| === davidm_ is now known as davidm | ||
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| dholbach | good morning | 07:47 |
|---|---|---|
| === cjwatson_ is now known as cjwatson | ||
| jussi01 | Hello all, which browser does ubuntu mobile use, and is flash lite available for it? | 12:33 |
| === cjwatson_ is now known as cjwatson | ||
| === doko_ is now known as doko | ||
| agoliveira | jussi01: UME uses basically firefox with a simplified interface so flash can run on it. I don't know what "flash lite" is though. | 12:46 |
| jussi01 | agoliveira: flash lite is the version of flash made for mbile phones... | 12:50 |
| jussi01 | ie: http://www.adobe.com/products/flashlite/ | 12:51 |
| agoliveira | jussi01: UME's target hardware has more than enough power to run the regular flash plugin so, unless there's some specific need, I don't see a reason to use the lite version. | 12:53 |
| jussi01 | agoliveira: ok, great. thanks :) | 12:54 |
| agoliveira | jussi01: No problem! | 12:54 |
| mdz_ | agoliveira,jussi01: if it uses less CPU (and therefore battery power), that would certainly be a good reason to use it | 13:54 |
| agoliveira | mdz_: For what I've quickly gathered, I don't think we can use it. I've seen references to symbian, brew and arm processors only but, anyway, I didn't go much deeper. | 14:00 |
| agoliveira | I found a FAQ that says: Does Flash Lite 2.1 support Linux? Flash Lite 2.1 can be ported to many realtime operating systems including Linux®. We are not | 14:02 |
| agoliveira | offering a downloadable version of Flash Lite 2.1 on Linux at this time. | 14:02 |
| tonyespy | amitk: ping | 16:46 |
| Jay-laptop | #launchpad-meeting | 17:21 |
| amitk | tonyespy: pong | 18:26 |
| tonyespy | amitk: i'm just putting together an email re: kernel sync, the ppa, and git trees... right now i'm not able to build against the version of the hardy kernel in the ppa cause i can't match it to a corresponding tagged git tree... | 18:27 |
| tonyespy | amitk: i'm mid-way thru composing the email... so give me a minute or two and i'll send it | 18:28 |
| amitk | tonyespy: I will answer the email in a bit then.. dinner time | 18:28 |
| tonyespy | amitk: cool, thanks | 18:29 |
| smagoun | bfiller_: Mithrandir the epoch has crept back into the hildon-desktop version number. Is that intentional? It happened at 1:0.0.43-1ubuntu1, so it's been that way for awhile. | 19:32 |
| bfiller_ | smagoun: what is the epoch? | 19:32 |
| smagoun | the 1: at the front of the version number | 19:32 |
| bfiller_ | smagoun: right | 19:33 |
| smagoun | looks like horace li put it there, the h-d changelog suggests that Mithrandir's removed it once already | 19:33 |
| bfiller_ | anyone know the best way to fix an amd64 build problem - compiler doesn't like a cast from gboolean to gpointer | 19:55 |
| agoliveira | bfiller_: Don't bother. We are not using it on amd64 platform anyway. | 19:59 |
| agoliveira | bfiller_: I mean, unless you want to fix it for the sake of fixing :) | 20:00 |
| bfiller_ | agoliveira: just to have good form :) | 20:02 |
| bfiller_ | agoliveira: so I don't get yelled at by anybody:) | 20:02 |
| smagoun | agoliveira: we need all the motu points we can get | 20:03 |
| agoliveira | smagoun: Can I give you mine? (If I actually have any, of course :) ) | 20:03 |
| suihkulokki | bfiller_: libhildonhelp? | 20:10 |
| bfiller_ | suihkulokki: what about libhildonhelp? | 20:11 |
| suihkulokki | bfiller_: is that where you have the gboolean issue? | 20:12 |
| bfiller_ | suihkulokki: no, it's in a patch that I recently created (04_container_visibility.patch). I think I have a fix though, as I was doing something pretty dumb | 20:13 |
| suihkulokki | bfiller_: ok, I just fixed there a similar problem using GINT_TO_POINTER | 20:14 |
| bfiller_ | suihkulokki: cool, I think I can use that macro as well. Thanks for the tip. | 20:14 |
| * agoliveira sometimes makes some stupid english errors and notices just *after* send the email. Frustrating... | 20:23 | |
| === cjwatson_ is now known as cjwatson | ||
| GrueMaster | So, can someone explain why a fresh install of MIC only installs the 2.6.22 kernel when building an Ubuntu-Hardy image when using menlow-lpia-ubuntu-hardy-ppa platform? | 21:48 |
| smagoun | GrueMaster: It installs a 2.6.24 kernel when using that platform, I just made one. When you installed from the USB drive to the target, did the boot prompt give you an option of which kernel to pick? | 21:54 |
| amitk | GrueMaster: fresh install of MIC from where? Hardy or git tree? | 21:57 |
| GrueMaster | Sorry. Had my back turned. I do a daily git pull of MIC from moblin.org as part of my support work. | 22:28 |
| GrueMaster | smagoun: I have a script that does my project builds, basically feeding MIC with cmdline options. It makes the project first, then the target, then adds the fsets. I also tried this all manually using the GUI. What I end up with is the 2.6.22-14-lpia kernel in the target/<target>/fs/boot directory. No 2.6.24 kernel. | 22:30 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!