=== lifeless_ is now known as lifeless | ||
=== asac_ is now known as asac | ||
=== Mithrand1r is now known as Mithrandir | ||
=== alex_jon1 is now known as alex_joni | ||
abogani | rtg: Are you around? | 09:49 |
---|---|---|
amitk | abogani: rtg should come online in 2-3 hours | 10:03 |
abogani | amitk: Thanks Amit. I have a problem on -rt. Can you help me, please? | 10:10 |
amitk | abogani: sure, what is it | 10:11 |
abogani | amitk: Thanks. After last (security) update of the kernel X don't want start at boot with nvidia X driver on 64bit (32bit works fine).... I suspect that the problem still live in Hardy. | 10:12 |
abogani | Where should I look? | 10:12 |
abogani | Do you have some suggestions? | 10:12 |
abogani | Who could explain me why 32bit version works fine and 64bit not? | 10:12 |
amitk | abogani: is the problem in Gutsy? | 10:13 |
abogani | amitk: Yes. | 10:14 |
amitk | abogani: I am checking the updates... | 10:17 |
abogani | amitk: I suspect that isn't dependent from last update only... | 10:18 |
abogani | I have only one 64bit system and i don't update/dist-upgrade often | 10:19 |
amitk | abogani: could you post the /proc/version_signature of the working and non-working kernels? | 10:30 |
abogani | Unofficial for both | 10:33 |
amitk | abogani: do you know the last tag where it was working? | 10:35 |
abogani | amitk: Sorry i don't remember. :-( | 10:38 |
amitk | that makes it a bit hard to narrow down the problem :) | 10:39 |
abogani | I know Amit ;-) | 10:40 |
amitk | abogani: Do you have the problem with Hardy Alpha 4? | 10:40 |
abogani | amitk: No Hardy (-rt) works very well but unfortunately my test system don't have a nvidia video card. Sorry but i don't enough computers :-) | 10:42 |
amitk | abogani: Do we _ever_ have enoughc computers? ;-) | 10:43 |
amitk | could you confirm with the Hardy live cd on the computer with the nvidia? | 10:44 |
abogani | amitk: I'll do this test! | 10:45 |
abogani | amitk: Thank you for the moment! :) | 10:45 |
amitk | np | 10:45 |
tjaalton | abogani: reinstall the driver | 10:53 |
tjaalton | abogani: unless you are using -nv | 10:53 |
abogani | tjaalton: Ok i'll try that first! Thanks Timo. | 10:56 |
amitk | tjaalton: why? | 10:57 |
tjaalton | amitk: that's a valid question, but people have said that it helped.. | 11:02 |
tjaalton | abogani: do you use the official driver or envy? | 11:02 |
tjaalton | abogani: also, the logfile would be nice | 11:03 |
amitk | tjaalton: packaging problem? | 11:03 |
tjaalton | amitk: with envy at least, our packages should be fine | 11:04 |
tjaalton | if the package doesn't divert some files, upgrading the server will break it | 11:05 |
tjaalton | I'm not sure if envy diverts libglx et al | 11:05 |
ogra | hey ... i seem to have lots of oopses recently with the -5 kernel related to tick_notify and _spin_unlock_irqrestore is that known ? | 12:07 |
ogra | it spills my logs and after some hours the system just hardlocks | 12:07 |
thegodfather | ogra: what about collecting those OOPSes? | 12:07 |
thegodfather | it's difficult to guess without | 12:08 |
ogra | well, in fact its always the same it seems | 12:08 |
thegodfather | well it doesn't help if you don't show us your OOPS ;) | 12:08 |
ogra | http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/54836/ | 12:09 |
ogra | there ist is :) | 12:09 |
thegodfather | ogra: it's somewhere in RPC code. i guess you are running NFS of somekind | 12:10 |
ogra | lets check, i'm not sure | 12:10 |
ogra | ogra@laptop:~$ ps ax|grep nfs | 12:10 |
ogra | 6603 pts/0 R+ 0:00 grep nfs | 12:10 |
ogra | # | 12:10 |
ogra | nop | 12:10 |
thegodfather | rpc | 12:11 |
ogra | ah, yeah | 12:11 |
ogra | the client stuff | 12:11 |
thegodfather | yeps | 12:11 |
