this: | 02:45 |
| mtaylor | DEBUILD_DPKG_BUILDPACKAGE_OPTS="-i -rfakeroot -ICVS -I.svn -I.bzr -ISCCS" | 02:45 |
| mtaylor | in ~/.devscripts | 02:45 |
| mtaylor | and add an -I*~ or something, I belive | 02:45 |
| eddyMul | mtaylor: thanks for the env. variables. I will try that. | 02:46 |
| mtaylor | eddyMul: cool.... it's not an env var, though | 03:05 |
| eddyMul | mtaylor: ah. it's a config file setting. thanx for pointing that out. :p | 03:10 |
| mtaylor | :) | 03:10 |
| === Pricey is now known as PriceChild | ||
| gryc | Is there any way to tell the ppa build servers to not even bother building my package on the lpia architecture? | 03:46 |
| RAOF | Yup. You can say "i386 amd64" rather than "any" for your arch field. | 03:47 |
| jamesh | gryc: why do you care if your package is built for lpia or not? | 03:48 |
| jamesh | it shouldn't affect the speed of builds on the other architectures | 03:48 |
| gryc | apparently mono isnt available for it | 03:48 |
| jamesh | ah. | 03:48 |
| jamesh | I wonder why not? | 03:49 |
| gryc | and I dont want to waste 3-4 minutes on something I know isnt going to build :P | 03:49 |
| jamesh | lpia is basically just x86 with different optimisation, iirc | 03:49 |
| gryc | oh, oops, looks like a misconfiguration in my rules file on my part >.<; | 03:51 |
| dhart | hi. does anyone know if super-projects can be nested? (i.e. a super-project belong to a super-project) | 03:52 |
| jamesh | dhart: we don't support that at the moment | 03:52 |
| dhart | ok thanks. I'm about to create some projects and just wanted to know. | 03:53 |
| mtaylor | I've got several things that don't build on lpia | 04:53 |
| mtaylor | I haven't sorted it out yet myself | 04:53 |
| === mtaylor is now known as mtaylor|zzz | ||
| === fabbione is now known as thegodfather | ||
| === fabbione is now known as thegodfather | ||
| victory747 | Hi. I was pointing someone to launchpad instead of sourceforge to consider for their project, but he says launchpad is missing things he needs, such as a way of uploading nightly builds, automatically updating a web site, etc. In fact, it seems launchpad doesn't have mailing lists, forums, or any way to release software except for ppa which is ubuntu specific. | 06:35 |
| victory747 | Launchpad doesn't seem to have space for project web pages. | 06:35 |
| jamesh | victory747: we don't currently provide project web space, but it is under consideration. | 06:36 |
| victory747 | I think he's hesitant to have his project spread across multiple places (sourceforge and launchpad). | 06:37 |
| mtaylor|zzz | victory747: launchpad does have a way to release files | 07:27 |
| mtaylor|zzz | victory747: you can upload files (which can be tarballs if you like) | 07:27 |
| mtaylor|zzz | and attach the to a release | 07:27 |
| === mtaylor|zzz is now known as mtaylor | ||
| ccm | hey guys | 08:29 |
| Fujitsu | Hi ccm. | 08:31 |
| ccm | is one of you technically responsible for the ubuntu.com mailservice? | 08:45 |
| ccm | i ran into a minor problem with the mail redirection for ubuntu members | 08:45 |
| Fujitsu | That's not exactly a part of Launchpad, I don't think. | 08:47 |
| Fujitsu | What's the problem? | 08:47 |
| ccm | well when redirecting mails via @ubuntu.com spf-checking mail servers might think it is a forged mail | 08:50 |
| ccm | afk for a while | 08:51 |
| ccm | . | 09:11 |
| AiSpirit | hello and good morning | 09:19 |
| Fujitsu | Hi AiSpirit. | 09:19 |
| AiSpirit | I have a little question about the bug #162394 I started a few times ago :p | 09:19 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 162394 in nautilus "Nautilus rights management problem with links" [Unknown,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/162394 | 09:19 |
| AiSpirit | I put a comment about it on french ubuntu forum http://forum.ubuntu-fr.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1511036#p1511036 | 09:20 |
| Fujitsu | This isn't a forum for Ubuntu support. | 09:20 |
| AiSpirit | oh oh. but for launchpad, no ? | 09:20 |
| Fujitsu | Yes. | 09:20 |
| AiSpirit | I mean, I'm wandering weither I have to start a new thread on launchpad or not | 09:20 |
