=== asac_ is now known as asac | ||
=== doko_ is now known as doko | ||
kraut | moin | 08:18 |
---|---|---|
Fujitsu | .win 26 | 08:18 |
Fujitsu | Oops. | 08:18 |
eradicus | hi why can't make menuconfig work? curses.h file not found even if it's installed properly...what could be the prob? | 10:52 |
abogani | eradicus: Are you already installed libncurses5-dev ? | 10:59 |
eradicus | abogani: yeah, it's working now. thanks ;) | 11:00 |
abogani | eradicus: You are welcome. | 11:00 |
=== \sh_away is now known as \sh | ||
=== amitk_ is now known as amitk | ||
Kano | hi rtg , did you see 2.6.24.1 + patch against latest root exploit? | 13:45 |
Kano | err .2 i mean | 13:46 |
Kano | has the fix | 13:46 |
rtg | Kano: kees is working on it. | 13:46 |
Kano | you only need .2 | 13:46 |
amitk | Kano: Merging 2.6.24.2 soon | 14:03 |
mateusz | Hi, Is ubuntu kernel patched with hdaps_protect ? | 14:49 |
amitk | mateusz: is that part of tp_smapi? | 14:54 |
mateusz | amitk: no | 14:56 |
amitk | mateusz: then file a bug, mark it as wishlist and describe why it should be in Ubuntu | 14:58 |
mateusz | amitk: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.22/+bug/139881 | 15:02 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 139881 in linux-source-2.6.22 "hdaps_protect patch to enable disk head parking on thinkpads" [Wishlist,Won't fix] | 15:02 |
mateusz | the bug is already there | 15:02 |
Kano | rtg: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/97655 | 15:05 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 97655 in linux-source-2.6.20 "dmraid45 target please" [Wishlist,Won't fix] | 15:05 |
Kano | rtg: what about that patch | 15:05 |
amitk | mateusz: it has been rejected for Ubuntu hardy, please read Ben Collins' comment | 15:06 |
mateusz | ok.. then can someone provide patch for Ubuntu users that applies on ubuntu kernel? | 15:08 |
amitk | mateusz: you should comment on the bug or ask the original patch submitter to do that. | 15:10 |
mateusz | amitk: patch submitter is debian user.. and patch doesnt applay on 2.4.22 ubuntu kernel | 15:12 |
amitk | mateusz: unfortunately, we can't help you here. It isn't a patch that is supported by the kernel-team. | 15:13 |
Kano | rtg: btw. there will be an updated aufs for 2.6.24 soon | 15:17 |
Kano | but i think you have enough to do for now *g* | 15:17 |
Kano | bbl | 15:17 |
mateusz | amitk: well someone said that tp_smapi will be in ubuntu.. and hdapsd hdaps-utils are already in gutsy.. they're useless without hdaps_protect | 15:18 |
laga | mateusz: that discussion already is in the ticket | 15:18 |
_MMA_ | Maybe I'm out of the loop but where is BenC? | 15:18 |
mateusz | laga: but why you're willing to put tp_smapi in ubuntu kernel and also saying me that hdaps_protect is not your team job ? | 15:19 |
laga | mateusz: i'm not part of the kernel team | 15:20 |
mateusz | laga: hdapsd + tp_smapi + hdaps_protect is needed for this to work | 15:20 |
mateusz | but someone said tp_smapi will be next week in ubuntu kernel | 15:20 |
mateusz | it wont work either without hdaps_protect | 15:20 |
mateusz | amitk: ? | 15:23 |
* laga must have gotten something mixed up then | 15:23 | |
smb | mateusz: I added the tp_smapi drivers to lum. With hdaps_protect you mean the hdaps driver from tp_smapi or another one? | 15:24 |
amitk | mateusz: smb here is looking at the integration of tp_smapi. One of the reasons to integrate it was for finer grained battery charging control. | 15:24 |
mateusz | smb: I think about queue freeze support for ATA | 15:25 |
mateusz | smb: aka hdaps_protect | 15:25 |
mateusz | something diffrent than hdaps driver and tp_smapi | 15:25 |