thegodfather | do you have some aggressive acpi features enabled? | 12:11 |
thegodfather | well it's a laptop.. hmmm | 12:11 |
thegodfather | try to disable acpid or whatever is used for power manager now | 12:12 |
thegodfather | for what i can see something goes bad between the 2 | 12:12 |
ogra | i dont do it explicitly and i think there is an APIC message during boot ... | 12:12 |
thegodfather | ACPI != APIC | 12:12 |
ogra | ACPI not connected to local APIC or so ? | 12:12 |
ogra | let me reboot i'll check | 12:12 |
thegodfather | try to boot with the usual options.. noapic noacpi or whatever they are called now | 12:13 |
thegodfather | because i run nfs/rpc stuff here but i don't see it | 12:13 |
thegodfather | on the other side i don't run any power management stuff | 12:13 |
ogra | (if booting wouldnt take 1h nowadays that would help :) ) | 12:13 |
thegodfather | just press the reset button :) | 12:13 |
thegodfather | that's why we have journal FS'es | 12:13 |
thegodfather | ;) | 12:13 |
thegodfather | reboot -n -f will do | 12:14 |
ogra | time not connected to IO-APIC ... no ACPI in that meassage, i was wrong | 12:14 |
ogra | *timer | 12:14 |
ogra | well, that speeds up shutdown ... booting is the painful thing here :) | 12:14 |
ogra | to quote one of my favorite bugs: the worm on the screen is only 1cm long during boot and stops there for a minute or two *g* | 12:15 |
thegodfather | it should be easy to figure the problem | 12:19 |
thegodfather | there is only one call to spin_unlock_irq in the whole sunrpc driver | 12:19 |
ogra | i wiped the nfs stuff for now ... nothing i need anyway | 12:19 |
thegodfather | and it might not even be a bug in sunrpc at the end | 12:21 |
thegodfather | the code didn't change since Aug. | 12:21 |
thegodfather | it's probably recalc_sigpending | 12:21 |
ogra | did we switch to tickless recently ? | 12:21 |
thegodfather | in .22 | 12:21 |
ogra | ah, well, no probs with .22 | 12:21 |
ogra | might indeed as well be the new hal and its powermanagement | 12:22 |
thegodfather | no | 12:22 |
thegodfather | this is a kernel bug... userland even if broken should not trigger this kind of OOPS'es | 12:22 |
thegodfather | the thing is: | 12:22 |
thegodfather | lock() | 12:22 |
thegodfather | dononething() | 12:23 |
thegodfather | unlock() | 12:23 |
thegodfather | and you are getting an OOPS in the unlock | 12:23 |
ogra | ah, right | 12:23 |
thegodfather | so it might even be the unlock operation to be broken (very unlikely) | 12:23 |
thegodfather | or the doonething that corrupts memory | 12:23 |
thegodfather | (as an example) | 12:23 |
thegodfather | anyway file a bug | 12:23 |
thegodfather | the file is net/sunrpc/svc.c | 12:23 |
thegodfather | there is only one call to that unlock thingy | 12:24 |
ogra | will do | 12:24 |
ogra | bug #89224 | 12:32 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 89224 in ubiquity "GrubInstaller failed with code 1" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/89224 | 12:32 |
ogra | ?? | 12:32 |
ogra | oh | 12:33 |
ogra | bug #189224 | 12:33 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 189224 in linux "sunrpc causes kernel oopses on 2.6.24-5-generic" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189224 | 12:33 |
ogra | :) | 12:33 |
kraut | moin | 12:56 |
=== \sh_away is now known as \sh | ||
=== imbrandon is now known as imbrandon_ | ||
=== LifeHacker is now known as tuxmaniac | ||
=== Traxer is now known as Traxer|off | ||
=== Traxer|off is now known as Traxer | ||
=== \sh is now known as \sh_away | ||
Kano | hi BenC , lum is still -6 not -7 | 16:50 |
rtg | Kano: upload are in process. patience. | 16:50 |
BenC | so? | 16:50 |
Kano | rtg: ok | 16:51 |
