[00:11] <[reed]> asac: http://ventnorsblog.blogspot.com/2008/02/how-do-i-notes-release.html [00:11] <[reed]> can you get that corrected? [00:11] <[reed]> thanks [06:48] [reed], where? [07:44] <[reed]> Ubulette: ? [08:59] hi [09:08] [reed]: i asked ... lets see ;) [12:13] ok, lets redo security uploads :( [16:55] is there an easy way to increase the amount of lines used on the mouse scroll wheel? === Ubulette_ is now known as Ubulette [18:36] hi [18:37] asac, the display corruption is gone for me using the debs from my ppa [18:57] Ubulette: cool ... so its cairo? [18:57] I'll try :) [19:01] hmm .. 1.5.8 has been sponsored already? [19:04] well, it's in but once again, not sponsored [19:06] i explicitly requested a sponsorship, and I expected seb128 to tell me if he was not happy with something, he didn't :( [19:07] ask him if he wants you to do work on libcairo again ... or if he just missed that bug [19:07] maybe he has some automated upgrade thing [19:07] that's not what I mean. [19:08] https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+source/cairo/1.5.8-0ubuntu1 [19:10] i (still) think its a problem of how launchpads calculates credits (e.g. it doesn't show up in your +packages though it should). for almost everybody having [ Name ] in changelog is definitly as much worth as signing an upload [19:11] i don't see how lp could infer a lp login from a free form text field [19:12] by name ... maybe one can add the email to that place? [19:14] i will talk to launchpad people about this when i get a grib on someone [19:15] could you sponsor that: http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/debdiff/gnome-control-center_2.21.90-0ubuntu1--2.21.90-0ubuntu2.debdiff seb was ok last friday yet it didn't do it today [19:16] and he's not there now [19:17] even thursday [19:19] Ubulette: is there a bug? [19:20] no, want one ? [19:20] would be good to track review .... let me look at the debdiff [19:20] tiny [19:22] Ubulette: hmm point is we will ship a link soon ... i think then two entries would pop-up there ... so we probably would need to back that out once we do the full transition [19:22] you mean, drop ff2 soon ? [19:22] yes this week is my plan :) [19:22] (well waiting for beta3) [19:23] i'm not sure it's such a good idea. most people depends on extensions... and ff3 is still poor in that regard [19:24] not to mention addons are kinda broken right now [19:24] and a lof of plugin work is still needed [19:24] sure ... i would love to just demote firefox to universe and keep both usable at the same time, but i currently don't see how [19:25] Ubulette: well ... totem is done here ... i am waiting for the final transition to upload because it can onl ybe installed either/or [19:25] the rest of the plugins i tried worked in both [19:25] because they (wisely) don't use xpcom [19:25] yo know of any other plugin that breaks? [19:26] are they all linked properly now ? [19:27] well as long as they work we can even build them against xulrunner 1.8 if they are in universe [19:27] (not saying that thats my preferred plan) [19:27] what about sun-java5-plugin/sun-java6-plugin, ubufox, listen, ... ? [19:28] listen is universe ... i have a patch for that [19:28] ubufox is done locally [19:28] sun plugins should work (don't they)? [19:28] and are not in main either [19:28] they depend on ff2 [19:28] The following packages will be REMOVED: [19:28] firefox firefox-dbg firefox-dom-inspector firefox-gnome-support [19:28] firefox-launchpad-plugin firefox-libthai listen sun-java5-plugin [19:28] sun-java6-plugin ubufox [19:29] yes ... for now i care to finish main ... then rebuild all against xulrunner 1.9 and if that doesn't work easily, just build against xulrunner 1.8 [19:29] (which should work because debian uses xulrunner 1.8) [19:29] Ubulette: i think for sun plugins its just an Depends += | xulrunner-1.9 and installing it in the right place [19:30] maybe [19:30] afaik doko takes care for that [19:31] point is the call for porting went out long time ago ... if MOTUs didn't do their tasks yet they probably need some brokeness to get encouraged :) [19:31] listen isn't fair, i know ... thats why i will do the port [19:32] http://paste.ubuntu.com/4174/ ... those are the firefox rdepends [19:33] we also need the locales... [19:33] i think those with | in front are recommends or suggests ... they most likely just need a firefox [19:33] binary to work well [19:33] Ubulette: yes, someone else is already dealing with that :) [19:33] his name is carlos and he is confident that we get automatic locale exports from launchpad for firefox and thunderbird this release [19:34] i think he starts this week to work on that [19:34] if that doesn't happen we still have a long time before we reach translation freeze [19:35] but i want to keep the pressure on him ... uploading locales doesn't contribute to make that happen imo :) [19:35] [reed], is there a plan to do the gnome-vfs to gio/gvfs transition before ff3 final ? [19:35] all the extensions will have to go [19:35] <[reed]> Ubulette: no [19:36] we have to reconsider which will be shipped and which not [19:36] i will write a blog entry asking contributors to help figure out if the most popular ones meat our criterias [19:43] wow ... firefox-3.0 just consumed 1138% of CPU :) [19:43] (while shutting down top showed that stat to me) [19:44] Ubulette: is capplets in your archive? [19:44] nope [19:45] strange [19:45] ok its part of control center: [19:45] pool/main/g/gnome-control-center/capplets-data_2.21.90-0ubuntu2~fta1_all.deb [19:46] oh, ok [19:48] mozilla bug 344818 [19:48] Mozilla bug 344818 in Build Config "Linking - missing library deps" [Normal,Reopened] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344818 [19:50] still no answer from vlad :( [19:51] mozilla bug 390025 is moving again [19:51] Mozilla bug 390025 in XP Apps "Move to LoginManager and remove wallet from SeaMonkey" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390025 [19:52] still far from libxul though [19:53] yep [19:53] <[reed]> ok, I just moved mozilla bug 344818 and requested blocking [19:53] <[reed]> I'll poke vlad [19:53] Mozilla bug 344818 in Build Config "Linking - missing library deps" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344818 [19:53] Ubulette: so does the AMO search not find anything because of our app name? i though it should use the app-id [19:53] or are there just no ffox 3 compatible extensions yet? [19:53] * asac hugs [reed] [19:54] <[reed]> what's your app name? [19:54] <[reed]> all you Linux people owe me something good [19:54] <[reed]> :p [19:54] <[reed]> ;) [19:54] * [reed] isnt paid to work on this like you are! [19:54] <[reed]> isn't* [19:54] i'm not either [19:57] asac, compared to a nighlty from yesterday, showing me only 1 addon, my ppa shows nothing as that addon is installed (viamatic foxpose) so it matches [19:57] i've patched that appname thing [19:59] Ubulette: you sure its the app name? i mean usually AMO looks at the app-id, which should be the same [19:59] the bogus url showed firefox-3.0, changing that to firefox fixed it [20:00] i've tried that url manually, it's the expected xml chunk [20:01] ok [20:02] http://paste.ubuntu.com/4176/ [20:04] <[reed]> yeah, that sounds like a personal problem :) [20:04] <[reed]> why did you all change that? [20:05] because we've change %APP% [20:05] changed [20:05] to have a dedicated profile name [20:07] <[reed]> ah [20:07] yeah ... we will fix it in the end :) [20:08] it's just a patch to drop.. but then, what about all the profile dirs ? [20:10] Ubulette: black magic :) [20:13] Ubulette: I will have the solution tomorrow ... today i burned myself too much for security stuff that finally will get released later :/ [20:13] <[reed]> asac: for .12? [20:13] yes [20:13] <[reed]> yeah, they just pushed to beta channel earlier today [20:13] * [reed] looks at his mail [20:14] <[reed]> "Firefox 2.0.0.12rc4 is available on beta channel since 11.26am." [20:15] yes :) ... well now i am ready with that at least [20:20] <[reed]> hehe [20:20] fail [20:35] Ubulette: addons search still doesn't work for me with your package: greasemonkey is not found (but maybe i am just missing something) [20:35] but greasemonkey is 3.0b3 in AMO [20:35] and works [20:35] is it in the recommended list ? [20:36] funny thing is that i see "See all search results(14)", but clicking there, doesn't change a thing [20:36] Ubulette: no the recommendation list is empty too [20:36] "All recommendations are already installed or incompatible" [20:40] Error: uncaught exception: [Exception... "Component returned failure code: 0x804b000a [nsIIOService.newURI]" nsresult: "0x804b000a ()" location: "JS frame :: chrome://global/content/contentAreaUtils.js :: openURL :: line 894" data: no] [20:44] Ubulette: btw, does ephy still work for with latest xul? [20:45] yes [20:45] needed a respin or what? [20:46] epi from hardy works with my xul/nss [20:46] hmm after a rebuild it appears to work. but maybe that was just my broken installs here [20:46] donno for hardy's nss [20:47] strange ... ok [20:48] http://paste.ubuntu.com/4178/ [20:48] sometimes it crashes after trying to open an url [20:48] ... but usally just nothing happens [20:50] Ubulette: still get corruption [20:51] oh wait [20:52] hm, at work, it stopped immediately after the upgrade, and not a single corruption during the day [20:52] for me its easiest to reproduce by editing wiki.ubuntu.com ... then hitting Preview [20:52] the preview iframe will be corrupted [20:53] [reed]: i think i already asked: do you see that ^^ [20:53] oh .. rightg you don't have the right driver [20:53] sorry for the noise [20:53] <[reed]> I use the proprietary ATI driver [20:53] really? [20:53] asac, try a nighlty then [20:53] [reed]: i use it too and see this, but you don't have hardy, right? [20:53] <[reed]> yes, I kinda need my video card to work [20:53] <[reed]> no, gutsy [20:54] <[reed]> I'll take a look in a sec [20:54] should be safe to upgrade :) [20:54] * asac has no idea, but [reed] doesn't know :) [20:54] <[reed]> lol [20:54] Ubulette: nightly of what? [20:54] ff [20:54] <[reed]> I might put hardy on my new laptop [20:55] Ubulette: well at least xul from 2 hours ago has the same issue too [20:55] i have an ATI at work too [20:55] using fglrx [20:55] no idea if firefox can actually something like this [20:55] (just xul i assume) [20:56] ? [20:56] Ubulette: i have xul from 2 hours and still see it ;) in the latest firefox-3.0 from ~fta [20:57] hm, strange [20:58] let me see what else is waiting in update-manager [21:00] epi doesn't quit on "File / Close" [21:03] hmm ... i nevr landed the login manager fix in bzr? [21:04] xul ? epi ? [21:04] xul [21:05] current ephy in archive has a workaround [21:05] apparently i forgot ... ok [21:19] is it still useful ? [21:20] until the login manager patch is in xul yes [21:45] cvs is damn slow tonight [21:54] <[reed]> cvs-mirror? [21:54] <[reed]> .m.o