| AiSpirit | about this bug | 09:20 |
| AiSpirit | so ... wrong channel or not ? :D | 09:20 |
| Fujitsu | If it's a different issue, you need to file a new bug. | 09:21 |
| AiSpirit | but I don't now if it's a different issue or a "temporary fix release". That's why I'm wandering : forum topic ? 162394 comments ? new bug ? | 09:22 |
| Fujitsu | Ah, I see, it's fixed upstream, not in Ubuntu. | 09:22 |
| AiSpirit | cause now, I have an error such as "different filesystem => cannot delete" | 09:22 |
| Fujitsu | I can't read French, unfortunately. | 09:22 |
| AiSpirit | arf :( | 09:22 |
| AiSpirit | I mean : I m knew in bug declaration, so I don't know if I let this like it s or I fill a new bug | 09:23 |
| AiSpirit | ** i'm new ;) | 09:23 |
| Fujitsu | Is it the same issue? | 09:23 |
| mrevell | Morning Launchpad | 09:23 |
| Fujitsu | Hey mrevell. | 09:23 |
| mrevell | hey hey | 09:24 |
| AiSpirit | for the result : yes : I can't remove link from partion ext3 if the real file is on ext3. but different error (due to the "fix") | 09:24 |
| AiSpirit | hey mrevell | 09:24 |
| mrevell | hi AiSpirit | 09:24 |
| Fujitsu | Are you sure it's due to the fix? The fix doesn't seem be in Hardy yet, let alone Gutsdy. | 09:24 |
| Fujitsu | *Gutsy | 09:24 |
| AiSpirit | donno | 09:25 |
| AiSpirit | so, I have this comment from Yann Rouillard : | 09:29 |
| AiSpirit | However, as gnome-vfs will be replaced with gvfs, I wonder it it's a good idea to introduce this kind of changes. | 09:30 |
| AiSpirit | maybe I should let it like this for the moment and wait for gvfs | 09:30 |
| AiSpirit | (though I do not much about them ...) | 09:31 |
| AiSpirit | so,good bye and maybe later. (back to work ...) | 09:32 |
| No` | hi all | 11:48 |
| No` | didn't see it in the Transaltion in Launchpad FAQ... how long does it take (very roughly) for a template to be checked before the translation are available? | 11:50 |
| ubotu | New bug: #188907 in ubuntu "Lock GNOME upstream translations" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/188907 | 12:01 |
| bd_ | Hi, where can I get a copy of xine-lib version 1.1.9-0ubuntu1? The source links off https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xine-lib/1.1.9-0ubuntu1 are broken, even if I remove /hardy/ from the url. | 12:41 |
| Hobbsee | bd_: which arch? | 12:42 |
| bd_ | Hobbsee: sources | 12:42 |
| Hobbsee | oh, yes, of course | 12:43 |
| Hobbsee | bd_: you can't. | 12:43 |
| bd_ | Ubuntu is required to provide it for GPL compliance. | 12:43 |
| Hobbsee | cprov: your workaround doesn't work - that still gives binaries, not sources | 12:43 |
| bd_ | for up to three years | 12:44 |
| Hobbsee | bd_: i know. they've been told that before. unfortunately, the LP guys haven't put it as important enough yet | 12:44 |
| cprov | Hobbsee: which workaround ? | 12:44 |
| Hobbsee | cprov: for accessing old sources for superceeded package releases | 12:44 |
| bd_ | Hobbsee: okay, who should I directly demand sources from until they get annoyed at having to manually provide GPL compliance and fix it? :) | 12:44 |
| Hobbsee | bd_: cprov, kiko, stevea. | 12:45 |
| cprov | Hobbsee: the code is not there yet | 12:45 |
| Hobbsee | bd_: in that order - cprov is likely the one who has to fix it, and kiko and SteveA is in charge. | 12:45 |
| * bd_ looks at cprov | 12:45 | |
| Hobbsee | cprov: well, i suggest you fix it asap, because, as bd_ says, it's a gpl violation. and it's also very annoying. | 12:45 |
| Hobbsee | and it used to work. | 12:45 |
| bd_ | it's not a violation if they fulfill requests manually, but it's still very annoying | 12:46 |
| bd_ | I'm trying to track down a regression between a just-uploaded package version and the immediate prior one | 12:46 |
| cprov | bug 179028 | 12:46 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 179028 in soyuz "+files doesn't work for removed SPRs" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/179028 - Assigned to Celso Providelo (cprov) | 12:46 |
| Hobbsee | so far, i've not seen them do that either | 12:46 |
| * Hobbsee adds to the bug. | 12:47 | |