BenC | Kano: lum can't build until the kernel does | 16:51 |
Kano | well it did here already ;) | 16:51 |
rtg | BenC: he is pointing out that the git repo hasn't been updated, but I just have been busy this morning. | 16:52 |
BenC | ah, gotcha | 16:52 |
tseliot | BenC: did you have a look at my suggestions on the wiki? | 16:55 |
BenC | tseliot: haven't had a chance yet | 16:57 |
tseliot | BenC: I hope we can do this before February 14. Envy works great with my solutions | 17:00 |
benje | hello | 17:01 |
benje | we have found how to resolv disk detection under kernel 2.6.24 with the fujistu amilio laptop | 17:02 |
benje | patko, give the link to the modificated .config please | 17:03 |
benje | did we must open bug for this version of the kernel ? | 17:04 |
amitk | benje: that would be appreciated, thank you | 17:05 |
patko | benje, here is the working .config: http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/54869/ | 17:06 |
BenC | Ok, in case people haven't seen: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Meeting | 17:06 |
BenC | The regular IRC kernel team meeting is in session | 17:06 |
benje | amitk, it's need review to stay generic we take off the ide generic support for this is working | 17:06 |
amitk | benje: please attach the config to the launchpad bug | 17:07 |
BenC | Agenda is at the URL above | 17:07 |
benje | BenC, this is for me ? | 17:07 |
BenC | this is for the channel | 17:07 |
benje | amitk, which else file must we post the original dmesg and this for now | 17:07 |
BenC | So a friendly request to hold off on general conversations until after the meeting | 17:08 |
amitk | benje: yes. We can continue this after the IRC meeting | 17:08 |
benje | ok | 17:08 |
BenC | We are going to make this quick, since everyone is fairly busy | 17:09 |
king_ | ok | 17:09 |
BenC | rtg: You've uploaded 7.11 today to fix the build failures in the 6.10 upload...guess we'll know soon if the builds process | 17:09 |
rtg | indeed we will | 17:10 |
BenC | rtg: since you've been closest with the kernel tree this release cycle...is there anything we should be concerned about with beta coming up? | 17:10 |
rtg | some of the virtual features are new, virtio, kvm, etc. They are not part of 2.6.24. | 17:10 |
rtg | iwlwifi remains at 1.2.0, but most of the other wireless cards are supported upstream. | 17:11 |
rtg | there are some collision issues with legacy v.s. new drivers. | 17:11 |
rtg | hopefully, blacklisting in modules-tools-init will help that. | 17:11 |
BenC | I noticed the whole b43/legacy/bcm43xx issues...are they resolved now? | 17:12 |
rtg | we'll see. | 17:12 |
Kano | well it build the module | 17:12 |
rtg | I'm sure Kano will let me know if they aren't. | 17:12 |
Kano | the b43legacy | 17:12 |
Kano | but i really prefer removing the pciids | 17:12 |
BenC | Blacklisting is prefered, since it lets the user decide | 17:13 |
rtg | black listing is effectively the same. | 17:13 |
BenC | removing pci id's hard codes too much | 17:13 |
Kano | echo bcm43xx >> /etc/modules | 17:13 |
Kano | user decided | 17:13 |
Kano | ;) | 17:13 |
BenC | if the pci id's are removed, then the module wont bind to the device | 17:13 |
Kano | not automatically | 17:13 |
BenC | not at all, unless you echo the pci id's into newid in sysfs | 17:13 |
BenC | unless you are just commenting out the MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() in the driver, and that's the same as blacklisting anyway | 17:14 |
BenC | but requires us to muck with the source | 17:14 |
rtg | There are more issues with bcm then just PCI ids, it also depends on the SSB bus driver. | 17:14 |
Kano | only the new one | 17:14 |
Kano | well new 2 | 17:15 |
Kano | b43* | 17:15 |
