[03:42] <[reed]> system hunspell coming to a build near you soon!
[08:39] <asac> uff ... what a marathon meeting
[09:58] <asac> Ubulette: ever looked at j2se1.4? and why it chokes on perl expression in rules?
[16:25] <asac> bug 127985
[16:25] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 127985 in libgtk2-perl "gutsy/amd64: ftbfs / autopkgtest failure" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/127985
[18:06] <asac> ok big upload batch now ... off for now
[18:45] <Ubulette> hi
[19:02] <armin76> bumb
[19:03] <Ubulette> asac, i've fixed the ftbfs of nspr on ppc
[19:04] <armin76> nspr failed on ppc?
[19:06] <Ubulette> debian specific failure
[19:06] <Ubulette> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11927838/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-powerpc.nspr_4.7.0~1.9b3-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[19:11] <armin76> i see...
[19:13] <Ubulette> hmm, is it powerpc or ppc
[19:14] <Ubulette> armin76, do you have ppc box ?
[19:14] <armin76> i have access to one
[19:14] <Ubulette> what does gcc -dumpmachine gives you ?
[19:14] <armin76> powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
[19:15] <Ubulette> hmm, it's supposed to be a triplet
[19:15] <Ubulette> i486-linux-gnu
[19:16] <armin76> i686-pc-linux-gnu
[19:17] <armin76> ppc is kernel stuff, powerpc is userland
[19:17] <armin76> Linux luna 2.6.14-hardened #1 Tue Nov 15 21:55:38 UTC 2005 ppc 7447/7457, altivec supported CHRP Pegasos2 GNU/Linux
[19:17] <armin76> but the compiler is powerpc
[19:18] <Ubulette> ok, i stick with powerpc
[19:19] <armin76> fyi mozilla uses uname -m in the 1.8 branch
[19:27] <asac> Ubulette: ok pushed. thanks
[19:53] <Ubulette> thx
[19:53] <Ubulette> asac, didn't you say earlier that more build boxes will be assigned to ppas ?
[19:59] <shirish> guys, any idea when ff3b3 will hit hardy?
[20:00] <shirish> !log
[20:00] <ubotu> Channel logs can be found at http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ - Logs for LoCo channels are at http://logs.ubuntu-eu.org/freenode/ - See also « /msg ubotu ircstats »
[20:04] <shirish> Ubulette: I know u're up, thanx to the logs ;)
[20:04] <asac> shirish: http://www.asoftsite.org/s9y/archives/128-My-5-Today-....html
[20:05] <shirish> asac: when would that be pushed to ubuntu mirrors?
[20:05] <asac> shirish: once they are built
[20:06] <asac> shirish: press reload on https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/3.0~b3+nobinonly-0ubuntu1
[20:08] <shirish> ok, thanx :) Do know will get it only if all the architectures are built without any complaints, will take a while. :( But still u guys are awesome.
[20:08] <Ubulette> xul started 18min ago
[20:08] <Ubulette> i386
[20:09] <Ubulette> and 15 min ago on amd64
[20:12] <shirish> would take it own's time even if everything gets resolved. Even getting it on the mirrors take about couple of hrs.
[20:16] <shirish> bbl, take care guys , good thing to know is I can check out this in few hours.
[20:39] <Ubulette> asac, why did you say firefox-4.0 everywhere ???  * provide link /usr/bin/firefox => /usr/bin/firefox-4.0
[20:51] <asac> everywhere? ... i guess its just that typo, isn't it?
[21:01] <Ubulette> asac, did you reup ff2 ?
[21:01] <asac> Ubulette: tomorrow
[21:01] <asac> its ready ... just want to test a few things
[21:01] <Ubulette> hm, will it work ?
[21:02] <asac> why not?
[21:02] <Ubulette> i mean, with ff3 already in ?
[21:02] <Ubulette> ff3 has the new ff meta package right ?