| * bd_ wonders if he knows any copyright holders of GPL code in ubuntu... | 12:51 | |
| Hobbsee | bd_: no, don't do that. | 12:51 |
| Hobbsee | bd_: blog to ubuntu planet about it. | 12:51 |
| bd_ | I kid, I kid. But seriously, there needs to at least be a manual procedure to get old sources. | 12:51 |
| Hobbsee | bd_: but really, before doing that, i'd suggest making the admin's aware of it. | 12:51 |
| Hobbsee | then, if they don't get it fixed asap, then yell. | 12:52 |
| bd_ | the admins being who, exactly? | 12:52 |
| Hobbsee | bd_: kiko, stevea | 12:52 |
| * Hobbsee thought she sadi that above | 12:53 | |
| bd_ | mhm, if they're not online at the moment, is there an email contact address or something? Or is my best bet to check back later? | 12:53 |
| Hobbsee | bd_: they both have emails listed on LP | 12:53 |
| bd_ | ok | 12:54 |
| * bd_ files a 'question' requesting a manual copy of the source | 12:57 | |
| === spiv_ is now known as spiv | ||
| === mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch | ||
| muszek | hi... quick question: in ubuntu gutsy, installing bzr from backports creates a dependency error when user tries to install bzr-gtk (bzr-gtk: Depends: bzr (< 0.91~) but 1.0-1~gutsy1 is to be installed). should it be filed as a bug or is it rather a "you installed backported stuff - deal with problems yourself" kind of an issue? | 13:04 |
| Hobbsee | muszek: ask jdong | 13:04 |
| Hobbsee | muszek: usually should be a bug on the product called "ubuntu-backports" | 13:04 |
| muszek | Hobbsee: thank you, I found that project and I'll file a report there | 13:06 |
| Hobbsee | muszek: you're welcome | 13:12 |
| Hobbsee | mrevell-lunch: please make sure that you update the PPA documentation about orig tarballs on the quickstart - it's wrong, nad it won't be helping with the number of questions you're getting about md5sum mismatches. | 14:00 |
| === mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell | ||
| mrevell | hi Hobbsee | 14:00 |
| Hobbsee | heya! :) | 14:01 |
| * mrevell checks email to see if I've had anything more specific | 14:01 | |
| mrevell | Hobbsee: I'm sorry there's an error. What have you spotted? "Please make sure you update" is a little vague :) | 14:02 |
| Hobbsee | oh | 14:02 |
| Hobbsee | mrevell: s/PPA builds do not have any dependency restrictions,/PPA builds do not have any build dependency restrictions,/ | 14:04 |
| Hobbsee | ew, we've grown a "pocket" in there too. no one outside LP actually understands what a pocket is. | 14:05 |
| Hobbsee | and last i checked, you couldn't use anythign but the default pocket (release) in LP anyway. | 14:05 |
| Hobbsee | for ppa | 14:05 |
| Hobbsee | mrevell: the part i spotted that was wrong is: {i} Note: ORIGs are not shared between the primary Ubuntu archive and your PPA. The first time you upload a source package you need to include the ORIG - i.e. build the source package with debuild -S -sa. | 14:06 |
| mrevell | Hobbsee: What's the more common term for "pocket"? | 14:06 |
| Hobbsee | there isn't one | 14:07 |
| Hobbsee | most people think ubuntu is normal, updates goes to the same place as ubuntu, and calling it $distro-updates is a matter of courtesy to the users, and that backports is a black art, independant of LP | 14:08 |
| mrevell | right | 14:08 |
| mrevell | Hmm. | 14:09 |
| Hobbsee | but, like i say, i didn't think you could use anything but "release" pocket anyway | 14:09 |
| Hobbsee | worth checkign with cprov | 14:09 |
| mrevell | Hobbsee: I think cprov would have to confirm | 14:09 |
| mrevell | right, yeah | 14:09 |
| mrevell | Hobbsee: This ORIG note. You're unhappy with the debuild options specified, right? | 14:10 |
| Hobbsee | mrevell: no, actually | 14:11 |
| Hobbsee | cprov: well done. finally critical :) | 14:11 |
| cprov | Hobbsee: mrevell: currently, PPAs can re-use ORIGs from PRIMARY archive. That's what should be changed in that comment. | 14:12 |
| Hobbsee | Distribution Management and PPA (Soyuz) | 14:12 |
| Hobbsee | ======================================= | 14:12 |
| Hobbsee | * Personal Package Archives now check the primary Ubuntu archive for | 14:12 |
