[01:10] <ubotu> New bug: #192115 in ubuntu "launchpad: shouldn't be able to add a branch for a package already in bug" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/192115
[01:55] <robvdl> Hi, I've just uploaded my first package successfully after a few goes.
[01:55] <robvdl> However, it seems to be source only https://launchpad.net/~robvdl/+archive
[01:56] <robvdl> How do I get it to show the DEB? everytime I do try to upload the DEB, I get errors that it is binary only, or mixed, and it rejects it
[01:57] <robvdl> If I build with dpkg-buildpackage -S it uploads it no problem, but it's source only
[01:57] <robvdl> any ideas?
[02:21] <robvdl> ah, it's come up now, but...
[02:21] <robvdl> make: dh_pysupport: Command not found
[02:21] <robvdl> failed to build :(
[02:22] <robvdl> it builds here at home on Gutsy
[02:25] <Hobbsee> boo
[02:26] <Hobbsee> robvdl: sounds like your package is missing a build-dep on python-support - did you build in  a chroot?
[02:26] <robvdl> I don't know
[02:27] <robvdl> I will add python-support to the control file and try again
[02:27] <robvdl> it now says Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5), python-support
[02:28] <Hobbsee> that should be more promising.
[02:42] <Hobbsee> dear launchpaders, please don't assume that people are on VAC for only a week.  thanks.
[02:55] <Hobbsee> oy, Fujitsu 
[02:56] <Hobbsee> see query :)
[03:51] <Hobbsee> cprov: how'd the session go?
[04:22] <robvdl> yay, package built successfully, thanks
[11:11] <ubotu> New bug: #192349 in soyuz "Should display unapproved queue" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/192349
[13:56] <pochu_> Does a team owner need to be a member of the team to be able to administer it?
[14:58] <RainCT> Hi
[14:59] <RainCT> if I want to get all the files from a bzr branch but without the bzr stuff, is there something better than   bzr checkout --lightweight ...; rm -r .bzr  ?
[15:00] <Nafallo> bzr export
[15:07] <RainCT> Nafallo: great! thanks
[17:34] <Seq> Hi, what causes a "Failed to upload"?
[17:35] <geser> Seq: different reasons, if you are the uploader you should got a mail with the reason
[17:36] <Seq> It was verifying binaries, then had an "Unhandled exception processing upload"
[17:37] <geser> Seq: can you pastebin the reason from the mail?
[17:38] <geser> or was this the complete error message?
[17:39] <Seq> geser:  http://pastebin.com/m17b4dd79
[17:39] <Seq> geser: I put the whole email in there incase I missed something
[17:40] <geser> Seq: I haven't seen this error yet so I can't help you.
[17:40] <geser> cprov: ^^^ any idea what went wrong?
[17:41] <cprov> geser: let check
[17:42] <cprov> geser: weird, linux-libc-dev_2.6.24-8.13~mactel1_amd64.deb: debExtractControl() 
[19:33] <Seq> cprov: any ideas? I just rebuilt the package, and it failed again
[19:35] <cprov> Seq: no, I don't know exactly what is wrong,  processing the binary manually results in the same error, although raising a python and using apt_inst manually seems to work
[19:35] <Seq> failed to transfer again, that is
[19:35] <cprov> Seq: did you add anything to the rules file ?
[19:36] <Seq> This package built fine on my personal PPA (this is an upload to the team). The only thing I modified was having it build the 386 flavour in addition to generic on i386
[19:37] <Seq> cprov: from default, I believe I added AUTOBUILD=1 to debian/rules
[21:41] <mtaylor> kiko: is there a plan to have a team be able to add their own sprint/meeting? 
[22:25] <RainCT> Hi again. Is there any other interface to Launchpad than the +rdf pages?
[22:32] <thumper> RainCT: a launchpad api is in the works
[22:32] <RainCT> ok, cool
[22:32] <thumper> RainCT: if you are after something specific right now, ask a question on the launchpad project
[22:40] <RainCT> thumper: I'll wait for the API :)
[22:40] <RainCT> thanks
[23:21] <ubotu> New bug: #192511 in launchpad "[PPA] if a superseeding package is deleted the superseeded package is not reshown" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/192511
[23:35] <pixelpapst> good morning
[23:35] <pixelpapst> any launchpad admins online ?
[23:35] <pixelpapst> i have a question about registering something... (not a FAQ :-)
[23:36] <Fujitsu> pixelpapst: I'm not an admin, but there might be one around, so ask your question.
[23:37] <pixelpapst> we have been developing a CDD in-house
[23:37] <pixelpapst> and want to open it up more to the outside
[23:37] <pixelpapst> and also move over to Ubuntu (possibly gobuntu) as out base
[23:38] <geser> has somebody an idea what happend to the "ispanish" package in hardy? It's gone missing. https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/amd64/ispanish/+index shows that it got moved from universe to main but now it's gone completely.
[23:38] <pixelpapst> evaluating that right now
[23:38] <pixelpapst> a while ago, i asked sabdfl: "if we move to ubuntu, should we register as a distri in LP" ?
[23:39] <pixelpapst> and he said to give you 
[23:39] <pixelpapst> and he said to give you guys (LP team) a poke when we need it
[23:40] <pixelpapst> so, with the release of 8.04 we want to switch over to ubuntu underneath
[23:40] <pixelpapst> have been evaluating it, and it looks _good_ :-)
[23:41] <pixelpapst> so i'd like to register the distri with LP now, and build up the process around LP in the coming months
[23:41] <Nafallo> weekend though
[23:42] <Nafallo> you usually have better luck during weekdays
[23:42] <pixelpapst> so my question is, should I register as a project first, and you guys change it over to a distri ?
[23:42] <geser> ilithuanian is in the same situation as ispanish
[23:42] <Fujitsu> geser: Oh good, that bug has appeared again.
[23:42] <LarstiQ> heya pixelpapst 
[23:42] <pixelpapst> Nafallo: ok
[23:42] <Fujitsu> It's the same one that killed everything just after Christmas.
[23:42] <pixelpapst> hi LarstiQ
[23:42] <geser> Fujitsu: someone forgot to feed LP again?
[23:43] <Fujitsu> cprov: I believe Soyuz is eating arch: all binaries again.
[23:43] <LarstiQ> kiko: ayt?
[23:43] <pixelpapst> just wanted to get the registration finished before the Developer week :-)
[23:44] <Fujitsu> cprov: See ispanish, ilithuanian, and probably lots of others.
[23:47] <Fujitsu> geser: Have you found any non-arch-indep binaries that have been eaten?
[23:48] <geser> not yet
[23:50] <geser> Fujitsu: perhaps, but I'm not sure it's the same problem
[23:50] <geser> superm1 is missing packages from the last mythplugins build
[23:51] <superm1> yeah a fairly sizable chunk too.
[23:51] <superm1> soyuz must be really hungry
[23:51] <geser> some got published but only on amd64 and powerpc (according to packages.u.c) but i386 seems to be missing
[23:56] <Fujitsu> geser: I don't think a.u.c has been updated in a couple of days.
[23:56] <Fujitsu> Something is borked.
[23:56] <Fujitsu> Soyuz is eating things, but I don't think mythplugins is one of them.
[23:56] <Fujitsu> (mythplugins on i386 was published a couple of days after the rest)
[23:59] <geser> Fujitsu: a.u.c not being updated would explain why my sear upload didn't appear there yet. I remember a.u.c getting the newly build debs quite fast in the past.