[21:02] <asac> yeah
[21:03] <asac> i renamed the binaries: firefox-2*
[21:03] <asac> if you want you could adapt your gnome preferred applications patch to look for /usr/bin/firefox-2
[21:03] <asac> as /usr/bin/firefox is now ffox 3
[21:03] <Ubulette> ff2 will not be upgraded to 3 with today's upload ?
[21:04] <asac> it will
[21:04] <asac> i will only provide a firefox 2 package that will go to universe for those that need some extension
[21:04] <asac> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~asac/firefox/ubuntu-2.0.0.x
[21:04] <Ubulette> so hardy will have no ff2 until tomorrow, right ?
[21:05] <asac> yeah :)
[21:05] <asac> hmm rev 122
[21:05] <asac> no idea why lp doesn't update that branch
[21:05] <asac> ah now
[21:06] <asac> hmmm ... i think i should push it to mozillateam
[21:07] <Ubulette> do you want to rename the ff2 profile to firefox-2.0 or something ?
[21:07] <Ubulette> would be appreciated by those willing to run the two at the same time
[21:08] <Ubulette> which is no longer possible right now
[21:10] <asac> yeah ... i know the implications. not for the first upload.
[21:11] <asac> so far i didn't pay much attention. just want to provide firefox 2 because some people complained that they rely heavily on some extension that isn't avail for ffox 3 yet
[21:11] <asac> but we could
[21:12] <asac> or maybe listen for complains and if there is real demand do it
[21:12] <asac> i will sleep about it
[21:22] <asac> Ubulette: do you still have the patch for preferred applications?
[21:23] <Ubulette> yes
[21:23] <Ubulette> i can update it
[21:24] <asac> ok i can sponsor then
[21:24] <asac> i could even replace firefox-3.0 by firefox-2 and the title for you if you give the patch to me :)
[21:24] <asac> of course, ready to patch appreciated :)
[21:32] <shirish> asac: ff3b3 is showing dependancy wait while xulrunner1.9 is showing as done both (i386) can u see/tell what the matter is?
[21:32] <Ubulette> asac, done
[21:32] <Ubulette> shirish, yep, don't worry, builders are just busy
[21:33] <Ubulette> asac, http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/debdiff/gnome-control-center_2.21.90-0ubuntu2--2.21.90-0ubuntu3.debdiff
[21:34] <shirish> Ubulette: that's ok what I want to understand is at https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/3.0~b3+nobinonly-0ubuntu1/+build/514712
[21:34] <shirish> it shows that there is a dependancy xulrunner-1.9-dev (>= 1.9~b3) which its waiting for.
[21:35] <Ubulette> it will keep retrying until it is solved.. which is already the case now
[21:35] <shirish> and if one looks at https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xulrunner-1.9/1.9~b3+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 it shows the i386 to be build.
[21:36] <shirish> to be successfully built.
[21:36] <shirish> Ubulette: so now its just waiting for the builders to be idle then it will try again or what?
[21:36] <Ubulette> armin76, xul failed on sparc for us, what about you ?
[21:37] <Ubulette> shirish, yes
[21:37] <Ubulette> shirish, https://edge.launchpad.net/+builds
[21:37] <Ubulette> virtual means ppa
[21:38] <shirish> ppa as in personal package archive?
[21:38] <Ubulette> yes
[21:39] <shirish> the urgency flag is for the builders to who should get the priority ?
[21:41] <Ubulette> most of the time, some builders are assigned to security builds or cd builds
[21:41] <Ubulette> now it's not the case
[21:42] <[reed]> Ubulette: mozilla bug 417312
[21:42] <ubotu> Mozilla bug 417312 in Web Services "webservices build broken" [Critical,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417312
[21:42] <shirish> just trying to understand the system.
