=== asac_ is now known as asac
[13:02] <asac> Ubulette: profile migration pushed
=== \sh_away is now known as \sh
[13:18] <asac> Ubulette: how did you take care that the time you use in DEBIAN_DATE is PST?
[13:19] <asac> i don't see any PST or something in the date expression used during checkout+
[13:43] <asac> lunch
[13:57] <asac> back
=== jimmy_ is now known as jimmy
=== ]reed[ is now known as [reed]
[16:07] <asac> Ubulette: you are a perl expert, right? j2se1.4-amd64 fails to build because of some illegal perl in rules (apparently)
[16:08] <asac> most likely it became illegal in recent perls, because the package built in feisty :)
[16:08] <asac> Ubulette: http://paste.ubuntu.com/4207/
[16:09] <asac> http://paste.ubuntu.com/4208/
[16:09] <asac> thants the complete expression
=== \sh is now known as \sh_away
[18:24] <Ubulette> hi
[18:25] <Ubulette> indeed, i'm good in perl (how did you know???)
[18:25] <Ubulette> I'll have a look in a short while
=== ]reed[ is now known as [reed]
[18:32] <asac> Ubulette: you told me long ago :)
[18:32] <Ubulette> really ? oh, ok
[18:35] <asac> (somehow my brain is still intact)
[18:37] <Ubulette> the code is weird but correct. Which perl is that ?
[18:37] <asac> ... it fails like in the past
[18:37] <asac> Ubulette: try to build j2se1.4-amd64
[18:37] <asac> (i assume you have amd64)
[18:38] <Ubulette> i have but it's now running i386 :P
[18:38] <asac> oh damn ;)
[19:19] <Ubulette> asac, so ff3 b3 will replace ff2 ?
[19:28] <Ubulette> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=688435
[20:24] <armin76> Ubulette: guess you know that's not new? :P
[20:46] <Ubulette> what ? the corruption ? for me it's gone
[21:04] <Ubulette> [reed], what was wrong with b3_rc1 ?
[21:05] <Ubulette> woow, and 200012rc4
[21:06] <[reed]> build&release forgot to change some settings on their end
[21:06] <[reed]> to match what had been changed on dev-end
[21:06] <[reed]> so, makes those builds not match what nightlies had been using
[21:06] <[reed]> so, they fixed it
[21:06] <[reed]> :)
[21:07] <Ubulette> what's the eta for final b3 if everything goes according to plan ?
[21:08] <[reed]> next Tuesday
[21:08] <Ubulette> 1 week !!!
[21:08] <[reed]> is that an exclamation of joy or despair?
[21:08] <Ubulette> I have time to do a rc3 preview than :)
[21:08] <Ubulette> rc2
[21:08] <armin76> ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/ <- 2030? :D
[21:09] <[reed]> heh
[21:09] <[reed]> lol
[21:09] <Ubulette> ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/nightly/3.0b3-candidates/
[21:10] <armin76> ah, that means it will be released in 2030 :P
[21:10] <[reed]> haha
[21:10] <Ubulette> rotfl
[21:14] <Ubulette> asac, is your "profile migrator" ready ? i'm about to push a preview to my ppa... :S
[21:14] <[reed]> [03:11:46PM] <nthomas|afk> rhelmer|afk: linux slave thinks it's 2030
[21:14] <[reed]> [03:12:01PM] <rhelmer|afk> er
[21:14] <[reed]> [03:12:03PM] <rhelmer|afk> really?
[21:14] <[reed]> [03:12:20PM] <nthomas|afk> http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/2030/02/2030-02-05-11-firefox3.0b3/
[21:14] <[reed]> [03:12:22PM] <rhelmer|afk> awesome
[21:14] <[reed]> [03:12:29PM] <rhelmer|afk> stupid clock, i'll kick it over
[21:14] <[reed]> [03:12:36PM] <nthomas|afk> probably screws the buildid
[21:14] <[reed]> [03:12:40PM] <rhelmer|afk> yeah
[21:14] <[reed]> [03:12:41PM] <rhelmer|afk> nthomas|afk: tx
[21:15] <Ubulette> lol
[21:15] <dejv_ntb> hello
[21:16] <Ubulette> [reed], cvs is much faster today
[21:17] <[reed]> I don't think cvs-mirror has changed.