| Hobbsee | candidate orig.tar.gz files. (Bug 139619) | 14:12 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 139619 in soyuz "Allow orig.tar.gz from distribution repos" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/139619 - Assigned to Celso Providelo (cprov) | 14:12 |
| * Hobbsee had to search for the release notes | 14:13 | |
| mrevell | Right, got it. Thanks. | 14:13 |
| mrevell | Hobbsee: Slipped through the cracks. Thanks for pointing it out. | 14:13 |
| Hobbsee | mrevell: a lot of people are getting tarballs that are the same version as later ubuntu versions of them, giving them a cryptic md5sum error. this confuses them. | 14:14 |
| Hobbsee | because they can't see any such package in their ppa | 14:14 |
| mrevell | right | 14:14 |
| Hobbsee | and here's one | 14:15 |
| rexbron_ | Hey, I am having a problem with the distro overrides in my PPA. | 14:15 |
| Hobbsee | rexbron_: if your .orig.tar.gz version is the same as *any* ubuntu release version, it'll get rejected as a md5sum mismatch, no matter how you override it. | 14:15 |
| rexbron_ | Hobbsee, but it is not | 14:16 |
| rexbron_ | Openlibraries is not in the archives | 14:16 |
| Hobbsee | then is probably a LP bug, and i don't konw. cprov can probably help you | 14:16 |
| * Hobbsee figured she'd get check for the trap people normally fall into | 14:17 | |
| rexbron_ | :) | 14:17 |
| rexbron_ | Correct me if I am mistaken, but the override system should allow you to have the same version of a package built and published for different distro | 14:19 |
| rexbron_ | Correct me if I am mistaken, but the override system should allow you to have the same version of a package built and published for different distro | 14:20 |
| Hobbsee | i didnt' think so, due to the pool structure of the archives | 14:20 |
| Hobbsee | that just lets you override whatever's in debian/changelog | 14:20 |
| rexbron_ | and therefore build and publish it in a diferent distro series | 14:21 |
| ubotu | New bug: #188942 in soyuz "please support uploads to -security pockets for PPA" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/188942 | 14:21 |
| rexbron_ | I suppose what I am after is to have a package built for both gutsy and hardy without having to maintain two source packages | 14:23 |
| Hobbsee | rexbron_: i suspect you awnt to look into launchpad.net/autoppa | 14:24 |
| rexbron_ | Hobbsee, too bad they do not have a hardy build in their PPA :P | 14:40 |
| Hobbsee | heh | 14:40 |
| === cprov is now known as cprov-lunch | ||
| No` | same player, try again: didn't see it in the Transaltion in Launchpad FAQ... how long does it take (very roughly) for a template to be checked before the translation are available? | 15:10 |
| No` | ok, I got my answer: roughly 24 hours. | 15:31 |
| === cprov-lunch is now known as cprov | ||
| allee | I'll want to rebuild some sources available during gutsy development. But all I get is an ops: OOPS-765EB111 https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+source/linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.22/2.6.22-13.33 Are only the sources kept that are released and not the intermediate version of the development cycle? | 16:45 |
| Hobbsee | allee: iz bug. no solution. bug cprov more until he finds one. | 16:47 |
| allee | Hobbsee: eh, it's also not in the archive itself :( http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/l/linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.22/ | 16:51 |
| Hobbsee | allee: that's an old version, no? | 16:51 |
| allee | Hobbsee: is there an archive that keeps intermediate sources | 16:51 |
| Hobbsee | nope | 16:51 |
| Hobbsee | lp used to do it | 16:51 |
| allee | Hobbsee: that's the last version that has unionfs 2.1. Fix it was reverted FAI (fully automatic installation is broken) and new try in proposed does not fix it :( | 16:52 |
| Hobbsee | oh, what hte hell? | 16:52 |
| Hobbsee | who decided to mangle this page, so it was harder to read? | 16:52 |
| Hobbsee | where's the damned info that was on it before? | 16:52 |
| Hobbsee | oh, it's because of +gutsy/ in there | 16:53 |