[21:43] <Ubulette> [reed], b3 fails on sparc: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11930235/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-sparc.xulrunner-1.9_1.9~b3%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[21:43] <Ubulette> g++-4.2 -o nsCookieService.o -c -fvisibility=hidden -DMOZILLA_INTERNAL_API -D_IMPL_NS_COM -DEXPORT_XPT_API -DEXPORT_XPTC_API -D_IMPL_NS_COM_OBSOLETE -D_IMPL_NS_GFX -D_IMPL_NS_WIDGET -DIMPL_XREAPI -DIMPL_NS_NET -DIMPL_THEBES  -DOSTYPE=\"Linux2.6\" -DOSARCH=Linux -DIMPL_NS_NET  -I. -I. -I../../../dist/include/xpcom -I../../../dist/include/string -I../../../dist/include/pref -I../../../dist/include/storage -I../..
[21:43] <Ubulette> /../dist/include   -I../../../dist/include/necko -I/usr/include/nspr -I/usr/include  -I/usr/include  -I../../../dist/sdk/include    -fPIC   -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -Wall -Wconversion -Wpointer-arith -Woverloaded-virtual -Wsynth -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -Wcast-align -Wno-long-long -pedantic -g -fno-strict-aliasing -fshort-wchar -pthread -pipe  -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -Os -freorder-blocks -fno-re
[21:43] <Ubulette> order-functions -Werror   -DMOZILLA_CLIENT -include ../../../mozilla-config.h -Wp,-MD,.deps/nsCookieService.pp nsCookieService.cpp
[21:43] <Ubulette> cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
[21:43] <Ubulette> In file included from ../../../dist/include/xpcom/nsCOMArray.h:42,
[21:43] <Ubulette>                  from nsCookieService.cpp:59:
[21:43] <Ubulette> ../../../dist/include/xpcom/nsVoidArray.h: In member function 'void nsAutoVoidArray::ResetToAutoBuffer()':
[21:43] <Ubulette> ../../../dist/include/xpcom/nsVoidArray.h:193: warning: cast from 'char*' to 'nsVoidArray::Impl*' increases required alignment of target type
[21:43] <Ubulette> make[6]: *** [nsCookieService.o] Error 1
[21:43] <Ubulette> make[6]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/xulrunner-1.9-1.9~b3+nobinonly/build-tree/mozilla/netwerk/cookie/src'
[21:43] <Ubulette> oops, flood
[21:43] <[reed]> file a bug
[21:43] <[reed]> :)
[21:43] <[reed]> Core :: Networking: Cookies
[21:44] <Ubulette> i hate to file bugs without looking for fixes 1st but here, i can't test, i don't have access to anything other than i386 :(
[21:44] <shirish> Good luck everybody, it has been a pleasant night :)
[21:49] <Ubulette> [reed], good, you subscribe me to bugs i'm interested in :)
[21:49] <[reed]> :)
[21:54] <Ubulette> [reed], mozilla bug 417345
[21:54] <ubotu> Mozilla bug 417345 in Networking: Cookies "build broken on sparc" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417345
[22:01] <Ubulette> [reed], will you commit the webservices patch ?
[22:01] <[reed]> no, both the people in that bug have commit access
[22:02] <[reed]> the patch author will commit it
[22:02] <Ubulette> ok
[22:20] <Admiral_Chicago> asac: why does firefox-3.0 depend on gnome-keyring  and its libraries?
[22:21] <Ubulette> it does ?
[22:22] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: http://paste.ubuntu.com/4567/
[22:22] <asac> i don't see that
[22:22] <asac> the first is firefox-3.0 ... the second is xulrunner-1.9
[22:23] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: why do you think it does?
[22:24] <Admiral_Chicago> perhaps i'm looking at a different version than what was uploaded 3.0~alpha8+nobinonly-0ubuntu1
[22:24] <Admiral_Chicago> is that in hardy and not gutsy?
[22:25] <Ubulette> a8 should be gone even in gutsy
[22:26] <Admiral_Chicago> well considering i'm downloading now and updated my sources yesterday...