[21:17] <[reed]> weird
[21:17] <dejv_ntb> please can you look at bug #106316 if the upstream fix landed in ubuntu?
[21:17] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 106316 in ghdl "sync request" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/106316
[21:17] <dejv_ntb> bug #106314
[21:17] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 106314 in firefox "[edgy] Firefox doesn't support X11/Gnome/KDE session managment" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/106314
[21:19] <Ubulette> mozilla bug 93789
[21:19] <ubotu> Mozilla bug 93789 in OS Integration "Mozilla should support X11 session management" [Enhancement,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93789
[21:19] <Ubulette> taggued as fixed
[21:19] <[reed]> mozilla bug 262258
[21:19] <ubotu> Mozilla bug 262258 in XRE Startup "GNOME session support broken ("save current setup")" [Normal,Assigned] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=262258
[21:19] <[reed]> has patch, waiting for review
[21:19] <[reed]> if that's what you're talking about
[21:20] <dejv_ntb> not sure
[21:21] <dejv_ntb> I'm cleaning up my bugs and see "resolved fixed" upstream at this one
[21:21] <dejv_ntb> and just "in progress" in LP
[21:22] <Ubulette> the moz bug linked in lp is fixed, apparently since 3.0 alpha 7
[21:23] <Ubulette> not ff 2.0.*
[21:25] <dejv_ntb> but it isn't in "in progress" state for 2.0 either, is it?
[21:27] <Ubulette> i don't think so. [reed], you're the bugzilla expert here :) do you confirm ?
[21:29] <dejv_ntb> if upstream won't fix, "invalid" would be suited better
[21:29] <Ubulette> yes
[21:30] <dejv_ntb> unless you [mozilla team] will hack the fix to 2.0 also :)
[21:30] <Ubulette> I wont for sure. i'll let asac decide.
[21:35] <dejv_ntb> It's waste of time IMO
[21:35] <Ubulette> indeed
[21:36] <dejv_ntb> FF3 is way ahead of 2 and it has "remember tabs" feature
[21:36] <dejv_ntb> so this is now just nuisance at logging off
[21:38] <dejv_ntb> ok, thanks for your time
[21:55] <Ubulette> asac, you're profile script won(t work
[22:11] <asac> Ubulette: which cases?
[22:11] <Ubulette> several bugs
[22:11] <Ubulette> i've fixed them
[22:11] <Ubulette> 1
[22:11] <Ubulette> it was granparadiso, not ff-granparadiso
[22:12] <asac> Ubulette: ok thanks
[22:12] <Ubulette> 2/ if you have like me the 3 old profiles, you'll end up with the oldest one after 3 runs
[22:12] <Ubulette> i've added a stamp file
[22:12] <asac> I cannot rule out typo ... I tested the most important use cases though
[22:13] <asac> Ubulette: really? ... oh right :) ... well you could have checked for *replaced as well
[22:13] <asac> e.g. if such a directory exists you never want to migrate
[22:13] <Ubulette> ok, doable too.
[22:14] <Ubulette> hm, no, it's either *replaced, or *abandoned, or ...
[22:16] <Ubulette> why a * in ${LIBDIR}*/ffox-3-beta-profile-migration-dialog ?
[22:16] <asac> Ubulette: now that i think about it: all should be renamed
[22:16] <Ubulette> it's not needed
[22:16] <asac> what is not needed?
[22:17] <asac> LIBDIR* ?
[22:17] <Ubulette> yes
[22:17] <asac> yeah ... i should have switched that back
[22:18] <Ubulette> what good does it do to rename all old profiles ?
[22:19] <asac> what good does it do to keep them?
[22:19] <Ubulette> right :)
[22:19] <asac> i though it would make sense to wipe them completely ...
