[08:04] <dholbach> good morning
[08:42] <jussi01> Morningdholbach 
[08:43] <HighNo> g'morning
[08:50] <dholbach> morning jussi01
[15:54] <smagoun> bfiller: StevenK did push a libosso patch last night, do you know what it was supposed to fix? The changelog says what he did (link the system + session busses) but not why, and it clobbers the fix I was going to put in.
[15:57] <bfiller> smagoun: I'll forward you an email from Martin Pitt that explains the proposed fix..
[15:57] <smagoun> thx
[15:57] <bfiller> smagoun: I assume StevenK took his advice..
[16:10] <bfiller> smagoun: I should have mentioned the email I was referring to were just comments on bug 149275
[16:10] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 149275 in tasks "First cut of source packages for -mobile promotions" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/149275
[16:11] <smagoun> thanks
[19:17] <agoliveira> mjg59: Around?
[19:28] <mjg59> agoliveira: Hi
[19:29] <agoliveira> Hi there. I heard that you will be talking at the Bossa conference, is that confirmed?
[19:33] <mjg59> Yes
[19:35] <agoliveira> mjg59: Cool. I hope we meet there then :)
[20:34] <ian_brasil> mjg59: what will you be talking about?
[20:37] <ian_brasil> ah found it...ubuntu mobile ;)
[20:52] <crevette> hi guys
[20:55] <crevette> it seems bluez-gnome doesn't work with latest bluez-utils; bluez-properties lists zero services
[22:31] <StevenK> smagoun: That change was so libosso could get promoted. Which it now has.
[22:31] <smagoun> StevenK: thanks. Turns out that change also fixes (masks?) the problem you and I discussed yesterday.
[22:32] <smagoun> Which is good, because I can now build a stable, bootable image.
[22:37] <StevenK> smagoun: I can explain it, but I'm on the phone.
[22:37] <smagoun> StevenK: no problem, I'm not sure I want to know :)
[22:41] <smagoun> tonyespy: The mid linux + lum trees on kernel.ubuntu.com are supposed to match the PPA, right? But right now there's no package in the PPA that corresponds to the head of the mid linux/lum trees, right?
[22:42] <smagoun> tonyespy: nevermind...it's the ume tree that in theory matches the PPA, not the mid tree.
[22:43] <tonyespy> The Intel/Canonical hardy git trees owned by RobR are the master for the PPA
[22:43] <tonyespy> smagoun: currently the kernel & lum packages in the PPA aren't publically available via git right now...
[22:44] <tonyespy> smagoun: also, all of the patches are in the .7 kernel in hardy, so we're not using the PPA kernel or LUM packages currently...
[22:44] <robr> i heard my name and my ears began to itch :-)
[22:45] <tonyespy> robr: sorry rob...  ;)
[22:45] <smagoun> tonyespy: right, I got that. I saw that Mike's tree (the mid tree) already had the beta 6 PSB driver integrated, but it looks like that tree doesn't correspond to any .debs anywhere outside Mike's machine.
[22:45] <tonyespy> smagoun: you are correct sir
[22:46] <tonyespy> smagoun: mike's tree is his personal sandbox, nothing more, nothing less
[22:47] <tonyespy> robr, jayc, amitk: by the way, i have the sd8686 v9 driver building on 2.6.24.  hope to test tomorrow, then will push my patch up to my tree on kernel.ubuntu.com
[22:47] <smagoun> robr: it looks like jay chetty pushed the beta 6 drivers to linux-ubuntu-modules in his personal tree (and mike's tree), are you guys going to push a build to the PPA?
[22:48] <smagoun> jayc: ^^^
[22:48] <robr> i believe once X side is tested out it will be pushed by AmitK into the PPA
[23:07] <mawhalen> rustyl: ?