Kano | both depend on ssb | 17:15 |
Kano | you could basically even disable bcm43xx | 17:15 |
Kano | debian did that | 17:15 |
rtg | We aren't gonna do that for now, so lets move on. | 17:16 |
BenC | Right, let's hash this out on kernel-team@ where it needs to be | 17:16 |
BenC | we know there is an issue, resolving it is beyond the context of the meeting | 17:16 |
BenC | rtg: anything else? | 17:16 |
rtg | I'm not as familiar with the current bug list as I should be. | 17:17 |
rtg | so, there are probably other issues. | 17:17 |
Kano | also has anybody else with the 64 bit no splash? | 17:17 |
BenC | well, I was looking past the bug list | 17:17 |
rtg | yep - I've seen it. | 17:17 |
BenC | Kano: off topic... | 17:17 |
Kano | thats a kernel issue | 17:17 |
rtg | this -7.11 upload is against the 2.6.24 rebase | 17:17 |
rtg | so, we'll have a stable code base against which to do our bug shooting. | 17:18 |
BenC | rtg: excellent | 17:18 |
rtg | thats it from me... | 17:18 |
Kano | or kernel config | 17:18 |
amitk | rtg: so we will go with upstream ALSA and iwlwifi for Hardy, correct? | 17:18 |
BenC | amitk: mobile...you were at the sprint last week...anything we need to worry about with the kernel+beta for them? | 17:18 |
rtg | amitk: correct. | 17:19 |
amitk | BenC: not really | 17:19 |
BenC | amitk: how important is 8.04 and 2.6.24 to UME right now? | 17:20 |
amitk | all the mobile code is self-contained in it's flavour patchset and will probably go beyond Hardy | 17:20 |
rtg | amitk squeaked in an lpia update this morning moments before I uploaded. | 17:20 |
amitk | 8.04 is important to the customer, but schedules are tight and they _might_ not make it. So we will move them to a PPA after Hardy | 17:21 |
amitk | rtg: yeah well.. I couldn't get back to sleep at 5am, so I pushed a patch instead ;) | 17:22 |
rtg | sounds like jet lag. | 17:22 |
BenC | insomnia goes hand-in-hand with last minute kernel patches, hehe | 17:22 |
rtg | and FTBSs cause insomnia. | 17:22 |
rtg | forgot to mention ndiswrapper updated to 1.52 | 17:23 |
amitk | rtg: is there anything else (major) that we will switch to LUM and upstream for Hardy? | 17:23 |
rtg | nothing on the radar. | 17:23 |
BenC | Ok, I think that covers us as far as status right now | 17:25 |
BenC | Wanted to get some intros out of the way...joining us from a few weeks ago is Stefan Bader (sbader)... | 17:25 |
BenC | stefanb I mean | 17:26 |
stefanb | Hi :) | 17:26 |
BenC | And just starting with Canonical on the kernel team yesterday is Colin King (king_) | 17:26 |
king_ | Hi too! :-) | 17:26 |
BenC | Both are generalist on the kernel team, and will help handle our main workload for hardy 8.04 and beyond to following releases | 17:27 |
BenC | And now some much needed, and usually avoided, discussion on our QA bug list | 17:28 |
maks_ | left freebsd king_ ? | 17:28 |
king_ | No.. I haven't touch FreeBsd for 10+ years now | 17:29 |
BenC | So anyone who hasn't seen it, ogasawara (who is on the QA team, concentrating on the kernel) maintains this page: http://people.ubuntu.com/~ogasawara/hardy-buglist.html | 17:29 |
BenC | It's an excellent starting place for community to work with the kernel team | 17:30 |
rtg | It needs serious love for the next few weeks. | 17:31 |
BenC | I'm sure ogasawara would appreciate feedback on this page as well (please, don't punish her inbox with requests to get your bug added :) | 17:31 |
BenC | Yeah, since 2.6.24 is released, and uploaded, this list is primary focus | 17:32 |
ogasawara | feedback would be great. I suppose I should add a blurb to the top about what the list for anyone new | 17:32 |
BenC | The churn is at a minimum now, so stable code base to work from | 17:32 |