[22:19] <Ubulette> we just rename anyway so there're still there
[22:19] <Ubulette> oh
[22:20] <asac> then i thought that some people might consider this: loss of data ... so i thought renaming them to something officially obsolete would be the right intermediate solution
[22:20] <Ubulette> ok, doing that rename with an explicit name
[22:21] <asac> explicit?
[22:22] <Ubulette> like you did for the others
[22:22] <asac> yes fine
[22:22] <Ubulette> i see you like unnecessary ${} in shell
[22:22] <asac> sometimes yes
[22:22] <Ubulette> makefile habit ?
[22:27] <asac> well i have never looked into the details how shell parses variables (e.g. how does it detect the end) ... so if i squash things together i use ${} to be safe ... and then i change the rest to the same approach to keep things more easily readable
[22:29] <Ubulette> it looks artificial to me. I've written zillions of lines of shell over the years.
[22:31] <Ubulette> I only use ${} when it's needed like ${FOO}bar or ${FOO}_bar or ${FOO}123
[22:31] <Ubulette> but I keep $FOO.bar, etc..
[22:31] <Ubulette> $FOO-bar
[22:32] <Ubulette> for ex, ${MOZDIR}/${FOUND} is totally useless
[22:40] <Ubulette> asac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/4222/
[22:44] <asac> mozilla bug 344818
[22:44] <ubotu> Mozilla bug 344818 in Build Config "Linking - missing library deps" [Major,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344818
[22:47] <asac> Ubulette: granparadiso and trunk most likely should be alpha.abandoned :-P
[22:47] <asac> anyway ... now ${} and $XX are completely mixed up
[22:47] <asac> :)
[22:48] <Ubulette> it was already mixed up, i've tried to keep yours as much as possible, even if I don't really like it. What do you propose ?
[22:49] <Ubulette> I can either drop all non needed or add everywhere
[22:51] <Ubulette> i vote just for ".abandoned"
[23:00] <Ubulette> ok, committed
[23:04] <Ubulette> damn, ppa buildds are stuck by a kernel (1h+), openoffice (6h+), kde, ...
[23:06] <asac> mozilla bug 130336
[23:06] <ubotu> Mozilla bug 130336 in Plug-ins "can load plugin from new $HOME tree" [Normal,Verified: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130336
[23:06] <asac> Ubulette: yes, i think there are plans to add a bunch more machines soon ... but those packages even block the real buildd's usually :)
[23:07] <Ubulette> yep, the kernel will take 4 or 5h, oo, i don't know, it's painful
[23:08] <Ubulette> new h/w is definitely good
[23:09] <Ubulette> oh, another guy pushed a kernel
[23:09] <Ubulette> seems everyone is pushing the same packages
[23:12] <Ubulette> my bot failed on ff3 today because xul is now b4pre but ff3.head has >= b3 << b4
[23:28] <Ubulette> [reed], do I need to ask for superreview for 292254 ?
[23:29] <[reed]> what's 292254?
[23:30] <Ubulette> oops, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344818
[23:30] <ubotu> Mozilla bug 344818 in Build Config "Linking - missing library deps" [Major,New]
[23:30] <[reed]> no
[23:30] <[reed]> vlad is enough
[23:30] <Ubulette> so it's enough like that ?
[23:31] <[reed]> yes
[23:31] <[reed]> it's a blocker, so it doesn't need approval
[23:31] <[reed]> and I added the checkin-needed keyword already
[23:31] <[reed]> I'll get to it sometime
[23:31] <[reed]> tree is still closed right now
[23:33] <Ubulette> really ? i thought it was open since b4pre landed
[23:34] <[reed]> it's been closed since last night for stuart landing jemalloc
[23:34] <[reed]> http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/Firefox/
[23:34] <[reed]> see that
[23:34] <Ubulette> ok
[23:34] <Ubulette> i was on it already
[23:35] <Ubulette> http://www.osnews.com/story/19278
[23:37] <[reed]> nice