| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| asac | Ubulette: profile migration pushed | 13:02 |
|---|---|---|
| === \sh_away is now known as \sh | ||
| asac | Ubulette: how did you take care that the time you use in DEBIAN_DATE is PST? | 13:18 |
| asac | i don't see any PST or something in the date expression used during checkout+ | 13:19 |
| asac | lunch | 13:43 |
| asac | back | 13:57 |
| === jimmy_ is now known as jimmy | ||
| === ]reed[ is now known as [reed] | ||
| asac | Ubulette: you are a perl expert, right? j2se1.4-amd64 fails to build because of some illegal perl in rules (apparently) | 16:07 |
| asac | most likely it became illegal in recent perls, because the package built in feisty :) | 16:08 |
| asac | Ubulette: http://paste.ubuntu.com/4207/ | 16:08 |
| asac | http://paste.ubuntu.com/4208/ | 16:09 |
| asac | thants the complete expression | 16:09 |
| === \sh is now known as \sh_away | ||
| Ubulette | hi | 18:24 |
| Ubulette | indeed, i'm good in perl (how did you know???) | 18:25 |
| Ubulette | I'll have a look in a short while | 18:25 |
| === ]reed[ is now known as [reed] | ||
| asac | Ubulette: you told me long ago :) | 18:32 |
| Ubulette | really ? oh, ok | 18:32 |
| asac | (somehow my brain is still intact) | 18:35 |
| Ubulette | the code is weird but correct. Which perl is that ? | 18:37 |
| asac | ... it fails like in the past | 18:37 |
| asac | Ubulette: try to build j2se1.4-amd64 | 18:37 |
| asac | (i assume you have amd64) | 18:37 |
| Ubulette | i have but it's now running i386 :P | 18:38 |
| asac | oh damn ;) | 18:38 |
| Ubulette | asac, so ff3 b3 will replace ff2 ? | 19:19 |
| Ubulette | http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=688435 | 19:28 |
| armin76 | Ubulette: guess you know that's not new? :P | 20:24 |
| Ubulette | what ? the corruption ? for me it's gone | 20:46 |
| Ubulette | [reed], what was wrong with b3_rc1 ? | 21:04 |
| Ubulette | woow, and 200012rc4 | 21:05 |
| [reed] | build&release forgot to change some settings on their end | 21:06 |
| [reed] | to match what had been changed on dev-end | 21:06 |
| [reed] | so, makes those builds not match what nightlies had been using | 21:06 |
| [reed] | so, they fixed it | 21:06 |
| [reed] | :) | 21:06 |
| Ubulette | what's the eta for final b3 if everything goes according to plan ? | 21:07 |
| [reed] | next Tuesday | 21:08 |
| Ubulette | 1 week !!! | 21:08 |
| [reed] | is that an exclamation of joy or despair? | 21:08 |
| Ubulette | I have time to do a rc3 preview than :) | 21:08 |
| Ubulette | rc2 | 21:08 |
| armin76 | ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/ <- 2030? :D | 21:08 |
| [reed] | heh | 21:09 |
| [reed] | lol | 21:09 |
| Ubulette | ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/nightly/3.0b3-candidates/ | 21:09 |
| armin76 | ah, that means it will be released in 2030 :P | 21:10 |
| [reed] | haha | 21:10 |
| Ubulette | rotfl | 21:10 |
| Ubulette | asac, is your "profile migrator" ready ? i'm about to push a preview to my ppa... :S | 21:14 |
| [reed] | [03:11:46PM] <nthomas|afk> rhelmer|afk: linux slave thinks it's 2030 | 21:14 |
| [reed] | [03:12:01PM] <rhelmer|afk> er | 21:14 |
| [reed] | [03:12:03PM] <rhelmer|afk> really? | 21:14 |
| [reed] | [03:12:20PM] <nthomas|afk> http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/2030/02/2030-02-05-11-firefox3.0b3/ | 21:14 |
| [reed] | [03:12:22PM] <rhelmer|afk> awesome | 21:14 |
| [reed] | [03:12:29PM] <rhelmer|afk> stupid clock, i'll kick it over | 21:14 |
| [reed] | [03:12:36PM] <nthomas|afk> probably screws the buildid | 21:14 |
| [reed] | [03:12:40PM] <rhelmer|afk> yeah | 21:14 |
| [reed] | [03:12:41PM] <rhelmer|afk> nthomas|afk: tx | 21:14 |
| Ubulette | lol | 21:15 |
| dejv_ntb | hello | 21:15 |
| Ubulette | [reed], cvs is much faster today | 21:16 |