BenC | ogasawara: something like "Go away if you value your sanity"? | 17:33 |
ogasawara | heh | 17:33 |
maks_ | have you already some nfs patches? | 17:34 |
maks_ | we have reports that nfs on 2.6.24 is quite buggy | 17:34 |
maks_ | aka does not sustain load | 17:34 |
maks_ | both nfs v3 and v4 | 17:34 |
BenC | ogasawara: One thing we discussed earlier was being more liberal with "Wont Fix" on some of these reports, and working harder to assign and respond to them more quickly | 17:34 |
BenC | maks_: is there an open bug report? | 17:35 |
maks_ | http://marc.info/?l=linux-nfs&m=120220211505693&w=2 | 17:35 |
maks_ | lots of informal reports on channel too | 17:35 |
BenC | Ok, we'll investigate that | 17:36 |
ogasawara | BenC: so one thing I haven't done in the past few weeks is assign to anyone as I wasn't sure how much work you guys already had on your plates | 17:36 |
BenC | ogasawara: that's my fault...I've been slacking on initial processing of your list | 17:36 |
stefanb | I normally go forward and self-assign me from that list | 17:37 |
BenC | That's good | 17:38 |
king_ | I probably need some assigning to me to kick off with | 17:38 |
BenC | king_: Oh, I can get you started off right :) | 17:40 |
king_ | BenC: the more the merrier | 17:41 |
ogasawara | oh no, famous last words :) | 17:41 |
BenC | Ok, let's wrap this up so we can get back to work...any out-of-band issues to bring up? | 17:41 |
BenC | excellent...meeting adjourned then | 17:42 |
BenC | ogasawara: thanks for joining us on short notice | 17:42 |
ogasawara | np | 17:42 |
BenC | Thanks everyone, have a great week | 17:43 |
stefanb | see you | 17:44 |
king_ | bye for now | 17:44 |
amitk | benje: so please attach the .config to the bug report and add an explanation if necessary | 17:45 |
rtg | amitk: ' hardy lpia Successfully built (NEW)' | 17:46 |
amitk | rtg: ofcourse! you thought I would commit a broken patch at 5am? ;-p | 17:47 |
rtg | amitk: and did you think I _didn't_ do a test build just to make sure? | 17:47 |
BenC | hehe | 17:47 |
tseliot | BenC: when can I ping you again? | 17:47 |
BenC | tseliot: let me get some lunch...in an hour? | 17:49 |
benje | amitk, ok | 17:50 |
tseliot | BenC: ok, thanks :-) | 17:50 |
amitk | rtg: :) | 17:50 |
* amitk -> groceries | 17:50 | |
benje | amitk, do you need the old dmesg and the new . we start explain what's happened with std kernel | 17:51 |
amitk | benje: add everything that you feel is necessary. | 17:52 |
Kano | rtg: when i change version+ rules clean i have got this problem: http://paste.debian.net/48499 | 17:54 |
rtg | Kano: use 'debuild -b' from devscripts to catch all of the package build deps. | 17:55 |
Kano | rtg: all installed, just not the other headers | 17:56 |
Kano | i only compile generic | 17:56 |
Kano | you have one binary | 17:57 |
Kano | utils/mod-dep | 17:57 |
rtg | Kano: build problems are outside my area of interest. Its building on the archive, so its right for me. | 17:59 |
Kano | rtg: you have too many binaries to build it on etch | 17:59 |
Kano | you usually dont need em | 17:59 |
=== fabbione is now known as thegodfather | ||
rtg | Kano: The hardy release is built within the Hardy environment. That is all I really care about (or am responsible for). | 18:00 |
Kano | rtg: call it like you want: this is bad | 18:02 |
benje | amitk, there many problem : boot with gutsy => kernel panic => soluce set noapic ; cd desktop gutsy noapic => no cdrom => must use netboot cdrom ; | 18:03 |
Kano | rtg: and: you only need to delete the file | 18:05 |
benje | do you think i must separate the post amitk | 18:06 |
Kano | rtg: ubuntu/sound/alsa-driver/utils/mod-deps | 18:06 |
Kano | delete it and it will be created when needed | 18:06 |