[22:26] <Ubulette> !info firefox-3.0 gutsy
[22:26] <ubotu> firefox-3.0 (source: firefox-3.0): lightweight web browser based on Mozilla (Development Version). In component universe, is optional. Version 3.0~alpha8+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 (gutsy), package size 1130 kB, installed size 3832 kB
[22:26] <Ubulette> hmm
[22:26] <Ubulette> oh, backport has b3~cvs from 1/1
[22:27] <Ubulette> !info firefox-3.0 gutsy-backports
[22:27] <ubotu> firefox-3.0 (source: firefox-3.0): lightweight web browser based on Mozilla (Development Version). In component universe, is optional. Version 3.0~alpha8+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 (gutsy), package size 1130 kB, installed size 3832 kB
[22:27] <Ubulette> hm
[22:27] <Admiral_Chicago> !iinfo firefox-3.0 hardy
[22:28] <Admiral_Chicago> !info firefox-3.0 hardy
[22:28] <ubotu> firefox-3.0 (source: firefox-3.0): lightweight web browser based on Mozilla (Development Version). In component main, is optional. Version 3.0~b3~cvs20080101t1000+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 (hardy), package size 1077 kB, installed size 3704 kB
[22:28] <Admiral_Chicago> guess it is time for me to update to Hardy
[22:29] <Ubulette> http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/f/firefox-3.0/firefox-3.0_3.0~b3~cvs20080101t1000+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~gutsy1_i386.deb
[22:29] <Ubulette> it's in gutsy-backports
[22:29] <Admiral_Chicago> ah i hate using backports.  i need to update the system anyways to Hardy, I might as well do that now
[22:30] <Admiral_Chicago> Ubulette: how is gnash working in Hardy? Do you know?
[22:30] <Ubulette> sorry, i don't use it
[22:30] <Admiral_Chicago> well thanks anyway
[22:32] <Ubulette> asac, got the debdiff ?
[22:47] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: in gutsy you should add -backports or my ppa to get a better version
[22:47] <asac> oh sorry :)
[22:48] <asac> didn't scroll down before answering
[22:48] <asac> Ubulette: http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/debdiff/gnome-control-center_2.21.90-0ubuntu2--2.21.90-0ubuntu3.debdiff ?
[22:49] <asac> Ubulette: why did you remove lool from Uploaders?
[22:50] <asac> (but keep the others)
[22:52] <asac> Ubulette: ok if i just drop that control hunk?
[23:07] <asac> http://songbirdnest.com/top40
[23:19] <Ubulette> i've read that too.
[23:20] <Ubulette> we still don't have songbird in :(
[23:20] <Ubulette> last time i've checked, it was a nightmare to package
[23:21] <asac> Ubulette: jorge is currently in contact with them about copyright/trademark issues
[23:21] <Ubulette> it had its private xul, is it still the case ?
[23:21] <asac> (e.g. they want to be in)
[23:21] <asac> most likely. we should work together with them once they have sorted their trademark concerns
[23:21] <asac> but he can probably tell you more
[23:22] <Ubulette> i wanted to do songbird but i've stopped because i didn't want to have another xul
[23:23] <asac> yeah ... that was the right decision imo
[23:23] <asac> they should fix that for xul 1.9 ... if they need help/advice they should ask
[23:23] <asac> i think i have to reup ephy tomorrow too
[23:24] <Ubulette> most are moz guys so they should already know
[23:24] <asac> iirc it is broken now because of nsIXPCNative*
[23:24] <asac> Ubulette: well ... moz guys still don't practice the split :)
[23:24] <Ubulette> ephy was broken for me when touching the url bar
[23:24] <asac> mozilla is the one who has the most interwoven source tree in the world :) ... with everything included
[23:25] <asac> Ubulette: yes thats because nsIXPCNative* symbol is still referred (uselessly)
[23:35] <armin76> Ubulette: didn't try beta3 on sparc, i'll let you know tomorrow