| [reed] | I don't think cvs-mirror has changed. | 21:17 |
| [reed] | weird | 21:17 |
| dejv_ntb | please can you look at bug #106316 if the upstream fix landed in ubuntu? | 21:17 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 106316 in ghdl "sync request" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/106316 | 21:17 |
| dejv_ntb | bug #106314 | 21:17 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 106314 in firefox "[edgy] Firefox doesn't support X11/Gnome/KDE session managment" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/106314 | 21:17 |
| Ubulette | mozilla bug 93789 | 21:19 |
| ubotu | Mozilla bug 93789 in OS Integration "Mozilla should support X11 session management" [Enhancement,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93789 | 21:19 |
| Ubulette | taggued as fixed | 21:19 |
| [reed] | mozilla bug 262258 | 21:19 |
| ubotu | Mozilla bug 262258 in XRE Startup "GNOME session support broken ("save current setup")" [Normal,Assigned] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=262258 | 21:19 |
| [reed] | has patch, waiting for review | 21:19 |
| [reed] | if that's what you're talking about | 21:19 |
| dejv_ntb | not sure | 21:20 |
| dejv_ntb | I'm cleaning up my bugs and see "resolved fixed" upstream at this one | 21:21 |
| dejv_ntb | and just "in progress" in LP | 21:21 |
| Ubulette | the moz bug linked in lp is fixed, apparently since 3.0 alpha 7 | 21:22 |
| Ubulette | not ff 2.0.* | 21:23 |
| dejv_ntb | but it isn't in "in progress" state for 2.0 either, is it? | 21:25 |
| Ubulette | i don't think so. [reed], you're the bugzilla expert here :) do you confirm ? | 21:27 |
| dejv_ntb | if upstream won't fix, "invalid" would be suited better | 21:29 |
| Ubulette | yes | 21:29 |
| dejv_ntb | unless you [mozilla team] will hack the fix to 2.0 also :) | 21:30 |
| Ubulette | I wont for sure. i'll let asac decide. | 21:30 |
| dejv_ntb | It's waste of time IMO | 21:35 |
| Ubulette | indeed | 21:35 |
| dejv_ntb | FF3 is way ahead of 2 and it has "remember tabs" feature | 21:36 |
| dejv_ntb | so this is now just nuisance at logging off | 21:36 |
| dejv_ntb | ok, thanks for your time | 21:38 |
| Ubulette | asac, you're profile script won(t work | 21:55 |
| asac | Ubulette: which cases? | 22:11 |
| Ubulette | several bugs | 22:11 |
| Ubulette | i've fixed them | 22:11 |
| Ubulette | 1 | 22:11 |
| Ubulette | it was granparadiso, not ff-granparadiso | 22:11 |
| asac | Ubulette: ok thanks | 22:12 |
| Ubulette | 2/ if you have like me the 3 old profiles, you'll end up with the oldest one after 3 runs | 22:12 |
| Ubulette | i've added a stamp file | 22:12 |
| asac | I cannot rule out typo ... I tested the most important use cases though | 22:12 |
| asac | Ubulette: really? ... oh right :) ... well you could have checked for *replaced as well | 22:13 |
| asac | e.g. if such a directory exists you never want to migrate | 22:13 |
| Ubulette | ok, doable too. | 22:13 |
| Ubulette | hm, no, it's either *replaced, or *abandoned, or ... | 22:14 |
| Ubulette | why a * in ${LIBDIR}*/ffox-3-beta-profile-migration-dialog ? | 22:16 |
| asac | Ubulette: now that i think about it: all should be renamed | 22:16 |
| Ubulette | it's not needed | 22:16 |
| asac | what is not needed? | 22:16 |
| asac | LIBDIR* ? | 22:17 |
| Ubulette | yes | 22:17 |
| asac | yeah ... i should have switched that back | 22:17 |
| Ubulette | what good does it do to rename all old profiles ? | 22:18 |
| asac | what good does it do to keep them? | 22:19 |
| Ubulette | right :) | 22:19 |
| asac | i though it would make sense to wipe them completely ... | 22:19 |
| Ubulette | we just rename anyway so there're still there | 22:19 |
| Ubulette | oh | 22:19 |