| Hobbsee | allee: it should be from https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.22/2.6.22-13.33 | 16:53 |
| Hobbsee | allee: the suggestion would be to bug cprov about finding you the source. claim a gpl violation if you wish, to get it done. | 16:54 |
| allee | Hobbsee: :) | 16:54 |
| allee | Hobbsee: thx a lot!! | 16:54 |
| allee | Hobbsee: eh, other page, same bug. | 16:55 |
| Hobbsee | allee: yes, i know. read the next line. | 16:56 |
| Hobbsee | allee: #canonical-sysadmin might be able to find you the sources, too | 16:59 |
| bd_ | Unable to identify file openc2e_0.0svn1609.orig.tar.bz2 (games) in changes. | 17:11 |
| bd_ | ^^^ what does this mean in a PPA rejection? | 17:11 |
| bd_ | the dput seemed to succeed | 17:11 |
| bd_ | does it not like bz2 or something?> | 17:11 |
| bd_ | aha, it was the bz2 | 17:17 |
| muszek | I created a project on launchpad earlier today and would like to enable bug tracking... but can't find it anywhere... can someone please help me? | 17:23 |
| muszek | I've searched "answers" for launchpad project and didn't find anything | 17:23 |
| gmb | muszek: If you go to your project's overview page you'll see a menu on the left hand side. | 17:29 |
| mrevell | muszek: Yes, no problem. You need to visit your project's overview page and then click "Change details" in the Actions menu on the left-hand side of the page. | 17:29 |
| mrevell | oh, gmb has beat me to it :) | 17:29 |
| gmb | muszek: What mrevell said ;) | 17:30 |
| mrevell | We should make this easier for people. | 17:30 |
| mrevell | muszek: Scroll around half way down the "Change project details" page | 17:30 |
| muszek | gmb, mrevell: thank you, I somehow missed that | 17:30 |
| mrevell | muszek: and you'll see the "Bugs are tracked in..." radio buttons. | 17:30 |
| mrevell | muszek: no problem | 17:30 |
| muszek | I'm used to trac inteface... in there, whenever I want to create a simple task that's not really a bug (for example: "implement rss feeds for comments" or "change the widget to blue"), I use the same bug reporting interface as if I was reporting a bug... how's it done (properly) in launchpad?) | 17:34 |
| gmb | muszek: In fact, bugs are treated as analogous to tasks. | 17:35 |
| muszek | gmb: ty | 17:36 |
| gmb | muszek: So in that case you could create a bug "There should be rss feeds for comments" and use that to track your progress. | 17:36 |
| gmb | muszek: Alternatively, if it's a bigger piece of work that you feel needs more specification you could use a blueprint http://blueprints.launchpad.net | 17:36 |
| muszek | gmb: thank, I'll play around with these things | 17:37 |
| gmb | muszek: Cool. Let us know if you have any problems. | 17:37 |
| ubotu | New bug: #189001 in launchpad "Enabling bug tracker and translations is not obvious" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189001 | 17:51 |
| bd_ | how long does it take for a PPA build to become queued, usually? | 18:09 |
| bd_ | ... there it goes | 18:15 |
| === Sciri_ is now known as Sciri | ||
| === Ubulette_ is now known as Ubulette | ||
| === Pricey is now known as PriceChild | ||
| ubotu | New bug: #189025 in soyuz "Missing tests for binary PAS in the PPA context" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189025 | 19:01 |
| === PriceChild is now known as Pricey | ||
| === Pricey is now known as PriceChld | ||
| === PriceChld is now known as PriceChild | ||
| goobsoft | What do I need to do in order to not get the following warning when installing packages from my PPA? | 20:29 |
| goobsoft | WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated! | 20:29 |
| stdin | you can't do anything, the repos aren't signed | 20:30 |
| goobsoft | ok, thanks | 20:31 |
| === samiam_ is now known as samiam | ||
| === Sciri_ is now known as Sciri | ||
| === leonel_ is now known as leonel | ||
| === spiv_ is now known as spiv | ||
| ubotu | New bug: #189108 in malone "ability to export all bug data for a project" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189108 | 23:51 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!