benje | between gutsy and the kernel 2.6.24 ? | 18:07 |
rtg | Kano: you're right. How in the _fuck_ did a binary get checked in? | 18:08 |
rtg | yhis was a clean checkout from the ALSA HG repo. | 18:08 |
Kano | maybe add it in the clean rule extra | 18:09 |
rtg | Kano: the original source directory is cloned into a build directory before building. there should not be any binaries to begin with. | 18:10 |
Kano | LANG= grep ELF -Rs *|grep Binary | 18:17 |
Kano | pretty simple check for binaries | 18:17 |
rtg | Kano: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-hardy-lum.git;a=summary | 18:27 |
Kano | fine | 18:27 |
=== LifeHacker is now known as tuxmaniac | ||
tseliot | BenC: are you there? | 19:19 |
tjaalton | maks_: client or server? (NFS instability) | 19:32 |
amitk | benje: I would restrict the report to Hardy for now, since it is unlikely that this will be fixed for Gutsy | 19:34 |
benje | amitk, ok this is quick description with .config http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/54902/ | 19:38 |
tjaalton | maks_: seems to be server, so that's probably why I havent seen that | 19:38 |
benje | amitk, i take off all about gutsy ;) | 19:40 |
amitk | benje: looks good. Make sure to attach the .config as an attachment, not inline text | 19:41 |
amitk | benje: and leave the gutsy parts in there, it might help in debugging | 19:41 |
benje | ok amitk | 19:41 |
benje | amitk, i found this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/178843 the message is the same for the first boot of 2.6.24 about noapic but not for the same model and not all the same problem . do i post to it or open a new one? | 19:59 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 178843 in linux "kernel panic on boot in kubuntu 8.04 alpa 2 becouse of Apic" [Medium,Triaged] | 19:59 |
benje | must i | 20:00 |
amitk | benje: new bug with a comment listing the other bug number | 20:03 |
benje | amitk, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/189368 | 20:35 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 189368 in linux "kernel panic with notebook Amilo Xa 2528 P5811 kernel 2.6.24" [Undecided,New] | 20:35 |
=== stefanb is now known as smb_away | ||
tormod | would be nice if someone could look at, and at least triage/milestone bug #186062. thanks | 23:33 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 186062 in linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24 "please update linux-wlan-ng (prism2_usb) to latest upstream version (>=1847)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/186062 | 23:33 |
rtg | tormod: from here? linux-wlan-ng-0.2.8/src/prism2/driver | 23:46 |
tormod | rtg: no, from svn. Where do you document where the code comes from? | 23:46 |
rtg | tormod: I didn't do this one. the previous guy didn't leave any tracks. | 23:47 |
tormod | bad guy ;) svn://svn.shaftnet.org/linux-wlan-ng/trunk | 23:47 |
rtg | tormod: put the svn URL in the LP report so we can remember it. | 23:48 |
tormod | ok | 23:48 |
tormod | what about Ubuntu changes, are they documented beside the commit comment? | 23:48 |
rtg | tormod: I'll put a BOM file in the prism2_usb directory (Bill of Materials) | 23:49 |
tormod | anyway, the only Ubuntu changes I could see by looking at the git history, are included upstream. | 23:51 |
tormod | s/only// | 23:51 |
rtg | tormod: does it need an updated p80211 ? | 23:53 |
tormod | yes, they are hand in hand | 23:53 |
tormod | p80211 was supposed to be something general for several drivers, it ended up in monogamy with prism2 | 23:54 |
tormod | I think l-u-m used to have p80211 as a subdir of prism2 or the other way around. | 23:55 |
rtg | tormod: ok, test building. | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!