| asac | then i thought that some people might consider this: loss of data ... so i thought renaming them to something officially obsolete would be the right intermediate solution | 22:20 |
| Ubulette | ok, doing that rename with an explicit name | 22:20 |
| asac | explicit? | 22:21 |
| Ubulette | like you did for the others | 22:22 |
| asac | yes fine | 22:22 |
| Ubulette | i see you like unnecessary ${} in shell | 22:22 |
| asac | sometimes yes | 22:22 |
| Ubulette | makefile habit ? | 22:22 |
| asac | well i have never looked into the details how shell parses variables (e.g. how does it detect the end) ... so if i squash things together i use ${} to be safe ... and then i change the rest to the same approach to keep things more easily readable | 22:27 |
| Ubulette | it looks artificial to me. I've written zillions of lines of shell over the years. | 22:29 |
| Ubulette | I only use ${} when it's needed like ${FOO}bar or ${FOO}_bar or ${FOO}123 | 22:31 |
| Ubulette | but I keep $FOO.bar, etc.. | 22:31 |
| Ubulette | $FOO-bar | 22:31 |
| Ubulette | for ex, ${MOZDIR}/${FOUND} is totally useless | 22:32 |
| Ubulette | asac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/4222/ | 22:40 |
| asac | mozilla bug 344818 | 22:44 |
| ubotu | Mozilla bug 344818 in Build Config "Linking - missing library deps" [Major,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344818 | 22:44 |
| asac | Ubulette: granparadiso and trunk most likely should be alpha.abandoned :-P | 22:47 |
| asac | anyway ... now ${} and $XX are completely mixed up | 22:47 |
| asac | :) | 22:47 |
| Ubulette | it was already mixed up, i've tried to keep yours as much as possible, even if I don't really like it. What do you propose ? | 22:48 |
| Ubulette | I can either drop all non needed or add everywhere | 22:49 |
| Ubulette | i vote just for ".abandoned" | 22:51 |
| Ubulette | ok, committed | 23:00 |
| Ubulette | damn, ppa buildds are stuck by a kernel (1h+), openoffice (6h+), kde, ... | 23:04 |
| asac | mozilla bug 130336 | 23:06 |
| ubotu | Mozilla bug 130336 in Plug-ins "can load plugin from new $HOME tree" [Normal,Verified: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130336 | 23:06 |
| asac | Ubulette: yes, i think there are plans to add a bunch more machines soon ... but those packages even block the real buildd's usually :) | 23:06 |
| Ubulette | yep, the kernel will take 4 or 5h, oo, i don't know, it's painful | 23:07 |
| Ubulette | new h/w is definitely good | 23:08 |
| Ubulette | oh, another guy pushed a kernel | 23:09 |
| Ubulette | seems everyone is pushing the same packages | 23:09 |
| Ubulette | my bot failed on ff3 today because xul is now b4pre but ff3.head has >= b3 << b4 | 23:12 |
| Ubulette | [reed], do I need to ask for superreview for 292254 ? | 23:28 |
| [reed] | what's 292254? | 23:29 |
| Ubulette | oops, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344818 | 23:30 |
| ubotu | Mozilla bug 344818 in Build Config "Linking - missing library deps" [Major,New] | 23:30 |
| [reed] | no | 23:30 |
| [reed] | vlad is enough | 23:30 |
| Ubulette | so it's enough like that ? | 23:30 |
| [reed] | yes | 23:31 |
| [reed] | it's a blocker, so it doesn't need approval | 23:31 |
| [reed] | and I added the checkin-needed keyword already | 23:31 |
| [reed] | I'll get to it sometime | 23:31 |
| [reed] | tree is still closed right now | 23:31 |
| Ubulette | really ? i thought it was open since b4pre landed | 23:33 |
| [reed] | it's been closed since last night for stuart landing jemalloc | 23:34 |
| [reed] | http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/Firefox/ | 23:34 |
| [reed] | see that | 23:34 |
| Ubulette | ok | 23:34 |
| Ubulette | i was on it already | 23:34 |
| Ubulette | http://www.osnews.com/story/19278 | 23:35 |
| [reed] | nice | 23:37 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!