mateusz | amitk: ok I understand... | 15:27 |
mateusz | amitk: istead of acpi ? | 15:27 |
smb | mateusz: I have a quick look at the bug you mentioned, to get myself updated | 15:27 |
amitk | right | 15:27 |
smb | mateusz: No, additionally | 15:27 |
smb | mateusz: I just looked at the hdaps_protect patch, and I must agree with ben. It touches quite a lot different places (especially ll_rw_blk.c) to simply include it. The tp_smapi and the hdaps driver there can just be added to lum without them beeing active. | 15:37 |
mateusz | smb: Zhenech says, that patch for 2.6.24 sometimes doesnt work.. system breaks.. but for some RC its fine... | 15:41 |
smb | mateusz: For patches like that it is better to have them at least in the -mm tree and then moving to mainline. | 15:51 |
amitk | mateusz: have you talked to patch author on why the patch is not upstrea> | 15:53 |
amitk | *upstream? | 15:54 |
=== fabbione is now known as thegodfather | ||
mateusz | amitk: no I dont know the author | 15:58 |
=== LifeHacker is now known as tuxmaniac | ||
amitk | rtg: smb: 2.6.24.2 pushed to git. I'll try out smb's new tools for test builds late tonite | 16:06 |
amitk | you are welcome to test build in the meanwhile. I am out for a few hours | 16:07 |
=== \sh is now known as \sh_away | ||
=== smb is now known as smb_away | ||
macd | I dont see a bug filed on LP regarding vmsplice vuln for ubuntu, only some other projects, is this being worked currently? | 18:27 |
macd | nvm, I see it as another tagged release. | 18:28 |
rtg | macd: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.22/+bug/190587 | 18:33 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 190587 in linux-source-2.6.22 "Local root exploit in kernel 2.6.17 - 2.6.24 (vmsplice)" [High,In progress] | 18:33 |
macd | thx, I saw it under 190587 also ;) | 18:41 |
macd | the fixes under that bug in GIT both worked for me in solving root/DoS | 18:43 |
=== smb_away is now known as smb | ||
Kano | amitk: apm_32 missing (tested server target) | 19:10 |
amitk | Kano: what is apm_32? | 19:45 |
mjg59 | The apm module got renamed apm_32 in .24 by accident | 19:46 |
mjg59 | It was going to be changed back, but I don't know if that's happened in stable | 19:46 |
Kano | amitk: you never seem to compile your kernel ;) | 19:47 |
amitk | mjg59: it was fixed in 2.6.24.1 | 19:47 |
amitk | Kano: we do, but not on your schedules :) | 19:47 |
salty-horse | will the recently discovered user->root exploit be patched soon? should I worry? | 19:50 |
rtg | salty-horse: it will be upload later this afternoon. | 19:51 |
rtg | s/upload/uploaded/ | 19:51 |
salty-horse | If all services/ports are closed, and I don't run unknown binaries, should I be safe? | 19:51 |
rtg | salty-horse: Given that its an exploit that has existed since 2.6.17, you ought to be OK for the next few hours. | 19:53 |
salty-horse | yeah, but I thought it was "in the wild" only recently :D | 19:53 |
rtg | well, its certainly becoming more well known in the last few days. | 19:54 |
JanC | salty-horse: you can always kick untrusted local users off your machines ;-) | 19:56 |
salty-horse | I'll have to rig some alarm system first :) | 19:57 |
Kano | rtg: ok is maybe wrong as the exploit is new. can be dangerous for multiuser systems | 19:58 |
=== \sh_away is now known as \sh | ||
=== \sh is now known as \sh_away | ||
Kano | rtg: btw. ath5k would work, i just dont know how to add it because of the build-deps | 20:50 |
kraut | is this vmsplice issue fixed in 2.6.22-14-server? | 22:06 |
amitk | kraut: there will be an upload later today AFAIK | 22:38 |
ln- | what will it break? | 22:39 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!